Norg reconfiguration to shift Dutch gas blending

Market: Natural gas
27/03/20

The supply of converted high-calorie gas to the Norg storage site and Germany's Gaspool market area may significantly shift the scope for Dutch blending between seasons, with a pronounced fall expected in winter.

The set-up of the Groningen transport system is to be modified from this summer to allow Norg to be filled with low-calorie gas that has been created through quality conversion, by adding nitrogen to high-calorie supply. Norg could previously only be filled using direct output from the Groningen field.

This measure could allow Dutch nitrogen ballasting units to be operated closer to capacity this summer, lifting Dutch high-calorie import demand for quality conversion and facilitating a fall in Groningen production (see graph). The government aims to ramp down production from the field as quickly as possible to minimise seismic activity in the region.

But while the use of converted gas for Norg injections will bolster high-calorie demand for quality conversion in summer, this may be at least partly offset by significantly less high-calorie gas being used for blending the following winter.

System operator GTS blends low-calorie supply by mixing it with high-calorie gas, lifting its Wobbe value to the upper end of the limit that keeps it compatible with compliances designed to burn low-calorie gas (see graph). This reduces the amount of Groningen gas that is required to meet low-calorie demand. Groningen gas has a Wobbe value of 43.8 MJ/m³, while the Wobbe index of gas can be lifted to a maximum of 44.4 MJ/m³ for low-calorie customers in the Netherlands and as high as 46.5 MJ/m³ in Germany, France and Belgium.

With Norg to be filled with converted high-calorie gas — which is already raised towards the top end of the Wobbe range that is permissible — there will be less scope to add high-calorie gas to low-calorie gas entering the grid the following winter, but possibly more scope this summer.

The Norg stockdraw averaged just under 30mn m³/d on 1 October-25 March, assuming a GCV of 43.8 MJ/m³ (see graph). Based on the correlation between aggregate Groningen output for sale and blending in October 2017-February 2020, this would have been mixed with 21mn m³/d of high-calorie gas — or a cumulative 3.7bn m³.

It will not be possible to maintain Norg withdrawals as quick next winter — limiting the effect of having to mix Norg withdrawals with little or no high-calorie gas.

Stocks at the facility can only be partly replenished this summer — a technical limitation of filling it with converted gas. Inventories are expected to reach 4bn m³ at the start of the winter, which would be down from the 5.46bn m³ to which they were revised up on 10 October 2019 after operator Nam was allowed to use more working gas at the facility (see graph).

But the reconfiguration of Norg could increase the scope for blending this summer.

The requirement to fill Norg with converted high-calorie gas could result in more direct Groningen field offtake having to be used this summer to meet northwest Europe's low-calorie demand — which could in turn allow for more blending.

GTS only expects the reconfiguration of Norg to reduce demand for Groningen gas by 800mn m³ this summer, further suggesting that while no Groningen gas will be needed for Norg injections, this will be partly offset by more being required to meet low-calorie demand.

A second measure to be implemented from 1 April which could pare GTS' ability to mix high-calorie gas with low-calorie supply, particularly in winter, is the supply of converted gas to Gaspool. The market area has previously been supplied with low-calorie exclusively from Groningen's De Eeker and Zuiderpolder clusters.

Exports to Gaspool at the Oude Statenzijl-Bunde border point averaged just over 9mn m³/d on 1 October-25 March — to which around 14mn m³/d may have been added, based on the correlation between output for sale and blending for exports in October 2017-February 2020. But GTS may not be able to fully substitute Groningen supply for converted high-calorie gas.

This measure could also cut into the scope for summer blending, although exports to Gaspool are lower in summer, when heating demand is minimal. But it could contribute to a rise in Groningen field offtake to meet overall low-calorie demand, similar to the Norg changes.

GTS sees stable blending ratio over full gas year

GTS still expects the overall scope for blending in the 2020-21 gas year to hold steady from previous years, suggesting that the use of blending may merely be shifted to the summer from the winter.

GTS foresees that in a scenario with Groningen production of 9.3bn m³ in the 2020-21 gas year, 7bn m³ of high-calorie gas can be used for blending. This would be in a scenario with heating degree days in De Bilt in line with the long-term average, according to GTS' suggested formula for next gas year. In a cold weather scenario, permitted Groningen output would rise to 14.3bn m³ while blending would also step up, to 9bn m³.

The ratio of blending to output for sale projected by GTS matches exactly with the correlation for October 2017-February 2020 (see graph).

Given that GTS does not expect a change in the scope of blending in the 2020-21 gas year as a whole, this suggests that less high-calorie gas being added to overall low-calorie supply in winter may be fully offset by more being mixed in summer.

By Natasha Fielding

High-calorie gas for blending in recent summers GWh/d

Nitrogen use vs available capacity

Groningen output for sale mn m³/d

Norg stocks TWh

Dutch high-calorie use for blending, QC GWh/d

Scope for blending depends on low-calorie supply mn m³/d

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

10/04/25

Norway plans to cut GHGs, but remain oil, gas producer

London, 10 April (Argus) — Norway's government has proposed a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction of a minimum 70-75pc by 2035, from a 1990 baseline, but has also committed to the country remaining "a stable and predictable supplier of oil and gas produced with low emissions". The government today set out plans for a 2035 GHG reduction target, as well as a wider climate plan for the country. The 2035 GHG reduction targets build on Norway's 2030 goal of "at least" a 55pc reduction in GHGs, again from 1990 levels. Norway has a legislated goal of "a low-emission society" by 2050 — GHG reductions of 90-95pc from the 1990 baseline. Norway's government underlined its commitment to Paris climate agreement goals and phasing out the use of fossil fuels "towards 2050", but also said that it would "not prepare a strategy for the end phase of Norwegian oil and gas". "The government's plan is about phasing out emissions, not industries", it said, noting that Norway is "a significant contributor to Europe's energy security". Norway is the largest producer and only net exporter of oil and gas in Europe. "The government will further develop the petroleum industry and facilitate the future provision of fields… production will continue to be efficient and with low emissions," the government said. It aims for the country's oil and gas sector — the country's highest-emitting industry — to bring emissions from production to net zero in 2050. The bulk of oil and gas emissions are from downstream use — known as scope 3. Norway plans to achieve the majority of its proposed 70-75pc GHG cuts through national measures, including reduced fossil fuel use and both technical and nature-based carbon removals. It also plans to purchase emissions reductions from outside the EU and European Economic Area. This refers to internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs) — emission credits — under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement. Norway's parliament will consider the proposals. Once legislated in the country's climate act, Norway plans to communicate its updated plans to the UN. Signatories to the Paris climate agreement are expected to submit updated climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — to UN climate body the UNFCCC every five years. The deadline for NDCs setting out climate goals up to 2035 was in February, but many countries have yet to submit plans . By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

09/04/25

News

09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?

09/04/25

News

09/04/25

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?

Some countries are considering retaliatory tariffs, while others hope to reduce their trade deficit in order to negotiate lower rates London, 9 April (Argus) — Newly announced US tariffs on goods entering the country and some of the countermeasures already announced by large trade partners are unlikely to cause any direct disruptions to global gas markets. But the indirect effects on gas supply and demand may be huge, stemming from a weaker macroeconomic outlook, fuel substitution and inflationary pressures on infrastructure development. US president Donald Trump on 2 April imposed a minimum 10pc tax on all foreign imports from 5 April,with much higher tariffs on selected countries that briefly came into force on 9 April, before Trump announced a 90-day pause. China is the only exception. It has announced retaliatory tariffs that could disrupt US energy exports, resulting in an escalation that has already brought up the respective levies to 125pc in the US and 84pc in China. These are unlikely to have any direct impact on LNG trade flows, as China had already stopped importing US LNG earlier this year. But disruptions to trade between the world's two largest economies may weigh heavily on manufacturing activity in China, in turn reducing industrial gas demand. And the ripple effects of disruptions to US LPG exports to China may alter fuel-switching economics in the region and beyond. Most other countries in Asia-Pacific have opted not to follow China's lead by retaliating against US tariffs, even though many have warned about the potential for long-term economic disruption. The Japanese government intends to negotiate a better tariff deal and is considering investing in the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project as part of wider efforts to reduce its trade surplus with the US. Countries in Asia-Pacific have been hit with some of the highest of Trump's targeted duties. The EU is keeping retaliatory measures on the table, but these are unlikely to include any levy on US LNG. Europe has become much more reliant on LNG imports after losing the bulk of its Russian pipeline supply, and imposing tariffs on energy imports would only reignite inflationary pressures that European countries have tried to curb over the past three years. The bloc says it is ready to negotiate on possibly increasing its US LNG imports to reduce its trade surplus and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agrees to do the same. But Trump says this offer is not enough, citing the EU's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justifies a tariff response. Nerves of steel Much greater risks for gas markets may stem from rising infrastructure costs in the US' upstream and midstream sectors, particularly as a result of earlier tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum imports. These present an immediate risk for US LNG developers, particularly for the five projects under construction and the six others expected to reach final investment decisions this year. Metals account for up to 30pc of the cost of building an LNG export plant. An LNG terminal can cost $5bn-25bn to build, depending on its size, with steel used for pipelines, tanks and other structural frameworks. US facilities can be built using some domestic metal, but higher prices for this may lead to construction and final investment decision delays for the country's planned liquefaction projects. US tariffs' primary effect on the domestic gas market stems from duties levied on non-energy goods used by the oil and gas industry, including steel and specialised pipeline components such as valves and compressors, which are imported from overseas. The US remains a net natural gas importer from Canada , but these flows are unlikely to be affected by trade tariffs given the lack of alternative supply sources available to some northern US states. US LNG project pipeline mn t/yr Project Capacity Expected start/FID Under construction Plaquemines 19.2 2025 Corpus Christi stage 3 12.0 2025 Golden Pass 18.1 2026 Rio Grande 17.6 2027 Port Arthur 13.5 2027 Waiting for final investment decision Delfin FLNG 1 13.2 mid-2025 Texas LNG 4.0 2025 Calcasieu Pass 2 28.0 mid-2025 Corpus Christi train 8-9 3.3 2025 Louisiana LNG 16.5 mid-2025 Cameron train 4 6.8 mid-2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German coalition negotiations come to an end

09/04/25

News

09/04/25

German coalition negotiations come to an end

London, 9 April (Argus) — Germany's centre-left SPD and centre-right CDU parties announced a final coalition agreement today, which includes some changes to energy policy. The parties still need to sign off on the agreement. The SPD will ask its members to vote on the text, which it expects could take about 10 days. And the CDU plans to hold a small party conference on the topic at the end of this month, meaning that the new government could be sworn in by early May. The coalition still plans to abolish the gas storage levy "for all" as part of its plan to lower energy prices for households and industry. And the parties plan to introduce "suitable instruments" to ensure gas storage filling to safeguard security of supply in a "more cost-effective" way. There is a large focus on lowering energy prices for industry in the hope of turning the tide on Germany's continued industrial slump, for example through lower electricity taxes, a cap on power grid fees and special relief for energy-intensive industries "otherwise not reached by subsidy plans". The government plans to "make possible and flank diversified, cheap long-term gas contracts with international suppliers" and "use potentials of conventional domestic gas production". And while the government is "examining strategic state holdings in the energy sector, also with grid operators", it will reduce its shares in Uniper and SEFE — which it had acquired in the gas crisis in 2022 — to "strategic shares". The state needs to sell down its stake in the two companies by 2028 but will probably retain a minority share, with the EU allowing a maximum 25pc plus one share, energy ministry officials previously said . Support for gas-fired power The parties reiterated their commitment to encourage the buildout of up to 20GW of dispatchable power generation capacity, with no apparent requirement for the plants to be hydrogen-ready. The parties plan to put forward a bill to allow carbon capture and storage for hard-to-abate emissions from industry as well as gas-fired power plants "immediately after the beginning of the new parliament". The coalition said that the timing of the coal phase-out "has to be judged on how quickly it is achieved to build out dispatchable gas-fired capacities", but it still commits to ending coal burn by 2038. The government reiterated its plan to use grid reserve capacity to stabilise power prices rather than only to stabilise the grid during supply shortages. Associations have warned about the implications of letting grid reserve plants participate in the open market on investment incentives for new generation capacity. It also remains unclear how long it would take to get Brussels' approval for a new subsidy scheme for dispatchable power generation capacity, given that the EU approved the outgoing government's power plant strategy only after lengthy negotiations. Heating sector plan thin on detail The future of Germany's heating law remains unclear in the coalition agreement. The coalition agreement keeps the CDU's standpoint that the outgoing government's buildings energy act will be "abolished", which the SPD had not agreed with in the negotiation documents. But the parties said that a new buildings energy act will be more technology neutral and flexible, indicating that there will still be some legislation to reduce carbon intensity of the built environment. The parties propose a "reachable greenhouse gas avoidance" as the key variable of a new policy, instead of the percentage of renewable energy used in the system as under the existing law. This could end up supporting gas-fired over oil-based heating or providing an incentive to replace older gas boilers with newer models. But the government plans to retain subsidies for new heating systems and insulation measures, which provide large incentives for the uptake of heat pumps. Heat pump industry association BWP welcomed this commitment, combined with a pledge to reduce power prices by about €0.05/kWh, saying that these are "clear signals of an improvement in the framework conditions for the industry". The final coalition agreement again contains a reference to a possible green gas quota , which could support gas-based heating systems, for example through biomethane or hydrogen which could be used to fulfil the quota. The parties said today that they would work out a "roadmap for de-fossilised energy sources" and that it is important to "preserve gas grids which are important for a secure heat supply". By Till Stehr Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU states propose 10pp flexibility on EU gas storage

09/04/25

News

09/04/25

EU states propose 10pp flexibility on EU gas storage

London, 9 April (Argus) — EU member states have put forward a fourth working draft of proposed amendments to the bloc's gas storage regulations, introducing leeway for a deviation of up to 10 percentage points (pp) from the 1 November target. The new document builds on the previous version of proposed amendments published in late March , and goes further with flexibility allowances for member states by introducing the possibility of deviating by up to 10pp from the 90pc 1 November target in case of "unfavourable market conditions, such as indications of possible market manipulations, or of trading activities hindering cost-effective storage filling, that significantly limit the ability to ensure that the gas storages are filled in accordance with this regulation". The previous version of proposals had only allowed for a 5pp deviation. The flexibility would also be extended to member states with derogations, with the five countries who have a 1 November target equivalent to 35pc of annual consumption having an allowed deviation of 3.88pp, while countries without their own storage who are obliged to store 15pc of average annual consumption abroad may deviate by 1.66pp. The previous clause stating that Germany and Austria must share responsibility for filling the cross-border facilities of Haidach and 7Fields would be replaced by a new clause instead specifying that Slovakia and the Czech Republic will share joint responsibility for filling the Dolni Bojanovice facility on the latter's territory, which has since April begun operating as a cross-border storage. The two states must decide on the ratio of filling responsibilities based on a bilateral agreement between them. The intergovernmental agreement between Germany and Austria on the filling of Haidach and 7Fields expires at the end of 2025. Intermediary targets, referred to as the ‘filling trajectory', would also explicitly be made "indicative" only, while the 1 November target, referred to as the ‘filling target', could instead be reached at any point between 1 October and 1 December. Once 90pc is reached in this period, it does not need to be maintained afterwards. These terms are consistent with the previous version from late March. Other important changes also remain the same as those previously proposed. One amendment allows a further 5pp leeway on top of the 10pp already allowed if a member state's gas production exceeds annual consumption over the previous two years, or if "specific technical characteristics" of an individual facility above 40TWh of capacity located on its territory require a "slow injection rate" causing an "exceptionally long" injection period of more than 115 days. The only storages above 40TWh are Germany's Rehden and the Netherlands' Norg and Bergermeer, while Denmark is the only country that nears having larger production than consumption, although the previous two years' data do not quite reach this. The European Commission would also be empowered to adopt delegated acts to further increase the allowed deviation for one filling season in case of "persistent unfavourable market conditions", provided that the security of supply of the union and member states is not "undermined". Member states using any of the flexibility provided for above shall "consult the commission and provide justification immediately", the proposal says. The commission will then "promptly update" the Gas Coordination Group (GCG) on the cumulative effects of all granted flexibilities in a "timely manner". The new document also maintains that the commission should continuously monitor the market and explore ways to help meet the filling target, "for example measures of financial nature, in particular when using demand aggregation and joint purchasing mechanism". Where a member state fails to meet its filling target in a given year, its competent authority shall "take effective measures to ensure security of supply considering the price impact on the gas market", and is required to inform the commission and GCG "without delay". The proposed amendments to the legal text note that the regulation will come into force on the day following its publication in the EU's official law journal, although it is unclear whether this will apply to the filling trajectory and target for 2025 or not. The European Parliament's energy committee debated the proposals ahead of a vote on 24 April , and chairman Borys Budka says he expects a compromise on amendments in the coming days. By Brendan A'Hearn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more