Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US readies lending program for oil companies

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 29/04/20

President Donald Trump's administration is close to rolling out new lending facilities to help oil and gas companies struggling from a collapse in prices brought on by Covid-19.

The program, which is still under development, would primarily consist of the US Treasury Department offering "bridge loans to help the industry through this pandemic" and the US Federal Reserve offering emergency lending under the so-called "section 13(3)" program, according to remarks from US energy secretary Dan Brouillette that were shared with Argus.

Those loans could benefit smaller producers now getting less than $10/bl for many physical grades and facing the threat of further revenue losses from shutting-in wells, as spare storage runs out. Brouillette said the lending facilities were not meant for "big players" in the sector that have other sources of capital.

But the loans are likely to fuel criticism that the Trump administration is giving a "bail out" to the oil sector and prioritizing it above other businesses that are also struggling. Oil companies were at the "edge of a financial cliff" long before the pandemic, liberal think tank the Center for American Progress said today.

Trump on 21 April said he was ordering Brouillette and US treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin to come up with a plan to "make funds available" to the oil and gas sector, setting off the efforts to structure the program. The lending facilities plan has not yet been finalized, but Brouillette said in comments to oil and gas producers yesterday he hoped it could move forward within the next day or two.

"We want these programs to be as robust in possible so that we can have this entire industry take advantage of them," Brouillette said.

The Energy Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mnuchin: No bail outs

Mnuchin and US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell have been discussing the proposal, Brouillette said, but Mnuchin has not made a final decision. The US Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve did not respond to a request for comment, but Mnuchin has denied the claim that the administration wants to bail out the oil industry.

"Let me be clear, the president has said no bail outs to any companies, whether that was airlines or oil companies," Mnuchin said earlier this week in a televised interview. "We will consider, again, loans to companies in a proper scenario with strategic importance, but no bail outs."

Small and medium-sized producers say they have been frustrated with their ability to obtain loans under last month's $2.2 trillion coronavirus rescue package, named the CARES Act. The industry says it struggles to qualify under existing lending programs, such as requirements in some programs for companies to have investment-grade credit ratings.

"Our main concern has been that there is fair access to the federal lending resources that have been available both by the Fed and the CARES Act," Independent Petroleum Association of America executive vice president Lee Fuller said.

The administration's tentative plan to support the oil industry would also ask US regulators not to put "undue pressure on banks to start calling in" loans to oil producers and service companies. Oil producers often use their reserves as collateral for loans, but the value of that collateral has dropped alongside the collapse in oil prices. That has fueled concern that banks will seek more equity from borrowers.

"Now is not the time to be asking borrowers in the energy industry for additional equity," Brouillette said.

Oil state lawmakers have been urging the administration to create lending programs for the oil industry and revise loan eligibility requirements. US senator Kevin Cramer (R-North Dakota) said yesterday that producers needed support as a result of a "lethal combination" of Covid-19 and an oil price war.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/04/25

South Korea’s GS Energy seeks term LNG from 2028

South Korea’s GS Energy seeks term LNG from 2028

Singapore, 3 April (Argus) — South Korean private-sector firm GS Energy's subsidiary GS Energy Trading Singapore is seeking LNG deliveries starting from 1 January 2028, over a 5-15 year period. The first round of offers will be due on 25 April and the second to close on 1 August later this year. The firm has requested volumes of up to 0.81mn t/yr in 2028 and up to 0.97mn t/yr from 2029 onwards. This is equivalent to around 13-14 cargoes/yr in 2028 and about 16-17 cargoes/yr from 2029 onwards, assuming an average LNG cargo size of 60,000t. The cargoes will be delivered to the country's 10.8mn t/yr Boryeong terminal, which is owned by power producers SK E&S and GS Energy. The firm has also specified for offers to be linked to Brent or a hybrid of Brent and Henry Hub. South Korean utility Korea South-East Power in June 2024 also signed an agreement with TotalEnergies for a five-year term delivery of up to 500,000 t/yr of LNG to South Korea from 2027. Meanwhile, state-owned gas incumbent Kogas is expected to operate with a smaller pool of long-term LNG supplies from 2025, with the government granting it more flexibility in its procurement strategy. Long-term contracted supply volumes may typically be priced at a higher premium, and could be deemed as a small price for buyers to secure supply security, traders said. By Naomi Ong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Oil futures, stock markets fall on Trump tariffs


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

Oil futures, stock markets fall on Trump tariffs

Singapore, 3 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping new tariffs on all US imports has sparked an immediate sell-off in oil futures and stock markets. Crude oil futures fell by almost 3.5pc in Asian trading and some stock markets in the region fell by a similar amount, after Trump unveiled the new import tariffs on 2 April. All foreign imports into the US will be subject to a minimum 10pc tax, with levels as high as 34pc for China and 20pc for the EU, Trump said. But energy and some mineral products have been excluded from the new tariffs. Tariffs on Japan and South Korea, both major trading partners and long-standing US allies in Asia, have been set at 24pc and 25pc respectively. Indonesia, Vietnam, Taiwan and Thailand also face tariffs of more than 30pc. Tariffs on imports from China will be subject to a 54pc rate, after taking into account the 20pc tariffs imposed by Trump over the last two months. Some imports from China that are subject to pre-existing tariffs will face an even higher effective rate. The blanket 10pc tariffs will take effect on 5 April. Any additional country-specific rates will come into force on 9 April. Oil futures fell despite the exemption for energy products. The June Brent contract on the Ice exchange fell by as much as 3.2pc to a low of $72.52/bl in Asian trading, while May Nymex WTI dropped by 3.4pc to $69.27/bl. The prospect that the US tariffs could disrupt global trade and hit export-focused economies in Asia sent stock markets in Tokyo, Hong Kong and South Korea down by 2-3pc or more. US stock futures also fell sharply. By Kevin Foster Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Senior figures in Australia's upstream gas sector have hit out at plans for intervention in the heavily regulated industry, as debate continues on how to best address domestic supply shortfalls later this decade. The federal Coalition in March announced National Gas Plan including a 50-100 PJ/yr (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) domestic reservation system aimed at forcing the three LNG exporters based in Queensland's Gladstone to direct more supply to the eastern states' market. But oversupplying the market to drive down prices would destroy the viability of smaller gas projects, Australian independent Beach Energy's chief executive Brett Woods said at a conference in Sydney on 1 April. The domestic-focused firm, which will export some LNG volumes via its Waitsia project in 2025, warns that such a move by the Peter Dutton-led opposition would reduce export incomes while harming Australia's international reputation. The volumes impacted by the policy could reach around 900,000-1.8mn t/yr. Expropriation of developed reserves is equivalent to breaking contracts with LNG buyers and with the foreign and local investors that the country needs for ongoing economic security, Woods said on 1 April. Domestic gas reservation systems put in place by the state governments of Western Australia (WA) and Queensland, designed to keep local markets well supplied, were "clearly supportable", Woods said, but only future supply should be subject to the regulations. LNG terminals, which represent about 70pc of eastern Australia's total gas consumption and shipped 24mn t in 2024 , should not be blamed for the failure of governments to expedite new supply and plan for Australia's gas future, head of Shell Australia Cecile Wake said in response to the Coalition's proposal. Shell's QGC business supplied 15pc of its volumes to the local grid, with the remainder shipped from its 8.5mn t/yr Queensland Curtis LNG project, Wake added. Canberra has moved to promote gas use as a transition fuel to firm renewable energy in line with its 2030 emissions reduction targets, but progress has been slow as reforming laws appear to be hampering development . The state governments, particularly in gas-poor Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), must recognise the need for locally-produced supply and streamline the approvals processes, especially environmental permits, executives said. But despite pleas for an end to years of interventionist policy — including the governing Labor party's measures to cap the price of domestic gas at A$12/GJ , Australia's fractured political environment and rising cost of living has sparked largely populist responses from its leaders. A so-called "hung" parliament is likely to result from the 3 May poll , with a variety of mainly left-leaning independents representing an anti-fossil fuel agenda expected to control the balance of power in Australia's parliament. LNG debate sharpens Debate on the causes of southern Australia's gas deficit has persisted, and the ironic outcome of underinvestment in gas supply could be LNG re-imports from Gladstone to NSW, Victoria and South Australia, making fracked coal-bed methane — liquefied in Queensland and regasified — a likely higher-emissions alternative to pipeline supply. Several developers are readying for this possibility , which is considered inevitable without action to increase supply in Victoria or NSW, increase winter storages or raise north-south pipeline capacity. Australian pipeline operator APA appears to have the most to lose out of the active firms in the gas sector. APA chief executive Adam Watson this week criticised plans for imports, because relying on LNG will set the price of domestic gas at a detrimental level, raise emissions and decrease reliability of supply, Watson said. The firm is planning to increase its eastern pipeline capacity by 25pc to bring new supplies from the Bass, Surat and Beetaloo basins to market. But investment certainty is needed or Australia will risk needing to subsidise coal-fired power for longer if sufficient gas is unavailable to back up wind and solar generators with peaking power, Watson said. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

LNG stocks at Japan’s power utilities rise


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

LNG stocks at Japan’s power utilities rise

Osaka, 2 April (Argus) — LNG inventories at Japan's main power utilities increased during the week to 30 March, as warmer weather reduced electricity demand for heating purposes and limited gas-fired generation. The utilities held 2.24mn t of LNG on 30 March, up by 22pc from a week earlier, according to a weekly survey by the trade and industry ministry Meti. This was higher by 51pc compared with 1.48mn t at the end of March 2024 and up by 10pc against 2.03mn t — the average end-March stocks over 2020-24. A seasonal rise in temperatures weighed on power demand, which fell by 12pc on the week to 87GW across 24-30 March, according to the Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operators (Occto). This resulted in a 24pc fall in gas-fired output to an average of 24GW during the period, the Occto data showed. Coal- and oil-fed generation also fell by 14pc to 23GW and by 21pc to 409MW respectively in the same period. The lower demand has created extra supplies to be sold on the wholesale market. This has weighed on day-ahead prices on the Japan Electric Power Exchange (Jepx) and worsened generation economics for the country's thermal power plants. Margins at a 58pc-efficient gas-fired unit running on oil-priced LNG supplies fell into negative territory, with the spark spread averaging at a loss of -¥2.28/kWh ($15.22/MWh) across 24-30 March, compared with the previous week's profit of ¥0.84/kWh. The 58pc spark spread using spot LNG widened the deficit, with the margin averaging at a loss of -¥3.79/kWh against the previous week's -¥0.80/kWh, based on the ANEA — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia. Coal remained competitive in Japan's merit order. But the dark spread of a 40pc-efficient coal-fired unit also fell by 64pc on the week to an average of ¥1.63/kWh over 24-30 March, based on Argus' spot coal and freight assessments. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil’s Bauna oilfield restarts after maintenance


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Brazil’s Bauna oilfield restarts after maintenance

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Brazil-focused Australian oil and gas company Karoon Energy has brought its Bauna oilfield in the offshore Santos basin back on line after the completion of intervention works at its SPS-88 well in February. Production resumed on 27 March after the project was shut down for maintenance on 7 March, Karoon said. The field's output has since reached about 26,500 b/d, above pre-shutdown levels because of the return of SPS-88 well production on 28 March. The well is pumping 2,000 b/d of oil on a restricted choke and is gradually being opened further, with rates in line with expectations. The intervention was originally planned for October-December 2024 after being taken off line in November 2023 because of a mechanical blockage in the gas lift valve. Karoon's plans to acquire the Cidade de Itajai floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) unit at its Bauna oilfield have progressed, with the transaction on track to close as forecast in April. Selection of a new operations and maintenance contractor for the FPSO will be announced in mid-2025, with an updated cost guidance to be provided once terms are agreed. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more