Latest market news

Japan should add value to biomass power projects: IEEJ

  • Market: Biomass, Electricity
  • 31/08/20

Government-affiliated think-tank the Institute of Energy Economics Japan (IEEJ) has emphasised the need to add value to biomass power projects in the country, as it will be difficult to reduce biomass power generation costs to a level that can compete with wholesale electricity prices under current market conditions.

The IEEJ expects capacity expansion of renewable power sources such as solar to continue to cap a rise in or dent wholesale electricity prices. This will make it even harder for biomass power to gain a competitive edge, as the fuel's generation costs have been high compared with thermal power sources.

It is important to find out other values and applications of the fuel besides energy production and create a mechanism to better recognise those values and uses, the IEEJ said on 27 August at the second meeting of a study group under the trade and industry (Meti) and agriculture and forestry (Maff) ministries.

The cross-government group was set up in July to study the best way to reduce biomass fuel procurement costs, which account for around 70pc of total power costs, while ensuring stable and sustainable supply of the fuel.

It is necessary to make efforts to reduce biomass fuel costs but given a lack of competition in the wholesale electricity market, it is also important to look at other values and uses of the fuel, the IEEJ said.

Biomass power generation can be used to adjust power demand fluctuations, which should offer benefits more than value per kWh, the IEEJ said. Co-generation of heat and power and the local production-local consumption model will also add value to biomass power operations, it said.

The IEEJ also stressed that biomass power projects will help stimulate the country's forestry industry, such as through the development of carbon resources, and expand the fuel's use beyond building material applications.

Possible contributions from such projects to environmental, social and governance, and sustainable development goals, as well as to forest environment conservation, are another priority.

Most Japanese biomass power projects are currently supported by the country's feed-in-tariff (FiT) scheme, which ensures power firms can sell electricity for 20 years at a fixed price. The feed-in-tariff committee under Meti decided this year to keep power firms' purchasing costs of electricity from a woody biomass plant with less than 10MW capacity under the FiT scheme at ¥24/KWh ($227.65/MWh) in the April 2020-March 2021 fiscal year.

The FiT price for a woody biomass power plant with more than 10MW capacity is decided through a tender system. But the 2019-20 tender failed to award any projects because of high bid prices. The 2020-21 tender is scheduled to be concluded in late December.

But concerns are rising in the biomass power industry over continuous and stable operations after the FiT support period ends. This has prompted industry participants to reduce biomass power costs to achieve a selling price of around ¥15/kWh (14¢/kWh), similar to gas-sourced electricity.

Only three of 54 biomass power firms, or 5.6pc, can run on prices below ¥15/kWh, according to a survey conducted by Meti last year. It is possible to continue business at ¥15-20/kWh for six firms, ¥20-25/kWh for 20 firms and ¥25-30/kWh for 17 firms. The remaining eight firms need more than ¥30/kWh.

Japanese wholesale electricity prices came under pressure last year from rising solar power output and a fall in thermal fuel costs. System-wide prices for day-ahead contracts on the Japan electric power exchange averaged ¥7.92/kWh in 2019-20, down by 18.8pc from ¥9.76/kWh in 2018-19. Daily day-ahead prices rose to ¥13.98/kWh on 27 August, supported by strong electricity demand for cooling purposes. But this was still lower from a target price of ¥15/kWh for biomass power supplies.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
06/01/25

Brazil's EV sales hit record high in 2024

Brazil's EV sales hit record high in 2024

Sao Paulo, 6 January (Argus) — Brazil's sales of electric vehicles (EVs) increased by 90pc to a record 177,360 units in 2024, according to the electric vehicle association ABVE. EV sales last year rose from 93,930 units in 2023. That includes battery electric vehicles (BEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), micro hybrid and mild hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) and flex HEVs. Disregarding micro hybrid units, which are not considered fully electrical, EV sales reached 173,530 last year, an 85pc increase from 2023. Plug-in market rising Sales of plug-in vehicles — including PHEVs and BVEs — totaled almost 125,625 in 2024, representing a 71pc of total EV sales and more than double from the 52,360 units sold in 2023. The expansion of the recharging infrastructure in Brazil drove the plug-in market growth, reducing concerns about the utilization of EVs in long-distance travels. There were more than 12,000 charging stations in the country as of early December, according to charging station management platform Tupi Mobilidade. Hybrid vehicles without external chargers — such as HEVs, flex HEVs and MHEVs — accounted for 29pc of total sales in 2024, with around 51,735 units, a 24pc hike from 2023. Sao Paulo keeps leading the way Southeastern Sao Paulo state remained the leader of EV sales in Brazil, with nearly 56,820 units sold and accounting for 32pc of total sales, followed by federal district Brasilia, with 9pc. Rio de Janeiro, Parana and Santa Catarina states represented 7.2pc, 6.8pc and 6.5pc, respectively, of Brazil's EVs sales. By Maria Albuquerque Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Italian gas-fired output down as RES grow in 2024


02/01/25
News
02/01/25

Italian gas-fired output down as RES grow in 2024

London, 2 January (Argus) — Italy's gas-fired generation in 2024 was the lowest in six years, owing to higher generation from renewable energy sources (RES), supported by additional capacity. Gas-fired generation fell to 10.7GW in 2024, from 11GW in 2023, accounting for 40pc of the power mix — the lowest percentage since 2019. Gas-fired output was displaced by growing renewables generation, which accounted for another 40.8pc of the mix, compared with 37.9pc in 2023. Higher renewable generation in 2024 was supported by a rise in installed capacity, up by 11pc to 75.8GW as of November. Solar capacity rose the most on the year, up by 6.8GW but still 3.6GW below the halfway mark for the 80GW target for 2030, and wind capacity rose by about 600MW. Solar output rose on the year, up by 400MW, while onshore wind generation fell by 200MW. While installed hydro capacity remained flat from 2023, hydro generation recorded the most significant increase, rising from 4.6GW to 5.9GW on the year and accounting for 22pc of the mix, as hydro stocks remained above the five-year norm up until the first half of April, owing to higher-than-average precipitation. Italy aims to have 131.3GW of installed renewable capacity by 2030, as laid out in the country's national energy and climate plan . As of November, there were almost 6,000 connection requests in place for solar plants, and onshore and offshore wind farms, with a total capacity of nearly 350GW. The Italian government has approved a renewables support scheme it hopes will speed up project authorisation. And the European Commission has approved a €9.7bn scheme to develop renewable plants for a total capacity of 17.65GW. Demand edged up on the year to 31.8GW, compared with 31.6GW in 2023, and domestic generation accounted for 26.6GW, up by 300MW on the year. Italy remained a strong net importer throughout 2024, despite net imports falling by 200MW to 5.9GW, compared with 2023. Total imports were the highest since 2018 at 6.6GW, with France and Switzerland accounting for almost 80pc. Total exports gradually increased in 2024, up by 90MW, compared with full-year 2023, reaching their highest in the fourth quarter at nearly 1GW and almost doubling from the fourth quarter of 2023. While exports to France nearly halved on the year to 70MW, combined exports to Slovenia and Montenegro recorded a 61pc increase to 272MW. By Ilenia Reale Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Trump, macro issues ahead for US renewables


02/01/25
News
02/01/25

Viewpoint: Trump, macro issues ahead for US renewables

Houston, 2 January (Argus) — A combination of substantial policy shifts under president-elect Donald Trump and macroeconomic issues puts the US renewable power sector on uncertain footing to begin 2025. Analysts expect the federal tax credits that have bolstered new renewable generation during its substantial growth over the past decade will survive in some fashion, although Trump campaigned on repealing the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). He also has promised 60pc tariffs on goods imported from China, a major player in the solar and battery storage supply chains. The ultimate effects may vary by project type and what the new administration is able to accomplish. Chinese solar products already face 50pc tariffs , which could temper any effects on the industry from Trump's protectionist trade policies, said Tom Harper, a partner at consultant Baringa specializing in power and renewables. But the new administration could make it more difficult to claim IRA incentives and could roll back federal power plant emissions rules , creating an environment that could slow the adoption of renewables. Utilities may become more cautious in using renewables because of higher costs, while others, such as companies with sustainability goals, might be able to weather the change, according to Harper. "There might be some very price insensitive corporate [power purchase agreement] buyers out there who are looking at a $45/MWh solar [contract] and now it's going to be $50/MWh after the tariff, and they'll be fine," he said. In addition, the US renewables industry is still weathering headwinds from supply chain constraints, increased borrowing rates and inflation, which have hampered new projects. For example, the PJM Interconnection — which spans 13 mostly Mid-Atlantic states and the District of Columbia — had approved more than 37,000MW of generation at the end of third quarter 2024, with only 2,400MW of that partially in service. Developers have blamed the delays on financing challenges, long lead times for obtaining equipment and local opposition to projects. Global problems, local solutions Changes to state procurement strategies could help. Maryland state delegate Lorig Charkoudian (D) next year will propose new state-run solar, wind and hydropower solicitations that would first target projects that have already cleared PJM's reviews. Her approach would echo programs in New Jersey and Illinois, and ultimately reduce utilities' reliance on renewable energy certificates (REC) procured elsewhere. "The idea is to give a path for these projects, so presumably they can be built within a few years," Charkoudian said. Utilities would use the new procurements for the bulk of their RECs, covering remaining demand by buying legacy Maryland solar credits and other PJM RECs on the secondary market. But a quick fix for Maryland's broader renewable energy objectives is unlikely after utilities used the alternative compliance payment (ACP) for two-thirds of their 2023 REC requirements. The fee for each megawatt-hour by which utilities miss their compliance targets serves as a de facto ceiling on REC prices. Maryland's ACP is low compared to neighboring states, where the qualifying REC pool overlaps, meaning that credits eligible in the state can fetch a higher price elsewhere. While lawmakers could raise the ACP to mitigate those issues, those costs would ultimately fall on utility customers. "As best as I can tell, the options are raise the ACP or adjust how we do it," Charkoudian said. "We're really concerned about ratepayer impacts, and so I don't think there's a real appetite to raise the ACP." In other states, the policy landscape is less certain. Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro (D) has no clear path for his proposed hike to the state's alternative energy mandate, should he choose to revisit it, after Republicans retained their state Senate majority in November. New Jersey state senator Bob Smith (D) has been working for two years to enshrine in law governor Phil Murphy's (D) goal of 100pc clean electricity, but the proposal failed to escape committee in 2024 after dying in 2023 over opposition to its support for offshore wind . Is the answer blowing in the wind? Offshore wind is a slightly different matter. Trump has been critical of the industry and federal regulators control much of the project permitting in the US. Moreover, as a burgeoning sector with higher costs, it could be more sensitive to the loss of the investment tax credit (ITC). Based on current expenses, Baringa's analysis suggests that losing the ITC could increase project costs by "at least" $30/MWh and push offshore wind REC prices in some cases near $150/MWh. That would be a "difficult cost for states to swallow", according to Harper. "We've seen a few offshore wind developers already say, 'Hey, we're not going to spend a dime more until we know what's going on,'" Harper said. Despite the challenging landscape, Charkoudian expects Maryland will move forward in areas it can control, such as expanding the onshore transmission, that will make offshore wind viable, whether it's now or "eight years from now". By Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply


02/01/25
News
02/01/25

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply

Washington, 2 January (Argus) — US utilities are concerned that they may not have enough railcars to haul coal in the future as multiple power plants are seeking to remain in operation longer than expected. Power demand is forecast to rise in the coming years because of planned data centers in multiple parts of the country. Many data centers are expected to open before new generation, including natural gas, wind and solar-power units, go into service. A number of utilities want to avert the temporary power shortage by extending the life of coal-fired power plants beyond planned retirement dates. In response, demand is "poised to shift to a slight growth in the need for coal cars", according to railcar expert Richard Kloster, president of Integrity Rail Partners. Longer power plant lives as well as expectations of increased metallurgical coal exports are likely to provide demand for equipment. But the supply of railcars for coal has been slowly shrinking. No new railcars for the coal industry — primarily gondolas or open-top hoppers — have been built in nearly a decade. Utilities and leasing companies have had little interest in ordering new railcars for a shrinking sector. Many existing cars have also been scrapped, particularly during periods of low coal demand and high scrap prices during the last few years. There also are thousands of coal railcars in storage, but those do not really count towards demand, Kloster said. The cost of pulling those cars out of storage and making them service-ready is not necessarily cost effective, he said. About 21pc of North American coal cars were in storage at the beginning of August, up from 15pc in November 2022, according to Association of American Railroads data. In comparison, about 35pc of the coal car fleet was in storage at the start of July 2020, near the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Possibilities of new construction There is a chance that "in the next 10 years, there will be coal cars built again", because many coal cars in the fleet are nearing 50 years of age, Kloster said. The retirement of many cars means that equipment must be pulled from storage or new units built, driving potential construction. Under Association of American Railroads (AAR) rules, railcars built after June 1974 can only be interchanged with other railroads for 50 years. After that, those cars are generally limited to operating on only one carrier. Some of those older cars may be retired early if they need repairs. Maintenance expenses could cause car owners to take units out of service. Utilities strategize Some utilities are already implementing plans to secure railcars, but others think taking additional steps will be unnecessary, according to railcar expert Darell Luther, chief executive of rail transportation firm Tealinc. The differing views are tied in part to whether utilities are regulated by states or merchant-owned, Luther said. Public utilities need to prove to regulators they can meet generating needs, including having enough coal and railcars. Privately owned operators have more flexibility in terms of contracting for coal and railcars. Several utility rail managers told Argus they do not see the need to take extra steps to secure railcars, confident that they already have plenty or can lease whatever they need in the future. But other utilities said they have taken steps to ensure they have coal cars in the future. Some utilities have purchased single or multiple cars as other generators sell them off. Others are increasingly leasing cars, with one utility saying that having more cars than needed is a cheap way of ensuring future supply. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten


31/12/24
News
31/12/24

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten

Houston, 31 December (Argus) — More US coal production cuts may be on the horizon, setting up thermal coal supply to potentially be lower than demand starting in late 2025. US coal producers have been scaling back mining operations since at least mid-2023 in response to lackluster demand. Market participants are continuing to contend with elevated power plant inventories following relatively mild winters and more competitive natural gas prices. Some producers are signaling more production cuts are coming in the next few months. As a result, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently forecast the country's coal output in 2025 would fall by 7.2pc from this year to 472.3mn short tons (428.5mn metric tonnes), the lowest level in agency data going back to 1949. But US coal-fired generation and coal consumption is expected to grow modestly next year, to 643.7bn kWh and 409.4mn st, respectively, from 641.6bn kWh and 406mn st in 2024, because of greater electricity and industrial demand. Coal consumption for the electric power sector alone is expected to rise to 371.5mn st from an estimated 369.4mn st in 2024, EIA data show. Generators are expected to draw from their existing coal inventories for the majority of the year to meet the slightly higher electricity demand, potentially bringing power plant stockpiles down to more normal levels. Coal producers also are expected to have less inventory at mines and loadout facilities as volumes that had been deferred to 2025 are delivered. If the inventory withdrawals and expected slight increase in domestic consumption are coupled with higher export market prices and demand, "there could be an impetus for a slight ramp-up in domestic production, but currently, that prospect does not appear to be visibly on the horizon", EIA chief economist Jonathan Church said. For example, Argus assessments for calendar year 2025 API 2 coal swaps averaged $112.85/t from 1-24 December, compared with $104.19/t for all of December last year. The response from coal producers to any improvement in demand could be uneven, which could constrict competition and boost prices. While larger producers with longwall mining equipment, primarily in northern Appalachia and the Illinois basin, can somewhat efficiently resume or increase production, other companies may struggle to ramp up operations. Producers also may not have the financial support to increase coal output. A number of market participants expect smaller producers with higher-cost operations to be forced out of business as major banks continue to pull back on lending money to coal mining companies. In the nearer term, recent or planned coal mine closures could further limit supply. Alliance Resource Partners said in November that it intends to retire its central Appalachian coal-producing MC Mining complex in Kentucky, and the company has already cut operations to two of its four production units. Earlier in 2024, American Consolidated Natural Resources closed its Pride Mine in western Kentucky and Hallador Energy idled two small Indiana mines in February. Other producers have scaled back operations but kept mines open. Coal miners worked an average 45.5 hours/wk in October when not adjusted for seasonal factors, preliminary figures from the US Labor Department show. A year earlier, coal miners averaged 48.3 hours/wk. Producers also have to contend with an uncertain outlook beyond 2025, including an expected shift in environmental policies under president-elect Donald Trump, how new data centers will affect electricity demand, and timelines for installing new generation and transmission upgrades. Alliant Energy, Vistra Energy, Duke Energy and Louisville Gas & Electric and Kentucky Utilities are among utilities that recently announced plans to potentially delay retiring coal-fired generating units or plans to remodel coal units to co-fired natural gas and coal to try to meet load growth projections for the next few years. This could keep coal-fired generation and demand at least somewhat stable, but it may not provid long-term support. "To have increased coal demand, you would have to have load growth outpacing new supply," said Robert Godby, associate professor in the economics department at the University of Wyoming. He and others expect new renewable generation and transmission projects to eventually accommodate projected electricity demand growth. Increased load growth will be "at best just a reprieve from the ongoing downward trend in coal production and coal demand", Godby said. As such, producers may continue to try to limit output in 2025, which could partially raise domestic prices from current levels that straddle the line of profitability for many coal mining companies. But the increases will likely be modest as alternative energy sources are expected to continue to suppress demand for coal generation. By Anna Harmon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more