Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Panama Canal opens December LNG slot: Correction

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 21/12/20

Corrects details on booking protocol in paragraph 4

The Panama Canal has made another Neopanamax transit slot available for LNG carriers in late December, with just two slots available until the start of March as of 16 December.

The new slot is available on 29 December in either direction for vessels in other market segments, but the direction available for LNG carriers — unspecified by the Canal Authority — will depend on the direction of the other LNG transit booking made for that day. The waterway offers only two daily transit slots to LNG carriers — either one in each direction or two northbound — although it has accommodated up to an additional two transits when demand for transit of the Neopanamax locks from other market segments has weighed on bookings.

Seven other bookings have been made for 29 December, suggesting the reserved slot for passenger carriers has not been utilised, leaving eight slots available for vessels from other market segments. A maximum of eight slots can be booked for the Neopanamax locks, one of which is reserved well in advance for passenger vessels.

The new available slot is in the second booking period, which is set to close by 25 December. But container vessels will take priority over LNG carriers during this period. The slot will be awarded according to ranking, with LNG carriers having second preference after container vessels. But if the slot goes unawarded, it will become available to any market segment on a first-come-first-served basis.

There is also an LNG transit slot available for 27 December — again offered in either direction through the canal, but the direction available to LNG carriers will depend on the direction of the other booked LNG transit. This slot is also in a second booking period that is set to close by 23 December. Seven slots have already been awarded, suggesting again that the reserved passenger vessel has gone unbooked.

And no other transits that may be used by LNG carriers were being offered as of 16 December by the Canal Authority until 2 March, likely as quick demand for transit from multiple market segments has emerged. This has been the case particularly for LNG freight market as northeast Asian demand continues to pull Atlantic basin supply for late December into the first quarter of 2021 into the Pacific, buoying transit demand for laden vessels heading southbound and empty vessels transiting northbound to load at US export terminals. A transit slot was available on 15 December for LNG carriers in mid-January but this has since been removed by the Canal Authority, suggesting the slot has been awarded.

Congestion at the Panama Canal in recent weeks has caused significant delays for LNG carriers en route to northeast Asia or returning to US export projects, particularly those carriers without pre-booked transit slots. These delays have led to a number of charterers opting to ship cargoes to Pacific markets through the Cape of Good Hope rather than Panama, despite the longer distance, in a bid to avoid the risk of multi-day delays at the central American waterway.

These charterers may seek to continue delivering through the Cape of Good Hope into the first few months of 2021, with only two bookable slots available until 2 March as of 16 December, tying up carriers on longer journeys and weighing on spot vessel availability over the period.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/04/25

Mexico, Canada sidestep latest Trump tariffs: Update

Mexico, Canada sidestep latest Trump tariffs: Update

Adds Canada reaction Mexico City, 3 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's sweeping tariff measures largely spared Mexico and Canada from additional penalties, as the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA) will continue to exempt most commerce, including Mexico's energy exports. According to Trump's tariff announcement on Wednesday , all foreign imports into the US will be subject to a minimum 10pc tax starting on 5 April, with levels as high as 34pc for China and 20pc for the EU. Mexico and Canada are the US' closest trading partners and have seen tariffs imposed and then postponed several times this year, but remained mostly exempt from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs. Energy and "certain minerals that are not available in the US" imported from all other countries also will be exempt from the tariffs. Trump also did not reimpose punitive tariffs on energy and other imports from Canada and Mexico. All products covered by the USMCA, which include energy commodities, are exempt as well. Yet steel and aluminum, cars, trucks and auto parts from Mexico and Canada remain subject to separate tariffs. Steel and aluminum imports are subject to 25pc, in effect since 12 March. The 25pc tariff on all imported cars and trucks will go into effect on Thursday, whereas a 25pc tax on auto parts will go into effect on 3 May. Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum this morning emphasized the "good relationship" and "mutual respect" between Mexico and the US, which she said was key to Trump's decision to prioritize the USMCA over potential further tariffs on Mexican imports. "So far, we have managed to reach a relatively more privileged position when it comes to these tariffs," Sheinbaum said. "Many of our industries are now exempt from tariffs. We aim to reach a better position regarding steel, aluminum and auto parts exports, too." The Mexican peso strengthened by 1.5pc against the US dollar in the wake of the tariff announcement, to Ps19.96/$1 by late morning on Thursday from Ps20.25/$1 on Wednesday. Mexico has not placed any tariffs on imports from the US, which may have eliminated the need for the US to reciprocate with tariffs. "In contrast to what will apply to 185 global economies, Mexico remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs," Mexico's economy minister Marcelo Ebrard said. Mexico exported 500,000 b/d of crude to the US last year, making the US by far the most important export market for the nation's commodity. Mexico also imports the majority of its motor fuels and LPG from the US. If US won't lead, Canada will: Carney To the north, Canada's prime minister says the US' latest trade actions will "rupture" the global economy. "The global economy is fundamentally different today than it was yesterday," said prime minister Mark Carney on Thursday while announcing retaliatory tariffs on auto imports from the US. Canada is matching the US with 25pc tariffs on all vehicles imported from the US that are not compliant with the USMCA, referred to as CUSMA in Canada. But unlike the US tariffs, which took effect Thursday, Canada's will not include auto parts. Automaker Stellantis has informed Unifor Local 444 that it is shutting down the Windsor Assembly Plant in Ontario for two weeks starting on 7 April, with the primary driver being Trump's tariffs. The closure will affect 3,600 workers. Trump on 2 April unveiled a chart of dozens of countries the US is targeting with new tariffs, but that lengthy list may also represent opportunity for Canada and Mexico, who have already been dealing with US trade action. "The world is waking up today to a reality that Canada has been living with for months," Canadian Chamber of Commerce president Candace Laing said, a reality which Carney views as an opportunity for his country. "Canada is ready to take a leadership role in building a coalition of like-minded countries who share our values," said Carney. "If the United States no longer wants to lead, Canada will." By Cas Biekmann and Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash

Washington, 3 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump does not intend to back down from his plan for sweeping import tariffs that have already caused a sell-off in global equity markets and some commodities, administration officials say. The tariffs — which will start at 10pc for most imports on 5 April before steeper country-specific tariffs take effect on 9 April, with exceptions for some energy and mineral imports — have caused key stock indexes to drop by as much as 5pc, with even larger declines in crude futures, as investors brace for lower growth and a higher chance of a recession. Trump earlier today defended the tariffs, as he prepared to leave the White House for a dinner tonight at a golf tournament at one of his resorts in Florida. "THE OPERATION IS OVER! THE PATIENT LIVED, AND IS HEALING," Trump wrote in a social media post before major stock markets opened. Trump's cabinet has downplayed the short-term price effect of the tariffs, which they say will boost economic growth in the US and cause a resurgence in domestic manufacturing. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said he does not think there is "any chance" that Trump will rescind the tariffs, and said Trump will only begin to work on new trade deals once a country has "really, really changed their ways" on trade practices. "Trump is going to stand firm because he is reordering global trade," Lutnick said today in an interview with CNN. "Make no mistake about it, America has been exploited, and he is done allowing America to be exploited." Other administration officials have suggested a greater potential for lower tariffs in the near-term. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has encouraged world leaders to "take a deep breath" and not to "panic" because the tariff rates that Trump announced were a "ceiling" that might come down, so long as there was no retaliation. "Don't immediately retaliate, let's see where this goes, because if you retaliate, that's how we get escalation," Bessent said on 2 April during interview on Fox News. The tariffs have caused bipartisan backlash on Capitol Hill, but so far legislative action has been symbolic and unlikely to become law. The US Senate, in a bipartisan vote on 2 April, approved a joint resolution that would end the justification Trump has used to put tariffs on Canada. US senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) introduced a bill today to eliminate most new presidential tariffs after 60 days without approval by the US Congress. Democrats say the tariffs will force consumers to pay far more on everyday goods, with revenue offsetting Republican plans to provide more than $5 trillion in tax cuts. "Donald Trump is using tariffs in the dumbest way imaginable. In fact, Donald Trump slapped tariffs on penguins and not on Putin," US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said today, in reference to Trump's decision to put a 10pc tariff on an island populated only with penguins. Trump has claimed his country-specific tariffs are "reciprocal" even though they have no relation to the tariffs each country charges on US imports. Instead, Trump's tariffs were calculated based on a universal equation that is set at half of the country's trade deficit with the US, divided by the country's imports from the US, with a minimum tariff rate of 10pc. Major US trading partners are preparing for retaliatory tariffs. Canada's prime minister Mark Carney said he would respond to Trump's tariffs on automobiles, which took effect today, by "matching the US approach" and imposing a 25pc tariff on auto imports that do not comply with the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. China said it was preparing unspecified countermeasures to US tariffs that would be set at 54pc. Trump's cabinet today dismissed the market reaction to the tariffs. Stock markets are going through a "short-term adjustment" but the tariffs will ultimately result in more growth and additional investments, US Small Business Administration administrator Kelly Loeffler said today in an interview on Fox News "The gravy train is over for the globalist elites," said Loeffler, who previously was a top executive at US exchange operator ICE. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

LNG faces limited direct disruption from US tariffs


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

LNG faces limited direct disruption from US tariffs

London, 3 April (Argus) — New US trade tariffs announced on 2 April are unlikely to cause any direct disruption to the LNG market because global LNG demand has become more inelastic in the past three years. But market participants warned of recessionary pressure and indirect effects on gas demand. The key recipients of US LNG — the EU, Japan and South Korea, for example — may be considering responding to the new US trade policy with retaliatory tariffs, among other measures. But these are unlikely to include levies on US LNG imports, market participants said, which would limit any direct disruption on LNG trade flows in the Atlantic basin. Europe has become much more reliant on LNG imports after losing the bulk of Russian pipeline imports. Europe last year imported 45pc of its LNG from the US, according to ship-tracking data from analytics firm Vortexa. And the EU would need quick LNG imports to replace Russian supply and fill its underground storage facilities this summer, with its combined gas inventory level at 33pc on 31 March, according to transparency platform Aggregated Gas Storage Inventory. Traditional Asian importers such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are likely to seek an engagement approach other than direct retaliatory tariffs on US imports. US LNG purchases in the past often have been a means by which to reduce countries' trade surplus with the US. South Korea's energy minister expressed the country's interest in the 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG project in a visit in late March , while Taiwan's CPC signed an initial agreement for the project, according to Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs . Emerging LNG importer Vietnam was considering reducing import taxes on US LNG to 2pc from the present 5pc, according to state-owned PV Gas. The possibility of increasing US LNG purchases in the future also may be a key element in potential trade negotiations with the US aimed at reducing the 46pc tariffs on imports from Vietnam announced on 2 April, according to market participants. LNG trade flows already had been reshuffled before the latest round of US tariffs, in light of China's retaliatory tariff of 15pc on US LNG imports. China halted LNG imports from the US in early February , by reselling its contracted US offtake in other markets and replacing it with cargoes of other origin, if needed. But the tariffs have destabilised economies around the world, particularly those with large trade surpluses with the US, which are likely to reduce gas and LNG demand in different geographies. Tariffs pose direct risks for US LNG projects US tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, imposed on 12 March, present an immediate risk for US LNG developers, particularly for the five projects currently under construction and the six others expected to reach final investment decisions in 2025. Metals represent up to 30pc of the cost of building an LNG export plant. Depending on the project's size, an LNG terminal could cost $5bn-$25bn, with steel used for pipelines, tanks and other structural frameworks. Although facilities can use some domestic supplies for construction, higher prices could result in delays to construction and final investment decisions in planned liquefaction projects ( see table ). Delays to the planned 18.1mn t/yr Golden Pass LNG facility have already underscored how rising costs can upend construction timelines. Zachry, a lead contractor in engineering, procurement and construction work for the facility, filed for bankruptcy last May and exited the project. Pandemic-related inflation and supply chain delays have caused costs to surge by $2.4bn from the original $9.25bn contract, the firm said . Golden Pass, which once targeted first LNG in the second half of last year, now expects its first production in late 2025 or early 2026 . NextDecade's 17.4mn t/yr Rio Grande LNG project in south Texas had bought only 69pc of supplies for trains 1-2 and only 33pc for train 3 by late February, making the three-train project particularly vulnerable to higher steel prices. Projects that are closer to completion may face less inflationary pressure. Equipment and materials needed for the seven-train expansion at Cheniere's Corpus Christi stage 3 were delivered, according to the firm in February . And 34 of 36 liquefaction trains at Venture Global's Plaquemines facility have been delivered on site, with the two remaining trains expected to arrive by the end of March, Venture global said last month . US LNG projects in pipeline Project Capacity ( mn t/yr ) Expected start/FID Under construction Plaquemines 19.2 2025 Corpus Christi stage 3 12.0 2025 Golden Pass 18.1 2026 Rio Grande 17.6 2027 Port Arthur 13.5 2027 Waiting for final investment decision Delfin FLNG 1 13.2 mid-2025 Texas LNG 4.0 2025 Calcasieu Pass 2 28.0 mid-2025 Corpus Christi train 8-9 3.3 2025 Louisiana LNG 16.5 mid-2025 Cameron train 4 6.8 mid-2025 — Argus Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

South Korea’s GS Energy seeks term LNG from 2028


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

South Korea’s GS Energy seeks term LNG from 2028

Singapore, 3 April (Argus) — South Korean private-sector firm GS Energy's subsidiary GS Energy Trading Singapore is seeking LNG deliveries starting from 1 January 2028, over a 5-15 year period. The first round of offers will be due on 25 April and the second to close on 1 August later this year. The firm has requested volumes of up to 0.81mn t/yr in 2028 and up to 0.97mn t/yr from 2029 onwards. This is equivalent to around 13-14 cargoes/yr in 2028 and about 16-17 cargoes/yr from 2029 onwards, assuming an average LNG cargo size of 60,000t. The cargoes will be delivered to the country's 10.8mn t/yr Boryeong terminal, which is owned by power producers SK E&S and GS Energy. The firm has also specified for offers to be linked to Brent or a hybrid of Brent and Henry Hub. South Korean utility Korea South-East Power in June 2024 also signed an agreement with TotalEnergies for a five-year term delivery of up to 500,000 t/yr of LNG to South Korea from 2027. Meanwhile, state-owned gas incumbent Kogas is expected to operate with a smaller pool of long-term LNG supplies from 2025, with the government granting it more flexibility in its procurement strategy. Long-term contracted supply volumes may typically be priced at a higher premium, and could be deemed as a small price for buyers to secure supply security, traders said. By Naomi Ong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Senior figures in Australia's upstream gas sector have hit out at plans for intervention in the heavily regulated industry, as debate continues on how to best address domestic supply shortfalls later this decade. The federal Coalition in March announced National Gas Plan including a 50-100 PJ/yr (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) domestic reservation system aimed at forcing the three LNG exporters based in Queensland's Gladstone to direct more supply to the eastern states' market. But oversupplying the market to drive down prices would destroy the viability of smaller gas projects, Australian independent Beach Energy's chief executive Brett Woods said at a conference in Sydney on 1 April. The domestic-focused firm, which will export some LNG volumes via its Waitsia project in 2025, warns that such a move by the Peter Dutton-led opposition would reduce export incomes while harming Australia's international reputation. The volumes impacted by the policy could reach around 900,000-1.8mn t/yr. Expropriation of developed reserves is equivalent to breaking contracts with LNG buyers and with the foreign and local investors that the country needs for ongoing economic security, Woods said on 1 April. Domestic gas reservation systems put in place by the state governments of Western Australia (WA) and Queensland, designed to keep local markets well supplied, were "clearly supportable", Woods said, but only future supply should be subject to the regulations. LNG terminals, which represent about 70pc of eastern Australia's total gas consumption and shipped 24mn t in 2024 , should not be blamed for the failure of governments to expedite new supply and plan for Australia's gas future, head of Shell Australia Cecile Wake said in response to the Coalition's proposal. Shell's QGC business supplied 15pc of its volumes to the local grid, with the remainder shipped from its 8.5mn t/yr Queensland Curtis LNG project, Wake added. Canberra has moved to promote gas use as a transition fuel to firm renewable energy in line with its 2030 emissions reduction targets, but progress has been slow as reforming laws appear to be hampering development . The state governments, particularly in gas-poor Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), must recognise the need for locally-produced supply and streamline the approvals processes, especially environmental permits, executives said. But despite pleas for an end to years of interventionist policy — including the governing Labor party's measures to cap the price of domestic gas at A$12/GJ , Australia's fractured political environment and rising cost of living has sparked largely populist responses from its leaders. A so-called "hung" parliament is likely to result from the 3 May poll , with a variety of mainly left-leaning independents representing an anti-fossil fuel agenda expected to control the balance of power in Australia's parliament. LNG debate sharpens Debate on the causes of southern Australia's gas deficit has persisted, and the ironic outcome of underinvestment in gas supply could be LNG re-imports from Gladstone to NSW, Victoria and South Australia, making fracked coal-bed methane — liquefied in Queensland and regasified — a likely higher-emissions alternative to pipeline supply. Several developers are readying for this possibility , which is considered inevitable without action to increase supply in Victoria or NSW, increase winter storages or raise north-south pipeline capacity. Australian pipeline operator APA appears to have the most to lose out of the active firms in the gas sector. APA chief executive Adam Watson this week criticised plans for imports, because relying on LNG will set the price of domestic gas at a detrimental level, raise emissions and decrease reliability of supply, Watson said. The firm is planning to increase its eastern pipeline capacity by 25pc to bring new supplies from the Bass, Surat and Beetaloo basins to market. But investment certainty is needed or Australia will risk needing to subsidise coal-fired power for longer if sufficient gas is unavailable to back up wind and solar generators with peaking power, Watson said. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more