Latest market news

Mideast Gulf oil firms aiming for hydrogen dominance

  • Market: Electricity, Fertilizers, Hydrogen
  • 22/01/21

State-owned Saudi Aramco is already eyeing the potential to dominate the emerging hydrogen industry, just as it dominates the oil sector, despite only shipping its first blue ammonia cargo in September.

After a number of false dawns, the potential for the low-carbon fuel has gained credibility in the past few years, according to Aramco chief technical officer Ahmad al-Khowaiter.

The progress has come from reduced renewable energy costs, maturing hydrogen production technology and growing importance placed on reducing emissions, Khowaiter said at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Forum.

But the fuel is not competitive yet because of infrastructure costs.

"We as the oil and gas industry produce about 75pc of hydrogen for use in the refinery," Khowaiter said. "And the challenge is putting the infrastructure in place to get it to the customer."

To be transported, hydrogen needs to be liquefied or compressed, which makes the process costly and complicated. But another way to transport hydrogen is by transporting ammonia as a hydrogen carrier. Ammonia is much easier to liquefy, store and transport than hydrogen.

This was the thinking behind Aramco's 40t blue ammonia shipment in September, which Aramco said would be used in power plants to generate electricity with no CO2 emissions.

The blue ammonia was produced in a process in which it was synthesised from nitrogen and blue hydrogen, but most of the CO2 generated in the process was captured and isolated. The blue hydrogen used in the process was produced from hydrocarbons, in this case, natural gas. And the 50t of CO2 captured during the blue ammonia production process was to be used for methanol production and enhanced oil recovery.

"The advantage of diesel and oil has been its fungibility — its ability to transfer at a lower cost. If we can transfer that same energy in a hydrogen, or a hydrogen carrier like ammonia, we will get the same value [as] from our hydrocarbons," Khowaiter said.

Blue ammonia, produced from hydrocarbons and blue hydrogen, and green ammonia, produced from renewable sources and green hydrogen, can be transported and used as fuel in power plants to generate carbon-free electricity.

The focus for now will be on blue hydrogen. But as global customers increase their demand for ever-lower carbon-intensive fuels, producers like Aramco will have to move towards green hydrogen, which is again produced from renewable sources with almost no CO2 involved.

The abundance of potential solar power, favourable geology and access to capital are other advantages for the Mideast Gulf producers. These could help state-owned energy giants such as Aramco and Abu Dhabi's Adnoc "replace their dominance in hydrocarbons with dominance in net-zero emissions", Jean-Francois Seznec of the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Centre said.

Yousif al-Ali, executive director of clean energy at Abu Dhabi-based renewable energy company Masdar, also highlighted this comparative advantage. "Being countries that have oil and gas heritage, [these countries] have the right infrastructure to pioneer the hydrogen business," he said.

But it will not be easy, Seznec said, as it will require enormous expenditure on research and development. "Saudi Arabia is at the forefront, but it will need to be multiplied many times over," he said.

Aramco already boasts that its crude has one of the lowest carbon intensity levels, with 10kg of CO2 produced for every barrel, compared with a global average of 40-60kg a barrel.

"We invested in capturing associated gas a long time ago for environmental reasons, which had zero value at the time, but turned out to have great economic reasons. That's the kind of long-term view that is needed today," Khowaiter said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Viewpoint: EU at crossroad on H2 rules, competitiveness


20/12/24
News
20/12/24

Viewpoint: EU at crossroad on H2 rules, competitiveness

London, 20 December (Argus) — The new team of EU commissioners will enter 2025 bent on reversing the bloc's economic stagnation and the flight of industry to cheaper parts of the globe, which have been salient themes in 2024. Hydrogen industry participants will keenly monitor Brussels' choice of interventions, which promise to restart the sector's engine, but must avoid undermining faith in rules. Pledges from re-elected president Ursula von der Leyen to tackle overcomplexity and "structurally high energy prices" both concern hydrogen, and her notion of a pivotal moment for the EU rings true for the hydrogen market because of its connection to industry and because stubborn costs and underwhelming growth in 2024 undermined confidence. Frequent vows for urgency, simplicity and speed have worn thin, and the European Commission's latest reformist push could flatter to deceive. But multiple warning shots fired last year — including from the European Court of Auditors and respected former Italian prime minister and president of the European Central Bank Mario Draghi — pile on pressure to tweak hydrogen policy in 2025. The auditors' report urged a "reality check" and strategy review, cautioning Europe could spectacularly miss its targets, while Draghi stressed cost-efficient decarbonisation to protect European industry — a view shared by member states and energy-intensive companies. Von der Leyen's "Clean Industrial Deal", promised inside 100 days of her new term, could set the tone. But some, like chemicals firm BASF, have already voted with their feet by relocating jobs outside Europe. For hydrogen, the commission's easiest reform might be setting realistic 2030 targets to replace the 20mn t/yr renewable hydrogen supply, since industry deems it impossible and the commission's own notes predict a 3mn-6mn t/yr market. But this is hardly the most pressing change and would not help morale. A more radical move would be to somehow relax the renewable hydrogen definition, which many market participants consider overly burdensome. The bloc's biggest economy, Germany, put its weight behind changes in September, saying "reality has now shown these requirements were still too high". Berlin's volte-face could hand Brussels an easier climb down. But reopening that can of worms would dent the investment climate and distract from the low carbon hydrogen rules coming in 2025. All this makes radical change risky, but postponing certain aspects might be slightly more palatable. Brussels must also decide to maintain or soften its 2030 mandates for renewable hydrogen. Several countries and companies want openness to hydrogen from other low-carbon production pathways, which are backed in the US, Canada, the UK and others. Some have more fundamentally urged freedom to find the cheapest route towards cutting CO2. The first interpretation of the industry mandates from the Netherlands highlights the difficulty balancing mandates with fair competition versus competitors inside and outside the bloc. But loosening rules would frustrate first movers that took pains to comply. Moreover, some firms champion the EU's forte of creating demand via rules over subsidies that cannot last forever nor compete with the US. "Don't blink, because people will invest money against 2030 mandates," Spanish integrated Moeve's director and chief executive Maarten Wetselaar urged Brussels recently. EU policymakers accept they must cut hydrogen costs and are weighing options with member states. "The market has changed, and we are probably more technology neutral and more colour friendly than we used to be... this is realism," commission deputy director general for energy Mechthild Worsdorfer said in November. But Worsdorfer opposed "changing anything right now" after the "intense" debates to settle definitions. Commission and members will "find the right balance", Worsdorfer said, but hydrogen participants need clarity sooner rather than later. By Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s Cleanaway, LMS to produce landfill gas


20/12/24
News
20/12/24

Australia’s Cleanaway, LMS to produce landfill gas

Sydney, 20 December (Argus) — Australian waste management operator Cleanaway and bioenergy firm LMS Energy will partner on a 22MW landfill gas-fired power station at Cleanaway's Lucas Heights facility near the city of Sydney. Cleanaway, Australia's largest publicly listed waste management firm, will receive exclusive rights to landfill gas produced at Lucas Heights for 20 years, the company said on 20 December. LMS will invest A$46mn ($29mn) in new bioelectricity assets, including a 22MW generator. Tightening gas markets owing to underinvestment in new supply has led to speculation that more waste-to-energy plants could be brought on line in coming years, especially in the southern regions. Landfill gas projects receive Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) by avoiding methane releases, with the total ACCU quantity calculated after a default baseline of 30pc is deducted for projects beginning after 2015. A total of 42.6mn ACCUs were issued to landfill gas projects since the start of the ACCU scheme in 2011, 27pc of the total 155.7mn and the second-largest volume after human-induced regeneration (HIR) methods at 46.68mn. Canberra is reviewing ACCU issuance for these projects, and wants most projects to directly measure methane levels in captured landfill gas to avoid overestimation. Landfill gas operations which generate electricity from the captured gases can also receive large-scale generation certificates (LGCs). LMS has 70 projects currently registered at the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) and has received 24.57mn ACCUs since the start of the scheme. This is the largest volume for any single project proponent, just ahead of Australian environmental market investor GreenCollar's subsidiary Terra Carbon with 23.57mn units. Cleanaway received almost 1mn ACCUs from two projects and has four other projects that have yet to earn ACCUs. By Tom Major and Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US Congress passes waterways bill


19/12/24
News
19/12/24

US Congress passes waterways bill

Houston, 19 December (Argus) — The US Senate has passed a bipartisan waterways infrastructure bill, providing a framework for further investment in the country's waterways system. The waterways bill, also known as the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA), was approved by the Senate in a 97-1 vote on 18 December after clearing the US House of Representatives on 10 December. The WRDA's next stop is the desk of President Joe Biden, who is expected to sign the bill. The WRDA has been passed every two years, authorizing the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to undertake waterways infrastructure and navigation projects. Funding for individual projects must still be approved by Congress. Several agriculture-based groups voiced their support for the bill, saying it will improve transit for agricultural products on US waterways. The bill also shifts the funding of waterways projects to 75pc from the federal government and 25pc from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund instead of the previous 65-35pc split. "Increasing the general fund portion of the cost-share structure will promote much needed investment for inland navigation projects, as well as provide confidence to the industry that much needed maintenance and modernization of our inland waterway system will happen," Fertilizer Institute president Corey Rosenbusch said. The bill includes a provision to assist with the damaged Wilson Lock along the Tennessee River in Alabama. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

USDA awards more funding to increase fertilizer output


19/12/24
News
19/12/24

USDA awards more funding to increase fertilizer output

Houston, 19 December (Argus) — The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) awarded over $100mn this week across nine states to increase domestic fertilizer production as the effort to make farmer affordability more favorable continues. About $116mn will be invested through the USDA's Fertilizer Production Expansion Program (FPEP) to help eight facilities expand output in California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Recipients include the Michigan Potash Company, where the construction of a new facility should yield 400,000 metric tonnes (t) annually of high-grade potash, and Farmers Cooperative Association, where funding will expand its existing dry fertilizer facility with additional storage and processing capacity. "When we invest in domestic supply chains, we drive down input costs and increase options for farmers," USDA secretary Tom Vilsack said. Through the FPEP, the USDA has invested $517mn in 76 fertilizer production facilities across 34 states and Puerto Rico. President Joe Biden's administration committed up to $900mn in the program through the Commodity Credit Corporation, which is expected to support long-term investments by strengthening supply chains. Higher US fertilizer prices throughout this year deterred fall demand as lower crop prices forced farmers to sell more of a crop to afford nutrients. The last USDA FPEP funding announcement was in August , when $35mn was granted to boost seven domestic production projects. By Taylor Zavala Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more