Argentina to award 24 LNG cargoes, led by BP

Market: Natural gas
18/03/21

Argentina's state-owned Ieasa received offers from 14 companies to supply 24 LNG cargoes at an average price of $6.50/mn Btu.

All the offers are expected to be awarded for a total $330mn, according to the energy secretariat.

The big winner was BP with 15 cargoes, followed by Gunvor with five, Total with two and Trafigura and Naturgy with one each.

The cargoes will be delivered during the approaching winter months at the Escobar regasification terminal in Buenos Aires province.

The tender, which was issued on 16 March, is the first of what are expected to be several tenders for LNG supply in the winter, when heating demand soars.

"We are very satisfied with this tender in which first-rate LNG companies participated and we have obtained a price that surpassed our expectations," energy secretary Dario Martinez said.

Before the tender, there had been expectations that the average price would exceed $7/mn Btu. Ieasa paid an average of just $2.87/mn Btu for 28 cargoes last year.

Shale-rich Argentina is turning to more LNG this year as domestic gas production and pipeline imports from Bolivia decline.

In the peak winter months, Argentina also imports regasified LNG from neighboring Chile via pipelines that were once used to export gas.

To ensure supply, Argentina is also seeking a short-term lease on another another regasification terminal in Bahia Blanca, where the country had given up importing LNG in 2018.

By Daniel Politi

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

15/04/25

VG begins contracted LNG deliveries at Calcasieu Pass

Houston, 15 April (Argus) — US LNG exporter Venture Global began deliveries of long-term contractual cargoes at its 12.4mn t/yr Calcasieu Pass terminal in Louisiana today after the facility started commercial operations, more than three years after producing its first LNG. "We are excited to reach this milestone and are grateful for our regulators and supply chain partners who have worked with our team to reach commercial operations as efficiently and safely as possible," said Venture Global chief executive Mike Sabel. But the long-delayed and highly contested start comes amid ongoing arbitration proceedings against Venture Global, which some customers including Shell, BP, Italian utility Edison and Spanish company Repsol argue was unjustified in deferring the contracted supplies (see offtakers table) . The LNG exporter originally sought to begin commercial operations in 2022 but cited impacts from Covid-19, two hurricanes and "major unforeseen manufacturing issues" related to one of the plant's heat recovery steam generators, equipment that helps power the facility. Because several of the plant's facilities, including the power island, were not officially placed in service with federal authorization, Venture Global maintained that the plant was not commercially operating — despite producing 444 cargoes totaling 28.2mn t of LNG (about 1.28 trillion cubic feet of natural gas) since its first in March 2022, according to Vortexa data. The start-up Tuesday comes on the final day before Venture Global could have lost control of the project. The company said in a December filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the agreement under which it had financed debt requires commercial operations to be completed by 1 June 2025. Should commercial operations have not begun 45 days prior to this date — which is Tuesday — then the agreement defaults, allowing "certain investors" to exercise control over the project. Before Tuesday, the company instead sold cargoes on the spot market for prices much higher than the terms of its offtake agreements. Calcasieu Pass produced its first LNG in January 2022 and exported its first cargo on 1 March 2022 — less than a week after Russia, then a key supplier of gas to Europe, invaded Ukraine. The facility produced its first LNG just 29 months after reaching a final investment decision (FID) on the project, compared with the industry average of four to five years. The timing of the project's start dovetailed with the war-driven volatility in the European gas market, helping Venture Global realize much larger profits than it would have under contracted volumes. The firm's liquefaction fees in 2023 and 2024 averaged $12.23/mn Btu and $7.28/mn Btu, respectively, compared with the average $1.97/mn Btu in its long-term deals, according to a company presentation in March. The lengthy commissioning process generated $19.6bn in revenue by the end of September 2024, Venture Global said in the December SEC filing. Shell estimated that Venture Global sold cargoes in 2023 at an average of $48.8mn per shipment, "raking in billions of dollars while shirking its contractual obligations", according to a filing with US energy regulator FERC in March 2024. Venture Global said in March that the customer arbitration cases are not likely to be resolved until after 2025. LNG facilities usually produce commissioning cargoes for a few months before beginning long-term contracts. But Venture Global has said its unique plant design, which uses a higher number of smaller, modular liquefaction trains compared with traditional trains, requires a longer start-up process. Calcasieu Pass LNG consists of 18 trains paired in nine blocks, and a similarly long commissioning period is expected at the first two phases of Venture Global's 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines facility consisting of 36 trains. The company also has plans for an 18.1mn t/yr expansion at Plaquemines. An FID is expected in mid-2027, with first LNG production 18-24 months later. Venture Global estimated that its third LNG facility, the 28mn t/yr CP2 facility adjacent to Calcasieu Pass, could export up to 550 commissioning cargoes . The company expects to make an investment decision on the first phase of CP2 this year. By Tray Swanson Calcasieu Pass offtake deals Offtaker Volume, mn t/yr Contract length, yrs Shell 2.0 20 Galp 1.0 20 Sinopec 1.0 3 CNOOC 0.5 5 Edison 1.0 20 Repsol 1.0 20 PGNiG 1.5 20 BP 2.0 20 — US DOE Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

14/04/25

News

14/04/25

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

Brussels, 14 April (Argus) — The International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism "does not yet ensure the sector's full contribution to achieving the Paris Agreement goals", the European Commission has said. "Does it have everything for everybody? For sure, it doesn't," said Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, the commission's climate and energy spokesperson said. "This is often the case as an outcome from international negotiations, that not everybody gets the most optimal outcome." The IMO agreement reached last week will need to be confirmed by the organisation in October, the EU noted, even if it is a "strong foundation" and "meaningful step" towards net zero GHG emissions in global shipping by 2050. The commission will have 18 months following the IMO mechanism's formal approval to review the directive governing the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS), which currently includes maritime emissions for intra-EU voyages and those entering or leaving the bloc. By EU law, the commission will also have to report on possible "articulation or alignment" of the bloc's FuelEU Maritime regulation with the IMO, including the need to "avoid duplicating regulation of GHG emissions from maritime transport" at EU and international levels. That report should be presented, "without delay", following formal adoption of an IMO global GHG fuel standard or global GHG intensity limit. Finland's head representative at the IMO delegation talks, Anita Irmeli, told Argus that the EU's consideration of whether the approved Marpol amendments are ambitious enough won't be until "well after October". Commenting on the IMO agreement, the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) pointed to the "neutral" approach to feedstocks, including first generation biofuels. "The EBB welcomes this agreement, where all feedstocks and pathways have a role to play," EBB secretary general Xavier Noyon said. Faig Abbasov, shipping director at non-governmental organisation Transport and Environment, called for better incentives for green hydrogen. "The IMO deal creates a momentum for alternative marine fuels. But unfortunately it is the forest-destroying first generation biofuels that will get the biggest push for the next decade," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal

14/04/25

News

14/04/25

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal

London, 14 April (Argus) — Compliance with the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) newly agreed global greenhouse gas (GHG) two-tier pricing mechanism will require LNG-powered ships to transition to bio-LNG by 2029 under the encouraged 'direct compliance' tier, or by 2033 for the minimum 'base target' tier, or else potentially incur heavy costs. The pricing mechanism was approved by IMO delegates on 11 April in London. Formal adoption will be decided in October, at the next Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting, when a two-thirds majority vote will be required. The text says ships must reduce their fuel intensity by a "base target" of 4pc in 2028 (see table) against 93.3g CO2e/MJ, the latter representing the average GHG fuel intensity value of international shipping in 2008. This gradually tightens to 30pc by 2035. The text defines a "direct compliance target", that starts at 17pc for 2028 and grows to 43pc by 2035. Well-to-wake emissions for LNG diesel-type engines at dual fuel slow speed are equal to 76.08g CO2e/MJ, an 18.4pc emission reduction from the IMO's 2008 benchmark. In theory, this means the average LNG-vessel is compliant with the IMO's scheme until 2029 under both maximum and minimum tiers, or until 2033 under the base target. Waste-based bio-LNG carries a GHG intensity of between 30 and -100g CO2e/MJ depending on feedstock and production, which translates to between 68.09-206.4pc GHG emissions savings, making it compliant across all tiers. However, the uptake of bio-LNG may be capped. Many LNG-capable vessels run on dual-fuel engines, meaning ship-owners may be more inclined to adopt biodiesel, ammonia or other diesel-engine applicable fuels, depending on price levels and other real-world drawbacks. The pricing mechanism establishes a levy for excessive emissions at $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) for ships compliant with the 'base' target, called Tier 2. For ships in Tier 1 — those compliant with the base target but that still have emission levels higher than the direct compliance target — the price was set at $100/tCO2e. Instead of physically transitioning to a greener fuel, ships could meet targets using 'surplus units', which will be allocated to over-compliant vessels equal to their positive compliance balance, expressed in tCO2e, and valid for two years after emission. Ships then will be able to use the surplus units in the following reporting periods, transfer to other vessels as a credit, or voluntarily cancel as a mitigation contribution. This could give rise to an entirely new ticket market or emissions trading scheme (ETS) common in many European markets for other transport fuel sectors. LNG vessels accounted for more than 2pc of the active global shipping fleet as of October last year, according to energy industry coalition SEA-LNG, but make up the majority of new-build alternative marine vessel orders over the next 10 years. By Madeleine Jenkins IMO GHG reduction targets Year Base Target Direct Compliance Target 2028 4% 17% 2029 6% 19% 2030 8% 21% 2031 12% 25% 2032 17% 30% 2033 21% 34% 2034 26% 39% 2035 30% 43% Source: IMO Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama

14/04/25

News

14/04/25

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama

New York, 14 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's back and forth over tariffs that sent oil prices tumbling to a four-year low last week has sparked jitters across the shale patch, although most producers are likely to take their time to respond. The oil and gas industry, one of Trump's biggest cheerleaders and donors during his election campaign, has been taken aback by the speed and scale of the president's escalating trade wars and executives are signalling growing impatience. Meanwhile, Trump's "Drill, baby, drill" mantra is even less likely to become a reality now, after oil slid below the $65/bl level that executives surveyed by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank last month warned was needed to profitably sink a new well. Trump's imposition of punitive tariffs on nearly every major US trading partner led to a sell-off in stock, bonds and commodity markets until he announced a 90-day pause for most nations — except China — on 9 April. While it may be too early for talk about dropping rigs and curtailing production, companies will face tough questions from analysts about their contingency plans when first-quarter results start coming through later this month. One key difference from previous downturns in 2014 and 2020 is that exploration and production (E&P) firms are in a better position this time, with less debt on their balance sheets and more modest growth plans, which may help limit the initial fallout. But higher costs owing to tariffs on steel imports could offset the efficiency savings that have kept production going in an era of restrained spending. "E&Ps are likely to mostly take a wait-and-see approach — with a high level of uncertainty about future policy — and not prematurely lay down rigs," consultancy Enverus principal analyst Andrew Dittmar says. "If prices are weak headed into 2026, that is where you are likely to see a more material reduction in drilling budgets. Feeling dominated The shale industry has welcomed Trump's "energy dominance" agenda and his promise of a permitting overhaul. But cracks are appearing in that relationship because of his stop-start policy on tariffs. "This administration better have a plan," Diamondback Energy president Kaes Van't Hof said in a social media post, in a direct appeal to energy secretary Chris Wright. Shale is the "only industry that actually built itself in the US, manufactures in the US, grew jobs in the US and improved the trade deficit — and by proxy GDP — in the US over the past decade", Van't Hof, who is due to become Diamondback chief executive later this year, said. His company became the largest pure-play producer in the prolific Permian basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico following its $26bn takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources last year. While few public producers were planning any kind of meaningful growth this year as higher dividends and buy-backs continue to be the priority, even that could eventually find itself on the chopping block. "The corporate reality for public players means that already modest growth could be at risk if prices remain near $60/bl," Rystad Energy vice-president for North American oil and gas Matthew Bernstein says. Little in the way of growth was forecast outside the core Permian this year even before Trump rolled out his tariffs. A prolonged period of lower prices could spur a downturn in the top-performing US basin. A combination of short-term activity levels, investor distributions and production could be sacrificed in order to defend margins, according to Rystad. And producers in the Delaware sub-basin could be especially vulnerable, given the region's steep initial decline rates, high well costs and large capital return requirements, the consultancy says. By Stephen Cunningham WTI breakeven price Nymex WTI futures month 1 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brunei LNG undergoes unplanned downtime

14/04/25

News

14/04/25

Brunei LNG undergoes unplanned downtime

Singapore, 14 April (Argus) — Brunei's 7.2mn t/yr Brunei LNG export terminal experienced an operational upset on 11 April, but there were no reported injuries or damages to its assets, the firm said in a notice. "Normalisation process is currently in progress," the firm added. Visible flaring and black smoke from the plant may be observed during this time, but the situation is under control and poses no risk to the surrounding community or environment, the firm reported. Brunei LNG cancelled its tender offering a cargo on a fob basis for loading on 22 June , likely as a result of the operational upset. The tender was initially due to close on 17 April. It is still uncertain when the export terminal will resume normal operations. By Joey Chan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more