India maintains feedstock rice cost for ethanol
India will hold flat the price ethanol distilleries must pay for rice feedstocks during the 2021-22 fiscal year ending 31 March, in a move targeting to support grain-based ethanol production and farmers' incomes.
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) will continue to supply excess rice to distilleries at a cost steady from this year at 2,000 rupees/quintal ($270/t) during 2021-22, it announced on 1 May.
The decision was made to assure the industry of price stability and availability of the raw material, in a bid to spur investment in grain-based distilleries. To date, 422 new distillery projects have registered under India's Department of Food and Public Distribution loan aid scheme, of which around 200 plan to use grain-based feedstocks.
The government is keen to boost the number of distilleries using grains like rice for ethanol instead of sugarcane feedstocks typical in the country, to drive more even output and blending of the biofuel nationwide beyond key sugarcane-producing states Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.
India fixed the ex-mill price oil companies must pay for ethanol made from surplus FCI rice at Rs56.87/litre during the current December 2020-November 2021 supply year, above the price for product made from C-heavy molasses and damaged food grains but below that for B-heavy molasses and unrefined sugar feedstocks.
Encouraging distilleries to divert sugar, sugarcane juice and sugarcane syrup directly to ethanol production remains the government's ethanol policy priority, as it attempts to draw down the country's sugar glut.
It aims to blend 7.5-8pc ethanol in the gasoline pool nationwide during the 2020-21 supply year, up from around 5pc during 2019-20. The country is targeting a blend rate of 10pc by 2022 and 20pc by 2025.
Related news posts
Denmark to launch carbon tax on agriculture from 2030
Denmark to launch carbon tax on agriculture from 2030
Dalby, 1 July (Argus) — The Denmark coalition government has introduced the world's first carbon emissions tax on agriculture, which will take effect from 2030. The agreement was reached on 24 June after five months of negotiations between the Government of Denmark, the Danish Agriculture and Food Council, the Danish Society for Nature Conservation, the Confederation of Danish Industry, Danish trade union NNF that organises workers within the domestic slaughterhouse and meat industry, and association Local Government Danish. Farmers will have to pay 120 Danish kroner/t ($17.30/t) of emitted CO2 equivalent from livestock from 2030, rising to DKr300 from 2035 onwards. Revenues from the tax will be channelled back to the sector and reinvested into green initiatives, climate technology, and production transformation, targeting agricultural sectors facing the most difficulty transitioning, according to the British Agriculture Bureau (BAB). Copenhagen is a significant exporter of pork and dairy, and agriculture is currently expected to account for 46pc of emissions by 2030. Experts believe the carbon tax will cut these emissions by 1.8mn t in 2030, its first year of operations, enabling Denmark to meet its target of cutting 70pc of its total emissions by that year, according to BAB. Resistant farmers have brought traffic to a standstill in European capitals several times this year, in protests for EU leaders to remove rules designed to clean up the agriculture sector. New Zealand in late 2023 delayed the introduction of a proposed tax on cow emissions which was set to start at the end of 2025, but the newly elected New Zealand government in June cancelled the plan to tax livestock producers on methane production. The then New Zealand government had forecast the levy would have reduced the amount of methane released by livestock into the atmosphere by as much as 47pc by 2050, without disclosing the baseline year. By Jessica Clarke Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
British Columbia raises biofuels output goal
British Columbia raises biofuels output goal
New York, 28 June (Argus) — British Columbia has increased by 15pc its 2030 goal for renewable fuels production in the province, driven by the success of its low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS). The province aims to produce 1.5bn liters/yr (26,000 b/d) of renewable fuels by 2030, up from its prior goal 1.3bn l/yr, the government said Thursday in a report on its clean energy strategy. British Columbia's LCFS has driven investment in petroleum alternatives and enabled more ambitious biofuel targets, with the province on track to produce 840mn l/yr of renewable fuels by 2026, according to the report. The new goal specifically covers renewable liquid fuels like renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel. The province also aims to scale up renewable natural gas and hydrogen, the report said. British Columbia's LCFS targets a 30pc reduction in the carbon intensity of the diesel and gasoline fuel pools by 2030 as well as a 10pc reduction in the carbon intensity of aviation fuels. The provincial program, which operates alongside new federal requirements, has the toughest reduction targets of any North American LCFS. LCFS programs require yearly reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. Conventional, higher-carbon fuels that exceed annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. British Columbia justified its renewable fuels goals in the report, arguing that "liquid and gas fuels will remain essential for the foreseeable future" for long-haul transportation, industry, and remote communities with less access to electricity. A more ambitious domestic production target is also designed to reduce the province's dependence on fuel imports. The only provincial fuel producers are Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure's 12,000 b/d refinery and Tidewater Renewables' 3,000 b/d renewable diesel refinery in Prince George as well as Parkland's 55,000 b/d refinery in Burnaby that co-processes renewable feedstocks with conventional petroleum feedstocks. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Canaries' bio-marine fuel demand hit by ETS exemptions
Canaries' bio-marine fuel demand hit by ETS exemptions
London, 28 June (Argus) — Spanish energy firm Cepsa has delayed plans to supply marine biodiesel blends in the Canary Islands as increased demand for conventional bunker fuels and EU regulatory exemptions weigh on market fundamentals for the blended products. Cepsa's international marine fuels sales manager, Francisco Diaz Castro, told attendees at the Maritime Week Las Palmas conference last week that the firm remains committed to supplying marine biodiesel in the Canary Islands but is delaying it in response to a sharp rise in conventional bunker fuel demand in recent months, underpinned by vessels re-routing around the southern tip of Africa to avoid the risk of Houthi attacks in in the Red Sea. Vessels have been stocking up on bunker fuels before and after sailing around Africa's Cape of Good Hope to avoid stopping along the way. Latest data from the Spanish transport ministry show sales of conventional bunker fuel out of the Canary Islands last month increased by 3pc compared with April and by 41pc on the may last year (see table) . This demand growth has pushed suppliers to retain barge availability for conventional bunker fuels, reducing capacity to supply marine biodiesel blends. Market participants told Argus that another reason marine biodiesel demand in the Canary Islands has not picked up is EU regulatory exemptions for vessels sailing between the islands and mainland Spain. According to article 12 (3b) of the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS) directive, "an obligation to surrender allowances shall not arise in respect of emissions released until 31 December 2030 from voyages between a port located in an outermost region of a member state and a port located in the same member state, including voyages between ports within an outermost region and voyages between ports in the outermost regions of the same member state, and from the activities, within a port, of such ships in relation to such voyages." Argus understands that this exemption applies to all vessels covered under the scope of the EU ETS, but would not apply if the vessel is sailing from an outermost region, such as the Canary Islands, to a different EU member nation, for example the Netherlands. A similar exemption for FuelEU Maritime regulations may be applicable as well, subject to member states asking for the exemption of the specific ports and routes for the vessels. Such an exemption could apply until 2029. Argus understands that requests from member states for this exemption will be published in the coming months. An exemption from FuelEU Maritime regulations could also be applied to routes connecting islands with a population under 200,000 people. This specific exemption would therefore not apply to Tenerife and Gran Canaria but may apply to other parts of the Canary Islands with smaller populations. By Hussein Al-Khalisy and Dafydd ab Iago Canary Islands liquid bunker sales t Month Las Palmas Tenerife Total Sales % m-o-m % y-o-y May-24 282,447 49,749 332,196 3 41 Apr-24 255,262 68,782 324,044 27 38 Mar-24 189,868 64,654 254,522 0 3 Feb-24 207,564 47,344 254,908 -6 0 Jan-24 219,962 51,894 271,856 16 27 Dec-23 187,889 47,306 235,195 4 1 Nov-23 181,218 45,940 227,158 5 -2 Spanish Transport Ministry Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US House panel advances waterways’ projects bill
US House panel advances waterways’ projects bill
Houston, 27 June (Argus) — A Congressional committee on Wednesday advanced a bill to authorize a bundle of US port and river infrastructure projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) biennially authorizes projects handled by the Corps' civil works program aimed at improving shipping operations at the nation's ports and harbors, and along the inland waterway system. The traditionally bipartisan legislation also approves flood and storm programs, and work on other aspects of water resources infrastructure. The House of Representatives' Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Wednesday passed the bill by a 61-2 vote. The Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works passed its own version of the bill on 22 May by a 19-0 vote. Neither the full Senate nor House have yet voted on the bills, which will need a conference committee to sort out different versions. A key difference is that the House bill did not include an adjustment to the cost-sharing structure for lock and dam construction and major rehabilitation projects. The Senate measure adjusted the funding mechanism so that 75pc of costs would be paid for by the US Treasury Department's general fund, with the rest coming from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. The 2022 version of the bill made permanent an increase to 65pc from the general fund and 35pc from the trust fund, which is funded by a barge diesel fuel tax. The House committee's decision not to include the funding change drew disappointment from shipping interests. The Waterways Council was "disappointed that the House did not include a provision to modernize the inland waterways system", but was hopeful that conference negotiations would result in its inclusion, Tracy Zea, chief executive of the group, said. The latest House version of the bill authorizes 12 projects and 160 new feasibility studies. Among the projects receiving approval were modifications to the Seagirt Loop Channel near the Baltimore Harbor in Maryland. The federal government would pay $47.9mn towards an estimate $63.9mn project to widen the channel, which would help meet future demand for capacity within the Port of Baltimore. That would include increased container volume at the Seagirt Marine Terminal. The project was in the works before the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge temporarily diverted freight from Seagirt and many other port terminals. The committee also authorized $314.25mn towards a resiliency study of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The study would consider hurricane and storm damage and identify ways to improve navigation, reduce the maintenance requirements, and provide resiliency. The waterway connects ports along the Gulf of Mexico from St Marks, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas. The House version of the bill also includes provisions to strengthen flood control, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure. "Critically, WRDA 2024 will help communities increase resiliency in the face of climate change," representative Rick Larsen (D-WA) said. By Abby Caplan and Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more