Petrobras LPG pricing shifts to track crude

  • Market: LPG, Natural gas
  • 25/06/21

Petrobras' LPG prices are starting to closely track rising international crude values as Brazil's state-controlled company seeks to attract imports of the fuel as well as investment in its refining assets.

Petrobras is making its LPG prices more responsive to crude price variations, partly to make its refineries more attractive to investors as it pushes to divest the assets by the end of the year,according to Brazil's LPG distribution industry association and a specialist.

Petrobras' sale of one of these units, Refinaria Landulpho Alves (RLAM), was approved this month by Brazilian competition watchdog Cade.

Petrobras' LPG prices for distributors rose by 83pc in the 12 months through mid-May, similar to Brent prices that rose in the same period by 90pc. Petrobras' LPG price was R3,208.85/metric tonne ($654/t) on 14 May 2021, up from R1,753.03/t a year earlier.

In the year-earlier period, there was little correlation between the two commodities. Petrobras' LPG prices fell by 10pc through 15 May 2020 from a year earlier, significantly trailing a 52pc drop in Brent.

The Brazilian association of LPG distribution companies, known as Sindigas, acknowledges that LPG prices track international crude prices, but only recently has there been an earnest effort to pass price fluctuations on to distributors. Petrobras is now more directly passing on international price fluctuations because the company is giving up its role as the sole guarantor of the national LPG supply as Brazil's new natural gas law opens up the market and Petrobras moves to reduce its share of domestic refining, the association said.

"Petrobras needs to price (LPG) in a way that generates incentives and gives confidence to potential investors," Sindigas said.

For residential consumers, the price of a 13 kilogram LPG cylinder rose by an average of 19pc to May 2021 from April 2020. Distributors say they reduced their sales margin by nearly 14pc to cushion customers from higher Petrobras prices. The federal government also reduced LPG taxes by 6.79pc in this period.

Petrobras adopted international price parity for its refined products in 2002, but it was only in 2015 that the company was allowed by its major stakeholder, the Brazilian Union, to increase prices frequently. By 2019, with a new board running the company and focusing on upstream activities, Petrobras planned for LPG prices to more closely reflect crude fluctuations, but when global Covid-19 lockdowns sent crude prices tumbling, the policy was not fully implemented.

The perception that Petrobras now is following the international parity pricing policy is an important signal for other companies to invest in Brazilian refining and also to start importing LPG, said Pedro Rodrigues, director at Brazilian Infrastructure Center (CBIE), a consultancy for energy and infrastructure.

"Petrobras pricing for LPG is changing as Petrobras follows its divestment plan in refining," Rodrigues said. "It gives autonomy to the company and more confidence to investors that the government is not going to interfere in pricing."

LPG sold in cylinders represents 25pc of Brazil's energy mix for residential consumers. Petrobras is the main supplier for LPG in Brazil, with 99pc of the market, selling the liquefied petroleum gas to distributors that package the gas and distribute it, typically via trucks, for sale to households.

Brazil is short on LPG and depends on imports to supply 34pc of the market. According to research conducted by BMJ Consulting, Brazil last year imported $309mn of mixed LPG, and pure propane and butane.

Petrobras did not immediately respond to a request for comment on its LPG pricing strategy.

Brent X LPG Brazil

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/07/24

US judge halts 'pause' on LNG export licenses

US judge halts 'pause' on LNG export licenses

Washington, 1 July (Argus) — A federal judge in Louisiana has ordered President Joe Biden's administration to end its five-month-old "pause" on the approval process for new LNG export licenses until the resolution of a lawsuit by states that said the policy is unlawful. The US Department of Energy (DOE) and other administration officials are immediately "enjoined and restrained" from "halting and/or pausing the approval process" for LNG export applications requesting licenses to export to countries without a free trade agreement with the US, federal district court judge James Cain wrote today. DOE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court's ruling is a potential blow for the Biden administration, which had said it would need until the first quarter of 2025 — after the November elections — to finish a more thorough review of the economic and climate-related effects of fully licensing LNG terminals, beyond the 48 Bcf/d of US liquefaction capacity that is fully permitted today. DOE officials have cited concerns that licensing more LNG projects could end up increasing natural gas prices for consumers. "So much has changed, including the volumes of what we're exporting," US deputy energy secretary David Turk said last week at a congressional hearing. "So we said, 'Let's take a step back, let's update our economic analysis." Biden announced the LNG licensing pause in January, delighting climate groups that have argued that approving additional projects would amount to a "climate bomb." But the pause enraged gas industry officials that worried the pause could threaten investments in a set of projects that were nearing a final investment decision. The pause raised uncertainty on the status of LNG export projects that have yet to obtain licenses, including Venture Global's proposed 28mn t/yr CP2 project in Louisiana that last week cleared a key part of the federal permitting process. The court's ruling does not explicitly require DOE to issue new LNG export licenses, or set an explicit deadline for the agency to take final action on pending applications. But the judge said that under the Natural Gas Act, DOE is required to act "expeditiously" once it receives an export application. Before Biden formally announced the pause, some LNG export applications were already subject to reviews that industry officials said amounted to a de facto freeze. In the ruling, Cain said that Louisiana and other states that challenged the LNG licensing pause were likely to succeed on the merits in showing Biden's policy was arbitrary and capricious, in part because DOE failed to provide a "detailed explanation" for its halt of the approval process. Cain said that DOE had made a "complete reversal" from its position in July 2023, when it defended its licensing process in its rejection of a complaint from environmentalists. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Precios de GLP en México van en aumento


01/07/24
News
01/07/24

Precios de GLP en México van en aumento

Mexico City, 1 July (Argus) — Los precios del gas LP (GLP) en México subieron a su punto más alto en tres meses por el aumento de precios del propano en EE. UU., y la tendencia podría continuar ya que las importaciones de la empresa estatal Pemex han aumentado este año por la reducción de la producción nacional. El precio máximo de venta al público de GLP en México del 30 de junio al 6 de julio aumentó semana a semana en 3pc a un promedio de Ps10.64/l ($2.22/USG), el precio máximo promedio más alto desde la semana del 3 al 9 de marzo, cuando fue de Ps10.73/l. La tendencia alcista podría continuar con el aumento de los precios internacionales del propano, a menudo un componente principal del GLP. Se prevé que los precios spot del propano en Mont Belvieu aumenten en 8pc a 68¢/USG en julio, comparado con 63¢/USG en julio de 2023, de acuerdo con la Administración de Información Energética de EE. UU. El pronóstico para julio también aumentaría respecto a la media prevista de 67¢/USG en junio. Esta previsión se basa en un aumento similar de las perspectivas de precio del crudo Brent, ya que los precios spot del propano suelen situartse entre los precios del crudo Brent y del gas natural Henry Hub. Además, se espera que los inventarios de propano de EE. UU. finalicen el tercer trimestre de 2024 en 82.3 millones de bl, lo que supone una disminución de 19pc respecto a los 102.2 millones de bl a finales del tercer trimestre de 2023, según los mismos datos. Sin embargo, el Gobierno mexicano podría amortiguar los picos de precios internacionales con los controles de precios, que se lanzaron por primera vez en agosto de 2021 bajo un decreto de emergencia de seis meses, y más tarde se extendieron indefinidamente. Alrededor de 60pc de la demanda de GLP de México de más de 278,000 b/d proviene del sector residencial, según los datos de la Secretaría de Energía (Sener). Las importaciones de Pemex aumentaron 38pc hasta los 83,000 b/d de GLP en mayo año tras año, y aumentaron en 10pc comparado con abril, según los datos de la empresa. El aumento de las importaciones se debió a la reducción de la producción nacional, ya que la producción de GLP de Pemex, principalmente procedente del procesamiento de gas anterior, cayó en 22pc a 83,300 b/d en mayo, frente a los 106,500 b/d en mayo de 2023. Se trata de la producción más baja desde diciembre de 2022, cuando Pemex produjo 79,500 b/d de GLP, según muestran los datos de la empresa. Por el contrario, las importaciones de GLP de empresas del sector privado han disminuido este año, ya que Pemex ha ampliado su participación en el mercado nacional de GLP en los últimos años, impulsada por las políticas nacionalistas de energía del presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Según los datos de Sener, las importaciones de las empresas del sector privado se redujeron en 11pc a 115,200 b/d de GLP entre enero y mayo, frente a los 129,200 b/d del mismo periodo de 2023. Pemex espera cerrar 2024 con una cuota de 63pc en las ventas nacionales de GLP, por encima de 62pc en 2023 y 50pc en 2020, lo que fue el más bajo de su historia, según los datos de la empresa. Las empresas del sector privado comenzaron a importar GLP a México en 2016. Nuevo gobierno genera incertidumbre La contundente victoria del actual partido en el poder Morena en las elecciones presidenciales y legislativas de México del 2 de junio añadió incertidumbre a los mercados de energía del país, ya que allanó el camino para el posible restablecimiento del monopolio legal de Pemex. La presidenta electa Claudia Sheinbaum no ha comentado sobre el mercado de GLP de México, pero apoya las políticas de energía nacionalistas de López Obrador. Mientras tanto, sigue sin estar claro si la empresa minorista de GLP estatal mexicana Gas Bienestar recibirá más apoyo, después de fallar en los objetivos de expansión trazados por el gobierno. Gas Bienestar solo opera en nueve de las 16 alcaldías de Ciudad de México casi tres años después de su lanzamiento. La empresa esperaba operar en toda la ciudad y en los estados de México, Tabasco y Veracruz para finales de 2022, pero los altos costos operativos y logísticos lo han impedido, según las fuentes. El gobierno fundó Gas Bienestar en agosto de 2021 para distribuir y vender GLP a un "precio justo" utilizando el suministro de Pemex para competir con el sector privado, según López Obrador. La empresa no divulga públicamente sus informes operativos, y Pemex ha declarado que Gas Bienestar no está obligado a responder a las solicitudes de transparencia. Por Antonio Gozain Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shale to emerge leaner from M&A boom


01/07/24
News
01/07/24

Shale to emerge leaner from M&A boom

New York, 1 July (Argus) — The recent flurry of deals in the US shale patch is poised to deliver significant productivity gains, potentially offsetting a drilling slowdown and suggesting that it might well be a mistake to bet against the sector any time soon. Ownership of top shale basins, such as the Permian in west Texas and New Mexico, is increasingly falling into the hands of fewer but larger operators, with the necessary resources to chase technology breakthroughs and drive economies of scale that could support further output growth. The flood of deal-making comes as shale growth is likely to slow after defying all expectations last year. Even as acquirers look to fine-tune their combined portfolios and slow activity in favour of shareholder returns, they will still be targeting ever longer lateral wells that reduce the need for more rigs and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) crews. Fracking multiple wells at the same time and shifting to electric fleets will also help them become more efficient. All in all, shale could continue to be a thorn in Opec's side for years to come. Underestimate US shale at your peril was the title of a recent report from analysts at bank HSBC. "We expect the mergers and acquisitions to result in substantial capital efficiencies," they wrote. Concentrated operations have reduced inefficiencies in the supply chain, and the elimination of downtime has also helped producers become leaner, according to consultancy Wood Mackenzie. But costs remain 15-30pc higher than 2020-21 levels, suggesting scope for further improvements. And while efficiency gains will inevitably become exhausted at some point, opportunities to tackle unproductive processes might still crop up. "The will and the technology are there for some operators, who should be able to keep cutting capex while modestly growing and maintaining shareholder distributions for a while to come," Wood Mackenzie research director for the Lower 48 Maria Peacock says. ExxonMobil flagged $2bn in annual savings from its $64.5bn takeover of shale giant Pioneer, with two-thirds to come from improved resource recovery and the rest from efficiencies. Leading US independent ConocoPhillips says improved technology will help it extend its inventory of top-quality drilling locations in both the Eagle Ford and Bakken basins after its $22.5bn tie-up with Marathon Oil. Return to spender Productivity gains are hardly the preserve of firms that have been active participants in the $200bn of shale deals seen over the past year. For example, US independent EOG, which has sat out the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) boom so far, plans to deliver the same level of growth for this year as seen in 2023 with four fewer rigs and two fewer fracking fleets. "Technology has evolved so much that you can go and drill horizontal wells in these and exploit that technology and you can get just absolutely outstanding returns," chief operating officer Jeff Leitzell says. Still, almost half of oil and gas executives recently polled by the Dallas Federal Reserve think that US oil output will be "slightly lower" if consolidation continues over the next five years. But the answer differed by company size. All executives from E&P firms that produce 100,000 b/d or more envisaged "no impact". Service company executives are more concerned: "Consolidation by E&P firms has curtailed investment in exploration," one said. "Our hope is that it's a temporary situation that will work itself out as the integration is completed." And even though the prolific Permian basin is due to peak before the end of the decade, analysts forecast robust growth in the intervening years. Relatively high oil prices that remain above breakeven costs and efficiency gains — which will shift the mix of wells to newer and more productive ones — will be the main drivers, according to bank Goldman Sachs. By Stephen Cunningham US tight oil production Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan mulls seeking more gas-fired capacity in auction


01/07/24
News
01/07/24

Japan mulls seeking more gas-fired capacity in auction

Osaka, 1 July (Argus) — Japan is considering further adding to gas-fired power generation capacity through its long-term zero emissions power capacity auction, given forecasts of rising electricity demand with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. A working group under the trade and industry ministry Meti has proposed to look for an additional 4GW of gas-fired capacity over two fiscal years from April 2024-March 2026 via a clean power auction. This came after awarded gas-fired capacity reached 5.76GW in the first auction held in January , with the auction seeking about 6GW over three years. The second auction — which Tokyo plans to hold in January 2025 — could seek 2.24GW, including the remaining 0.24GW in the first auction, for 2024-25 and another 2GW for 2025-26 in a third auction, the working group suggested. It has also proposed to extend the period within which awarded gas-fired projects have to start operations to eight years from the previous six years, given current resource shortages at plant manufacturers. Japan has launched the auction system to spur investment in clean power sources by securing funding in advance to drive the country's decarbonisation towards 2050. This generally targets clean power sources — such as renewables, nuclear, storage battery, biomass, hydrogen and ammonia. But the scheme also applies to new power plants burning regasified LNG as an immediate measure to ensure stable power supplies, subject to a gradual switch from gas to cleaner energy sources. These measures will not necessarily lead to increased demand for LNG, as Japanese import demand for the fuel would further come under pressure from expanded use of renewables and nuclear power. But the power sector will have to secure enough capacity to meet peak demand, especially with power consumption by data centres and semiconductor producers expected to continue to increase. Japan's peak power demand in 2033-34 is forecast at 161GW, up from an estimated 159GW in 2024-25, as the country's digital push will more than offset the impact of falling population and further energy saving efforts, according to the nationwide transmission system operator Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operator. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US Supreme Court ends 'deference' to regulators


28/06/24
News
28/06/24

US Supreme Court ends 'deference' to regulators

Washington, 28 June (Argus) — The US Supreme Court's conservative majority, in one of its most significant rulings in years, has thrown out a landmark, 40-year-old precedent under which courts have offered federal agencies significant leeway in deciding how to regulate the energy sector and other industries. In a 6-3 ruling that marks a major blow to President Joe Biden's administration, the court's conservatives overturned its 1984 ruling Chevron v. NRDC that for decades has served as a cornerstone for how judges should review the legality of federal regulations when a statute is not clear. But chief justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said experience has shown the precedent is "unworkable" and became an "impediment, rather than an aid" for courts to analyze what a specific law requires. "All that remains of Chevron is a decaying husk with bold pretensions," the opinion said. For decades, under what is now known as Chevron deference, courts were first required to review if a law was clear and if not, to defer to an agency's interpretation so long as the government's reading was reasonable. But the court's majority said the landmark precedent has become a source of unpredictability, allowing any ambiguity in a law to be a "license authorizing an agency to change positions as much as it likes." Roberts wrote that the federal courts can no longer defer to an agency's interpretation "simply because" a law is ambiguous. "Chevron is overruled," Roberts writes. "Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority." The court's ruling, named Loper Bright Enterprises v. Gina Raimando, focuses on lawsuits from herring fishers who opposed a rule that could require them to pay about $710 per day for an at-sea observer to verify compliance with regional catch limits. The US Commerce Department said it believes it interpreted the law correctly, but the fishers said the "best interpretation" of the statute was that it did not apply to herring fishers. The court's three liberal justices dissented from the ruling, which they said will likely result in "large-scale disruptions" by putting federal judges in the position of having to rule on the merits of a variety of scientific and technical judgments, without the benefit of expertise that regulators have developed over the course of decades. Overturning Chevron will put courts "at the apex" of policy decisions on every conceivable topic, including climate change, health care, finance, transportation, artificial intelligence and other issues where courts lack specific expertise, judge Elena Kagan wrote. "In every sphere of current or future federal regulations, expect courts from now on to play a commanding role," Kagan wrote. The Supreme Court for years has been chipping away at the importance of Chevron deference, such as a 2022 ruling where it created the "major questions doctrine" to invalidate a greenhouse gas emission rule limits for power plants. That doctrine attempts to prohibit agencies from resolving issues that have "vast economic and political significance" without clear direction from the US Congress. That has led regulators to be hesitant in relying on Chevron to defend their regulations in court. The Supreme Court last cited the precedent in 2016. The ruling comes a day after the Supreme Court's conservatives, in another 6-3 ruling , dramatically curtailed the ability of the US Securities and Exchange Commission — and likely many other federal agencies — to use in-house tribunals to impose civil penalties. The court ruled those enforcement cases instead need to be filed as jury trials. That change is expected to curtail enforcement of securities fraud, since court cases are more resource-intensive. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more