Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

IEA downbeat on pace of energy transition

  • Market: Chemicals, Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Oil products, Petrochemicals
  • 13/10/21

The world's progress on low-carbon energy is "far too slow to put global emissions into sustained decline towards net zero", the IEA said today to mark the launch of its World Energy Outlook 2021 (WEO).

Although the report recognises that "a new energy economy" is emerging "as solar, wind, electric vehicles and other low-carbon technologies flourish", it also notes that strong growth in global coal demand this year is pushing CO2 emissions towards their second-largest annual increase in history.

"The world's hugely encouraging clean energy momentum is running up against the stubborn incumbency of fossil fuels in our energy systems," IEA executive director Fatih Birol said. Birol calls on governments to resolve the problem at next month's UN Cop 26 climate conference by giving a clear signal that they are committed to rapidly scaling up the clean technologies of the future.

The WEO examines three scenarios, each outlining potential paths for energy supply and demand over the next 30 years. In addition to the Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) scenario, which was published in May, the report explores the Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS), which is based on existing energy and climate measures as well as policy initiatives under development, and the Announced Pledges Scenario (APS), which assumes all of the net zero emissions pledges announced by governments so far are fully implemented on time.

In all three, peak oil demand arrives at various points before 2050. "For the first time in a WEO, oil demand goes into eventual decline in all the scenarios examined, although the timing and speed of the drop vary widely," the IEA said. In the STEPS, oil demand peaks at 104mn b/d in the mid-2030s and then declines very gradually to 2050. In the APS, consumption peaks soon after 2025 at 97mn b/d and falls to 77mn b/d in 2050. In the NZE, demand has already peaked and drops to 72mn b/d in 2030 and just 24mn b/d by 2050.

Demand for natural gas increases in all three scenarios over the next five years. "But there are sharp divergences after this," the WEO said. "The share of natural gas in the global energy mix remains around 25pc to 2050 in the STEPS, while it falls to 20pc in the APS and to 11pc in the NZE. Around 70pc of natural gas use in 2050 in the NZE is equipped with carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS)."

The IEA reiterates that in the NZE, no new oil and gas fields are needed beyond those already approved for development. One of the key reasons is a rapid rise in the use of low-emissions fuels, such as green hydrogen, alongside greater efficiency and electrification. But it warns that actual deployment of low-emissions fuels "is well off track". The current pipeline of planned low-carbon hydrogen projects falls short of the levels of use in 2030 assumed in the APS and even further short of the amounts required in the NZE, it said.

Clean path

To put the world on a path towards net zero emissions by 2050, the IEA says investment in clean energy projects and infrastructure needs to more than triple over this decade, to nearly $4 trillion/yr by 2030. And according to Birol, "some 70pc of that additional spending needs to happen in emerging and developing economies, where financing is scarce and capital remains up to seven times more expensive than in advanced economies".

The IEA suggests that there are four solutions available to close the gap over the next 10 years between today's climate pledges and the emissions reductions required to limit the increase in global temperatures to 1.5°C compared with pre-industrial levels. These include a "relentless focus on energy efficiency", a broad drive to cut methane emissions from fossil fuel operations, and a major boost to clean energy innovation.

The WEO also calls for "a massive additional push for clean electrification". This would involve, among other things, a doubling of solar and wind power capacity compared with what has already been pledged, a major expansion of other low-emissions power generation, and a rapid phase out of coal.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
10/04/25

Quebec stands by GHG program

Quebec stands by GHG program

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — Quebec legislators and government officials reaffirmed their support for the province's cap-and-trade program on Wednesday. The National Assembly of Quebec unanimously adopted a joint resolution expressing continued support for the provincial program, which was introduced by members from opposition parties Quebec Liberal Party, Québec solidaire, Parti québécois and Quebec environment minister Benoit Charette of the majority party Coalition avenir Québec. The resolution's passage came a day after US president Donald Trump issued an executive order taking aim at state climate policies as an "overreach" of their authority, specifically citing California's cap-and-trade program, which formed a joint market with the province in 2013. While Trump's order cast a wide net over potential areas the administration intends to scrutinize, a familiar theme from his previous term did appear around state climate policies interacting with international relations. "These state laws and policies try to dictate interstate and international disputes over air, water, and natural resources," Trump said. While Quebec's Ministry of Environment declined to comment on the order, the province's link with California's program was an area of contention between the state and the first Trump administration. The Trump administration in October 2019 filed a lawsuit that sought to sever California's link on the grounds the state had unlawfully overstepped federal powers to negotiate independent foreign policy for greenhouse gas (GHG) regulation and was "inconsistent" with Trump's then-ongoing withdrawal from the Paris Agreement started in 2017. But the lawsuit ultimately failed following two separate rulings by the same federal judge in 2020, with a subsequent appeal by the Trump administration withdrawn after the election of former US president Joe Biden. Trump's new executive order roiled environmental markets on Wednesday, with California Carbon Allowances (CCAs) for December delivery trading as low as $22.51/metric tonne on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), before partially rebounding as participants expressed concern about potential federal action against the program. While state and government officials continue to evaluate the order, the office of California attorney general Rob Bonta (D) said the state's Department of Justice will use the "full force of the law and tools of this office to address the climate crisis head on." The California and Quebec programs aim for economy-wide reductions in GHG emissions, including from power plants, refineries and on-road fuel use. Both jurisdictions are seeking to increase the stringency of their respective programs to remain on course for statutory targets through a pair of rulemakings that may be implemented next year. The joint market, known as the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), is also evaluating linking with the Washington "cap-and-invest' program, which would make the state the first one to join California in the WCI, creating a larger North American carbon market. Quebec seeks to reduce GHG emissions by 37.5pc below 1990 levels by 2030, and achieve carbon neutrality in 2050. Provincial regulators are considering removing 17.5mn allowances from the program to speed emissions reductions, while tapering the use of carbon offset credits by 2030, among other changes. California requires a 40pc reduction from 1990 emission levels by the end of 2030, and net-zero in 2045. CARB is considering changing the 2030 target to 48pc. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Brazil's diesel market eyes Trump and Petrobras


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

Brazil's diesel market eyes Trump and Petrobras

Sao Paulo, 10 April (Argus) — Tensions surrounding whiplash changes in trade policies favored by US president Donald Trump have created favorable conditions for foreign diesel imports into Brazil, just days after state-controlled Petrobras cut its refinery gate diesel prices. On 1 April, Petrobras cut wholesale diesel prices by 4.6pc, bringing the average price to R3,550/m³ (226.86¢/USG) from around R3.720/m³ (237.73¢/USG). Foreign diesel prices had been trending lower than Petrobras' prices for more than a month prior to the announcement. The competitiveness of imported diesel led some retailers to delay the withdrawal of fuel contracted with Petrobras, even at the cost of paying penalties. Petrobras' price reduction made the company's diesel more attractive on the domestic market, but the scenario was short-lived. Within about 24 hours, on 2 April, Trump unveiled so-called "reciprocal tariffs" on products imported from practically all US trading partners, triggering a strong global reaction, and setting the stage for a showdown with China. Investors' concern about recessionary risks clobbered prices for a wide range of commodities traded on the world's stock exchanges. Nymex ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) futures fell more than 10pc between 2-8 April, to a near four-year low. The volatility of the international markets has caused a turnaround in diesel prices on the Brazilian market. The heightened uncertainty led some participants to adopt a more cautious stance, waiting for prices to settle before making firmer decisions. "We are planning imports where we need to cover supply needs, without lengthening our position," said one trader. Between 2-8 April, the price indicator for ex-port land terminal diesel traded on the spot market at Santos, Paranagua, Suape and Itaqui ports fell in relation to Petrobras' basis by R140/m³, R230/m³, R102.5/m³ and R160/m³, respectively. The move followed international volatility caused by trade conflicts, as imported diesel responds to nearly 20pc of all the Brazilian domestic supply. The escalation of trade conflicts led to an interruption in talks between importers and suppliers last week, when both sides took the opportunity to assess the impact of developments on the fuel sector. Around 1.6mn m³ of imported diesel is expected to land in Brazil in April, according to data from shipping agencies and energy analytics firm Vortexa. If realized, the volume would represent a 33pc increase over the same period of 2024. To traders, the surging volume of product available on the domestic market and the wide variation in daily prices between different locations could offer good trading opportunities for importers. The Petrobras factor Market participants are also monitoring Petrobras' behavior in this new context. The price cut at the company's refineries and the subsequent reopening of arbitrage for imports has reinforced the perception that further price cuts are on the company's radar. Deeper cuts would be welcomed by Brazil's federal government, which is locked in a fight against creeping inflation. Rising prices are being blamed for the slipping popularity of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Diesel has a small influence on the extended national consumer price index IPCA portfolio, at around 0.24pc, but the view is that the fossil fuel has a significant indirect impact on the formation of food prices, which account for 21.87pc of the index. Despite favorable arbitrage for imported product in March, part of the market was surprised by Petrobras' latest price cut. There is a perception among traders that the predictability of the company's decisions has diminished. The company's management has indicated that it will not act while uncertainty in global markets persists. By Marcos Mortari Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EIA lowers summer gasoline price forecast


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

EIA lowers summer gasoline price forecast

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) lowered its gasoline price forecast for the summer driving season because of low crude prices. US retail gasoline prices will average about $3.10/USG from April to September, the lowest inflation-adjusted summer average price since 2020, the agency said in its in its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO). The forecast is about 20¢/USG lower than EIA's previous forecast. The agency expects gasoline prices to average near $3.20/USG in the summer of 2026 as a continuing decline in crude prices is offset by refinery closures and lower gasoline inventories. LyondellBasell recently shut all units at its 264,000 b/d Houston, Texas, refinery and Phillips 66 is planning to shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery by October. US summer gasoline prices reached a decade high of $4.67/USG in 2022, decreasing in subsequent years, the EIA said. The agency delayed the release of the STEO by two days to consider significant changes in markets after the US announced sweeping import tariffs against major trading partners. Crude prices have dropped sharply since the 2 April tariff announcement, even as US president Donald Trump paused the more punitive tariffs for 90 days on Wednesday. Amid the tariffs, a core group of eight Opec+ crude producers in a surprise move last week sped up plans to gradually unwind some 2.2mn b/d of production cuts, adding downward pressure to crude prices. The NYMEX front-month WTI crude contract was trading near $59/bl at 12:30pm ET on Thursday, down by more than $12/bl since the 2 April tariff announcement. The modeling and analysis for the STEO was completed on 7 April. More recent policy changes are not incorporated, the EIA said. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EIA slashes WTI outlook by $7/bl on trade uncertainty


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

EIA slashes WTI outlook by $7/bl on trade uncertainty

Calgary, 10 April (Argus) — The US light sweet crude benchmark will be nearly $7/bl lower this year than previously expected, with an ongoing trade war stifling global demand by nearly 500,000 b/d, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said today. WTI at Cushing, Oklahoma, is expected to average $63.88/bl in 2025, the agency said in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), lower by $6.80/bl from its March forecast. It will fall further to $57.48/bl in 2026, or $7.49/bl lower from the prior STEO. Brent prices saw similar downward revisions and is now forecast at $67.68/bl in 2025 and $61.48/bl in 2026. The latest STEO was to be released on 8 April, but the EIA said it needed more time to rerun its models in light of last week's sweeping tariff action by US president Donald Trump and subsequent retaliation by China. The protectionist measures have led major banks to cut oil price forecasts amid growing concerns over a stagnating US economy. The EIA completed its analysis on 7 April meaning it did not incorporate the most recent developments, including Trump's 9 April pause on the highest levels of punitive tariffs against key US trading partners and an increase in Chinese tariffs . The latest forecast is "subject to significant uncertainty," said the EIA. Global consumption of oil and liquid fuels is now expected to average 103.64mn b/d in 2025, lower by 490,000 b/d from the previous forecast. Consumption in 2026 is forecast at 104.68mn b/d, lower by 620,000 b/d. Global production meanwhile was lowered by to 104.1mn b/d for 2025 and to 105.35mn b/d for 2026. These are lower from the prior forecast by 70,000 b/d and 43,000 b/d, respectively. In the US, domestic consumption is projected to average 20.38mn b/d in 2025, lower by 70,000 b/d compared to last month's STEO. Consumption was lowered for 2026 by 110,000 b/d at 20.49mn b/d. Domestic production will come in at 13.51mn b/d in 2025 and 13.56mn b/d in 2026, the EIA said. This is lower by 100,000 b/d and 200,000 b/d, respectively, compared to the March STEO. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US absence unlikely to derail IMO talks


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

US absence unlikely to derail IMO talks

London, 10 April (Argus) — The US delegation's absence from the 83rd International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting is unlikely to derail the outcome of discussions on a greenhouse gas (GHG) economic pricing mechanism, market participants told Argus . This comes after the US sent a statement to foreign embassies of countries partaking in the IMO GHG economic pricing mechanism talks, confirming the US' absence from the negotiations. The statement says: "President Trump has made it clear that the US will not accept any international environmental agreement that unduly or unfairly burdens the US or the interests of the American people," according to a document seen by Argus . It adds: "Should such a blatantly unfair measure go forward, our government will consider reciprocal measures so as to offset any fees charged to US ships and compensate the American people for any other economic harm from any adopted GHG emissions measures". The statement ends: "The US will engage with partners on energy and investment issues of common interest. We stand ready to work with you to advance our shared commitment to energy security and economic growth". "The US will not be engaging in negotiations at the IMO's 83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee. Consistent with President Trump's executive orders on international environmental agreements and on energy dominance, it is the administration's policy to put the interests of the US and the American people first in the development and negotiation of any international agreements", the US State Department told Argus . IMO member countries are voting this week on the economic pricing mechanism for marine GHG emissions, for which the structure is expected to be agreed by 11 April, according to IMO secretary-general Arsenio Dominguez. Even if the US does not engage in the GHG talks, it cannot unilaterally block decisions at the IMO, a spokesperson told Argus . Many of the GHG measures remain under discussion, with final approvals from the working group expected by 11 April. "The US doesn't have a huge share of the global ocean-going fleet, so their absence or opposition probably won't change the broader [IMO members] consensus", a Chile-based ship owner told Argus . US imposing "reciprocal" costs on foreign ships calling at US ports will almost certainly get passed on to [US] consumers, which could lead to higher prices for goods in the US, the owner said. If the measures are ratified by IMO member nations, US-flagged ships will probably not adhere to IMO's regulations when they call into ports of member countries, a Singapore-based shipbroker said. "We are not expecting any impacting on Asia-Pacific region yet, and it's subject to what is agreed at the MEPC and how levies are calculated," the shipbroker added. Despite not having veto power, the US remains the largest financial contributor to the UN, a Greece-based shipowner told Argus . If international shipbuilding credit lines begin to tighten under US influence, other countries may align with Washington's stance, it added. The IMO has 176 member countries. Greece, China and Japan account for the largest shares of the global ocean-going fleet. During the ongoing session, member states have approved interim guidance on the carriage of biofuel blends. The guidance allows conventional bunker ships certified for carriage of oil fuels under Marpol Annex I to transport blends of not more than 30pc by volume of biofuel , as long as all residues or tank washings are discharged ashore, unless the oil discharge monitoring equipment is approved for the biofuel blends being shipped. By Hussein Al-Khalisy, Madeleine Jenkins, Stefka Wechsler, Mahua Mitra, Natália Coelho, and Gabriel Tassi Lara Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more