Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Cop 27 unlikely to speed up maritime emissions cuts

  • Market: Emissions, Oil products
  • 14/09/22

The next UN Cop 27 climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, is unlikely to speed up the International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) decisions on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the shipping industry, just as Cop 26 pressure failed to do so last year.

The IMO's present strategy targets a 50pc reduction in overall GHG emissions by 2050 compared with 2008 levels, and a 70pc reduction in CO2 emissions over the same timeframe. Member countries are currently working towards revising the strategy by the middle of 2023. The Marshall Islands, which with Liberia and Panama have the three largest ship registries globally, does not expect Cop 27 discussions to directly affect the work of the 79th Marine Environment Protection Committee meeting in December. Liberia's Maritime Authority marine environmental protection director Daniel Tarr says he hopes that the discussions at Cop 27 will push the IMO to act, although he also cautions that the most progress he sees happening at December's IMO meeting is a non-binding agreement on a set of more ambitious targets.

Around 10,000 vessels are registered in Liberia and the Marshall Islands, with the latter a major tanker fleet registry. Flag states have responsibility for implementation and enforcement of maritime laws, which means they have to ensure ships under their registries are compliant with the IMO strategy. In the first days of Cop 26 last year, the Marshall Islands led the declaration on zero emission shipping by 2050, with the US and Denmark, and the support of Danish container ship firm Maersk. Other initiatives born during Cop 26 added to pressure on the IMO to revise its emission strategy before 2023. These include the Clydebank declaration for green shipping corridors, which sought to establish at least six zero-emission maritime routes between two or more ports by 2025, and the First Movers Coalition.

If at first you don't succeed

Although Cop 26 brought about ambitious goals for the shipping sector and despite the pressure to do more, IMO member countries have so far failed to agree to speed up the revision process, let alone the setting of new emissions targets. The Marshall Islands, with Kiribati and Solomon Islands submitted a resolution for the 77th IMO environmental committee meeting, which followed Cop 26, to commit to zero GHG emissions in shipping by 2050, but it failed to gain support. And in June, IMO's 78th committee meeting faltered in its attempts to update its emission targets and decide on mid to long-term measures to reduce emissions. Divisions emerged between states over the impact of more ambitious targets, with some states refusing outright to countenance a total phase-out of emissions by 2050. Decisions at the IMO need to be taken unanimously.

But the UN climate conference and some of its initiatives are continuing to influence the IMO debate. A World Shipping Council paper presents three suggestions to IMO members ahead of the December meeting. One of these suggestions is to build on existing initiatives and develop an IMO "green corridors programme", which would draw on Cop 26's Clydebank declaration. Partnerships between Rotterdam and Singapore, as well as Los Angeles and Shanghai, Canadian Great Lake ports, and European Baltic ports have been announced following the 2021 declaration, although none of these has committed to the 2025 target. The World Shipping Council also proposed reducing the number of steps in the GHG fuel standard goals — a mid-term measure proposed by a group of European countries in March that seeks to establish a measure of GHG intensity in marine fuels — and using a well-to-wake lifecycle assessment for benchmarking emissions.

By James Marriott


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
10/04/25

Tariff concerns drive US VLSFO to 4-year lows

Tariff concerns drive US VLSFO to 4-year lows

New York, 10 April (Argus) — Very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) monthly averages at four US ports have declined to their lowest levels since 2021, driven by uncertainty surrounding US tariffs. Houston and New Orleans VLSFO monthly averages dropped to $470/t and $491/t, respectively, so far in April. That is the lowest average for Houston since April 2021 and the lowest since February 2021 for New Orleans. New York and Philadelphia VLSFO averages are at $498/t and $510/t, respectively, the lowest since April 2021 for New York and May 2021 for Philadelphia. Bunker market participants have had mixed reactions to the price decline so far. According to one trader, some buyers have been trying to buy bunker fuel with delivery dates for one month from now, to lock in the lower prices, rather than one week out, which is typical when buying bunker fuel in the spot market. Another market contact said they have seen a mixture of elevated buying interest but also some buyers who will hold off waiting to see if prices continue to drop or if the volatility in prices ease as there have been large price swings within the same business day. "I have not seen anything this volatile since the start of the Russia vs Ukraine war," the trader said. Oil futures went up by almost 5pc on 9 April reversing losses from early that morning after US president Donald Trump paused higher punitive tariffs against key trading partners such as the EU and Japan and increased tariffs against China. The wild swing for intraday bunker prices on 9 April , which typically traces Brent crude, lowered market demand. By Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports: Correction


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports: Correction

Corrects description of options for avoiding feedstock tariffs in 12th paragraph. Story originally published 3 April. New York, 10 April (Argus) — New US tariffs on nearly all foreign products could deter further imports of beef tallow, a fast-rising biofuel feedstock and food ingredient that had until now largely evaded President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape global trade. Tallow was the most used feedstock for US biomass-based diesel production in January for the first month ever, with consumption by pound rising month to month despite sharp declines in actual biorefining and in use of competing feedstocks. The beef byproduct benefits from US policies, including a new federal tax credit known as "45Z", that offer greater subsidies to fuel derived from waste than fuel derived from first-generation crops. Much of that tallow is sourced domestically, but the US also imported more than 880,000t of tallow last year, up 29pc from just two years earlier. The majority of those imports last year came from Brazil, which until now has faced a small 0.43¢/kg (19.5¢/lb) tariff, and from Australia, which was exempt from any tallow-specific tariffs under a free trade agreement with US. But starting on 5 April, both countries will be subject to at least the new 10pc charge on foreign imports. There are some carveouts from tariffs for certain energy products, but animal fats are not included. Some other major suppliers — like Argentina, Uruguay, and New Zealand — will soon have new tariffs in place too, although tallow from Canada is for now unaffected because it is covered by the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Brazil tallow shipments to the US totaled around 300,000t in 2024, marking an all-time high, but tallow shipments during the fourth quarter of 2024 fell under the 2023 levels as uncertainty about future tax policy slowed buying interest. Feedstock demand in general in the US has remained muted to start this year because of poor biofuel production margins, and that has extended to global tallow flows. Tallow suppliers in Brazil for instance were already experiencing decreased interest from US producers before tariffs. Brazil tallow prices for export last closed at $1,080/t on 28 March, rising about 4pc year-to-date amid support from the 45Z guidance and aid from Brazil's growing biodiesel industry, which is paying a hefty premium for tallow compared to exports. While the large majority of Brazilian tallow exports end up in the US, Australian suppliers have more flexibility and could send more volume to Singapore instead if tariffs deter US buyers. Export prices out of Australia peaked this year at $1,185/t on 4 March but have since trended lower to last close at $1,050/t on 1 April. In general, market participants say international tallow suppliers would have to drop offers to keep trade flows intact. Other policy shifts affect flows Even as US farm groups clamored for more muscular foreign feedstock limits over much of the last year, tallow had until now largely dodged any significant restrictions. Recent US guidance around 45Z treats all tallow, whether produced in the US or shipped long distances to reach the US, the same. Other foreign feedstocks were treated more harshly, with the same guidance providing no pathway at all for road fuels from foreign used cooking oil and also pinning the carbon intensity of canola oil — largely from Canada — as generally too high to claim any subsidy. But tariffs on major suppliers of tallow to the US, and the threat of additional charges if countries retaliate, could give refiners pause. Demand could rise for domestic animal fats or alternatively for domestic vegetable oils that can also be refined into fuel, especially if retaliatory tariffs cut off global markets for US farm products like soybean oil. There is also risk if Republicans in the Trump administration or Congress reshape rules around 45Z to penalize foreign feedstocks. At the same time, a minimum 10pc charge for tallow outside North America is a more manageable price to pay compared to other feedstocks — including a far-greater collection of charges on Chinese used cooking oil. And if the US sets biofuel blend mandates as high as some oil and farm groups are pushing , strong demand could leave producers with little choice but to continue importing at least some feedstock from abroad to continue making fuel. Not all US renewable diesel producers will be equally impacted by tariffs either. Some tariffs are eligible for drawbacks, meaning that producers could potentially recover tariffs they paid on feedstocks for fuel that is ultimately exported. And multiple biofuel producers are located in foreign-trade zones, a US program that works similarly to the duty drawbacks, and have applied for permission to avoid some tariffs on imported feedstocks for fuel eventually shipped abroad. Jurisdictions like the EU and UK, where sustainable aviation fuel mandates took effect this year, are attractive destinations. And there is still strong demand from the US food sector, with edible tallow prices in Chicago up 18pc so far this year. Trump allies, including his top health official, have pushed tallow as an alternative to seed oils. By Cole Martin and Jamuna Gautam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Quebec stands by GHG program


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

Quebec stands by GHG program

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — Quebec legislators and government officials reaffirmed their support for the province's cap-and-trade program on Wednesday. The National Assembly of Quebec unanimously adopted a joint resolution expressing continued support for the provincial program, which was introduced by members from opposition parties Quebec Liberal Party, Québec solidaire, Parti québécois and Quebec environment minister Benoit Charette of the majority party Coalition avenir Québec. The resolution's passage came a day after US president Donald Trump issued an executive order taking aim at state climate policies as an "overreach" of their authority, specifically citing California's cap-and-trade program, which formed a joint market with the province in 2013. While Trump's order cast a wide net over potential areas the administration intends to scrutinize, a familiar theme from his previous term did appear around state climate policies interacting with international relations. "These state laws and policies try to dictate interstate and international disputes over air, water, and natural resources," Trump said. While Quebec's Ministry of Environment declined to comment on the order, the province's link with California's program was an area of contention between the state and the first Trump administration. The Trump administration in October 2019 filed a lawsuit that sought to sever California's link on the grounds the state had unlawfully overstepped federal powers to negotiate independent foreign policy for greenhouse gas (GHG) regulation and was "inconsistent" with Trump's then-ongoing withdrawal from the Paris Agreement started in 2017. But the lawsuit ultimately failed following two separate rulings by the same federal judge in 2020, with a subsequent appeal by the Trump administration withdrawn after the election of former US president Joe Biden. Trump's new executive order roiled environmental markets on Wednesday, with California Carbon Allowances (CCAs) for December delivery trading as low as $22.51/metric tonne on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), before partially rebounding as participants expressed concern about potential federal action against the program. While state and government officials continue to evaluate the order, the office of California attorney general Rob Bonta (D) said the state's Department of Justice will use the "full force of the law and tools of this office to address the climate crisis head on." The California and Quebec programs aim for economy-wide reductions in GHG emissions, including from power plants, refineries and on-road fuel use. Both jurisdictions are seeking to increase the stringency of their respective programs to remain on course for statutory targets through a pair of rulemakings that may be implemented next year. The joint market, known as the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), is also evaluating linking with the Washington "cap-and-invest' program, which would make the state the first one to join California in the WCI, creating a larger North American carbon market. Quebec seeks to reduce GHG emissions by 37.5pc below 1990 levels by 2030, and achieve carbon neutrality in 2050. Provincial regulators are considering removing 17.5mn allowances from the program to speed emissions reductions, while tapering the use of carbon offset credits by 2030, among other changes. California requires a 40pc reduction from 1990 emission levels by the end of 2030, and net-zero in 2045. CARB is considering changing the 2030 target to 48pc. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil's diesel market eyes Trump and Petrobras


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

Brazil's diesel market eyes Trump and Petrobras

Sao Paulo, 10 April (Argus) — Tensions surrounding whiplash changes in trade policies favored by US president Donald Trump have created favorable conditions for foreign diesel imports into Brazil, just days after state-controlled Petrobras cut its refinery gate diesel prices. On 1 April, Petrobras cut wholesale diesel prices by 4.6pc, bringing the average price to R3,550/m³ (226.86¢/USG) from around R3.720/m³ (237.73¢/USG). Foreign diesel prices had been trending lower than Petrobras' prices for more than a month prior to the announcement. The competitiveness of imported diesel led some retailers to delay the withdrawal of fuel contracted with Petrobras, even at the cost of paying penalties. Petrobras' price reduction made the company's diesel more attractive on the domestic market, but the scenario was short-lived. Within about 24 hours, on 2 April, Trump unveiled so-called "reciprocal tariffs" on products imported from practically all US trading partners, triggering a strong global reaction, and setting the stage for a showdown with China. Investors' concern about recessionary risks clobbered prices for a wide range of commodities traded on the world's stock exchanges. Nymex ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) futures fell more than 10pc between 2-8 April, to a near four-year low. The volatility of the international markets has caused a turnaround in diesel prices on the Brazilian market. The heightened uncertainty led some participants to adopt a more cautious stance, waiting for prices to settle before making firmer decisions. "We are planning imports where we need to cover supply needs, without lengthening our position," said one trader. Between 2-8 April, the price indicator for ex-port land terminal diesel traded on the spot market at Santos, Paranagua, Suape and Itaqui ports fell in relation to Petrobras' basis by R140/m³, R230/m³, R102.5/m³ and R160/m³, respectively. The move followed international volatility caused by trade conflicts, as imported diesel responds to nearly 20pc of all the Brazilian domestic supply. The escalation of trade conflicts led to an interruption in talks between importers and suppliers last week, when both sides took the opportunity to assess the impact of developments on the fuel sector. Around 1.6mn m³ of imported diesel is expected to land in Brazil in April, according to data from shipping agencies and energy analytics firm Vortexa. If realized, the volume would represent a 33pc increase over the same period of 2024. To traders, the surging volume of product available on the domestic market and the wide variation in daily prices between different locations could offer good trading opportunities for importers. The Petrobras factor Market participants are also monitoring Petrobras' behavior in this new context. The price cut at the company's refineries and the subsequent reopening of arbitrage for imports has reinforced the perception that further price cuts are on the company's radar. Deeper cuts would be welcomed by Brazil's federal government, which is locked in a fight against creeping inflation. Rising prices are being blamed for the slipping popularity of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Diesel has a small influence on the extended national consumer price index IPCA portfolio, at around 0.24pc, but the view is that the fossil fuel has a significant indirect impact on the formation of food prices, which account for 21.87pc of the index. Despite favorable arbitrage for imported product in March, part of the market was surprised by Petrobras' latest price cut. There is a perception among traders that the predictability of the company's decisions has diminished. The company's management has indicated that it will not act while uncertainty in global markets persists. By Marcos Mortari Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EIA lowers summer gasoline price forecast


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

EIA lowers summer gasoline price forecast

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) lowered its gasoline price forecast for the summer driving season because of low crude prices. US retail gasoline prices will average about $3.10/USG from April to September, the lowest inflation-adjusted summer average price since 2020, the agency said in its in its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO). The forecast is about 20¢/USG lower than EIA's previous forecast. The agency expects gasoline prices to average near $3.20/USG in the summer of 2026 as a continuing decline in crude prices is offset by refinery closures and lower gasoline inventories. LyondellBasell recently shut all units at its 264,000 b/d Houston, Texas, refinery and Phillips 66 is planning to shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery by October. US summer gasoline prices reached a decade high of $4.67/USG in 2022, decreasing in subsequent years, the EIA said. The agency delayed the release of the STEO by two days to consider significant changes in markets after the US announced sweeping import tariffs against major trading partners. Crude prices have dropped sharply since the 2 April tariff announcement, even as US president Donald Trump paused the more punitive tariffs for 90 days on Wednesday. Amid the tariffs, a core group of eight Opec+ crude producers in a surprise move last week sped up plans to gradually unwind some 2.2mn b/d of production cuts, adding downward pressure to crude prices. The NYMEX front-month WTI crude contract was trading near $59/bl at 12:30pm ET on Thursday, down by more than $12/bl since the 2 April tariff announcement. The modeling and analysis for the STEO was completed on 7 April. More recent policy changes are not incorporated, the EIA said. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more