US oil sector seeks flexibility on methane fee
The oil and gas sector is pressing President Joe Biden's administration to provide exceptions and flexibility on a first-time federal fee on methane waste that will begin to apply in 2024.
Large oil and gas facilities on 1 January 2024 will begin paying $900 for each metric tonne (t) of methane emitted above a minimum emissions intensity, under part of the Inflation Reduction Act that will start to impose a penalty on leaks of the greenhouse gas. The fee will be $1,200/t in 2025 and rise to $1,500/t in all subsequent years.
But it will fall to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to figure out exactly how to collect the "waste emission charge" through regulations it aims to propose by March. Oil industry officials ahead of that have raised questions into how the charge will work, while asking for changes such as not imposing a charge on methane that escapes unburned from flares.
The Inflation Reduction Act bases the methane charge off "Subpart W" emissions data that oil and gas facilities emitting at least 25,000 t/yr of greenhouse gasses have been required to report to EPA for the last decade. The nearly 2,400 oil and gas facilities covered by the program in 2021 collectively estimated releasing 2.8mn t of methane that year, according to federal data.
But rather than putting a fee on all methane emissions, the law carves out an exception for methane emissions equivalent to up to 0.2pc of natural gas "sent to sale" from each facility, alongside with a different exception for oil wells. The natural gas sales threshold has puzzled industry officials, who see a mismatch between the $900/t weight-based fee and how producers structure gas sales.
"Natural gas is sold by volume," the Independent Petroleum Association of America wrote to EPA this month. "To calculate the mass requires a density volume but it is not routinely determined."
Oil industry officials say EPA needs to provide clear guidance on how to calculate the emission thresholds — including any potential calculations on converting volume to weight — because they say ambiguity could be grounds for potential fines and audits by federal officials.
Experts say EPA may have difficulty coming up with a legally defensible way to calculate what qualifies for the fee exception, since the composition and density of natural gas can vary at different wells, and can even change throughout the day. A court reviewing EPA's rules might eventually find "it's a violation of some form of due process to pass a law that no one can comply with," said BakerHostetler attorney Poe Leggette, who has represented the oil industry in past litigation.
Other industry groups are seeking to change which emissions should count toward the methane fee. The American Petroleum Institute, in comments sent last week, asked EPA to revise Subpart W to omit methane released from incomplete combustion, which it says should not be considered waste. The American Exploration and Production Council asked EPA to develop an emissions threshold that accounts for wells with "varying combinations of natural gas and oil," rather calculating the threshold based either on natural gas sales or oil sales.
Environmental groups are pushing EPA to write rules to crack down on what they see as chronic under-reporting of greenhouse gas emissions by the oil industry. The Clean Air Task Force, in comments filed this month, said some operators are claiming high flaring combustion efficiency that is "clearly not possible," while others are reporting very low emissions from pneumatic controllers that leak constantly by claiming the equipment is only technically "operating" for 1pc of the year.
Oil companies have the potential to reduce or eliminate future methane fees if they cut their emissions below the 0.2pc threshold, a step some producers are taking. ExxonMobil said today it had eliminated all "routine" flaring in the Permian basin, and also reduced non-routine flaring, as part of company goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Related news posts
TotalEnergies agrees to sell stake in Nigeria SPDC JV
TotalEnergies agrees to sell stake in Nigeria SPDC JV
London, 17 July (Argus) — TotalEnergies has agreed to sell its 10pc stake in Nigeria's SPDC onshore oil and gas joint venture to Africa-focused independent Chappal Energies for $860mn. Other partners in the SPDC joint venture comprise operator Shell with a 30pc interest, state-owned NNPC with 55pc and Italy's Eni with 5pc. Shell agreed to sell its stake in the joint venture to a consortium of five companies for up to $2.4bn in January. That deal remains subject to a due diligence process by regulators. The joint venture's assets include around 50 producing oil and gas fields across 18 licences. TotalEnergies will transfer its 10pc interest and all its rights and obligations in 15 of the licences to Chappal. These licences mainly produce oil and netted TotalEnergies around 14,000 b/d of oil equivalent last year. The other three licences — OML 23, OML 28 and OML 77 — mainly produce gas and account for 40pc of supply to the Nigeria LNG (NLNG) joint venture, in which TotalEnergies has a 15pc stake. TotalEnergies will also transfer its 10pc stake in these licences to Chappal but it will retain "full economic interest" in them, it said. The divestment "allows us to focus our onshore Nigeria presence solely on the integrated gas value chain and is designed to ensure the continuity of feed gas supply to Nigeria LNG in the future", said TotalEnergies' exploration and production president Nicolas Terraz. Chappal specialises in taking over and operating mature fields. It agreed a deal in November last year to acquire Norwegian firm Equinor's stake in Nigeria's OML 128 block, a transaction that was finally approved earlier this month . The company said last month that it is contemplating issuing a bond to raise up to $450mn to help it finance acquisitions. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
China’s CNOOC gets record gas results from Bohai well
China’s CNOOC gets record gas results from Bohai well
Singapore, 17 July (Argus) — Chinese state-controlled oil firm CNOOC has achieved what it described as record gas production results from a test well at its Longkou 7-1 (LK7-1) oil and gas field in the eastern region of China's Bohai Sea. The LK7-1-1 exploration well could produce almost 1mn m³/d of natural gas and about 210m³/d (1,320 b/d) of crude oil, the company said on 15 July. The former set a record for natural gas tested productivity in the Bohai Sea, according to CNOOC. China produced 123.6bn m³ of natural gas in January-June, up by 6pc from a year earlier, according to the National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS). The country produced 4.15mn b/d of crude in 2023, NBS data showed. The potential output adds to CNOOC's reserves and production in the Bohai Sea, which stood at 1.97mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) and 599,847 boe/d as of the end of 2023, according to CNOOC. The region represents 29pc of the company's total reserves and approximately 32pc of its production. CNOOC, along with other state-controlled firms like PetroChina and Sinopec, dominates China's domestic oil and gas production. CNOOC has also separately started production at an oilfield offshore China. The Wushi 23-5 oilfield development project — located in the Beibu Gulf of the South China Sea — is expected to produce light crude, and achieve peak production of 18,100 boe/d in 2026. "The project will realise full-process recovery and utilisation of the associated gas through integrated natural gas treatment," the company said on 1 July. CNOOC in November 2023 started production at its Bozhong 19-6 condensate gas field in the Bohai bay. The gas field is currently producing an estimated 37,500 boe/d, exceeding an initial expectation of peak production of about 37,000 boe/d, the company said on 11 July. CNOOC in March 2023 discovered the Bozhong 26-6 field with over 100mn t of oil equivalent reserves, also in the Bohai Sea. By Joey Chan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New Zealand, Australia carbon brokerage rivalry builds
New Zealand, Australia carbon brokerage rivalry builds
Sydney, 17 July (Argus) — Commodities broker Marex announced today it opened an office in New Zealand and launched a new carbon trading platform for local emissions units, days after New Zealand competitor Jarden rolled out its own trading platform in Australia. Marex will initially focus on execution and clearing services across carbon, electricity and dairy sectors in New Zealand, in both listed and over-the-counter products. Its New Zealand-based and global clients will also be able to trade New Zealand emissions units (NZUs) in a newly launched platform called Neon Carbon. New Zealand clients will have access to clearing directly through Marex on the Singapore Exchange and Australian Securities Exchange, with the latter planning to soon launch physically settled futures contracts for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs), large-scale generation certificates (LGCs) and NZUs . The new Marex team will be led by Nigel Brunel, formerly Jarden's head of commodities in New Zealand. Jarden is considered to have the biggest share of the brokered NZU market through its CommTrade spot trading platform, followed by domestic trading platforms CarbonMatch and emsTradepoint, which is operated by state-owned electricity transmission system operator Transpower New Zealand's Energy Market Services. CommTrade expansion Marex has hired several other former Jarden brokers in recent months in New Zealand and Australia, as it looks to expand its environmental products business across Asia-Pacific . But the increasing brokerage competition in Australia with growing trading volumes for ACCUs in recent years prompted Jarden to roll out CommTrade in the Australian market. Jarden's clients in Australia had until now only a price display mechanism for ACCUs. But they are now able to directly input bids and offers through CommTrade, with real-time matching capabilities displayed on screen. "Transactions remain anonymous until matched, after which clients receive a contract note from Jarden detailing settlement terms," Jarden announced late last week. All transactions are settled directly through the company, with clients also able to trade other products such as LGCs. Marex told Argus it would not be able to share any product details on Neon Carbon at this stage. UK-based broker Icap entered the New Zealand carbon trading market earlier this year with the acquisition of domestic brokerage firm Aotearoa Energy, while several other brokers have entered the ACCU market in recent years. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Tanker owner denies Houthi attack in Med
Tanker owner denies Houthi attack in Med
London, 16 July (Argus) — The owner of a tanker reported attacked today in the Mediterranean Sea has said there was no such incident. Petronav Ship Management said its tanker, Olvia , was not targeted as claimed by Yemen's Houthi militants. An attack in the Mediterranean would be a big step outside the Houthi's region of operations, which is limited to the area in and around the Bab el-Mandeb strait at the southern end of the Red Sea. The Houthis claimed two other attacks today in the Red Sea, on crude tanker Chios Lion and oil product tanker Bentley I . By Ben Winkley and Bob Wigin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
![Generic Hero Banner](/_next/image?url=%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fproject%2Fargusmedia%2Fmainsite%2Fimages%2F14-generic-hero-banners%2Fherobanner_1600x530_generic-c.jpg%3Fh%3D530%26iar%3D0%26w%3D1600%26rev%3D8ec86dce0f724687bd325a9a917cffae%26hash%3D9FD39B08C9D84A160C91A3649C40A186&w=3840&q=75)
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more