Japan to fund seven projects to advance CCS strategy

Market: Emissions, Hydrogen
13/06/23

Japan's state-owned energy agency Jogmec has selected seven potential carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects for its financial support, aiming to accelerate the development and utilisation of the technology to drive the country's decarbonisation.

The cross-industry winners of the seven projects, comprising five domestic and two overseas projects, are to begin test drilling from the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year and confirm how much the projects will be able to store carbon dioxide (CO2). They are likely to make a final investment decision in 2026-27. Japan is aiming to start commercial CCS business from 2030-31 with its current CCS roadmap.

The seven projects, which aim to expand hub and cluster businesses and cut costs, are projected to store a combined 13mn t/yr of CO2. The projects include those that can store 1.5mn t/yr of CO2 in north Japan's Hokkaido's Tomakomai, 2mn t/yr in the Sea of Japan side of Tohoku, 1.5mn t/yr in Higashi-Niigata, 1mn t/yr in the Metropolitan area and 3mn t/yr in the Kyusyu region, along with 2mn t/yr offshore Malaysia and 2mn t/yr in an unspecified area of Australasia.

This is the government's first financial support for CCS. It is still unclear how much Jogmec will finance each project, depending on future negotiations with the winning consortiums. The trade and industry ministry (Meti) has allocated around ¥3.5bn ($25mn) in its 2023-24 initial budget to support advanced CCS projects through Jogmec.

Japan plans to achieve CO2 storage capacity of 6mn-12mn t/yr by 2030 so that the country can start its CCS business from 2030. Tokyo aims to store 120mn-240mn t/yr of CO2 by 2050, after adding the 6mn-12mn t/yr of capacity over 20 years from 2030. Meti has estimated the country could store around 70pc of 240mn t/yr of CO2 in 2050 through the domestic projects, if it could develop 20-25 areas, including the selected five domestic areas.

Japan would need to deploy CCS and carbon capture, utilisation and storage technology to offset CO2 emissions that cannot be removed in sectors such as power, refinery, steel, chemical, cement and paper production sites. Japan aims to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to 760mn t by 2030-31, down from 1.2mn t in 2019-20.

Jogmec last year expanded its funding coverage to CCS projects, as well as hydrogen and ammonia, to help reduce domestic firms' risk exposure.

By Motoko Hasegawa

Japan CCS projects selected by Jogmec
	Consortium	CO2 storage capacity (mn t)

Tomakomai	Japex, Hokkaido Electric Power, Idemitsu	1.5
Tokyo metropolitan	Inpex, Nippon Steel, Kanto Natural Gas Development	1.0
Sea of Japan, Tohoku	Itochu, Nippon Steel, Taiheiyo Cement, Inpex, MHI, Taisei	2.0
Higashi Niigata	Japex, Tohoku Electric Power, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Hokuetsu, NRI	1.5
Kyushu	Eneos, JX, J-Power	3.0
Offshore Malaysia	Mitsui	2.0
Australasia	Mitsubishi, Nippon Steel, ExxonMobil Asia Pacific	2.0
		Source: Jogmec

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

02/04/25

UK to sign remaining CfDs for first H2 round in May

Birmingham, 2 April (Argus) — The UK hopes to sign long-awaited subsidy contracts with the remaining projects from its first hydrogen allocation round (HAR1) in May, minister of state for the department of energy security and net zero, Sarah Jones, said. The UK will also "very shortly" unveil a shortlist of projects selected for subsidies of a larger second round (HAR2), Jones said at the Hydrogen UK conference in Birmingham today. But the announcement will hardly satisfy UK developers who have been expecting the shortlist any day since late 2024 . The missing list was the top talking point among delegates at the event. The UK has signed 15-year contracts-for-difference (CfDs) with four of the 11 renewable hydrogen projects selected in HAR1 , according to the latest information from the Low Carbon Contracts Company (LCCC), the government-backed counterparty. Finalising the rest of the CfDs is long-overdue in the eyes of many developers because the UK first announced its winners in December 2023. The process was delayed by the general election last summer and concerns around the Climate Change Levy (CCL) charged on electricity supply, among other issues. The new government took a step towards assuaging concerns about the CCL last week which might allow more projects to sign contracts. But HAR1 developers have warned that signing a CfD does not guarantee they will build projects straight away, since there is hardly any penalty for signing the subsidy deal. Some still need to finalise deals for power supply, construction contracts and financing, meaning it could still take time for signatories to take their final investment decisions. The UK will also update its hydrogen strategy later this year, Jones said. "New evidence has emerged on cost, demand and expected operating patterns, and our understanding has evolved with time," including on "how we can expect the hydrogen economy to develop over time," Jones said. The statements could indicate that the Labour government might amend the 10GW clean hydrogen production target set by the previous administration for 2030, according to one industry participant. The Conservative government's 10GW goal from 2022 had included a sub-target for 6GW electrolytic production capacity. The government will also reconsider the role of hydrogen in making steel in the UK, Jones said. The idea of using hydrogen for steel appeared to have little future in the UK under the previous government as concepts from the UK's steel plants had made no tangible progress . By Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

Lisbon, 2 April (Argus) — Allowing the use of credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement for compliance with the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) could provide flexibility for developing countries that lack the capacity to set up their own carbon pricing systems in response to the measure, delegates at a conference in Lisbon, Portugal, heard today. The CBAM regulation provides for a carbon price already paid on a product in its country of origin to be deducted from CBAM costs, providing an incentive for countries importing products covered by the measure to the EU to introduce equivalent carbon pricing systems. But developing countries often lack the capacity to enact such policies, the chief sustainability and innovation officer at ACT Group, Federico di Credico, told delegates, and allowing the use of Article 6 credits for compliance could provide an alternative. This could in one form take place implicitly, di Credico said, if CBAM liabilities are adjusted down in relation to pricing systems that themselves allow some compliance using Article 6 credits. An example of this is Singapore, where 5pc of the country's carbon tax can be offset through the purchase of Article 6 internationally traded mitigation outcomes (Itmos). A more direct inclusion of Article 6 credits for compliance could entail a calculation on a euro-for-euro basis, di Credico suggested, for example reducing a CBAM liability of €100 to €50 if the importer has purchased €50-worth of Article 6 credits. Using a tonne-for-tonne basis would not work because the CBAM is not volume based, he said. But the uncertainty surrounding Article 6 credits means that their inclusion would bring an added layer of complexity to the CBAM, Cedric de Meeus of cement producer Holcim said. Article 6 credits are not usable in the EU emissions trading system (ETS), which forms the reference price for the CBAM, he pointed out, while not all activities producing Article 6 credits would be equivalent to the deep decarbonisation being carried out by European industry. It remains unclear how the EU will take into account carbon prices in other jurisdictions for the purposes of the CBAM. The CBAM regulation includes the ability to credit a "carbon price… effectively paid in the country of origin" but does not define what falls within this term, and the implementing regulation that will provide further detail on the matter has not yet been tabled. Article 6 of the Paris deal provides for two carbon pricing mechanisms allowing countries to collaborate voluntarily to reduce their emissions. Article 6.2, which is already fully operational, produces Itmos through bilateral agreements on emissions reduction or removal projects, while Article 6.4 establishes the soon-to-be-implemented Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (Pacm), a UN-regulated global carbon crediting system. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

London, 2 April (Argus) — Public and corporate spending on energy research and development (R&D) is "trending upwards", with a focus on "low-emissions" technology, but venture capital investment in energy start-ups dropped last year, energy watchdog the IEA found. Government and corporate energy R&D spending increased to $50bn and over $160bn, respectively, in 2023 — the latest year for which full data are available, the IEA said. There are "early indications of continued growth in 2024", although the pace of growth has "slowed slightly" since 2022, it added. But "the momentum of investing in low-emissions energy technologies has been maintained", partly on the back of climate policy goals, the IEA noted. The share of "low-emissions" energy R&D spending has held at "roughly four-fifths of the global total" in recent years, the IEA said. It defines low-emissions energy as renewable power, grids and storage, energy efficiency, nuclear and "low-emissions fuels". Venture capital investments in energy start-ups totalled around $27bn in 2024, 23pc lower on the year, the IEA found. This reflects the "cyclical nature" of venture capital, as well as a drop in funding owed to inflation, but the trend "could have long-term negative impacts as innovators struggle to scale up high-potential technologies without access to affordable capital", the watchdog noted. The IEA also suggested that "the situation is compounded by uncertainties about political commitments to the climate policies that many start-ups depend on to drive demand". But venture capital financing rose in 2024 for start-ups focused on nuclear, synthetic fuels and carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS), it found. CCUS and "novel CDR" — carbon removal — technologies have drawn more venture capital funding in recent years, and sector R&D "is being spurred on by private capital mobilised by carbon credits", the IEA said. There are multiple ways to capture and store CO2, but many are at very early stages, while most funding goes towards just two approaches — direct air capture and bioenergy with CCS, its report found. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Senior figures in Australia's upstream gas sector have hit out at plans for intervention in the heavily regulated industry, as debate continues on how to best address domestic supply shortfalls later this decade. The federal Coalition in March announced National Gas Plan including a 50-100 PJ/yr (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) domestic reservation system aimed at forcing the three LNG exporters based in Queensland's Gladstone to direct more supply to the eastern states' market. But oversupplying the market to drive down prices would destroy the viability of smaller gas projects, Australian independent Beach Energy's chief executive Brett Woods said at a conference in Sydney on 1 April. The domestic-focused firm, which will export some LNG volumes via its Waitsia project in 2025, warns that such a move by the Peter Dutton-led opposition would reduce export incomes while harming Australia's international reputation. The volumes impacted by the policy could reach around 900,000-1.8mn t/yr. Expropriation of developed reserves is equivalent to breaking contracts with LNG buyers and with the foreign and local investors that the country needs for ongoing economic security, Woods said on 1 April. Domestic gas reservation systems put in place by the state governments of Western Australia (WA) and Queensland, designed to keep local markets well supplied, were "clearly supportable", Woods said, but only future supply should be subject to the regulations. LNG terminals, which represent about 70pc of eastern Australia's total gas consumption and shipped 24mn t in 2024 , should not be blamed for the failure of governments to expedite new supply and plan for Australia's gas future, head of Shell Australia Cecile Wake said in response to the Coalition's proposal. Shell's QGC business supplied 15pc of its volumes to the local grid, with the remainder shipped from its 8.5mn t/yr Queensland Curtis LNG project, Wake added. Canberra has moved to promote gas use as a transition fuel to firm renewable energy in line with its 2030 emissions reduction targets, but progress has been slow as reforming laws appear to be hampering development . The state governments, particularly in gas-poor Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), must recognise the need for locally-produced supply and streamline the approvals processes, especially environmental permits, executives said. But despite pleas for an end to years of interventionist policy — including the governing Labor party's measures to cap the price of domestic gas at A$12/GJ , Australia's fractured political environment and rising cost of living has sparked largely populist responses from its leaders. A so-called "hung" parliament is likely to result from the 3 May poll , with a variety of mainly left-leaning independents representing an anti-fossil fuel agenda expected to control the balance of power in Australia's parliament. LNG debate sharpens Debate on the causes of southern Australia's gas deficit has persisted, and the ironic outcome of underinvestment in gas supply could be LNG re-imports from Gladstone to NSW, Victoria and South Australia, making fracked coal-bed methane — liquefied in Queensland and regasified — a likely higher-emissions alternative to pipeline supply. Several developers are readying for this possibility , which is considered inevitable without action to increase supply in Victoria or NSW, increase winter storages or raise north-south pipeline capacity. Australian pipeline operator APA appears to have the most to lose out of the active firms in the gas sector. APA chief executive Adam Watson this week criticised plans for imports, because relying on LNG will set the price of domestic gas at a detrimental level, raise emissions and decrease reliability of supply, Watson said. The firm is planning to increase its eastern pipeline capacity by 25pc to bring new supplies from the Bass, Surat and Beetaloo basins to market. But investment certainty is needed or Australia will risk needing to subsidise coal-fired power for longer if sufficient gas is unavailable to back up wind and solar generators with peaking power, Watson said. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US oil, farm groups push EPA for steep biofuel mandate

01/04/25

News

01/04/25

US oil, farm groups push EPA for steep biofuel mandate

New York, 1 April (Argus) — The American Petroleum Institute and biofuel-supporting groups told Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials at a meeting today that the agency should sharply raise advanced biofuel blend mandates for 2026. The coalition told EPA that it supported a biomass-based diesel mandate next year of 5.25bn USG, up from 3.35bn USG this year, and a broader advanced biofuel mandate, including the cellulosic category, at 10bn Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits, up from 7.33bn RINs this year, according to three different groups that attended the meeting. Both mandates would be record highs for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program. Soybean oil futures and RIN credit prices have risen sharply over the past week on optimism that oil and biofuel interests were working to coordinate volume mandate requests for consideration by President Donald Trump's administration. The coalition is also pushing the agency to set a total conventional volume requirement at 25bn RINs, which would keep an implied mandate for corn ethanol flat at 15bn USG. Ethanol groups had previously eyed a mandate even higher, but limits on the amount of ethanol that can be blended into gasoline make much more-stringent requirements a tough sell to oil refiners. The coalition provided no specific request for the cellulosic biofuel subcategory, where most credit generation comes from biogas. Credits in that category are more expensive, but price concerns have been less potent recently given an EPA proposal to lower previously set cellulosic obligations, signaling that future volume requirements can be cut, too. EPA is aiming to finalize new RFS volume mandates by the end of the year if not earlier, people familiar with the administration's thinking have said. EPA officials signaled at the meeting they were working urgently on the rulemaking. "The agency is intent on getting the RFS program back on the statutory timeline for issuing renewable volume obligation rules," EPA said, declining to comment further on its plans for the rule. The RFS program requires oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. Under the program's unique nesting structure, credits from blending lower-carbon biofuels can be used to meet obligations for other program categories. One gallon of corn ethanol generates 1 RIN, but more energy-dense fuels earn more RIN credits per gallon. Some disagreements persist While groups at the meeting were aligned around high-level mandates, how administration officials and courts treat small refinery requests for exemptions from RFS requirements could undercut those targets. Groups present were broadly aligned on asking EPA not to grant widespread exemptions, though there is still disagreement in the industry about how best to account for exempted volumes when deciding requirements for other refiners. Groups present at the meeting today included the American Petroleum Institute and representatives of biofuel producers and crop feedstock suppliers. Some groups that previously engaged with the coalition's efforts to project unity to the Trump administration were not present. And some groups more historically skeptical of the RFS and more supportive of small refinery exemptions — including the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers — have not been closely involved. Fuel marketer groups notably did not attend the meeting after a representative sparred with others in the coalition at an American Petroleum Institute meeting last month. Some retail groups, including the National Association of Convenience Stores and the National Association of Truck Stop Operators, instead sent a letter to EPA today arguing that the groups pushing steep volumes are discounting potential headwinds to the sector from new tax credit policy. Some of the groups advocating for higher biofuel volumes have pointed to high production capacity and feedstock availability, but have preferred to ignore thornier issues like tax credits, lobbyists say. "An overly aggressive increase in advanced biofuel blending mandates under the RFS will be punitive for American consumers" without extending a long-running $1/USG tax credit for biomass-based diesel blenders, the retailers' letter said. That incentive expired last year and was replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act's "45Z" credit, which offers subsidies to producers instead of blenders and throttles benefits based on carbon intensity. Generally lower credit values for biomass-based diesel — coupled with the US government's delays setting final regulations on qualifying for the credit — have spurred a sharp drop in biofuel production to start the year. Without a blenders credit, the RFS volume mandates pushed by some groups could increase retail diesel prices by 30¢/USG, the fuel marketers estimate, a potential political headache for a president that ran on curbing consumer costs. Other biofuel groups say that extending the credit would be an uphill battle this year, with some lawmakers and lobbyists instead focused on legislatively tweaking the 45Z incentive's rules to benefit crop feedstocks instead of reverting wholesale to the prior tax policy. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more