Divisions continue to delay IMO GHG strategy
The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) began the 80th meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 80) in London today, with member states deeply divided on emissions.
The end of this week, 7 July, is the deadline for adoption of the IMO's revised greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy. Member states must agree on a timeline for reducing GHG emissions and the amount by which to reduce them from 2008 levels.
IMO secretary general Kitack Lim said these discussions had "reached the final stage" following five years of negotiations. Most members agree there should be a target for 2050, and intermediary ones for 2030 and 2040, but there is no coherence on implementation, leniency, nor if these targets should be met around or by these dates.
Australia professed disappointment in what it felt to be the inadequate targets being proposed, calling for full decarbonisation of the shipping industry by 2050 at the latest. This echoed comments from Pacific Islands states, such as Kiribas and the Marshall Islands, which insisted on maintaining the 1.5C temperature rise stipulated in the Paris Agreement. The Netherlands and Sweden pushed for a net zero target.
Others urged the need for practicality and the protection of the shipping industry. China and India painted more ambitious targets as attempts to restrain their economic growth. Brazil argued that developed countries — responsible historically for climate change — were seeking to raise funds, which they had promised to developing countries to support them, through IMO to avoid making reparations.
Venezuela and Argentina opposed decarbonisation and a maritime tax as unfairly burdening countries with distant markets and lower-value goods. They said the shipping industry is disproportionately targeted.
There was much discussion around the effects of any adopted measures on developing states, which are more vulnerable to climate change's consequences and have less funds to sustain a path to lower emissions. A common refrain during the meeting was "a fair, equitable and just transition."
Decisions taken at IMO levels are legally-binding for governments accepting the IMO's convention. The revision of the strategy could have far-reaching consequences for the shipping industry. The IMO's initial strategy on GHG emissions in 2018 set targets for the carbon intensity of shipping to decline by at least 40pc by 2030 and 70pc by 2050 compared with 2008 levels. Members also agreed to reduce overall GHG emissions by at least 50pc by 2050.
How far away is a consensus
Secretary general Lim was optimistic on consensus being reached by deadline, but lack of progress in intersessional meetings puts this into question. Lim said progress had been made in reaching a consensus for the GHG strategy during the intersessional working group (ISWG) last week, but in fact only guidelines on the lifecycle GHG intensity of marine fuels (LCA) were drafted.
Asked if a charge on CO2 emissions could be guaranteed, Lim said the MEPC draft had adopted it as part of its basket of measures, but that its modality had not been agree upon. But a report on the outcome of ISWG-GHG 14 and 15 said consensus could not be reached on economic measures, or on methodology for the impact assessment of the strategy on individual states.
A United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) report concluded that more needed to be done urgently by IMO to reach its decarbonisation targets. Any measure decided this week will have its implementation discussed, probably for a couple of years, and then a further two years would be necessary to put them into actions. There are limits to the IMO's ability to enforce any of its regulations. If a consensus is not found, the committee cannot call for a majority vote, only the member states can.
The GHG working group has not been released at time of publication.
Related news posts
Trump taps Vance as running mate for 2024
Trump taps Vance as running mate for 2024
Washington, 15 July (Argus) — Former president Donald Trump has selected US senator JD Vance (R-Ohio) as his vice presidential pick for his 2024 campaign, elevating a former venture capitalist and close ally to become his running mate in the election. Vance, 39, is best known for his bestselling memoir Hillbilly Elegy that documented his upbringing in Middletown, Ohio, and his Appalachian roots. In the run-up to the presidential elections in 2016, Vance said he was "a never Trump guy" and called Trump "reprehensible." But he has since become one of Trump's top supporters and adopted many of his policies on the economy and immigration. Vance voted against providing more military aid to Ukraine and pushed Europe to spend more on defense. Trump said he chose his running mate after "lengthy deliberation and thought," citing Vance's service in the military, his law degree and his business career, which included launching venture capital firm Narya in 2020. Vance will do "everything he can to help me MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN," Trump said today in a social media post. Like Trump, Vance has pushed to increase domestic oil and gas production and criticized government support for electric vehicles. President Joe Biden's energy policies have been "at war" with workers in states that are struggling because of the importance of low-cost energy to manufacturing, Vance said last month in an interview with Fox News. Trump made the announcement about Vance on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and just two days after surviving an assassination attempt during a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Earlier today, federal district court judge Aileen Cannon threw out a felony indictment that alleged Trump had mishandled classified government documents after leaving office. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Waning German products oversupply evens domestic prices
Waning German products oversupply evens domestic prices
Hamburg, 15 July (Argus) — Germany's recent refined products oversupply, particularly in the south, is waning because of higher demand and technical issues reducing availability. Price differences within the country are starting to level out. Availability of heating oil and road fuels at the Bayernoil consortium's 215,000 b/d Vohburg-Neustadt refinery in Bavaria is restricted. At least one of the refinery's stakeholders is restricting loadings of E5 and 98 Ron gasoline and will probably continue to do so until the end of July. Planned maintenance works on a reformer have reduced production. Diesel and heating oil availability for spot sale are also restricted. A unit outage is affecting the refinery's diesel throughput, and a damaged heating oil tank at Vohburg has restricted loading capabilities since June. Term contracts are unaffected. Demand has increased across the board because of lower domestic prices, after Ice gasoil futures dropped week-on-week. Traded heating oil volumes reported to Argus last week rose especially strongly, by 28pc, and fuel demand also went up. By Natalie Mueller Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Singapore LNG bunker sales post fresh highs in June
Singapore LNG bunker sales post fresh highs in June
Singapore, 15 July (Argus) — Demand for alternative marine fuels rose further in June at the port of Singapore, with LNG demand for bunkering touching fresh highs. Total bunker sales in June rose by 8.7pc from a year earlier to 4.27mn t, according to preliminary data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), lifted by a 2.7pc increase in vessel throughput in Singapore to around 10.11mn in June. But sales slipped by 11pc from a strong May. "It is [lower] LNG prices versus fuel oil prices, along with higher fuel demand, due to the longer passage through the Cape, [and] that is playing an important role," said a key Singapore-based LNG bunker supplier, referring to the increased demand from the rerouting of vessels because of attacks on shipping in the Red Sea region. Demand for bunkering LNG has increased this year, with Singapore recording 175,030t of LNG used to fuel ships in the first half of this year. This is more than a threefold increase from the same period last year when 36,900t of LNG was bunkered in Singapore. Demand for biofuel blends in the first half increased by 46.7pc versus the same period last year. January-June sales were 280,160t compared with 191,000t a year earlier. The blend of 76pc very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and 24pc used cooking oil methyl ester, also known as B24, has been the first choice of alternative fuel among shipowners in Singapore, partly because of its drop-in character. Increased enquiries emerged for B24 in Singapore since April-May this year, with short-term tenders going to key shipowners planning voyages to Europe. "There are customers taking more volumes in H2 2024. Volumes wise [for the year, this] might not see a huge increase [but we] will just see more customers," said an international trader. Consumption of conventional bunker fuels has remained largely steady in Singapore, with the exception of high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) where sales for June rose by 26pc compared with a year earlier to 1.56mn t. There was a 29pc increase for January-June this year against the 2023 equivalent. Firmer demand has continued for lower priced HSFO, particularly for vessel owners hoping to maximise the use of installed exhaust scrubber systems in handling alternative marine fuels. VLSFO consumption was down by 2pc in the first six months of 2024 versus the same period in 2023, with overall demand largely unchanged. Supplies have been higher in Singapore from this year's second quarter, which is expected to remain in the short term, said industry participants. Red Sea diversions Singapore has absorbed 40pc of the increased demand created by the Red Sea disruptions, data from the International Bunker Industry Association show. Demand in Singapore rose to 4.62mn t/month in this year's first quarter from 4.23mn t/month in 2023. Container terminals in Singapore were congested in the first half of the year because of Red Sea voyage rerouting. Container throughput at the city-state grew by 6.4pc from a year earlier in the first half of 2024 to 20.25mn 20ft equivalent units (TEUs) by June, according to the MPA. Singapore in May recorded a 7.7pc year-on-year increase to 16.9mn TEUs, said Singapore's transport minister Chee Hong Tat. Tonne-mile demand for tanker vessels is expected to grow this year. Greek crude tanker owner Okeanis Eco Tankers forecasts tonne-mile demand to grow by 5.6pc in 2024 and by a further 5.5pc in 2025. By Cassia Teo, Sean Zhuang and Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia's Climate Active program drives ACCU demand
Australia's Climate Active program drives ACCU demand
Sydney, 12 July (Argus) — The Australian federal government-backed Climate Active certification program continued to drive voluntary demand for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) last year, although future growth remains uncertain as the scheme will undergo a planned reform. Cancellations of ACCUs for Climate Active certification reached 592,837 units in 2022, down from an all-time high of 625,705 in 2021, according to estimated data that the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) recently disclosed to Argus . Figures for 2023 are not yet available, according to the department, but cancellations may have reached a new high between 650,000-700,000 units, according to Argus estimates ( see table ). Each ACCU represents 1t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) stored or avoided by a project. The Clean Energy Regulator (CER) said it does not have a dataset of ACCU cancellations for Climate Active certification, despite having disclosed figures in some of its quarterly carbon market reports in recent years. It mentioned late last year that the program accounted for around 0.5mn of a total 0.8mn cancelled for voluntary purposes in the first three quarters of 2023, and later reported total voluntary cancellations of 290,146 units in the fourth quarter alone. Voluntary cancellations reached nearly 1.1mn units in 2023 , a new record high. Certification under the Climate Active standards is awarded to businesses that measure, reduce and offset their carbon emissions to achieve carbon neutrality. More than 700 certifications have been provided to entities including large and small businesses, local governments, and non-profit organisations. But significant changes in climate science, business practices and international benchmarks since the program was established in 2010 prompted the federal Labor government to seek modifications aimed at driving a more ambitious voluntary climate action in Australia, following its separate reform of the compliance market's safeguard mechanism . The DCCEEW late last year launched a consultation with proposals to reform Climate Active, which would require more climate ambition from businesses seeking to be certified under the program. The use of carbon credits to offset emissions that have not been reduced by businesses would be tightened, with a requirement that all eligible international offset units meet a five-year rolling vintage rule, replacing the existing post-2012 vintage requirement. Other proposals include mandating a minimum level of gross emissions reductions and a minimum percentage of renewable electricity use. "The government is working through feedback on these proposals and will announce the consultation outcome later this year," a DCCEEW spokesperson told Argus . No expected changes in eligible offsets ACCUs have been representing a small share of the total offsets used for Climate Active certification at between 5.7-10.8pc in recent years, despite the estimated record high last year, according to DCCEEW estimates ( see table ). Organisations can currently use certified emissions reductions (CERs) and removal units (RMUs) under the program, as well as verified carbon units (VCUs) from the Verra registry and verified emissions reductions (VERs) from Gold Standard. The DCCEEW did not provide a breakdown of cancelled volumes per credit type. No minimum use of ACCUs and no changes to the list of eligible international units are expected in the near term, following advice from a review from Australia's Climate Change Authority (CCA) in 2022. But some market participants have been asking for the removal of CERs, which account for the "vast majority" of carbon offsets surrendered by Australian organisations, according to utility AGL. CERs are "outdated", utility Origin Energy said in its submission to the Climate Active consultation. "We consider it would be consistent with international carbon reduction mechanisms to introduce a clear end date to phase out the use of CERs from the program and ensure greater alignment with the more relevant Paris Agreement," Origin said. "This reform is considered an immediate priority, and of more urgent need than some of the other proposals in this consultation." Uncertainties over future demand More investor and activist pressure in recent years over the use of carbon offsets with perceived low levels of integrity have also been forcing companies to review not only their offset standards, but also claims of ‘carbon neutrality' and similar terms. One of the DCCEEW's proposals is to discontinue the use of ‘carbon neutral' to describe the certified claim and to choose a different description. "A lot of the voluntary demand for carbon offsets in Australia has traditionally come from Climate Active, but the landscape is indeed moving quickly and the concept of carbon neutrality is being replaced by net zero," said Guy Dickinson, chief executive of Australia-based carbon offset services provider BetaCarbon and head of carbon trading at sister company Clima. This should drive more price stratification between carbon removals and carbon avoidance credits, he noted. Telecommunications firm Telstra, one of the biggest companies in Australia, recently announced it will stop using carbon offsets to focus instead on reducing its direct emissions. It will no longer seek Climate Active certification as a result and will remove references that its plans are ‘carbon neutral' or ‘carbon offset'. This could prompt other businesses to follow suit, market participants said. Another source of uncertainty over future voluntary demand comes from a DCCEEWW proposal that abatement from all ACCUs used under Climate Active would count towards meeting Australia's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement. The use of ACCUs under the program have so far been treated as ‘additional' to Australia's emissions reduction target through accounting under the Kyoto Protocol. If the government goes ahead with such a proposal, this could disincentivise participation in Climate Active as organisations might consider this as "paying to help the government meet its targets through the voluntary action of businesses," utility EnergyAustralia warned in its submission. There has been increased interest in emerging and alternate standards to those acceptable under Climate Active, such as the American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve and Puro.Earth offsets, according to environmental marketplace Xpansiv's vice president of carbon and Australian energy, Peter Favretto. But Climate Active has reported positive growth in certified brands since its inception and will likely continue to create demand for offsets in the international voluntary market and the Australian ACCU market, he said. "With the upcoming mandatory climate reporting legislation in Australia , and a similar atmosphere in other global jurisdictions such as the US and the UK, there is a growing demand that could lead to further growth in Climate Active certifications," Favretto added. By Juan Weik ACCUs used for Climate Active certification units Year Volume Total voluntary ACCU use Climate Active % 2019 243,105 329,145 73.9 2020 417,405 605,499 68.9 2021 625,705 844,445 74.1 2022 592,837 855,081 69.3 2023 650,000-700,000* 1,090,575 60-64* DCCEEW, CER *Argus estimates Total offsets under Climate Active unit Year ACCUs Total offsets ACCUs % 2019 243,105 4,230,011 5.7 2020 417,405 6,857,628 6.1 2021 625,705 5,796,466 10.8 2022 592,837 7,472,711 7.9 DCCEEW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more