EU ETS in pricing ‘no man’s land’
The EU emissions trading system (ETS) is sitting in a period between traditional price signals from the power sector and expected future industrial sources of price direction, delegates at a conference in Florence, Italy, heard today.
The EU ETS is "right in the middle" of the transition phase from a power-centric to industrial-driven market, head of carbon markets at Spanish bank BBVA, Ingo Ramming, told the event, pointing to the fall in hedging of carbon allowances by the power sector as a result of renewable capacity buildout and reduced power demand in the current economic slowdown.
Improvements in the economy could see more forward hedging by industrials, Ramming said. Aviation and shipping — the other sectors covered by the EU ETS in which decarbonisation has so far been limited — could be further ahead on this if they had synchronised their carbon hedging with their fuel hedging, Ramming added.
But until industry steps in to fill the current gap, the EU ETS is "in no man's land", head of research at fund manager Andurand Capital, Mark Lewis, said.
"Carbon this year is a price taker, not a price maker," head of market research and analysis at environmental commodities trading firm Vertis, Stefan Feuchtinger, said. "Carbon doesn't matter to the carbon price."
But while Lewis sees this gap leaving space in the market open to the financial sector, attributing recent price direction and volatility to speculators, Feuchtinger believes there is still "significant" power hedging in the EU ETS, even if at much lower levels than in the past.
Feuchtinger expects the carbon market to continue to be priced by the utility sector until 2026-27, when there is no longer sufficient coal in the market to justify this and pricing shifts to the industrial side.
Where the carbon price will sit once it is set by industrials is "less straightforward", Feuchtinger said. Carbon capture and storage is key to this, he said, but depends on where it is based and which technology is used, requiring carbon prices in a range of €90-150/t of CO2 equivalent.
And while carbon prices sitting well below these levels mean less action is currently being taken to develop solutions for industrial decarbonisation, this time delay will lead to larger price spikes in the future, he said.
Related news posts
Biden touts climate legacy
Biden touts climate legacy
New York, 25 September (Argus) — US president Joe Biden made the case for his climate legacy on Tuesday, casting the Inflation Reduction Act as part of a "new economic playbook" and warning of environmental and economic repercussions if former president Donald Trump returns to the White House. The 2022 law, which included a raft of tax credits to subsidize clean energy technologies, was the "most significant climate law passed in the history of the world," Biden said in a speech at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum, an event on the sidelines of the UN general assembly and Climate Week NYC. The market for clean energy is "booming" because of the law, Biden said, pointing to investments made after its passage in battery technology, nuclear energy, hydrogen, and what the administration terms "climate-smart agriculture." Most of those benefits are flowing to Republican-led states, he noted. While analysts see some provisions in the law as less vulnerable than others, including tax credits for hydrogen and carbon capture popular among oil and gas companies, Republicans have said they want to repeal much of the law. Trump-era tax cuts are set to expire in 2025, teeing up a major legislative fight over tax policy next year regardless of which party controls the US Congress and the White House. Although Biden argued that his climate policies have already had substantial impacts, he also said that Trump could halt much of that progress. Manufacturing facilities and businesses that have started up because of the law's incentives would "shut down" if it was repealed, he said. The US shifting course on energy policy could also have spillover effects on other countries' climate ambitions, Biden said, pointing to his administration's support for language agreed to at last year's UN Cop 28 climate summit around transitioning away from fossil fuels. "If we didn't lead, who the hell leads? Who fills the vacuum without America leading?" he said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
New York, 24 September (Argus) — Brazil's carbon trading market will not be fully implemented in this decade, according to think tank Centro Brasil no Clima. The creation of the carbon market is a long process that starts with passing a law to create a carbon market. But environmental groups and others have criticized Brazil's carbon market bill that the lower house approved at the end of last year as too complex. The senate has yet to set a timeline to debate the lower house's proposal but is expected to make significant changes to the bill, meaning that it will need to return to the lower legislature for a final round of voting. Still, there is a growing expectation in the public and private sectors that the bill will pass ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate conference later this year. The think tank estimates that the implementation phase of the carbon market would take around 5-6 years under the current draft bill. The preparation and legal framework for the creation of the market may take from 1-2 years. Pilot testing and initial rollout of the carbon market would take around a year. The submission of monitoring plans and emissions reporting would also be completed within 1-2 years after the pilot testing. But there is no clarity on a deadline for the phase that involves testing of the market with a full allocation of carbon credits, said William Wills, technical director at the think tank. Only 25pc of the emissions produced in Brazil will be cover in the carbon market, he said. This includes emissions from energy, waste and industries, but the agriculture sector, which accounted for 27pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced in the country in 2022, will be excluded. Brazil's largest source of GHG emissions comes from land use change and forestry, accounting for 48pc of emissions in the same period. By Jacqueline Echevarria Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
New York, 24 September (Argus) — More companies registered support today for a US-backed carbon offsetting initiative that is hoping to steer funds toward the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors. The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA) — a project of the US State Department and two philanthropies, the Bezos Earth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation — said that 19 companies support the general idea of the initiative, that "high-integrity carbon credits" can support "an accelerated and just clean energy transition." As part of an announcement tied to Climate Week NYC, 14 companies, including some that had previously not registered interest, signed onto a letter saying they were committed to working with the ETA as the initiative advances. The letter notes, however, that the companies are not pledging any "obligation of funding" for the initiative, which has an unclear timeline for getting projects up-and-running. The ETA previously set plans for formally launch this past April but instead said then that it would spend this year "building" on a framework for projects released last year . The ETA is hoping to create a "jurisdictional-scale" carbon crediting standard, steering funds toward efforts such as accelerating the retirement of coal-fired power plants, building new renewable generation, and improving the electric grid in developing countries. The idea is that buyers would be able to finance offset projects with more tangible climate benefits, hopefully avoiding the reputational risks associated with much of the voluntary carbon market. Prices for some major nature-based carbon offsets have fallen over the past year, as concerns about their integrity have deterred prospective buyers . The initiative's goals for this year are working to build "a community of buyers and sellers," said Nat Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions think tank at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit on Monday. Chile, the Dominican Republic, and Nigeria have expressed interest in serving as ETA pilot countries, while the Philippines this year signed on as an observer country rather than as a direct participant. Ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate summit this year in Azerbaijan, the ETA wants to demonstrate the progress interested countries have been able to make and to collaborate with the World Bank on economic analysis and modeling to understand what future projects and investment plans might look like, Keohane said. Winrock International, which runs the American Carbon Registry, was tasked by the ETA last year with developing a standard and methodology for crediting emissions reductions. Keohane expects that to be out "next year," he said at the event. Winrock did not immediately respond to requests for comment for more clarity on its timeline. "There are also some other crediting standards coming out, and ETA will be evaluating those against the criteria that we put out in our framework last year," Keohane said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
New York, 24 September (Argus) — The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) is broadening its focus and plans to offer guidance around improving "market structure," the chair of the private sector initiative said this week. The group is "going to turn to market structure issues," bringing key players from the still relatively small voluntary carbon market together to examine what would be needed to supporter a larger, more liquid market, ICVCM chair Annette Nazareth said at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit, a Climate Week NYC side event. The council currently assesses carbon offset project types and carbon crediting programs, which has allowed for the sale this year of credits labeled as meeting the group's "core carbon principles" for project quality. The group has sought to standardize the largely unregulated market, potentially boosting trust among prospective corporate buyers that are worried about the reputational and legal risks of funding offset projects that might reduce emissions less than they claim. ICVCM said Nazareth was referring to previously announced "continuous improvement work programs," which involve studying issues that could feature in the next edition of the group's core carbon principles rulebook that is due for implementation in 2-3 years. Some of these study groups are underway, including ones on how to align projects with national climate commitments and strengthen requirements around the permanence of emissions reductions, while others are set to start later this year. Some topics Nazareth mentioned could make the market — which is largely an over-the-counter one today — less opaque for prospective buyers. She said there was interest in looking at encouraging price transparency and trade reporting, better integration of data, and addressing the fragmentation of carbon registries to allow for more "interoperability" and potentially encouraging a "meta-registry." Other topics on the ICVCM's agenda involve equity concerns, such as setting best practices around disclosing and sharing revenues with local communities and also making it easier for small developers to access funds for starting up projects. "Do we need to create databases on the performance of project developers? Would it help to have some sort of platform where lenders and project developers can find each other? There's a lot of interesting things that we could look at," Nazareth said. Proponents of more guidance, which has come over the last year from various private groups and from regulators like the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, hope that clearer standards will assuage doubts about the market and scale up investments in climate change mitigation projects. But there is still deep disagreement about the ultimate role of carbon offsets, which some environmental groups fear is deterring companies from reducing emissions within their own operations. The Science Based Targets Initiative, a private sector group that assesses corporate climate goals, said earlier this year that companies can meet its standards even if they use carbon credits to offset emissions from their supply chain, but the group later backtracked and said it was still debating the issue. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more