Queensland to review CCS after rejecting Glencore plan
Australia's Queensland state government will review the long-term suitability of carbon capture and storage (CCS) following the rejection of a demonstration project planned by commodities producer and trading firm Glencore.
Queensland's Department of Environment, Science and Innovation late last week rejected the environmental impact statement for Glencore's CTSCo Surat Basin CCS project, which aimed to demonstrate carbon capture from a coal-fired power station and the permanent storage of carbon dioxide. The project was unsuitable to proceed because of the potential impact on groundwater resources in the Great Artesian Basin, the department said.
"The department's final decision on the EIS acknowledges the importance of the Great Artesian Basin to multiple stakeholders and makes it clear that other carbon capture and storage projects will not be viable in the Great Artesian Basin," it added.
The aquifer is used for agriculture, irrigation and stock watering, with Glencore's proposal sparking strong criticism from farmers and local groups. The decision to reject the project was a step in the right direction but not enough, said Queensland Farmers' Federation chief executive Jo Sheppard.
"We know that there are currently two companies with exploration permits for CCS in the Great Artesian Basin and we know that other companies globally are looking at the basin as a cheap way to conduct CCS at an industrial scale to manage their emissions," Sheppard said. "In the absence of federal policy, the Queensland government can and must now take a leadership role and put regulations in place to protect the Queensland component of the Great Artesian Basin from further CCS bids."
The rejection meant the state government has now "effectively banned" CCS projects in Queensland, Glencore said.
"It's a missed opportunity for Queensland and sends mixed messages on emissions reduction to industry who are looking to invest in low-emission technologies, including CCS," the company noted. "It's now up to the Queensland government to explain how it's going to meet its ambitious emissions reduction targets in the absence of CCS technology for heavy industry."
The state government will assess the suitability of CCS in the state following the "logical conclusion" on the CTSCo project, Queensland premier Steven Miles said on 27 May. "Cabinet will now have a conversation about what we think the longer term and wider application of those concerns should be. That is whether CCS should be allowed and under what circumstances."
Queensland last month approved two separate laws setting renewable energy and emissions reduction targets over the next decade. It set net greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets of 30pc below 2005 levels by 2030, 75pc by 2035 and zero by 2050. The government will receive advice from an expert panel on the measures needed to reduce emissions. It will need to develop and publish sector plans by the end of 2025 with annual progress reports to Queensland's parliament.
Related news posts
Italy’s NECP eyes 11pc of power demand from nuclear
Italy’s NECP eyes 11pc of power demand from nuclear
London, 2 July (Argus) — Italy aims to generate at least 11pc of its power demand from nuclear energy by 2050 and could double that amount if necessary as part of efforts to meet its climate goals. In its new national energy and climate plan (NECP) sent to Brussels yesterday, Rome said its "conservative" scenario envisioned installing 8GW of nuclear power capacity using mainly small modular reactors but also fusion plants. Italy could build as much as 16GW of nuclear capacity depending on developments across the energy system, according to the document. The ‘with-nuclear' option would provide savings of around €17bn ($18.3bn) compared with not using it. It would also mean less gas consumption tied to carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. Italy banned nuclear power in a referendum in 1987 after the Chernobyl disaster, but the current right-wing government of Giorgia Meloni has voiced its support for the technology. Last year it set up the national platform for sustainable nuclear power to map out a timeline for a possible return to nuclear power. In confirmation of targets set last year , Rome said it aimed to install a total of 131GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030, compared to 58GW in 2021, with a view to meeting 63pc of power demand and 39.4pc of total energy consumption. Most of the new capacity will be solar photovoltaic (PV), with 79GW expected to be installed driven by new subsidies and easier permitting. Wind capacity is expected to contribute 28GW, with offshore wind providing just 2.1GW. The plan envisages the development of contracts for difference (CfDs) through auctions for larger plants, as well as a framework to boost power-purchasing agreements (PPAs). Italy's NECP also maps out the development of electricity grids and cross-border interconnections. "The long-term risk is that the tight renewables penetration targets and the CfD mechanism established by the EU to deliver incentives could lead to a negative impact on spot prices, currently driven in Italy by the price of natural gas and carbon allowances," Italian broker Equita said. The current final revision of Italy's NECP comes after a cross-sector and public consultation. It was submitted to the European Commission for approval on 1 July, a day after the deadline required by EU law. By Steven Jewkes and Timothy Santonastaso Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Countries draft trade deal to address climate change
Countries draft trade deal to address climate change
London, 2 July (Argus) — Trade ministers for Costa Rica, Iceland, New Zealand and Switzerland have finished negotiations on a trade deal focused on tackling climate change, pollution and loss of biodiversity. The deal — the agreement on climate change, trade and sustainability (ACCTS) — will include an "ambitious" list of environmental goods, with a definition and criteria for updates, the ministers said. The agreement will eliminate tariffs on more than 300 goods, including solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles and wood products. It will also outline conservation and sustainability commitments for the production of such items. The agreement will also "contribute a meaningful definition of fossil fuel subsidies to international efforts", the ministers said. On these, there will be "clear prohibitions and a limited set of exceptions to safeguard fundamental policy goals", the ministerial statement added. Pledges to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by various countries, including the G7 and G20 groups, are long-standing. But subsidies for fossil fuels remain widespread and totalled $7 trillion in 2022, according to the IMF. The legal review of the text must be completed before it is signed, ratified and implemented, the ministers said. Their ambition is for the ACCTS to be "a pathfinder agreement that will drive momentum" at the World Trade Organisation, they added. Norway participated in all 15 rounds of negotiations and hailed the "great progress" made. But the country needs more time to assess the agreement, Norwegian foreign minister Espen Barth Eide said. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Reformed Australia safeguard scheme faces uncertainties
Reformed Australia safeguard scheme faces uncertainties
Canberra, 2 July (Argus) — Australia's reformed safeguard mechanism triggered more decarbonisation efforts in its first year, but key uncertainties need to be clarified to unlock bigger investments, delegates heard at a Carbon Market Institute (CMI) symposium in Canberra on 1 July. Settings are clear until 2030 but uncertainties over a few major factors beyond that year have been causing hesitation and blocking investments, market experts said. The mechanism became a 'declining baseline-and-credit' emissions trading scheme (ETS) from 1 July 2023 after a reform by the Labor government , which set a emission reduction target of 43pc by 2030 from 2005 levels after taking office in mid-2022. Figures from the first year under the reformed scheme, between 1 July 2023-30 June 2024, will only be known after facilities surrender their units ahead of the 1 April 2025 compliance deadline . The Australian government still needs to define the design of the cost containment reserve , under which safeguard facilities may access Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) held by the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) at a fixed price that started at A$75 ($50) in the 2023-24 fiscal year to 30 June and will be increased with inflation plus 2pc/yr. "On a fundamental basis, [the reserve] shouldn't be required to be triggered before 2027-28, but we do need price signals to unlock a new wave of investments and capitalise a whole new suite of projects that are not already banked," climate solutions and brokerage firm Core Markets' chief executive Chris Halliwell told delegates on 1 July. Uncertainty over baseline decline rate Under the reformed mechanism, facilities that emit more than 100,000t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in a fiscal year face declining baselines and need to surrender ACCUs or upcoming safeguard mechanism credits if their onsite abatement activities were not enough to keep their emissions below thresholds. The rate of decline was set at 4.9pc/yr from 2021-22 to 2029-30 and will be set in five-year blocks from 2030-31 onwards, in line with future updates to Australia's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, with later rates to be defined by 1 July 2027. The government disclosed an indicative decline rate of 3.285pc/yr in the safeguard rules from 2030-31 to 2049-50, said Australian carbon advisory company RepuTex's head of research Bret Harper. But that would mean "a less ambitious" rate than the existing one, even as Australia might set a much more ambitious emissions reduction target by 2035, Harper added. Uncertainty for trade-exposed facilities There is significant uncertainty and risk for so-called trade-exposed baseline adjusted facilities, which are typically smaller industrial participants that face a high risk of carbon leakage. Such facilities can apply for a discounted decline rate as low as 1pc/yr, but several of them do not know whether they will qualify, climate risk and energy transition consultancy Energetics' head of emissions quant David Kazmirowicz told delegates. He mentioned the example of one client, Victoria-based glass manufacturer Oceania Glass, which is the sole producer of float glass products in Australia. "All their competition comes from overseas and they are, putting it mildly, up in arms that there was a domestic policy mechanism triggered without an equivalent for overseas imports," he said. "This facility is looking at existential impacts where, I think, big players in the resource industry are potentially not." Australia has been looking at the possibility of introducing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), with a second consultation paper to be published in the "near future", said Australian National University professor Frank Jotzo, who has been leading the carbon leakage review. The first round of consultation showed strong "support for the principle of a CBAM", he added. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia’s safeguard credit selling interest unclear
Australia’s safeguard credit selling interest unclear
Canberra, 2 July (Argus) — There is buying interest in Australia's upcoming safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs), but selling interest has been scant so far, delegates heard at a Carbon Market Institute (CMI) symposium in Canberra on 1 July. The Clean Energy Regulator (CER) will start to issue SMCs from 2025 onwards to safeguard facilities that report scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below their annual baselines, effectively introducing emissions allowances into the Australian carbon market. Each SMC will represent 1t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) below the baseline of a facility, which will have the option to either hold it for future use or sell it to facilities that exceeded their thresholds. Facilities that overstep their baselines are required to buy and surrender one Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) or SMC for each excess 1t of CO2e, and will be penalised if they fail to do so. This means companies in need of units will have interest in buying SMCs, but there are doubts about selling interest, market experts said. "We hear lots of our clients aiming to go out there and buy SMCs, but very few who are going to generate them are willing to sell because they see them as a mechanism for hedging future risk," said sustainability advisory firm Anthesis' climate resilience and decarbonisation lead, Thomas Hodgson. Facilities will be allowed to hold an unlimited number of SMCs until 2030. They will be able to use the credits for safeguard compliance at any point up to that year — irrespective of when the SMCs are issued — but the Australian government has pledged to review post-2030 banking arrangements in the scheduled review of the safeguard mechanism in 2026-27, according to CMI. Climate risk and energy transition consultancy Energetics has been working with 10 clients that account for a combined 15mn t/yr of CO2e in Australia. But most of them were not currently looking at the opportunity of receiving SMCs in the near future, Energetics' head of emissions quant David Kazmirowicz said, highlighting a potentially limited credit issuance. Actual SMC transactions are only expected to pick up once the CER issues the first units in early 2025, when there will be more visibility on issuance volumes as well as selling and buying appetite. These below-baseline credits will be "a certificate to watch", said the regulator's principal economist Georgina Prasad. There will be advantages in banking SMCs for future liability, but several facilities likely to receive the credits are not expected to have any liability in the next several years, according to Australian carbon advisory company RepuTex's head of research Bret Harper. "So this is probably a prime opportunity for them to test the market and see if they can monetise those credits," he pointed out. SMCs are expected to trade at a discount to ACCUs as their use will be restricted to safeguard facilities, excluding them from voluntary and non-federal compliance demand, according to market participants. Safeguard volumes accounted for 75pc of all the nearly 1.2mn ACCU cancellations in the first quarter of 2024, according to latest CER data. Generic ACCU prices have ranged between A$33.75-34.60 ($22.50-23.05) in recent weeks. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more