Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

India’s higher LNG regas rates receive customer flak

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 13/09/24

Indian LNG terminal developers led by state-run Petronet LNG and Shell are charging some of the highest rates among the world to regasify LNG, prompting consumers to complain, raising concerns over the government's plan to more than double the share of gas in the country's energy mix to 15pc by 2030.

Petronet is charging as much as Rs62.91/mn Btu ($0.75/mn Btu) to regasify the fuel received at the 17.5mn t/yr Dahej terminal on the west coast, the country's largest such facility, according to consumers using the import facility.

Coupled with the annual escalation in charges, the rates are "unsustainable in the longer-run," a person who did not wish to be identified said.

"Going by the 5pc increase in regas rates every year, by 2030, regas rates could become Rs84/mn Btu ($1/mn Btu), which is not justified," the source added. State-run Petronet has lifted regasification rates by 5pc in recent years.

"The 5pc hike in regas rates every year may eventually have to stop in the coming years before it reaches a dollar," an equity analyst at a foreign investment bank said.

Shell is also charging similar rates at its 5.2mn t/yr Hazira LNG import facility on the west coast at $0.75/mn Btu, industry sources said. Both Dahej and Hazira are well connected to consumption centres by pipelines and operate year-round, unlike many of India's other terminals which suffer from lack of a breakwater facility or weak pipeline connectivity.

Higher regas prices account for the lower usage levels in other terminals, because the country's overall LNG imports are lower than major importers like China or Japan, market participants say.

India's regasification rates are much higher compared to terminals in the Europe. The 9.2mn t/yr Gate terminal in Netherland charges around $0.35/mn Btu for unloading and regasification, while Spain is much lower. Regasification rates in Japan LNG terminals are around $0.5/mn Btu, while rates at terminals operated by Jera, like the 22.9mn t/yr Futtsu LNG facility, are much lower, according to market participants.

Regasification rates in China, however, are also higher, on a par with India as PipeChina's eight LNG terminals, including the largest 12mn t/yr Tianjin terminal in north China, and 6mn t/yr Dalian terminal in Liaoning. These are charging $0.7-1.3/mn Btu for unloading and regasification, sources say.

Regas rates across the world are mostly determined by market forces based on demand fundamentals compared with fixed prices charged by Indian terminal operators.

But record regasification rates have not stopped city gas utilities and industries from using Petronet and Shell's terminals to import the fuel, enabling Petronet to operate Dahej at around 109pc in April-June, a record for the facility, according to oil ministry data.

Hazira, which in the past has operated at over 80pc, operated at 46.5pc in the second quarter.

Capacity usage at LNG terminals in Europe, China and Japan are mostly in the range of 30-50pc, and the rest of India's five terminals with a combined 25mn tons a year in capacity operate at 20-40pc of that.

Judging by deliveries in January-July this year, India's LNG imports stood at 16mn t, compared to an annual installed import capacity of 47.7mn t.

Strategic location

Importers in the country have little option of switching to other facilities because of the strategic location of Dahej and Hazira, which are well connected by major pipelines to the country's western region — where consumption is strong.

The cost structure breakdown for a customer comes to $11.62/mn Btu at the Dahej terminal, which is calculated based on a delivered LNG price at $10/mn Btu, custom duty of 2.75pc at $0.275/mn Btu, regas price at $0.76/mn Btu, system used gas at $0.07/mn Btu and zone 1 pipeline tariff at $0.51.

Tariffs under zone 2 are $0.95/mn btu and zone 3 is at $1.27/mn Btu. The zone 1 tariff is application for pipelines defined as up to 300km from the terminal, followed by between 300-1,200km for zone 2 and zone 3 more than 1,200km.

Regulatory scrutiny

Weak capacity utilisation levels in India's LNG terminals have attracted the attention of India's Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB), as it issued a draft proposal for enhanced regulatory control earlier this year.

The draft regulations state the PNGRB must approve new facilities or capacity additions, review regasification fees and approve setting up pipeline infrastructure for regasified LNG.

Terminal operators are reluctant to share information with the regulator. Total Adani, operator of the 5mn t/yr Dhamra LNG terminal on the east coast, said "requirement to share commercially sensitive information" such as project costs, regasification tariffs and capacity allocation are "not consistent" with the PNGRB Act. "An authorisation regime for LNG terminals may indeed negatively impact healthy competition and create monopolistic behaviour by the existing terminals."

Each project would require a certification of registration by PNGRB, and may even face penalties if there are any start-up delays. Developers will also need to publicly disclose their regasification tariffs and other charges for transparency.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
07/05/25

IMO GHG pricing falls short on green methanol, ammonia

IMO GHG pricing falls short on green methanol, ammonia

New York, 7 May (Argus) — The International Maritime Organization's (IMO) proposed global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism might not drive significant uptake of green methanol and green ammonia by 2035, given current market prices. Despite introducing penalties on high-emission fuels use and tradable surplus credits for low-emission fuels, the mechanism does not sufficiently close the cost gap for green alternatives. Under the system, starting in 2028 ship operators will face a two-tier penalty: $100/t CO₂e for emissions between the base and direct GHG intensity limit, and $380/t CO₂e for those exceeding the looser base limit. These thresholds will tighten annually through 2035. Ship operators can earn tradable credits for overcompliance when their GHG emissions fall below the direct limit. Assuming a surplus CO₂e credit value of $72/t — mirroring April 2025's average EU emissions trading system price — green ammonia would earn about $215/t in surplus credits in 2028 (see chart) . This barely offsets its April spot price of $2,830/t VLSFO equivalent in northwest Europe. Bio-methanol would receive about $175/t in credits, offering minimal relief on its $2,318/t April spot price. Currently, unsubsidized northwest Europe bio-LNG sits mid-range among bunker fuel options under IMO's emissions framework. While more expensive than HSFO, grey LNG, and B30 bioblends, the bio-LNG is cheaper than B100 (pure used cooking oil methyl ester), green ammonia, and bio-methanol. To become cost-competitive with unsubsidized bio-LNG — priced at $1,185/t in April 2025 — green ammonia and bio-methanol prices would need to fall by 57pc and 49pc, respectively, to around $1,220/t VLSFOe and $1,180/t VLSFOe by 2028. Unless green fuel prices drop significantly or fossil fuel prices rise, the IMO's structure alone provides insufficient economic incentive to accelerate green ammonia and bio-methanol adoption at scale. By Stefka Wechsler NW Europe, fuel prices plus IMO penalties and credits Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen: Update


06/05/25
News
06/05/25

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen: Update

Updates with details throughout, including Houthi response. Washington, 6 May (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he will end the US military campaign against Yemen's Houthis, claiming that the militant group pledged to stop attacks on commercial ships passing through the Red Sea. The Houthis reached out with a request to stop the US bombing campaign, and the US will do so immediately, Trump told reporters at the beginning of his meeting with Canada's prime minister Mark Carney on Tuesday. "They don't want to fight anymore," Trump said. "They have capitulated ... And I will accept their word, and we are going to stop the bombing of the Houthis effective immediately." US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who also attended the meeting with Carney, added that if the Houthi attacks "are going to stop, then we can stop." Oman mediated a ceasefire agreement between the US and the Houthis, Oman's foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said in a social media post following Trump's remarks. "In the future, neither side will target the other, including American vessels, in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait, ensuring freedom of navigation and the smooth flow of international commercial shipping." It was not clear from Albusaidi's statement whether the Houthis committed to stop their attacks on all vessels passing near Yemen's coastline. The Houthis claimed in late 2023 that, out of solidarity with Gaza's Palestinian population, they would attack any ship that was owned by an Israeli company or made calls at an Israeli port. But the Houthi attacks were indiscriminate, effectively crippling the regular passage of oil, LNG and other commercial vessel traffic through Red Sea waterways. The militant group paused its attacks on commercial shipping following the ceasefire in Gaza in January, but resumed them in March, after Israel stopped allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza. The Houthis also launched attacks against Israel, drawing retaliatory strikes by the Israeli Air Force, and on US naval vessels in the Red Sea. There was no explicit confirmation of a ceasefire from Houthi-controlled information outlets. A Houthi spokesman reposted a social media post suggesting that "America stopped its aggression in Yemen" and that "the one who retreated is America." Another media channel used by the group said that "the Israeli and American aggression will not pass without a response and will not deter Yemen from continuing its position in support of Gaza". US president Donald Trump's administration listed its military campaign against Yemen-based Houthis, which began on 15 March, as a key foreign policy accomplishment in his first 100 days in office even though the militant group continued to launch missile and drone attacks — most recently on 4 May against Israel's main airport. Israel responded to the 4 May attack with air strikes on Yemen's port of Hodeidah and, today, on the main airport in Yemen's capital Sanaa. Israel also vowed to retaliate against Tehran, which is the main provider of weapons to the Houthis. The US separately warned Iran to discontinue its military support for the Yemeni militant group. The Trump administration is engaged in talks with Iran to address Tehran's nuclear program, with Iranian officials hoping to use the diplomatic negotiations to press for relief of oil and other sanctions against Iran. Trump said he will visit Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar next week and is widely expected to also visit Israel on the same trip. "Before then, we're going to have a very, very big announcement to make, like, as big as it gets, and I won't tell you on what," Trump said. "But it will be one of the most important announcements that have been made in many years about a certain subject, very important subject." By Haik Gugarats, Nader Itayim and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US onshore crude output likely peaked: Diamondback


06/05/25
News
06/05/25

US onshore crude output likely peaked: Diamondback

New York, 6 May (Argus) — US onshore crude production has likely peaked as activity slows in response to the recent decline in oil prices, according to Diamondback Energy. The leading US independent estimates that the US hydraulic fracturing crew count is already down 15pc this year, while the frack crew count in the Permian basin has fallen by about 20pc from its January peak. Moreover, the US oil rig count is expected to be almost 10pc lower by the end of the second quarter with further declines seen. "As a result of these activity cuts, it is likely that U.S. onshore oil production has peaked and will begin to decline this quarter," Diamondback's chief executive officer Travis Stice said in a letter to shareholders. Given the shale sector has matured from the rapid growth seen in the early days of the shale boom, "this is not one of the types of declines that can be offset by improved efficiencies," Stice later told analysts on a conference call. Diamondback Energy also set out plans to cut spending and drill and complete fewer wells in the aftermath of the price slump, which has been driven by the economic fall-out over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff policy, as well as the Opec+ group's plan to accelerate the return of barrels to the market. Capital spending is now seen at $3.4bn-$3.8bn this year, a decline of 10pc from the midpoint of previous expectations. The company will drop three rigs and one full-time completion crew in the second quarter, and expects to hold steady at those levels through most of the third quarter. If oil prices remain weak or fall further, Diamondback could reduce activity further. Or if prices rebound above $65, it could ramp activity back to previous levels. Under normal circumstances, it would use a period of lower service costs to build more drilled but uncompleted wells. But well casing, its biggest drilling input cost, has increased by 10pc in the last quarter due to steel tariffs. "To use a driving analogy, we are taking our foot off the accelerator as we approach a red light," said Stice. "If the light turns green before we get to the stoplight, we will hit the gas again, but we are also prepared to brake if needed." The impact on oil output is expected to be minimal given volumes have outperformed year to date. The company now sees annual oil production in a range of 480,000-495,000 b/d, down just 1pc from the midpoint of prior guidance. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen


06/05/25
News
06/05/25

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen

Washington, 6 May (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he will end the US military campaign against Yemen's Houthis, claiming that the militant group pledged to stop attacks on commercial ships passing through the Red Sea. The Houthis reached out with a request to stop the US bombing campaign, and the US will do so immediately, Trump told reporters at the beginning of his meeting with Canada's prime minister Mark Carney. "They don't want to fight anymore," Trump said. "We will honor that and we will stop the bombings. They have capitulated." There was no immediate statement by the Houthi group to confirm Trump's comment. US president Donald Trump's administration listed its military campaign against Yemen-based Houthis, which began on 15 March, as a key foreign policy accomplishment in his first 100 days in office even though the militant group continued to launch missile and drone attacks — most recently on 4 May against Israel's main airport. The Houthis resumed attacks on commercial shipping through Red Sea waterways in early March, after a self-declared ceasefire. They also launched attacks against Israel, drawing retaliatory strikes by the Israeli Air Force, and on US naval vessels in the Red Sea. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US EIA will not release international outlook in 2025


06/05/25
News
06/05/25

US EIA will not release international outlook in 2025

Washington, 6 May (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) no longer expects to publish one of its major energy reports this year after losing some of its staff through President Donald Trump's efforts to downsize the federal workforce. The EIA does not plan to publish its International Energy Outlook (IEA) — which models long-term global trends in energy supply and demand — this year because of a loss of staff responsible for producing the report, according to an internal email initially reported by the news outlet ProPublica . The EIA confirmed the authenticity of the email. "At this point, you can assume that we will not be releasing the IEO this year," the EIA's Office of Energy Analysis assistant administrator Angelina LaRose wrote in the 16 April email. "This was a difficult decision based on the loss of key resources." Oil and gas producers, traders, utility companies, federal regulators and foreign governments have come to rely on the data and models from the EIA, an independent agency within the US Department of Energy. The 2025 version of the IEO might still be published early next year, the EIA said. The agency for now is focusing on trying to "preserve as much institutional knowledge as possible" with an "all hands-on deck" effort under which remaining staff will document models and procedures on long-term modeling, LaRose wrote in the email. Trump and his administration have worked to cut the size of the government's workforce through voluntary buyouts and a process known as a reduction in force. The EIA has yet to say how many personnel it has lost, but about a third of the agency's 350 staffers have accepted voluntary buyouts, according to a person familiar with the situation. The White House last week proposed an 18pc budget cut for the non-nuclear portions of the Department of Energy, but has yet to say if it is seeking to cut spending at the EIA. Last month, the EIA released its premier report, the Annual Energy Outlook , but omitted its traditional in-depth analysis. A technical issue on 1 May delayed the release of a key natural gas storage report by more than three hours, the EIA said. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more