Latest market news

'No reason' for Cyprus gas monopoly: Cyfield

  • Market: Electricity, Natural gas
  • 16/10/24

There is "no reason" for the gas market monopoly given to state-owned Cygas to continue given sufficient private-sector interest in investing, the chief executive of construction and energy conglomerate Cyfield, George Chrysochos, has told Argus.

Cyprus gave Cygas the monopoly thinking that it was the only feasible way to cover the large cost of developing the Vasilikos LNG import terminal, but the government has since been "extremely slow and inefficient in completing the terminal", Chrysochos said. And since 2019, private investors — notably regional producer Energean — have shown increasing interest in Cyprus' gas market, "indicating that there is no reason for the monopoly to exist", he said, adding that a competitive liberalised market would reduce the price of gas imports and therefore also domestic electricity production.

The Vasilikos project is currently under investigation by national and European authorities on suspicion of procurement fraud, misappropriation of EU funds and corruption. The project's shared liability between disparate companies made it "impossible for many parties to show interest", Chrysochos said.

Completing the project is a priority for Cyprus and that can be done in one of two ways, he said. Either state-owned developer ETYFA could issue a new construction tender using EU and Cypriot funds, which could potentially be completed within a year, or ETYFA could "give the terminal as a concession" to a new operator that finances all remaining work, operates the facility and pays annual rights to Cygas, Chrysochos said.

The "ideal scenario" for bringing gas to Cyprus would be to build a pipeline directly to existing Israeli offshore fields, and if funding for a pipeline to Israel's Karish field were available, that would "definitely bring cheaper gas to Cyprus", he said. "All redundancies are welcome," he added. But with Vasilikos already 80pc complete and its floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) purchased, completing the terminal is the "most reasonable option", Chrysochos said.

Cyprus has made several large gas discoveries in its exclusive economic zone, but has been unable to develop them commercially. "Cyprus is a small market and cannot serve as a starting point that will make this extraction feasible," Chrysochos said, meaning that "the viability of the project depends 100pc on the sale of these quantities abroad." Because of this, the only "feasible way" for Cyprus to utilise its discoveries is to pipe the gas to Egypt, where it can be liquefied and then exported back to Cyprus or elsewhere, he said. Alternatively, a pipe could be built to bring gas directly to Cyprus from the Aphrodite field. The consortium developing Aphrodite submitted plans to pipe processed gas to Egypt in September, with similar plans for production at Cronos.

Cyfield subsidiary Power Energy Cyprus has been building a 260MW combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant, which had been intended to be fully operational by early 2025. The construction works are almost complete, but if delays to the Vasilikos terminal prove "significant", the firm might opt to modify the plant to run on diesel, which would require "significant" capital expenditure, Chrysochos said. In any case, Cyfield supports the government in completing Vasilikos and hopes that the CCGT will be operational with either gas or diesel in the next 12 months, he said. Considering the small size of the Cypriot market and that the Electricity Authority of Cyprus is building another power plant, Cyfield now plans to gradually shift its focus for the future to storage and renewables, he said.

The proposed 1GW Great Sea electricity interconnector with Greece, approved by the Cypriot council of ministers last month, poses a "greater threat" to local generation than it offers in terms of opportunities, Chrysochos said.

Because the scale of energy projects in Greece and Europe is much larger than in Cyprus, the levelised cost of energy is lower, so "it is almost impossible at this stage for Cyprus to export electricity to Europe", he said. The Great Sea line would probably make Cypriot generation redundant and would also be "extremely expensive for the Cypriot consumer, which means that any benefit from importing electricity from Greece will never outweigh the cost", he said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Lignite displaces gas in German power mix


15/10/24
News
15/10/24

Lignite displaces gas in German power mix

London, 15 October (Argus) — Rallying German gas prices have pushed a significant amount of gas-fired generation out of the country's power mix this month, opening space for lignite. Average daily gas-fired generation in Germany has slipped to 3.8GW so far this month from 4.2GW in September and August and 4.1GW in July. During that time, lignite-fired generation climbed to 9GW from 7.2GW in September and August and 7.4GW in July. Coal-fired generation has also edged down to 2.9GW so far this month from just over 3GW in September, but higher than the averages of 2.3GW in August and 1.4GW in July. Meanwhile, supporting demand for thermal-fired generation, German renewables output has fallen to 30.3GW so far in October from just under 32GW in September when wind generation stepped up, but slightly above the 29.5GW in August when wind output was lower. Remaining German power demand in recent weeks has been covered by imports, which have risen to a net 3.8GW so far this month from 3.4GW in September, but remained well below the 6.2GW in August. Electricity imports from neighbouring countries such as France are occasionally cheaper than domestic generation and can help fill in gaps between German power demand and supply. A combination of changing renewable output, higher gas prices, stable lignite prices and lower emissions prices have spurred changes in the German power mix. The German THE day-ahead has risen strongly since late July and prices have rallied in recent weeks against a backdrop of rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Meanwhile, German lignite-fired plants typically source fuel from nearby mines, substantially insulating domestic lignite prices from external market forces. German regulator Bnetza assumed earlier this year that domestic lignite would cost about €3/MWh in 2024-25. At the same time, near-term prices in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) — a key driver of competitiveness for German lignite-fired generation — have fallen. Prompt ETS allowances closed at €65.36/t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) on Monday, down from €72.14/t CO2e on 19 August, boosting the profitability of lignite-fired plants, which are the more CO2 intensive than coal and gas. Those recent price shifts have made output from lignite-fired plants with a typical efficiency of 36pc more profitable than normal 55pc-efficient gas-fired plants as well as coal-fired stations operating at 40pc efficiency, which have also become more profitable . By contrast, in the first eight months of this year, 36pc-efficient lignite-fired plants had competed tightly with 55pc-efficient gas-fired plants even as gas prices fell to the bottom of the coal-to-gas fuel-switching range ( see fuel-switching graph ). Buffer zone More competitive lignite-fired generation has also started acting as the domestic buffer to cover gaps between supply and demand left by renewable generation ( see power generation graph ). After Germany renewable generation dropped to 26.8GW on 2-9 October from a strong 45.5GW on 26-28 September, lignite-fired generation jumped to 10.1GW from 6.4GW — a 57pc gain — while gas-fired output only rose to 3.5GW from roughly 3GW and coal-fired generation increased to 2.9GW from 2.3GW. In December-July, when the gas and lignite fuel-switching range was tight, generation from both fuels reacted similarly to fluctuations in renewable output and both plant types buffered their generation based on demand ( see power generation graph ). And forward prices assessed by Argus suggest that lignite-fired generation could remain competitive against gas and coal-fired output in the German power mix next month. As of market close on Monday, November-dated fuel and emissions prices would place the operating costs of a 36pc-efficient lignite-fired plant during that time below those of a 55pc-efficient gas-fired plant and a 40pc-efficient coal-fired plant. That said, Germany's decreasing lignite and coal-fired generation capacity limits how much of the national power mix those plant types can provide. As of April, Germany had 82.4GW of gas-fired capacity, but just 15.1GW of lignite-fired capacity and 11.5GW of coal-fired plants, according to Bnetza. By Lucas Waelbroeck Boix Fuel switching range €/MWh Power generation by fuel, 7 day average GW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan's 2MW Susono biomass plant starts construction


15/10/24
News
15/10/24

Japan's 2MW Susono biomass plant starts construction

Tokyo, 15 October (Argus) — Japan's 2MW Susono biomass-fired power plant in Shizuoka prefecture has started construction today, with the aim to begin commercial operations in October 2025. The Susono plant will burn 27,000 t/yr of wood chips secured in Shizuoka to generate around 15 GWh/yr of electricity. Operating company Susono Biomass Power is held 50pc by Japanese utility Chubu Electric Power, 40pc by energy company ML Power, which is a subsidiary of financing firm Mizuho Leasing, and 10pc by renewable energy developer Prospec AZ. Those companies plan to build three other biomass-fired power plants in Gunma, Nagano, and Niigata prefectures. Each plant is expected to come on line in November 2025, April 2026, and May 2027. The three 2MW plants will burn 27,000-29,000 t/yr of locally gathered wood chips to generate around 15 GWh/yr. Chubu has invested in a number of biomass-fired power plants, including the 112MW Tahara in Aichi prefecture , which is currently under construction and aims to start commercial operations in September 2025. By Takeshi Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US oil company filings put 'spotlight' on taxes


14/10/24
News
14/10/24

US oil company filings put 'spotlight' on taxes

Washington, 14 October (Argus) — Recently reported data showing some US-headquartered oil and gas companies regularly paid less in taxes to the US than to foreign governments could become a focus in an upcoming debate in the US Congress over federal tax policy. ExxonMobil reported paying nearly $1.2bn in taxes to the US in 2023, a fraction of the $5.6bn in taxes it paid to the UAE the same year, according to a first-time "Form SD" report it filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last month. In its own report, Chevron disclosed it paid nearly $1.2bn in taxes to the US last year, compared with $4bn to Australia. US independent Hess paid $190,000 in taxes to the US last year and $50mn in taxes to Malaysia. Oil industry officials say the data on tax payments — disclosed ahead of a 30 September deadline the SEC set as part of a long-delayed provision from the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act — does not provide a comprehensive view of industry's tax obligations, which can vary among countries depending on the tax code and their operations. The payment disclosures also do not cover payroll taxes or state and local taxes, for example, and do not say if a company had carryover net operating losses or tax credits that reduced its overall tax bill in the US. "It would be very inaccurate to reach a conclusion that only takes a little bit of information, and try to extrapolate from that the big picture," an oil industry official said. But tax watchdogs say the disclosures should give Congress further cause to revisit the federal tax code, to understand why some profitable oil companies headquartered in the US are able to pay far less in taxes to the US than to foreign governments, or in some years pay no taxes to the US. US independent Apache parent APA reported paying no income taxes to the US in 2023 on a net income of $2.3bn, according to its filing. APA said "tax net operating losses" last year reduced its tax bill to zero. "Having this information publicly available puts a spotlight on an industry that so far has escaped that attention," nonprofit group Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency Coalition's policy director Zorka Milin said. "It does put them on a back foot. I think that's obvious, and they need to get used to that." The tax disclosures, which only cover publicly listed companies, show some US oil companies with international operations paid nearly all of their government taxes to the US. US independent EOG Resources paid $1.1bn in taxes to the US last year and $9mn to Trinidad. US independent Devon Energy's $350mn in reported tax payments last year went entirely to the US, according to its filing. Devon has operations in Canada but no reported tax payments. ExxonMobil, in a filing with the SEC alongside its disclosure report, said the data in Form SD had a narrow focus, whereas its "total expense for taxes and duties" in the US was more than $10bn, which includes tax obligations from its acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources. Chevron, which reported US tax expenses of $1.8bn in the US last year in separate securities filings, said it complies with "all legal and contractual requirements" where it operates. Hess said that except for a subsidiary that paid the reported $190,000 in taxes, all other subsidies were in a taxable loss position last year. The release of the tax data comes as Congress heads to a "tax cliff" from the expiration at the end of 2025 of an estimated $4 trillion in tax cuts that were made temporary, under former president Donald Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2017. To extend those tax cuts, Congress will be looking for revenue-raisers, such as increasing corporate taxes or cutting spending. Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris says the US will "have to raise corporate tax rates" to offset the costs of her policies. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has pledged to cut corporate tax rates to as low as 15pc, from 21pc currently, alongside various other tax cuts that are likely to cost trillions of dollars. Consumer groups say the disparity in the "tax take" in the US compared with other countries is noteworthy, because it suggests that oil companies could remain profitable in the US even if taxes were higher. Oil industry officials, meanwhile, say they want Congress to cut tax further than the 21pc corporate tax rate enacted in 2017 through the TCJA. "We supported TCJA because it lowered corporate tax rates," American Petroleum Institute president Mike Sommers said on 26 September during an event on Capitol Hill. "It's still in a competitive place, but it should be lowered even more." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India industries confident of 2030 renewable energy aim


14/10/24
News
14/10/24

India industries confident of 2030 renewable energy aim

Mumbai, 14 October (Argus) — Indian industries are confident about reaching the country's renewable energy target of 500GW by 2030, senior executives said at the Financial Times' Energy Transition Summit in New Delhi last week. This is especially given strong capacity installation of solar and wind projects in the coming years, delegates heard. India's renewable energy capacity stands at 199.5GW as of August, a rise of 12pc on the year, data from the Central Electricity Authority show. "India's [renewable] power sector has already grown at a [compound annual growth rate] of nearly 20pc in the last 10 years … The pace at which some of the bids are coming, we should reach 500GW by 2030," said domestic utility Tata Power's chief executive officer Praveer Sinha. A record 69GW of renewable energy tenders were issued during the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year, surpassing the government-mandated target of 50GW. Tata Power is operating 4.5GW installed capacity of renewable energy that produced 64.6Th of electricity in the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year. It aims to add another 5GW of installed capacity in the coming years, underscoring its commitment to providing round-the-clock renewable energy through solar, wind, and pumped hydro storage projects, Sinha added. Indian steel manufacturer ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel (AMNS) also plans to add 1GW/yr of renewable energy capacity for its captive power consumption, managing director Dilip Oommen said. AMNS has developed a 975MW hybrid renewable energy project at Alamuru village in India's southern state of Andhra Pradesh. The project will generate 661MW of solar and 314MW of wind power capacity, which will be integrated with a pumped hydro storage facility owned by renewables developer Greenko to overcome the intermittent nature of wind and solar power generation, ensuring round-the-clock power. Power generated from the solar and wind sites will be connected from Andhra Pradesh's Kurnool district via a 400kV interstate transmission system up to AMNS' Hazria facility. The firm is also considering using hydrogen in its electric arc furnace, but remains skeptical about the cost economics. "At present, the cost of hydrogen is $3.50/kg," Oommen said, adding that if this falls below $2/kg, it would be feasible for commercial use at its facilities. The reduction in the cost of renewable power generation over the last few years has also raised interest in the sector, incentivising the coal-dominated eastern regions of India to adopt renewables, said Indian independent power provider Ampin Energy's chief executive officer Pinaki Bhattacharya. The domestic steel sector, one of the country's largest carbon emitters, is looking at ways to reduce emissions in light of the policies under the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which will take effect on 1 January 2026. This was echoed during a session on 9 October when India's finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman noted that India has been consistent in promoting domestic investment in renewables and establishing transmission lines. But she described CBAM as "a trade barrier" that could hurt investment in India's heavy industries and hinderthe country's transition away from fossil fuels. CBAM is a "unilateral" and "arbitrary" measure, which would "not be helpful" for India, she said, adding that India's concerns "would definitely be voiced" with the EU. Her sentiments were in line with that of commerce minister Piyush Goyal, who said last year that India will not accept any unfair taxes on steel that the EU imposes under the CBAM. Coal to renewables switch "We are not on track yet to displace coal," said Indian not-for-profit thinktank Centre for Science and Environment's director general Sunita Narain, when asked about India's transition from coal to renewables, considering that coal still dominates the country's electricity mix. Renewable energy generation capacity has currently increased to 13pc of the total electricity mix, but the country needs to hit the 35pc target by 2030, she added. India's power generation continues to rely on coal because of an abundant supply of the fuel as well as its cheaper price over other alternatives. Out of India's total installed capacity of 451GW, coal comprises 48.27pc, followed by solar at 19.84pc and wind at 10.47pc, as of August, data from government think tank Niti Aayog show. By Ankit Rathore Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more