IAEA chief sees ‘good sign’ ahead of Iran visit

Market: Crude oil, Electricity
12/11/24

The director general of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said today that he has seen good signs from the new Iranian administration ahead of his visit to the Iranian capital on 13 November.

Speaking to reporters in Baku, Rafael Grossi said he and his colleagues at the IAEA are looking forward to what he described as "a very important visit" with the aim of "re-establishing contact" with the Iranian authorities.

The visit will be Grossi's first to Iran since Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian took office in late July, and comes at a time of increased tensions in the Middle East region.

Israel's offensive against Gaza-based militia group Hamas that was triggered by the group's deadly 7 October 2023 cross-border attack on Israel has since expanded into Lebanon and, to an extent, drawn Iran into the fray, with Tehran and Tel Aviv having now traded missile strikes twice in recent months.

Israel's latest strike in October has raised fears that Iran could respond not only in kind, but also by speeding up its work to enrich uranium and move the country ever closer to possessing weapons-grade nuclear material.

This is despite Iranian officials, not least Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, insisting that Iran has no intention of building or possessing nuclear weapons.

"We are looking forward to that [meeting]. It's high time we establish or re-establish contact with the government," Grossi said. "We have been preparing for this meeting for quite a long time."

Grossi said he saw it as "a good sign" that the new Iranian administration is showing "a disposition to talk."

"Of course, we have to give content and meaning to the conversations. But I am encouraged by the fact that we seem to be having a good agenda in front of us."

Damage limitation

The meeting comes after the IAEA's board of governors in June passed a resolution calling on Iran to step up its co-operation with the agency, and reverse a decision to restrict access to nuclear sites by de-designating inspectors.

Tehran at the time rejected that resolution as "politically biased", prompting a swift denial from Grossi, saying that the agency does not adhere to an "anti-Iran policy".

Asked today whether Donald Trump's election victory last week could impact relations with Iran, Grossi admitted that while it will "undoubtedly" have an influence, he expected that the incoming administration would work well with the IAEA, as was the case during Trump's first term. "We will adjust to that," Grossi said.

A diplomatic source with knowledge of the situation described the ongoing tensions in the Mideast Gulf region as "out of control," and said they are hopeful Grossi's visit to the Iranian capital will help "keep a lid on the situation" and help to find some badly-needed "solutions".

If Grossi achieves what he set out to do on this visit, it could lay the groundwork for any co-operation that the agency may have with the new administration around how best to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat, the source said.

By Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

02/01/25

Viewpoint: Trump, macro issues ahead for US renewables

Houston, 2 January (Argus) — A combination of substantial policy shifts under president-elect Donald Trump and macroeconomic issues puts the US renewable power sector on uncertain footing to begin 2025. Analysts expect the federal tax credits that have bolstered new renewable generation during its substantial growth over the past decade will survive in some fashion, although Trump campaigned on repealing the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). He also has promised 60pc tariffs on goods imported from China, a major player in the solar and battery storage supply chains. The ultimate effects may vary by project type and what the new administration is able to accomplish. Chinese solar products already face 50pc tariffs , which could temper any effects on the industry from Trump's protectionist trade policies, said Tom Harper, a partner at consultant Baringa specializing in power and renewables. But the new administration could make it more difficult to claim IRA incentives and could roll back federal power plant emissions rules , creating an environment that could slow the adoption of renewables. Utilities may become more cautious in using renewables because of higher costs, while others, such as companies with sustainability goals, might be able to weather the change, according to Harper. "There might be some very price insensitive corporate [power purchase agreement] buyers out there who are looking at a $45/MWh solar [contract] and now it's going to be $50/MWh after the tariff, and they'll be fine," he said. In addition, the US renewables industry is still weathering headwinds from supply chain constraints, increased borrowing rates and inflation, which have hampered new projects. For example, the PJM Interconnection — which spans 13 mostly Mid-Atlantic states and the District of Columbia — had approved more than 37,000MW of generation at the end of third quarter 2024, with only 2,400MW of that partially in service. Developers have blamed the delays on financing challenges, long lead times for obtaining equipment and local opposition to projects. Global problems, local solutions Changes to state procurement strategies could help. Maryland state delegate Lorig Charkoudian (D) next year will propose new state-run solar, wind and hydropower solicitations that would first target projects that have already cleared PJM's reviews. Her approach would echo programs in New Jersey and Illinois, and ultimately reduce utilities' reliance on renewable energy certificates (REC) procured elsewhere. "The idea is to give a path for these projects, so presumably they can be built within a few years," Charkoudian said. Utilities would use the new procurements for the bulk of their RECs, covering remaining demand by buying legacy Maryland solar credits and other PJM RECs on the secondary market. But a quick fix for Maryland's broader renewable energy objectives is unlikely after utilities used the alternative compliance payment (ACP) for two-thirds of their 2023 REC requirements. The fee for each megawatt-hour by which utilities miss their compliance targets serves as a de facto ceiling on REC prices. Maryland's ACP is low compared to neighboring states, where the qualifying REC pool overlaps, meaning that credits eligible in the state can fetch a higher price elsewhere. While lawmakers could raise the ACP to mitigate those issues, those costs would ultimately fall on utility customers. "As best as I can tell, the options are raise the ACP or adjust how we do it," Charkoudian said. "We're really concerned about ratepayer impacts, and so I don't think there's a real appetite to raise the ACP." In other states, the policy landscape is less certain. Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro (D) has no clear path for his proposed hike to the state's alternative energy mandate, should he choose to revisit it, after Republicans retained their state Senate majority in November. New Jersey state senator Bob Smith (D) has been working for two years to enshrine in law governor Phil Murphy's (D) goal of 100pc clean electricity, but the proposal failed to escape committee in 2024 after dying in 2023 over opposition to its support for offshore wind . Is the answer blowing in the wind? Offshore wind is a slightly different matter. Trump has been critical of the industry and federal regulators control much of the project permitting in the US. Moreover, as a burgeoning sector with higher costs, it could be more sensitive to the loss of the investment tax credit (ITC). Based on current expenses, Baringa's analysis suggests that losing the ITC could increase project costs by "at least" $30/MWh and push offshore wind REC prices in some cases near $150/MWh. That would be a "difficult cost for states to swallow", according to Harper. "We've seen a few offshore wind developers already say, 'Hey, we're not going to spend a dime more until we know what's going on,'" Harper said. Despite the challenging landscape, Charkoudian expects Maryland will move forward in areas it can control, such as expanding the onshore transmission, that will make offshore wind viable, whether it's now or "eight years from now". By Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply

02/01/25

News

02/01/25

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply

Washington, 2 January (Argus) — US utilities are concerned that they may not have enough railcars to haul coal in the future as multiple power plants are seeking to remain in operation longer than expected. Power demand is forecast to rise in the coming years because of planned data centers in multiple parts of the country. Many data centers are expected to open before new generation, including natural gas, wind and solar-power units, go into service. A number of utilities want to avert the temporary power shortage by extending the life of coal-fired power plants beyond planned retirement dates. In response, demand is "poised to shift to a slight growth in the need for coal cars", according to railcar expert Richard Kloster, president of Integrity Rail Partners. Longer power plant lives as well as expectations of increased metallurgical coal exports are likely to provide demand for equipment. But the supply of railcars for coal has been slowly shrinking. No new railcars for the coal industry — primarily gondolas or open-top hoppers — have been built in nearly a decade. Utilities and leasing companies have had little interest in ordering new railcars for a shrinking sector. Many existing cars have also been scrapped, particularly during periods of low coal demand and high scrap prices during the last few years. There also are thousands of coal railcars in storage, but those do not really count towards demand, Kloster said. The cost of pulling those cars out of storage and making them service-ready is not necessarily cost effective, he said. About 21pc of North American coal cars were in storage at the beginning of August, up from 15pc in November 2022, according to Association of American Railroads data. In comparison, about 35pc of the coal car fleet was in storage at the start of July 2020, near the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Possibilities of new construction There is a chance that "in the next 10 years, there will be coal cars built again", because many coal cars in the fleet are nearing 50 years of age, Kloster said. The retirement of many cars means that equipment must be pulled from storage or new units built, driving potential construction. Under Association of American Railroads (AAR) rules, railcars built after June 1974 can only be interchanged with other railroads for 50 years. After that, those cars are generally limited to operating on only one carrier. Some of those older cars may be retired early if they need repairs. Maintenance expenses could cause car owners to take units out of service. Utilities strategize Some utilities are already implementing plans to secure railcars, but others think taking additional steps will be unnecessary, according to railcar expert Darell Luther, chief executive of rail transportation firm Tealinc. The differing views are tied in part to whether utilities are regulated by states or merchant-owned, Luther said. Public utilities need to prove to regulators they can meet generating needs, including having enough coal and railcars. Privately owned operators have more flexibility in terms of contracting for coal and railcars. Several utility rail managers told Argus they do not see the need to take extra steps to secure railcars, confident that they already have plenty or can lease whatever they need in the future. But other utilities said they have taken steps to ensure they have coal cars in the future. Some utilities have purchased single or multiple cars as other generators sell them off. Others are increasingly leasing cars, with one utility saying that having more cars than needed is a cheap way of ensuring future supply. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US crude output at record 13.46mn b/d in Oct: EIA

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

US crude output at record 13.46mn b/d in Oct: EIA

Calgary, 31 December (Argus) — US crude production in October rose to a record high 13.46mn b/d on sustained strength in Texas and New Mexico, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said today in its Petroleum Supply Monthly report. Output rose from 13.2mn b/d in September and from 13.15mn b/d in October 2023. The prior record of 13.36mn b/d was set in August. Texas, home to 44pc of the country's crude production, pumped out a record 5.86mn b/d in October, up from 5.8mn b/d in September and up from 5.57mn b/d in October 2023. New Mexico, which shares the prolific Permian basin with Texas, produced 2.08mn b/d in October, ticking down by 5,000 b/d from record highs set in August and September but up from 1.8mn b/d in October 2023. US offshore crude output in the Gulf of Mexico rebounded to 1.85mn b/d in October after hurricane activity in September cut production to 1.57mn b/d. Still, US Gulf of Mexico output was down from 1.94mn b/d in October 2023. Monthly production changes inland were mixed, with North Dakota falling to 1.16mn b/d in October from 1.21mn b/d in the month prior. Bakken shale basin producers had to contend with wildfires during the month and effects are still lingering for some, state officials said earlier this month. Colorado output rose in October to the highest in more than four years at 499,000 b/d. This was up from 476,000 b/d in September and the highest level for the state since March 2020. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: 2025 Hardisty heavy diffs may remain strong

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: 2025 Hardisty heavy diffs may remain strong

Calgary, 31 December (Argus) — Heavy crude spot differentials in Alberta are expected to remain strong into next year, even with growing oil sands production and possible US import tariffs. After years of cost-overruns and construction delays, the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) commenced on 1 May, nearly tripling the capacity of crude able to reach Canada's Pacific coast and providing Alberta oil sands producers with increased access to buyers on the US west coast and Asia-Pacific. Extra egress capacity for Alberta crude westward has pulled previously apportioned volumes away from Enbridge's 3mn b/d Mainline system — Canada's main method of export to ship crude south to US refiners in the midcontinent and Gulf coast. In the fourth quarter, apportionment averaged just over 1pc for both light and heavy crude on the Mainline, significantly lower than the average apportionment of 21pc for lights and heavies in the fourth quarter last year. While president-elect Donald Trump's looming blanket tariff on all Canadian imports would re-direct more Albertan crude westward via TMX to Asia- Pacific buyers, many believe the tariff would be too harmful to US midcontinent refiners for Trump to actually carry out his threat. Prior to TMX's commencement, high apportionment combined with rising crude production heading into the winter months forced more crude onto railcars, which typically requires a $15/bl to $20/bl spread between Western Canadian Select (WCS) at Hardisty Alberta, and Houston, Texas, for uncommitted shippers to profit. With the redirection of apportioned volumes to buyers in the west, Canadian heavy spot differentials in Alberta have strengthened in a quarter when discounts have generally widened in recent years. Argus's WCS Hardisty assessment averaged a $12.08/bl discount to the CMA Nymex WTI during fourth quarter Canadian trade cycle dates, $11.52/bl stronger than the $23.61/bl discount averaged in the fourth quarter a year prior. Yet, crude output in Alberta's key oil sands is expected to rise heading into 2025, with production levels reaching record-high levels this year. Alberta crude output was 4.2mn b/d in October, according to the latest Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) data, up by 9.4pc year from a year earlier and the second highest monthly production on record. Alberta oil sands producers, meanwhile, have increased their crude production guidance for next year. Suncor expects to pump out 810,000-840,000 b/d across its upstream sector in 2025, up by 5pc from 2024. Cenovus expects to increase production next year by 4pc to between 805,000-845,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), and Imperial Oil plans to boost upstream production by 2pc to 433,000-456,000 boe/d. Egress capacity remains ample despite rising production heading into 2025. Total crude pipeline egress capacity out of Alberta is expected to be over 4.6mn b/d in 2025, with shippers still yet to utilize uncommitted space on the 890,000 b/d Trans Mountain pipeline. About 712,000 b/d or 80pc of the system is reserved for contracted shippers, with the remaining 20pc available for uncontracted shipments. With unconstrained egress capacity expected to persist, Suncor and Cenovus have both assumed WCS at Hardisty will average a strong $14/bl discount to WTI in 2025. In the near term, Trump's plans to impose a blanket 25pc tariff on all Canadian imports would threaten some US demand for Canadian crude. Yet, while some traders are pricing in the reality of US tariffs, most market participants are skeptical of whether Trump's tariff plans would extend to Canadian crude due to the co-dependency between Albertan producers and some US refiners. US midcontinent refiners, many of whom were financial backers of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, are dependent on Canadian crude given a lack of access to alternative heavy sour crudes suited for their refineries. Canadian grades represent approximately 70pc of the US midcontinent refinery feedstock, with the remainder largely sourced in the US. US importers may take more crude from countries including Saudi Arabia, given the country has plenty of spare capacity to increase the production of heavy sour crude favored by US midcontinent refiners. However, replacing Canadian crude with waterborne supplies would result in a substantial increase in tanker demand. In August, only around 370,000 b/d of the 3.8mn b/d of Canadian crude imported by US refiners moved on tankers, Vortexa data show. Even if US refiners can replace Canadian and Mexican heavy crude, they are expected to face higher landed costs and, potentially, less reliable supplies. By Kyle Tsang Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten

Houston, 31 December (Argus) — More US coal production cuts may be on the horizon, setting up thermal coal supply to potentially be lower than demand starting in late 2025. US coal producers have been scaling back mining operations since at least mid-2023 in response to lackluster demand. Market participants are continuing to contend with elevated power plant inventories following relatively mild winters and more competitive natural gas prices. Some producers are signaling more production cuts are coming in the next few months. As a result, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently forecast the country's coal output in 2025 would fall by 7.2pc from this year to 472.3mn short tons (428.5mn metric tonnes), the lowest level in agency data going back to 1949. But US coal-fired generation and coal consumption is expected to grow modestly next year, to 643.7bn kWh and 409.4mn st, respectively, from 641.6bn kWh and 406mn st in 2024, because of greater electricity and industrial demand. Coal consumption for the electric power sector alone is expected to rise to 371.5mn st from an estimated 369.4mn st in 2024, EIA data show. Generators are expected to draw from their existing coal inventories for the majority of the year to meet the slightly higher electricity demand, potentially bringing power plant stockpiles down to more normal levels. Coal producers also are expected to have less inventory at mines and loadout facilities as volumes that had been deferred to 2025 are delivered. If the inventory withdrawals and expected slight increase in domestic consumption are coupled with higher export market prices and demand, "there could be an impetus for a slight ramp-up in domestic production, but currently, that prospect does not appear to be visibly on the horizon", EIA chief economist Jonathan Church said. For example, Argus assessments for calendar year 2025 API 2 coal swaps averaged $112.85/t from 1-24 December, compared with $104.19/t for all of December last year. The response from coal producers to any improvement in demand could be uneven, which could constrict competition and boost prices. While larger producers with longwall mining equipment, primarily in northern Appalachia and the Illinois basin, can somewhat efficiently resume or increase production, other companies may struggle to ramp up operations. Producers also may not have the financial support to increase coal output. A number of market participants expect smaller producers with higher-cost operations to be forced out of business as major banks continue to pull back on lending money to coal mining companies. In the nearer term, recent or planned coal mine closures could further limit supply. Alliance Resource Partners said in November that it intends to retire its central Appalachian coal-producing MC Mining complex in Kentucky, and the company has already cut operations to two of its four production units. Earlier in 2024, American Consolidated Natural Resources closed its Pride Mine in western Kentucky and Hallador Energy idled two small Indiana mines in February. Other producers have scaled back operations but kept mines open. Coal miners worked an average 45.5 hours/wk in October when not adjusted for seasonal factors, preliminary figures from the US Labor Department show. A year earlier, coal miners averaged 48.3 hours/wk. Producers also have to contend with an uncertain outlook beyond 2025, including an expected shift in environmental policies under president-elect Donald Trump, how new data centers will affect electricity demand, and timelines for installing new generation and transmission upgrades. Alliant Energy, Vistra Energy, Duke Energy and Louisville Gas & Electric and Kentucky Utilities are among utilities that recently announced plans to potentially delay retiring coal-fired generating units or plans to remodel coal units to co-fired natural gas and coal to try to meet load growth projections for the next few years. This could keep coal-fired generation and demand at least somewhat stable, but it may not provid long-term support. "To have increased coal demand, you would have to have load growth outpacing new supply," said Robert Godby, associate professor in the economics department at the University of Wyoming. He and others expect new renewable generation and transmission projects to eventually accommodate projected electricity demand growth. Increased load growth will be "at best just a reprieve from the ongoing downward trend in coal production and coal demand", Godby said. As such, producers may continue to try to limit output in 2025, which could partially raise domestic prices from current levels that straddle the line of profitability for many coal mining companies. But the increases will likely be modest as alternative energy sources are expected to continue to suppress demand for coal generation. By Anna Harmon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more