Singapore bunker sales jump 19.5pc in October

Market: Biofuels, Natural gas, Oil products
14/11/24

Bunker fuel demand at the port of Singapore rose by 19.5pc on the month to 4.8mn t in October, supported by stronger enquiries from shipowners.

It takes total bunker consumption at the port to 45.3mn t in the first 10 months of the year, putting Singapore on course to break last year's record high sales of 51.8mn t.

The latest statistics release from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) show consumption of both conventional and alternative marine fuels rose strongly last month as more ships refuelled in Singapore.

Bio-bunkers and B24 demand hit a new record monthly high of 116,200t, taking the total for January-October to 586,500t. Consumption has already exceeded last year's 518,000t, driven by shipping emissions compliance requirements set by the EU and IMO. Demand for B24 is expected to steadily rise in the coming months ahead of the implementation of the FuelEU regulations from January 2025.

Demand for LNG as a marine fuel at the port of Singapore increased by 37pc from September to 50,600t in October, which was also a new record high for monthly consumption.

"In general, we are seeing bigger enquiries in the last month or so," said a London-based trader.

Sales of very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) in Singapore rose by 11.8pc from September to 2.5mn t last month, while high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) consumption jumped by 11pc to 1.8mn t.

By Mahua Chakravarty

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

27/12/24

Viewpoint: Policy doubts hit Australia's biofuel sector

Sydney, 27 December (Argus) — Australia's biofuels sector has garnered significant interest during the first 2½ years of the current federal Labor government, but uncertainty over key policy support measures has stymied investment and led developers to question whether 2025 will be a year of reform. Labor secured its first majority government since 2007 in the mid-2022 election and subsequently pledged to cut Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 43pc on 2005 levels by 2030. But the country is not on track to meet this ambitious target because of slow progress decarbonising its electricity and transport sectors. Biofuels have become increasingly popular, given decarbonising hard-to-abate transport industries is seen as key to reaching the 2030 goal. Canberra has committed to a low carbon liquid fuels (LCLF) standard, which the industry views as crucial to enabling investment in processing, refineries and new feedstock crops. In its May 2024 budget, the federal government expressed a desire to develop sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable diesel (HVO) industries. The outcomes of consultations are expected to be released imminently. On the demand side, a regulatory impact analysis of the costs and benefits associated with mandates for LCLF has been promised, but no timeframe has been released. Domestic refiners Ampol and Viva, as well as BP at its former Kwinana refinery, have expressed interest in biofuel production but all require certainty on demand and supply-side support mechanisms. Australian bioenergy developer Jet Zero and a consortium including major airlines aim to build a 113mn litres/yr plant in the northern part of Queensland state, but initial engineering for the concept has not yet been completed. The consortium plans to convert bioethanol from domestic agricultural byproducts like sugarcane molasses into SAF and HVO through the alcohol-to-jet pathway, with production expected to start in 2027. Jet Zero is also planning to produce SAF through the Hydrotreated Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) production pathway in a 50:50 joint venture with Aperion Bioenergy. But the project, which is still in its feasibility stage, is facing hurdles in pricing the feedstock offtake agreements or term contracts. Complicating the picture, heavy transport is now showing greater signs of electrification, as demonstrated by iron ore producer Fortescue's major order for new electric haul trucks. Regardless, the introduction of new safeguard mechanism laws requiring large emitters to reduce pollution has led Australia's fuel companies to increase HVO sales, with 500,000l contracts now signed on a regular basis despite the higher costs. Australian coal mining firm Stanmore has tested a 20pc HVO blend at its Bowen basin Poitrel mine, demonstrating an increasing acceptance of biofuels by customers. Ampol and Viva both sell fatty acid methyl esters (Fame) based biofuel blends at 5pc, 10pc and 20pc. Ampol has two projects in the pipeline: a co-processing facility that would supply up to 60mn l/yr by 2026 and the Brisbane renewable fuels joint venture, which would be a larger project of 0.5bn-1bn l/yr and is due for a final investment decision by late 2025. Viva has been less forthcoming about its plans for biofuel production since it announced a new biofuel blending venture at its 120,000 b/d Geelong refinery in 2023. There will be a federal election no later than mid-May 2025 and both major parties are keen to enhance their green image while supporting regional communities and manufacturing jobs. New regulatory support is crucial if Australia is to transition from supplying significant quantities of feedstock for biofuels to other countries, particularly tallow and canola seed, to producing its own renewable fuels. Australia's increasing reliance on imported oil products and foreign crude, along with a worsening geopolitical backdrop, has started to raise concerns in Canberra. This could be the deciding factor in whether the government will create the required regulatory environment for a local biofuels industry to thrive. By Tom Major and Tom Woodlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Viewpoint: US naphtha market poised for change

26/12/24

News

26/12/24

Viewpoint: US naphtha market poised for change

Houston, 26 December (Argus) — US Gulf coast naphtha supplies accumulated in the last half of 2024 amid faltering demand, with gasoline blenders representing a higher profile buying sector, but a pending refinery closure is set to tighten the market. Demand for all naphtha grades was much weaker coming into December because of a bearish gasoline outlook and as elevated octane prices dampened naphtha demand. Poor refinery margins encouraged refiners to run minimally, cutting back on refiner demand as well. Gasoline blenders' demand for naphtha dominated in 2024, which highlighted stronger naphtha prices in visible trades. Prices for good quality, low sulphur N+A naphtha into the gasoline blend pool averaged about 10-15¢/USG above generic reformer feedstock naphtha. Naphtha sellers were also keen to export, which moved larger volumes without engaging in volatile domestic spot markets. US naphtha exports this year through mid-December were up by over 50pc to average 272,730 b/d from a year prior, according to Vortexa data. From November to mid-December, naphtha departures from the US were up on the year by 66pc to 312,800 b/d. Despite overall increased exports in 2024, weakened Asia Pacific and European naphtha markets in the latter half of December diminished arbitrage opportunities. Heavy virgin naphtha (HVN) differentials to Nymex RBOB hovered in the mid-to-stronger 30s¢/USG discounts in the first half of December, compared with upper Nymex RBOB -40s¢/USG observed in the same period last year. However, these higher differentials were attributed more to the lower Nymex RBOB pricing basis than market strength. Comparative cash prices hovered around 160¢/USG year on year, despite a 10¢/bl hike in differentials in 2024. Supply, demand changes in store A major supply change in the Gulf coast naphtha market should tighten the ample supply of naphtha by February. LyondellBasell is on schedule to begin a staggered shutdown of its 264,000 b/d refinery in Houston, Texas, in January. The last crude distillation unit (CDU) at the site is expected to shut by February. The refiner is a steady supplier of premium quality HVN with very low sulphur, which is typically sold into the gasoline blending market. Depending on production rates, LyondellBasell, also known as Houston Refining (HRC) in naphtha circles, can load 10-15 barges of the premium quality HVN a month. However, Gulf coast naphtha remains well-supplied. ExxonMobil's third CDU at its 609,000 b/d Beaumont, Texas, refinery started operations in 2023, adding more naphtha production to the region. Naphtha exports were also significant on the demand front in 2024, despite Gulf coast naphtha export opportunities to Venezuela being curbed again on 18 April. US sanctions on oil trades to Venezuela were eased in October 2023, but reimposed by April this year due to fresh political conflict. Naphtha exports to Venezuela are currently restricted to joint-venture partners such as Chevron and Reliance. Some participants hope the incoming administration of president-elect Donald Trump will re-address oil trading with Venezuela, keeping this an item to watch in 2025. US naphtha exports to Venezuela averaged 57,600 b/d in 2024, up from 11,100 b/d during 2023, according to Vortexa, on relaxation of Venezuela sanctions from October 2023 through May 2024. Meanwhile, naphtha exports out of the Gulf coast were still focused on shipments to South America, led by Brazil and Colombia. Exports to Brazil averaged 48,600 b/d in 2024, up by 68pc from 2023 while naphtha arrivals in Colombia averaged 36,600 b/d in 2024, up by 36pc from 2023. Colombia buys light naphtha from the US for use as diluent and sells full-range naphtha out of Mamonal port to the US. By Daphne Tan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US gas market poised for more volatility

26/12/24

News

26/12/24

Viewpoint: US gas market poised for more volatility

New York, 26 December (Argus) — US natural gas markets may be subjected to more dramatic price swings in 2025 as growing LNG exports and increasingly price-sensitive producers place greater pressure on the US' stagnant gas storage capacity. Those price swings could pose challenges for consumers without ample access to gas supplies, as well as producers interested in keeping some output unhedged to capture potentially higher prices without taking on excessive financial risk. But volatility may also present opportunities for traders looking to exploit unstable price spreads, and for producers that can adapt their operations to fit a more unpredictable pricing environment. Calm before the storm High storage levels and low spot prices this year — averaging $2.11/mmBtu through November this year at the US benchmark Henry Hub — triggered by an unusually warm 2023-24 winter, may have obscured some of the structural factors pushing the US gas market into a more volatile future. But those structural factors remain and loom increasingly large for prices. The US has moved from a roughly 60 Bcf/d (1.7bn m³/d) market eight years ago to a more than 100 Bcf/d market today, "and we haven't grown our storage capacity at all", Rich Brockmeyer, head of North American gas and power at commodity trading house Gunvor, said earlier this year. As supply and demand for US gas grow, the country's roughly 4.7-Tcf storage capacity becomes ever less effective in stemming demand shocks, such as extreme winter weather events, which can more rapidly draw down inventories than in years past. Additionally, a growing share of US gas is being consumed by LNG export terminals being built and expanded on the US Gulf coast. When those facilities encounter unexpected problems and cease operations — as has happened numerous times at the 2 Bcf/d Freeport LNG terminal in Texas in recent years — volumes that were previously being liquefied and sent overseas were instead backed up into the domestic market, crushing prices. More LNG exports may mean more opportunities for such supply shocks. US LNG exports are expected to increase by 15pc to almost 14 Bcf/d in 2025 as operations begin at Venture Global's planned 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines facility in Louisiana and Cheniere's 11.5mn t/yr Corpus Christi, Texas, stage 3 expansion, US Energy Information Administration data show. Spot price volatility will be most acutely felt in regions like New England that lack underground gas storage. "In areas like the Gulf coast, where you have a lot of storage, it won't be a problem," Alan Armstrong, chief executive of Williams, the largest US gas pipeline company, told Argus in an interview. Producers' trade-off Volatile gas markets are a mixed bag for producers, many of whom profit from volatility while also struggling to plan and budget based on uncertain revenues for unhedged volumes. Though insufficient gas storage deprives the market of stability, "from the standpoint of a marketing and trading guy that's trying to manage my gas supply to customers and my trading book, I love volatility",said Dennis Price, vice president of marketing and trading at Expand Energy, the largest US gas producer by volume. BP chief financial officer Sinead Gorman in November 2023 specifically named Freeport LNG's eight-month-long shutdown in 2022-23 from a fire as a driver of volatility in the global gas market. The supermajor was able to exploit the "incredibly fragile" gas market, she said, which was a key factor driving the success of its integrated gas business. "Those opportunities are what we typically seek and enjoy," Gorman said. Increasingly, producers have also been adapting to a more volatile market by switching production on and off in response to prices, but often without revealing the price at which a supply response will occur. Expand Energy, for instance, told investors in October that it was amassing drilled but uncompleted wells and wells that had yet to be brought on line, which it could activate relatively quickly when prices rise. It declined to name the price at which that would occur. Market participants, attempting to price in this phenomenon by anticipating producers' next moves may respond more dramatically to supply signals than in the past, when production was steadier. Producers' increased responsiveness to prices could help to balance the market somewhat, though more aggressive intervention into operations could take a toll on well performance and pipelines, FactSet senior energy analyst Connor McLean said. Producers are "treating the reservoir itself like a storage facility", Price said. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Tariffs may curb US bunker demand

26/12/24

News

26/12/24

Viewpoint: Tariffs may curb US bunker demand

New York, 26 December (Argus) — US president-elect Donald Trump's plans to enact new tariffs, especially those targeting Mexico and Canada, may curb demand for US bunker fuel and ripple across international markets. The proposed 25pc tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada could affect all products coming into the US from those countries, including the significant volumes of residual fuel oil from Mexico and Canada that US Gulf coast and east coast buyers import. This could lift prices of residual fuel oil sold for bunkering in US Gulf coast and east coast ports, prompting some ship owners calling there to instead fuel outside the US in more price-competitive ports. Depending on their routes, ship owners could shift some of their bunker demand to Singapore, Rotterdam, Fujairah and Panama. Mexico alone supplied 74pc of the residual fuel oil imported to the US Gulf coast and and 29pc to the east coast in the first nine months of the year, according to US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data ( see table ). Meanwhile, Canada supplied 7pc and 16pc of the fuel oil imported to the US Gulf and east coasts, respectively. The US east coast imported 46,730 b/d of residual fuel oil and produced 35,000 b/d in the first nine months of the year ( see chart ). By comparison, the US Gulf coast imported 48,909 b/d and produced 161,667 b/d. Prices of Canadian and Mexican residual fuel oil exports to the US are typically benchmarked against US Gulf and east coast residual fuel oil prices. Should Trump implement the 25pc tariffs, companies bringing Canadian and Mexican residual fuel oil to the US could bid lower to try to offset their tariff costs. Lower bids from US buyers could redirect some of the Mexican and Canadian residual fuel oil exports to buyers in northwest Europe, Panama and Singapore. Or if Canadian and Mexican producers are not able to find lucrative clients outside of North America, they may have to settle for lower profit margins for their residual fuel oil exports to the US. On the US west coast, Trump's campaign promise to impose tariffs of up to 60pc on imports from China has already prompted some shippers to front-load container cargoes. Potential additional tariffs could slow container ship traffic from China to the US' busiest container ship ports — Los Angeles and Long Beach in California. There is a lot of uncertainty around the extent of Trump's tariff plans, as some analysts view his threats as aimed at generating leverage for negotiations. But provided that they are put into place, the Mexico and Canada tariffs could push US east and Gulf coast importers to purchase more residual fuel oil from other countries like Algeria, Colombia, Iraq, Kuwait, Nigeria, Peru and Saudi Arabia. An increase in Chinese tariffs could prompt US west coast importers to shift their purchases to other southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. But once the dust settles from the geographical reshuffling, new trading networks may have been established, and the US bunker market could settle into a new normal. By Stefka Wechsler US Gulf and east coasts residual fuel oil imports, Jan-Sep 2024 '000 b/d East coast % of all countries Gulf coast % of all countries Mexico 13.6 29% 36.1 74% Canada 7.4 16% 3.3 7% All countries 46.7 100% 48.9 100% — EIA US Gulf and east coast FO imports, Jan-Sep ’000 b/d Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US jet fuel demand to trail passenger growth

26/12/24

News

26/12/24

Viewpoint: US jet fuel demand to trail passenger growth

Houston, 26 December (Argus) — The upward trajectory of US jet fuel demand is likely to continue lagging the pace of rising passenger numbers because of recent capacity gains for multiple US airlines and the slow but steady improvement of aircraft fuel efficiency. More than 2.35mn travelers were screened weekly at US airports this year through the end of November, according to the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) — a 6.2pc increase from the same 11-month period in 2019, before the Covid-19 pandemic curtailed domestic and international flights. Passenger screenings have exceeded 2019 levels consistently since the summer of 2023. Yet US jet fuel products supplied — a proxy for demand — remains stubbornly below pre-Covid-19 levels, despite the rise in traffic. Weekly jet fuel products supplied this year through 13 December was 1.66mn b/d, down by 6.5pc from daily demand in full-year 2019, according to US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. This slower recovery in jet demand relative to rising passenger numbers may be driven by several factors, including airlines carrying more passengers than in the past, as well as steady improvements in aircraft fuel efficiency. More seats, more flyers Many US airlines have increased flying capacity, as measured by available seat miles (ASMs), since pre-pandemic levels, while load factor — the percentage of seats filled by passengers — has been stable to lower compared with 2019. United Airlines' 2024 third quarter ASMs were up by 14pc at 81.54bn compared with the same three months in 2019. United's load factor was down by 0.8 percentage points to 85.3pc in the same period. Rival US carriers American Airlines and Southwest Airlines similarly posted capacity increases of 14pc and 15pc, respectively, compared with the third quarter of 2019. American's load factor was unchanged at 86.6pc, while Southwest saw a decline of 2.3pc to 81.2pc. Airlines have also made fuel efficiency improvements in recent years. This is in part from the retirement of many older airplane models during the lean years of the pandemic, combined with delivery of newer, more efficient models in more recent years. Southwest Airlines' third quarter fuel efficiency improved by 1.5pc year-over-year, the company said in October. Southwest improved its fuel efficiency with the delivery of nine Boeing MAX 8 aircraft in the third quarter while retiring 15 older planes. The MAX 8's and MAX 9s have average fuel efficiencies of 96 and 101 seat miles per USG (sm/USG), respectively. That would make them 23pc and 30pc more efficient than older planes they may have replaced, such as the Boeing 737-800, with a 78 sm/USG. Other airlines are also refreshing their fleets with newer, more fuel-efficient planes. American Airline's mainline fleet at the end of the third quarter grew by 2.2pc from a year earlier to 971 aircraft. It took in 600 new aircraft from 2013 to 2023, including 31 new planes in 2023. United Airline's third-quarter fleet was similarly 3.4pc larger than a year earlier. But there are limits to this growing efficiency. Globally the average age of airline fleets has risen to 14.8 years, according data from the International Air Transport Association (Iata) — up from 13.6 years in 1990-2024. This is due largely to the steep dropoff in new plane deliveries as aircraft manufacturers struggled with supply chain issues and high costs from the pandemic. Boeing, a chief provider of planes for many US airlines, had a spate of production disruptions in 2024, including a multi-week strike this past fall, that slowed the delivery of newer aircraft. But even a trickle of newer models would gradually affect fuel efficiency, potentially continuing to hold gains in fuel consumption below the rate of passenger growth. By Jared Ainsworth Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more