Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Tariffs may throw Canada-US crude flows into turmoil

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 30/01/25

Impending US tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports could mean significant changes for millions of barrels of daily cross-border crude flows between the countries.

President Donald Trump on Thursday repeated his threat to impose 25pc tariffs on all trade with Canada and Mexico effective 1 February. Trump said the US "... may or may not" exclude oil" from the tariffs, depending on crude price levels. That decision could come later today.

Canadian officials have also weighed targeted retaliatory tariffs on the US and even withholding crude outright.

A long history of crude and refined products flows between the three countries under well-established trade agreements has tightly bound together operations on all sides. This means adaptations on short notice could be difficult, leading to higher road fuel prices for some US drivers and businesses. February volumes have already been purchased, but not yet moved across the border, so importers could still be on the hook for the added tax if tariffs are imposed on 1 February.

Since Trump's initial pronouncement weeks ago, market participants on both sides of the border have been trying to determine potential impacts on movements and price. The Canadian trade cycle for March starts 3 February, with mixed opinions leading to volatility in the financial market for heavy Western Canadian Select (WCS) in Hardisty, Alberta. Thursday trading put March WCS at a $14.25-13.75/bl discount to the CMA Nymex WTI, after averaging a $12.25/bl discount to the benchmark during the February trade cycle.

About 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production flows downstream to US refiners, with US imports of Canadian crude reaching a record high of 4.42mn b/d in the week ending 3 January, according to Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. The single largest conduit is Enbridge's 3mn b/d Mainline system, which reaches into Chicago to serve midcontinent refiners and hands off crude to other lines that go to the US Gulf coast for refining or export. South Bow's 622,000 b/d Keystone pipeline also serves US markets via a more westerly route.

Two-way dependence

Alberta oil sands producers are highly dependent on those US customers, but the dependence is two-way, as 4.25mn b/d of US midcontinent refining capacity relies on heavy sour Canadian crudes for up to 70pc of their supplies.

In theory, US midcontinent refiners could run lighter, US-produced grades. But there are relatively few pipelines serving the midcontinent with such grades and those grades would be much less profitable than using a pre-tariff WCS barrel. 

Canadian heavy crudes already have become less price advantaged relative to lighter grades in the wake of the startup of 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline in May 2024 sending crude to Canada's west coast. The Argus WCS Cushing discount to the CMA Nymex averaged about $4.90/bl for February delivery, down from about $8/bl during the February 2024 trade month. Some market participants have already seen an uptick in demand for Canadian crude amid the uncertain impact of US import tariffs.

US Gulf coast flows

Canadian crude is also suited for many refineries on the US Gulf coast, but these refiners are less reliant on Canadian imports because of the region's access to alternative Latin American and Middle Eastern waterborne heavy sour supplies. Currently, Canadian crude makes up just over a quarter of crude imports to the US Gulf coast, with domestic US crude production encompassing a large majority of the refinery feedstock in the region.

Canadian crude values at the Texas Gulf coast have also risen over the last year. The Argus WCS Houston discount to the CMA Nymex is roughly $4/bl for February delivery this year, tightening from over $7/bl a year earlier. Higher values have likely led some refineries to shift to lighter, sweeter crudes already as the price advantage for heavies decreased. But recent refinery operational issues and the pending closure of LyondellBassell's 268,000 b/d Houston refinery is weighing on Houston-area prices lately.

West coast also has options

On the US west coast, TMX's startup increased imports of Canadian grades in the region. Since May, west coast refiners have imported about 170,000 b/d of crude from Vancouver's Westridge Marine terminal, up from just under 40,000 b/d a year earlier according to data analytics firm Vortexa.

But tariffs would make TMX cargoes less affordable from Vancouver and decrease its competitiveness relative to heavy sour alternatives. This could allow demand for Latin American medium and heavy sour crudes such as Napo and Oriente to recover after being displaced by cheaper and more convenient TMX supplies.

Argus' fob Vancouver Cold Lake assessment is averaging a roughly $7.60/bl discount to Ice Brent during the January calendar month so far, narrower than the $8.70-$8.80/bl discounts to the international benchmark for November and December.

Notwithstanding potential Canadian retaliatory tariffs, market participants also lack clarity on how Canadian imports of US diluent will be handled under potential US import tariffs once blended with Albertan bitumen and re-exported to US refiners. Although a majority of the diluent used for blending in Alberta is domestically sourced, considerable condensate demand is satisfied via Pembina's 110,000 b/d Cochin and Enbridge's 180,000 b/d Southern Lights pipelines, both of which transport condensate from Illinois to the Edmonton region.

Major Canada-to-US crude flows

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

California refinery closures panic politicians


05/05/25
News
05/05/25

California refinery closures panic politicians

Houston, 5 May (Argus) — California could lose up to 17pc of its refining capacity within a year, triggering major concerns about its tightly supplied and frequently volatile products market. US independent Valero announced on 16 April that it will shut or repurpose its 145,000 b/d Benicia refinery near San Francisco by April 2026. The firm is also evaluating strategic alternatives for its 85,000 b/d Wilmington refinery in Los Angeles. And independent Phillips 66 said in October that it would shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery in the fourth quarter of this year. Valero's Benicia announcement brought a quick reaction from state officials. Governor Gavin Newsom on 21 April urged regulators at the California Energy Commission (CEC) to work closely with refiners through "high-level, immediate engagement" to make sure Californians have access to transport fuels. He has ordered them to recommend by 1 July any changes to California's approach that are needed to ensure adequate fuel supply during its energy transition. The message appears to have hit home. The CEC delayed a vote on new refinery resupply rules to provide time for additional feedback and consultation with stakeholders after the Valero announcement. The CEC also plans to introduce a rule this year for minimum inventory requirements at refineries in the state as well as possible rules on setting a refiner margin cap. The new rules are part of an effort by Newsom to mitigate fuel price volatility in California, including the signing of two pieces of legislation known as AB X2-1 and SB X1-2. Refiners have been unhappy with the state's regulatory and enforcement environment for some time. It is "the most stringent and difficult" in North America owing to 20 years of policies pursuing a move away from fossil fuels, Valero chief executive Lane Riggs says. The long and short of it Refinery closures are fuelling long and short-term supply concerns in California. The most immediate is an anticipated supply crunch at the end of this summer. Phillips 66's plan to shut the Los Angeles refinery by October will deal a significant blow to the state's refining capacity and is likely to occur at a time when Californian gasoline prices are most prone to volatility. The US west coast is an isolated market, many weeks sailing time from alternative supply sources in east Asia or the US Gulf coast. California's strict product specifications further limit who can step in when refinery output falls. The state sometimes sees price spikes in late summer and early autumn because the switch from summer gasoline blends leaves local inventories low while in-state refineries adjust to producing winter grades. California gasoline prices spiked in September 2022 when stocks fell to a nine-year low on the west coast. Spot deliveries hit a record $2.45/USG premium to Nymex Rbob futures in the Los Angeles market at the time (see graph). Production problems at several refineries in southern California led to another spot price surge in September 2023. The California Air Resources Board (Carb) permitted an earlier switch to cheaper winter gasoline production in response to both events. Refinery closures will force California to rely on imports in the longer term, leaving the state exposed to stretched supply lines. State regulators' proposed solutions have raised eyebrows. The CEC's Transportation Fuels Assessment report in August last year included a policy option in which California would buy and own refineries, which the state is not pursuing. Another option involves state-owned products reserves to allow rapid deployment of fuel when needed. The CEC and Carb regulators will also release a draft transportation fuels transition plan later this year. By Eunice Bridges and Jasmine Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Crude futures slump after Opec+ output decision


05/05/25
News
05/05/25

Crude futures slump after Opec+ output decision

Singapore, 5 May (Argus) — Crude oil futures slumped to new four-year lows in Asian trading today after a core group of Opec+ members agreed to further increase output. The front-month July Ice Brent contract fell by 4.6pc to a low of $58.50/bl. June WTI futures on Nymex traded as low as $55.30/bl, a drop of 5.1pc. Prices fell after eight Opec+ members agreed on 3 May to accelerate a plan to unwind production cuts . Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan will raise their collective output target by 411,000 b/d in June, three times as much as planned in the original roadmap to gradually unwind 2.2mn b/d of crude production cuts by the middle of 2026. Prices fell despite the prospect of further violence in the Middle East. A ballistic missile fired by Yemen's Houthi militant group hit Israel's main airport early on 4 May, prompting several airlines to suspend flights to the country. Israel pledged to retaliate against the Houthis and the group's backers in Tehran. By Kevin Foster Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Opec+ eight agree accelerated hike for June: Update


03/05/25
News
03/05/25

Opec+ eight agree accelerated hike for June: Update

London, 3 May (Argus) — A core group of eight Opec+ members has agreed to accelerate, for a second consecutive month, their plan to unwind some of their production cuts, the Opec secretariat said Saturday. As it did for May, the group will again raise its collective output target by 411,000 b/d in June, three times as much as it had planned in its original roadmap to gradually unwind 2.2mn b/d of crude production cuts by the middle of next year. The original plan envisaged a slow and steady unwind over 18 months from April, with monthly increments of about 137,000 b/d. But today's decision means that the eight — Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan — will have unwound almost half of the 2.2mn b/d cut in the space of just three months. The decision to maintain this accelerated pace into June is somewhat surprising, given the weakness in oil prices and the outlook for the global economy. The eight's decision last month to deliver a three-in-one hike in May was seen as a key reason for the recent slide in oil prices, alongside US President Donald Trump's tariff policies. Front month Ice Brent futures have fallen by about $13/bl since early April to stand at just over $61/bl. But the eight today pointed to "current healthy market fundamentals, as reflected in the low oil inventories" as a key factor in its latest decision. It reiterated, as it has in the past, that the gradual monthly increases "may be paused or reversed subject to evolving market conditions." As was the case for May, delegates said that the main driver for the June hike was again a desire to send a message to those countries that have persistently breached their production targets since the start of last year — most notably Kazakhstan and Iraq, which each have significant overproduction to compensate for through the middle of next year. "This measure will provide an opportunity for the participating countries to accelerate their compensation," the secretariat said. This group of eight is due to next meet on 1 June to review market conditions and decide on July production levels. By Nader Itayim, Aydin Calik and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Opec+ eight to agree another accelerated hike for June


03/05/25
News
03/05/25

Opec+ eight to agree another accelerated hike for June

London, 3 May (Argus) — A core group of eight Opec+ members look set to today to accelerate, for a second consecutive month, their plan to unwind some of their production cuts, four delegates told Argus . As it did for May, the group would again raise its collective output target by 411,000 b/d in June, three times as much as it had planned in its original roadmap to gradually unwind 2.2mn b/d of crude production cuts by the middle of next year. The original plan envisaged a slow and steady unwind over 18 months from April, with monthly increments of about 137,000 b/d. But today's decision would mean that the eight — Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan — will have unwound almost half of the 2.2mn b/d cut in the space of just three months. The decision to maintain this accelerated pace into June would be somewhat surprising, particularly given the weakness in oil prices and the outlook for the global economy. The eight's decision last month to deliver a three-in-one hike in May was seen as a key reason for the recent slide in oil prices, alongside US President Donald Trump's tariff policies. Front month Ice Brent futures have fallen by about $13/bl since early April to stand at just over $61/bl. While Opec+ has said that it is acting to support an expected rise in summer demand, the decision to speed up the output increases once again appears to be driven by a desire to send a message to countries that have persistently breached their production targets — most notably Kazakhstan and Iraq. By Aydin Calik, Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more