Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

German election impacts on energy and mobility sectors

  • Market: Oil products
  • 17/02/25

Germany heads to the polls on 23 February, with its political parties divided over how to revive the country's struggling economy and shape climate policy in the face of continued concern over high energy costs.

How the next government's policies are shaped could significantly impact regional energy markets and Germany's role as a key player in the European economy over the next four years. But most parties appear in agreement over maintaining the outgoing government's stance on Russian gas.

Opinion polls suggest that support for the conservative CDU/CSU party has cooled in recent months, but it is still expected to be tasked with forming the next government. It is all but impossible for one party to win an absolute majority in the German parliament, so parties typically have to form a coalition. Support for the far-right AfD has grown in recent months, but the party still trails by some distance in second place. The CDU/CSU says it will not form a coalition with the AfD, so barring a dramatic surge in support for the latter in the final days of campaigning, a CDU-led coalition — possibly including the Social Democrats (SPD) and Greens — is likely to be in charge by the end of the month.

The AfD's stance on energy and climate change is largely at odds with most other parties, but the CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens have some common ground. They all acknowledge the Paris climate agreement and EU Green Deal and seek to adhere to emissions reduction mandates, and they all plan to extend the scope of the EU emissions trading system (ETS).

The three parties' manifestos chime on a need to reduce energy prices — which are widely seen as a key factor in the downturn in German industrial output — while transitioning to cleaner forms of transport and prioritising climate protection. But the parties diverge on how best to achieve these goals.

Many energy-intensive industries in Germany have struggled with high gas prices since Russia embarked on its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The three parties all say they will bring down energy prices by adjusting taxes and subsidies, and increasing power generation. The parties aim to cut network fees and electricity taxes as much as possible within the EU, and the SPD and Greens plan to encourage the European Commission to compensate energy-intensive industries for high power prices.

The three all agree that further expanding renewable energy is the best way to reduce energy prices but, unlike the SPD and Greens, the CDU/CSU is unwilling to close coal-fired power plants until they are replaced, and it wants to assess whether it is technically and financially feasible to reactivate mothballed nuclear power plants. The AfD wants to expand coal-fired and nuclear generation and halt the expansion of solar and wind.

Gas goals

The CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens all support replacing fossil gas with hydrogen in power generation and manufacturing in the near future. How soon that can happen is up in the air. Industrial groups have cited hydrogen's high costs and constantly changing legal framework as barriers to its expansion, calling for the simplification of national and EU hydrogen legislation, the continuation of subsidies for domestic production, and more consumer incentives to substitute natural gas. But the CDU/CSU also wants to reverse the gas boiler ban introduced by the outgoing government, which mandated that new buildings install heating systems using at least 65pc renewable energy from January 2024. Instead, it proposes subsidising low-emission heating solutions — regardless of the technology on which they are based.

If implemented, this could check the decline in residential gas demand, although gas consumption is likely to become less attractive after the heating and road sectors are included in the EU ETS from 2027, pushing gas costs up. The CDU/CSU has made it clear that it intends to continue adhering to the Paris and EU climate agreements, but says this is conditional on the "competitiveness of the German economy" and "social load limits". The AfD not only seeks to end putting a price on CO2 emissions altogether, it also wants to undo the EU emission reduction mandates as a whole.

Crucially, none of the potential coalition partners plans to reverse course on Russian gas — unlike the AfD, which is calling for the lifting of all sanctions on Russia, including those on gas and oil imports into the EU. The AfD also intends to reopen the undamaged pipe B of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to restart flows of Russian gas to Europe, and repair and reopen the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipes that were damaged in September 2022.

Vorsprung durch technik?

On the question of the future of mobility in Germany, there is significant disagreement between the parties that might find themselves in a coalition government. While the SPD and Green party believe that e-mobility will be most relevant and want to maintain the ban on registering internal combustion engine (Ice) cars from 2035, the CDU and AfD advocate for "technology openness" and want to reverse these agreements.

The SPD says that it wants Germany to remain a leader in car manufacturing, but with its focus on electric vehicles (EVs). In order to encourage consumers to buy EVs that are "made in Germany", it proposes tax cuts for domestically manufactured units. This might be a lesson learned from unintended consequences of the general subsidy for EV purchases that was phased out at the end of 2023 — this was as beneficial for foreign EV manufacturers as domestic ones. The Green party supports the same tax cuts, provided the car is mostly manufactured within Europe.

The SPD and Green party also believe that eFuels should primarily be used in aviation or shipping, rather than on the road. They aim to establish a climate-neutral European aviation sector through rules to prevent ‘carbon leakage', with the Greens even aiming to make domestic flights unnecessary.

The Conservatives and the AfD take a completely different approach — they believe that the market should decide which mode of mobility will prevail. Based on this belief, their main goal is to reverse the EU policy of banning new Ice car registrations from 2035. The CDU and AfD instead both aim to make Ice cars — probably running on eFuels — a financially competitive alternative to EVs. They do not believe it is the government's responsibility to influence markets in one way or another. For the AfD, this extends to not using public funds to finance vehicle charging infrastructure. The two parties also agree that EU fleet emission limits, or at least associated penalties, should be abolished to avoid subjecting the German car manufacturing industry to additional pressure.

The CDU's lead in the polls — and the performance of the AfD — reflects the priorities of Germany's voters, which are focused most heavily on immigration and the state of the economy, with energy and climate policies much further down the list. The CDU leads approval ratings on expected handling of economic issues. So the party's view on how far Germany's shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy dovetails with reviving economic competitiveness could play a role in dictating the pace of the energy transition in Europe's largest economy in the years ahead.

German power generation mix GW

Change in gas demand by sector, y-o-y GWh/d

German gas demand by year

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/25

UK EAC to explore airport expansion, net zero conflict

UK EAC to explore airport expansion, net zero conflict

London, 28 March (Argus) — UK parliament's cross-party environmental audit committee (EAC) has begun an inquiry into whether the country's airport capacity expansion could be achieved in line with its climate and environment targets. "The aviation sector is a major contributor to the UK's carbon emissions, and on the face of it, any expansion in the sector will make net zero even more elusive," EAC chair Toby Perkins said. Any expansions must meet strict climate and environment commitments, the UK government has said. The government in January expressed support for a third runway at London's Heathrow airport — the country's largest. UK transport minister Heidi Alexander said in February that she was "minded to approve" an expansion at London's Gatwick airport, ahead of a final decision in October. The expansion would involve Gatwick making its northern runway operational. It is currently only used as a back-up option. The government is also "contemplating decisions on airport expansion projects at London Luton… and on the reopening of Doncaster Sheffield," Perkins said. "It is possible — but very difficult — for the airport expansion programme to be consistent with environmental goals," Perkins said. "We look forward to exploring how the government believes this can be achieved." The UK has a legally-binding target of net zero emissions by 2050. Its carbon budgets — a cap on emissions over a certain period — are also legally binding. The government must this year set levels for the UK's seventh carbon budget , which will cover the period 2038-42. The committee has invited written submissions on the possible airport expansions and net zero, with a deadline of 24 April. It will report in the autumn. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Oil, biofuel groups meet to align on RFS policy


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

Oil, biofuel groups meet to align on RFS policy

New York, 27 March (Argus) — Energy and farm groups met last week at the American Petroleum Institute to negotiate a joint request for President Donald Trump's administration as it develops new biofuel blend mandates, according to five people familiar with the matter. The private meeting involved groups from across the supply chain, including representatives of feedstock suppliers, biofuel producers, fuel marketers, and oil refiners with Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) obligations. The groups coordinated earlier this year around a letter to the Trump administration on the need to update the RFS and are now seeking agreement on other program elements. According to the people familiar with the matter, the groups agree on pushing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set higher blend mandates under the program's D4 biomass-based diesel and D5 advanced biofuel categories. Groups support slightly different volume targets that are nevertheless all in "a rounding number of each other" in the D4 category, according to one lobbyist. But there is still disagreement about whether to ramp up mandates quickly in 2026 or provide a longer runway to higher volumes. Clean Fuels Alliance America and farm groups have publicly supported a biomass-based diesel mandate of at least 5.25bn USG starting next year, which could justify a broader advanced biofuel mandate above 9bn USG, according to the people familiar, though others worry about fuel cost impacts if mandates spike so quickly. The current mandate for 2025 is 7.33bn USG in the advanced biofuels category, including a 3.35bn USG mandate for the biomass-based diesel subcategory, so the volumes being pushed for future years would be a steep increase. The RFS, highly influential for fuel and commodity crop prices, requires oil refiners and importers to blend annual amounts of biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits from those who do. The idea behind the groups' coordination is that the Trump administration might more quickly finalize RFS updates if lobbyists with a history of sparring over biofuel policy can articulate a shared vision of the program's future. One person familiar said the effort comes after the Trump administration directed industry to align biofuel policy goals, though others said they understood the coordination as largely voluntary. EPA did not provide comment. There is less agreement around the program's D6 conventional biofuel category, which is mostly met by corn ethanol. Oil groups have in the past criticized EPA for setting the implied D6 mandate at 15bn USG, above the amount of ethanol that can feasibly be blended into gasoline, though excess biofuels from lower-carbon categories can be used to meet conventional obligations. Ethanol interests support setting the D6 mandate even higher than 15bn USG, which could be a tough sell. The discussions to date have not involved targets for D3 cellulosic biofuels, a relatively small part of the program. A proposal to lower 2024 volumes has hurt D3 credit prices, signaling that future mandates are effectively optional, according to frustrated biogas executives , and has reduced the salience of the issue for other groups. A proposal from President Joe Biden's administration to create a new category called "eRINs" to credit biogas used to power electric vehicles has similarly not come up. "We're not expecting to see any attempt to include eRINs in this next [RFS] proposal," Renewable Fuels Association president Geoff Cooper told Argus earlier this month. The meeting last week was largely oriented around the RFS, though a National Association of Truck Stop Operators representative raised the issue of tax policy too. The group has been frustrated by the expiration of a long-running blenders credit and the introduction this year of a less generous credit for refiners, which is only partially implemented and has spurred a sharp decline in biomass-based diesel production. But others involved in negotiations, while they acknowledge tax uncertainty could hurt their case for strong mandates, are trying to avoid contentious topics and focus mostly on volumes. Republican lawmakers are separately weighing whether to keep, repeal, or adjust that credit to help out fuel from domestic crops, and there is no telling how long that debate might take to resolve. Another thorny issue discussed at the meeting is RFS exemptions for small refineries. Biofuel producers strongly oppose such waivers and say that exempted volumes should at least be reallocated among facilities that still have obligations. Oil groups have their own views, though it is unclear how involved the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers — which represents some small refiners and has generally been more critical of the RFS than the American Petroleum Institute — are in discussions. EPA is aiming to finalize new volume mandates by the end of this year , people familiar with the administration's thinking have said, though timing for a proposal is still unclear. Future conversations among energy and farm groups to solidify points of unity — and strategize around how to downplay disagreements — are likely, lobbyists said. RIN prices rally Speculation over the trajectory of the RFS, and the potential for higher future volumes, supported soybean oil futures and widened the bean oil-heating oil (BOHO) spread. The BOHO spread maintains a positive correlation with D4 RIN prices as a widening value raises demand for D4 credits as biofuel producers look to offset higher production costs. Thursday's session ended with current-year ethanol D6 credits valued between 79¢/RIN and 82¢/RIN, while their D4 counterparts held at a premium and closed with a range of 84¢/RIN to 89¢/RIN. These gains each measured more than 5.5pc growth relative to Wednesday's values. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Repsol to begin Nantes bitumen terminal flows in April


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

Repsol to begin Nantes bitumen terminal flows in April

London, 27 March (Argus) — Spanish integrated Repsol plans to supply next week its first bitumen cargo to the Nantes import terminal on the French Atlantic coast. It will move a second cargo to the terminal during April. The start of these flows will coincide with the scheduled restart of the 50/50 Repsol/Moeve joint venture 1.2mn t/yr Asesa bitumen refinery. The refinery has been down since early March for planned maintenance work. The Nantes oil products terminal, including the bitumen storage facility there, has been operated by Dutch liquid bulk storage firm Chane since summer 2024, after a rebrand from its previous name Alkion Terminals. Shell ceased its bitumen cargo throughput deal into and truck supply operation from Nantes and Bayonne at the end of 2024. Repsol and Abu Dhabi-controlled Spanish energy company Moeve then struck exclusive deals to supply bitumen cargoes to Nantes and Bayonne respectively. Cepsa began exclusively using the Bayonne bitumen terminal from 1 February. Repsol has been increasingly active in bitumen export markets over the past year or so, underlined by rising cargo flows from its 135,000 b/d La Coruna and 220,000 b/d Bilbao refineries on the Spanish Atlantic coast. The Nantes terminal has three 4,000t storage tanks. One of the tanks is undergoing work and will be available for use from June. By Fenella Rhodes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK GHG emissions fell by 4pc in 2024


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

UK GHG emissions fell by 4pc in 2024

London, 27 March (Argus) — The UK's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions fell by 4pc year-on-year in 2024, provisional data released by the government today show, driven principally by lower gas and coal use in the power and industry sectors. GHG emissions in the UK totalled 371mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) last year, the data show, representing a fall of 54pc compared with 1990 levels. The UK has legally-binding targets to cut its GHG emissions by 68pc by 2030 and 81pc by 2035 against 1990 levels, and to reach net zero emissions by 2050. The electricity sector posted the largest proportional year-on-year fall of 15pc, standing 82pc below 1990 levels at 37.5mn t CO2e. The decline was largely a result of record-high net imports and a 7pc increase in renewable output reducing the call on coal and gas-fired generation, as well as the closure of the country's last coal power plant in September , which together outweighed a marginal rise in overall electricity demand, the government said. Industry posted the next largest emissions decline of 9pc, falling to 48.3mn t CO2e, or 69pc below 1990 levels, as a result of lower coal use across sectors and the closure of iron and steel blast furnaces. Fuel supply emissions fell by 6pc to 28.4mn t CO2e, 63pc below where they stood in 1990. And emissions in the UK's highest-emitting sector, domestic transport, fell by 2pc to 110.1mn t CO2e, 15pc below 1990 levels, as road vehicle diesel use declined. Emissions in the remaining sectors, including agriculture, waste and land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), edged down collectively by 1pc to 67.2mn t CO2e, some 50pc below 1990 levels. Only emissions from buildings and product uses increased on the year, rising by 2pc as gas use increased, but still standing 27pc below 1990 levels at 79.8mn t CO2e. UK-based international aviation emissions, which are not included in the overall UK GHG figures, rose by 9pc last year to reach pre-Covid 19 pandemic levels of 26.1mn t CO2e, the data show. But UK-based international shipping emissions edged down by 1pc to 6.2mn t CO2e. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Virgin, Qatar airlines partner on Australia SAF project


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

Virgin, Qatar airlines partner on Australia SAF project

Singapore, 27 March (Argus) — Privately-held airline Virgin Australia and state-owned carrier Qatar Airways will partner with bioenergy firm Renewable Developments Australia (RDA) on a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) project near the city of Charters Towers in northern Queensland state. The project seeks to build an alcohol-to-jet (AtJ) facility with a nameplate capacity of 96mn litres/yr of SAF to be supplied to nearby airports, most likely to terminals at Townsville and Cairns city. The refinery is in the pre-final investment decision stage and is aiming to reach first output in early 2029, according to RDA. "Our SAF facility will be a fully integrated production site, generating sustainable fuel from bioethanol derived from locally grown sugarcane," RDA managing director Tony D'Alessandro said on 27 March. SAF by-products will be used to generate renewable power on-site and increase sustainability credentials, RDA said. Qatar last year agreed to buy a 25pc stake in Virgin , Australia's second-largest airline, with plans to increase international flights to Australia using Qatar planes wet leased by Virgin approved last month. The development comes after Virgin last week agreed to a deal with Australian refiner Viva Energy to operate services from the town of Proserpine in north Queensland using a SAF blend for several months this year . North Queensland's sugar industry has attracted interest from other developers of AtJ plants, including Australian bioenergy developer Jet Zero's 113mn l/yr Project Ulysses at Townsville, which has attracted funding from investors including Australian carrier Qantas, Airbus and Japanese energy conglomerate Idemitsu Kosan. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more