Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

ExxonMobil 'underestimates' CO2 risks

  • Market: Emissions
  • 11/09/14

ExxonMobil underestimates the risks to its business from climate change curbs and its pursuit of high capital, lower-return projects threaten shareholder value, carbon risk analysis firm the Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI) said today.

ExxonMobil's returns have fallen and its share price performance has deteriorated as it invested in capital intensive, low-return projects such as oil sands, CTI said in a report, Responding to Exxon — A Strategic Perspective.

"Exxon's underperformance over the past five years may be associated with its increased investment in lower return, capital-intensive assets. These high-cost projects include carbon intensive tar sand and arctic assets — high carbon and high cost often go hand in hand," CTI chief executive Anthony Hobley said.

Tar sands and heavy oil accounted for 7.5pc of ExxonMolbil's proven oil and gas reserves and around 15pc of its liquid reserves in 2007. By the end of 2013, this had risen to 17pc and 32pc, respectively. By contrast, conventional projects fell from 45pc to 33pc of total proven reserves, the report said.

Also, based on ExxonMobil's resource estimates, the proportion of such high capital, lower-return projects is likely to continue to rise and could potentially weigh on group returns — unless the company's management changes course.

"A strategy focusing on lower cost projects, stricter capital discipline and increased distribution to shareholders may boost group returns and lower risk, CTI said.

CTI's analysis is in response to a March statement from ExxonMobil, Energy and Carbon — Managing the Risks, which aimed to assure investors that the company was managing its climate-related risks. This was in response to a resolution from activist shareholders Arjuna Capital and As You Sow that questioned ExxonMobil's potential carbon asset risks.

ExxonMobil was one of the first oil and gas companies to react to an initiative by CTI and sustainability campaign group CERES to engage with fossil fuel majors on their carbon asset risks. As part of this initiative, the two think-tanks earlier this year released a report, Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Oil Capital Expenditures.

The earlier study highlighted the risks that lower demand for fossil fuels, more ambitious emissions regulation, technological advances and improved efficiency pose for highest–risk, highest–cost oil projects and shareholder value. It further identified ExxonMobil as having the second-highest total capital expenditure exposure to 2025.

Today's study said that ExxonMobil's narrow definition of stranded assets may leave it unprepared for a shift in the oil market and could risk projects delivering an unacceptably low return to shareholders.

"Exxon does not seem to consider the financial risk to it and other oil producers from the potential for global oil demand to begin declining within the next 10-15 years, even without robust climate policies," it said.

According to ExxonMobil, it is difficult to envision governments opting for a low-carbon path. But contrary to ExxonMobil's assumption, the share of global GHG emissions subject to national legislation or emission-reduction strategies rose to 67pc from 45pc between 2007 and 2012, the CTI study points out.

As such, a strategy focusing on lower-cost projects, stricter capital discipline and increased distribution to shareholders may boost group returns and lower risk, the report said.

ExxonMobil ought to consider more seriously the likelihood of a 2°C rise scenario and the implications for its business model, the report said. "It should be worrying for investors that Exxon, although recognising the need to manage climate change risks, continues with an investment strategy that seems to assume business as usual," the report said.

em/gb

Send comments to feedback@argusmedia.com





If you would like to review other ArgusMedia.com content options, request more information about Argus' energy news, data and analysis services.

Copyright © 2014 Argus Media Ltd - www.ArgusMedia.com - All rights reserved.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

New German climate minister stresses nature angle


07/05/25
News
07/05/25

New German climate minister stresses nature angle

Berlin, 7 May (Argus) — Germany's new federal minister for the environment, climate action, nature conservation and nuclear safety today stressed the importance of "healthy nature" to protect the climate, and of renewable energies and "innovative" technologies to reduce carbon emissions in Germany. Environment minister Carsten Schneider, of the co-ruling left-of-centre SPD party, was sworn in on Tuesday evening with his cabinet colleagues. Schneider said he is looking forward to "driving forward climate action in the coming years, and to promoting the preservation and improvement of our natural resources in nature and the environment, for soil, water and air". Schneider said it is "good and right" to once again have national and international climate action, along with nature conservation and environmental protection, bundled in the environment ministry. Germany's last government split the climate dossier between the economy ministry, which was given the climate action portfolio, and the foreign ministry, which dealt with international climate policy. Previous economy minister Robert Habeck of the Green party last month criticised the decision to exclude climate action from the economy ministry, emphasising the "interlocking" between climate action, industry and energy policy. Schneider today underlined the crucial importance of "ambitious marine protection", and of continuing the previous ministry's natural climate protection action programme to boost the "important" ecosystems in forests, moors and bodies of water. The ministry will support cities and municipalities on nature conservation and climate adaptation, he said. Schneider made no mention of carbon markets or emissions trading systems. Schneider, the former special envoy for Germany's eastern states, is a budget expert with no climate or environment background. His permanent junior minister is Jochen Flasbarth, former permanent junior minister at the development ministry and a permanent junior minister at the environment ministry between 2013-21, at a time when the environment minister was responsible for climate policy. Flasbarth was involved in international climate negotiations, including the UN Cop 21 climate summit in Paris in 2015. Flasbarth is also a former president of federal environment office UBA. Flasbarth as junior development minister urged richer developing countries such as China or Saudi Arabia to contribute more to international climate finance . By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Energy-related methane emissions not falling: IEA


07/05/25
News
07/05/25

Energy-related methane emissions not falling: IEA

Paris, 7 May (Argus) — Emissions of the greenhouse gas methane from the energy sector did not fall in 2024 despite widespread pledges to cut them, as few countries have delivered solid plans, according to energy watchdog the IEA. Methane emissions from the fossil fuel sector totalled around 120mn t last year, the organisation said in its global tracker released today. This is in line with emissions in recent years, which have held roughly steady since 2019. The gas has contributed to around 30pc of human-induced global warming since the industrial revolution, the agency said. Four countries — China, Russia, the US and Iran — were responsible for more than 50pc of fossil fuel-related methane emissions last year, with a 20pc, 16pc, 11pc and 5pc share, respectively. Fossil-fuel related methane emissions have held steady, but methane intensity has dropped slightly since 2019, as hydrocarbon production has increased, the IEA said. The watchdog has brought new emissions sources within its remit, integrating emissions from abandoned facilities, including coal mines, for the first time. These sites were responsible for 7.7mn t of emissions in 2024, it found, of which 70pc comes from just three countries — China with 36pc, the US with 21pc and Russia with 12pc. Around three quarters of global hydrocarbon by country of origin, and half by producing firm, falls under voluntary agreements to cut methane emissions, including the Global methane pledge aiming to cut emissions by 30pc by 2030 from 2020. Only 5pc of oil and gas emissions is currently produced under verifiable near-zero emissions standards, the IEA said. It has doubled its estimate of methane released by bioenergy, to 20mn t from 10mn t, largely from incomplete combustion of traditional biomass, with India accounting for a fifth of the total. Around 2mn t comes from biogas and biomethane. Leaks from biogas and biomethane production sites can undermine or entirely cancel out the benefit of switching to these fuels from natural gas, it said. It estimates methane intensity from biogas and biomethane — the proportion of produced gas which leaks — at 8pc and 4pc in Asia-pacific and Europe respectively, the two leading regions in the sector. The IEA estimates that 30pc of fossil fuel-related emissions could have been abated at no net cost, down from its estimate of 40pc of last year because of falls in gas prices. The current round of updates of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) — plans to cut emissions — offers an opportunity to increase ambition, the IEA said. Only 30 NDCs as of 2024 laid out specific measures for targeting methane, while only nine had precise targets. But China last year announced that its NDC would cover all greenhouse gases. US methane The IEA predicts a 35pc fall in US energy-related methane emissions by 2030, despite rollbacks of Biden-era methane initiatives since the beginning of Donald Trump's second presidency. Trump in March blocked a rule which would have obliged producers to pay $900/t for methane emissions, slated to cut fugitive emissions from the US' sprawling gas industry. But some state laws remain on the books, the IEA said, such as limits to venting and flaring in New Mexico and Colorado. And some US firms are still members of emissions cut partnerships such as the UN methane initiative and the oil and gas decarbonisation charter . US producers can still deploy abatement projects which have a positive rate of return, allowing more gas to be brought to market, the IEA said. But lower gas prices in the US compared to prevailing global markets could lessen the incentive for US producers to cut emissions in the absence of binding regulations. By Rhys Talbot Fossil fuel-related methane emissions, 2024 mn t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s CER sees disinterest in carbon trading tool


07/05/25
News
07/05/25

Australia’s CER sees disinterest in carbon trading tool

Sydney, 7 May (Argus) — Australia's Clean Energy Regulator (CER) plans to work with existing carbon credit trading platforms to potentially link them to its new registry, following a lack of market interest in a carbon credit trading tool proposed late last year. The CER did not see "a lot of enthusiasm" for the use of a financial instrument developed by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) as a trading model for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs), chair and chief executive David Parker said on 7 May at lobby group Carbon Market Institute (CMI)'s Carbon Farming Industry Forum in New South Wales, Australia. "What people did say was that they wanted us building up infrastructure… linking [over-the-counter] trading platforms into our new registry," Parker noted. The CER had previously planned to develop and operate the so-called Australian Carbon Exchange for spot ACCU transactions, but had already indicated it pushed back on the idea when it consulted on the trading tool late last year. Its proposal would see participants using a Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) Depository Interest (CDI) — a mechanism used by the ASX to allow the trading of interests in bonds and some international shares on the exchange. Under the proposed model, market participants would not be required to have a registry account to buy beneficial interests in ACCUs through CDIs. They would be able to trade the CDIs multiple times and would only need registry accounts if they needed to convert the CDIs into ACCUs for actual delivery. Currently, climate solutions and markets firm Core Markets, brokerage firm Jarden, and environmental marketplace Xpansiv's CBL each have separate trading platforms for ACCUs. Exchanges ASX and CME last year launched separate futures contracts for physically-deliverable ACCUs, although trading interest has been very limited so far. Core Markets is working on developing its platform so that it would be able to potentially link to the CER's registry in the future, chief executive Chris Halliwell told Argus on the sidelines of the event on 7 May. The CER launched its new registry late last year. It started issuing the new safeguard mechanism credit units into the new registry, and plans to transfer ACCUs from the existing Australian National Registry of Emissions Units later this year. New units and certificates such as renewable energy guarantees of origin and biodiversity certificates under the nature repair market will be added to the new registry, while large-scale generation certificates and small-scale technology certificates will continue in the renewable energy certificate registry. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US EIA will not release international outlook in 2025


06/05/25
News
06/05/25

US EIA will not release international outlook in 2025

Washington, 6 May (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) no longer expects to publish one of its major energy reports this year after losing some of its staff through President Donald Trump's efforts to downsize the federal workforce. The EIA does not plan to publish its International Energy Outlook (IEA) — which models long-term global trends in energy supply and demand — this year because of a loss of staff responsible for producing the report, according to an internal email initially reported by the news outlet ProPublica . The EIA confirmed the authenticity of the email. "At this point, you can assume that we will not be releasing the IEO this year," the EIA's Office of Energy Analysis assistant administrator Angelina LaRose wrote in the 16 April email. "This was a difficult decision based on the loss of key resources." Oil and gas producers, traders, utility companies, federal regulators and foreign governments have come to rely on the data and models from the EIA, an independent agency within the US Department of Energy. The 2025 version of the IEO might still be published early next year, the EIA said. The agency for now is focusing on trying to "preserve as much institutional knowledge as possible" with an "all hands-on deck" effort under which remaining staff will document models and procedures on long-term modeling, LaRose wrote in the email. Trump and his administration have worked to cut the size of the government's workforce through voluntary buyouts and a process known as a reduction in force. The EIA has yet to say how many personnel it has lost, but about a third of the agency's 350 staffers have accepted voluntary buyouts, according to a person familiar with the situation. The White House last week proposed an 18pc budget cut for the non-nuclear portions of the Department of Energy, but has yet to say if it is seeking to cut spending at the EIA. Last month, the EIA released its premier report, the Annual Energy Outlook , but omitted its traditional in-depth analysis. A technical issue on 1 May delayed the release of a key natural gas storage report by more than three hours, the EIA said. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more