Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

German industry backs EU CO2 border tax

  • Market: Emissions
  • 23/09/19

The EU emissions trading system (ETS) is failing to shield industry from carbon leakage, and the EU should introduce carbon border measures to help European firms compete internationally, some of Germany's largest industrial companies have said.

Calls for an EU-wide carbon border tax have increased in recent months, after European commission president-elect Ursula von der Leyen pledged to introduce legislation proposing the idea in her first 100 days of office. She begins her five-year term in November.

A carbon border tax would impose a levy on imports into the EU from non-EU countries, so that the imported product is subject to CO2 costs comparable with if it had been made in Europe, where its emissions would have been covered by the EU ETS.

The price of an EU ETS permit, which allows a company to emit one tonne of CO2, has more than tripled since the start of 2018. The EU gives free ETS allowances to industry to attempt to avoid carbon leakage, which occurs when firms relocate to non-EU regions to avoid paying ETS costs.

But this system is not working, according to industrial firms.

"If you want to keep industry in Europe, additional carbon leakage measures have to be implemented. That could be a carbon border adjustment," HeidelbergCement's EU public affairs director Rob van der Meer said.

EU cement-makers say they are struggling to compete with firms in countries such as Turkey and Egypt, which have lower production costs, partly because they do not face the EU's CO2 costs. It is also relatively cheap to ship cement and clinker to Europe from countries further afield, such as China, which accounts for more than half of the world's cement production.

These challenges will become more acute from 2021, when the EU will tighten the amount of free permits it gives to industry.

"This will become even more evident in phase four of the EU ETS [2021-30], when the free allocation changes," HeidelbergCement Berlin liaison office head Christoph Reissfelder said.

German chemicals firm BASF also called for carbon border measures to help EU firms stay competitive.

"We need a competitive CO2 price globally, but until then we need compensation on the border, otherwise our products will be so expensive that we will not be able to sell them on the global market," BASF head of energy and climate policy Claus Beckmann said.

One way to implement border measures would be to define carbon benchmarks for product groups, and apply these to all imports, regardless of which country the product comes from. Applying the tax to products, rather than specific countries, could help ensure it complies with World Trade Organisation rules, Beckmann said.

‘Second best'

German industry associations also back EU carbon border measures, but said an international ETS would be a more efficient way to support decarbonisation in their sectors.

Higher EU ETS costs are "really reducing our international competitiveness in a very difficult international environment", German steel association Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl executive director Martin Theuringer said, pointing to challenges including global steel overcapacity, market dumping and risks arising from the US-China trade war.

The EU can tackle carbon leakage by giving industry more free ETS permits, or by compensating firms for their electricity costs if higher carbon prices cause power prices to rise, he said.

"But if all this fails, then of course we have to think about developing new instruments to integrate other countries' supplies into our carbon pricing system, and that is basically a border adjustment," he said.

EU carbon border measures are likely to become necessary, according to German industry, mining and chemical trade union IG BCE's head of energy and economic policy, Ralf Bartels. But they "will always be second best to an international emissions trading system", he added.

A carbon border tax is not without risks. One concern is the threat of retaliatory measures from other countries, according to Heiko Reese, head of metal workers' union IG Metall's office in Dusseldorf.

And a product-based tax could be hard to implement in the chemicals sector, as calculating and applying a carbon duty to thousands of different products would be a practical challenge, the German chemical industry association's head of energy and climate, Jorg Rothermel, said.

Industrial emissions

Europe's heavy industry will face increasing pressure to cut its emissions in the coming years — especially if the EU sets an economy-wide target to reach net zero emissions by 2050, which would probably require all sectors to cut emissions by at least 95pc.

Emissions from EU industry have barely fallen since 2013, while the EU power sector has cut its emissions by 17pc over the same period.

Some industrial sectors have performed better than others. ETS emissions from steel production were 122.2mn t CO2 equivalent (CO2e) last year, down by 7pc compared with 2013. But emissions from cement production increased by 7pc over the same period to 121.3mn t CO2e in 2018 (see chart).

Environmental groups say that the EU's decision to give industry free allowances has reduced the incentive for these sectors to cut CO2 emissions. The cement sector received roughly 64mn more free permits in 2013-18 than its EU ETS emissions over the period — although this accounts only for emissions from cement production, and not from the sector's fuel combustion to generate power.

There are also technological challenges to reducing emissions in industry, with no quick fix to decarbonising some CO2-intensive industrial processes, while the power sector can make large CO2 savings by switching from coal to gas-fired power generation.

Many of the technologies that industrial sectors are betting on — such as using hydrogen instead of coal to produce low-carbon steel — have not yet reached commercial scale. These technologies require large investments in order to reach commercialisation, and could increase the cost of steel production by 20-30pc. EU steel firms say they need public funding to help them bear these costs and remain competitive.

EU ETS emissions for selected sectors mn t CO2e

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
17/03/25

EU prepares CBAM export scheme

EU prepares CBAM export scheme

Brussels, 17 March (Argus) — The European Commission is preparing a "solution" for exported goods under the bloc's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), to be presented before the end of the year. The commission will also expand the scope of the CBAM to "certain" steel and aluminium-intensive downstream products. The changes to the CBAM will be announced as part of a European steel and metals plan. In a draft of the plan to be formally presented on 19 March, the commission points to the need to address the problem of carbon leakage for CBAM goods exported from the EU to non-EU countries. The draft also notes that the commission is currently "quantifying" risks, before proposing an extension of the CBAM to "certain" steel and aluminium-intensive downstream products, so as to address the risk of European producers relocating outside the bloc to avoid higher carbon costs. The metals plan also announces an anti-circumvention strategy for the CBAM to be presented in the second half of 2025. The commission points to the risk of goods from low-carbon production facilities in non-EU countries being redirected to European customers, while carbon-intensive production continues for other markets. The metals plan also points to the risk of "greenwashing" carbon accounting practices, with "electro-intensive metals production benefiting from market-based instruments to appear low-carbon". The commission put forward proposals last month to simplify the CBAM, exempting some 90pc of the firms currently covered by the mechanism. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips


17/03/25
News
17/03/25

Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips

Brussels, 17 March (Argus) — The European Commission appears to have pushed back an official proposal for a 2040 climate target for the EU, which will further delay the bloc's submission of a 2035 climate plan to the UN. The commission's agenda does not include the presentation of a legal proposal for a 2040 climate target before the end of the first quarter. The commission in February 2024 confirmed its preference for a 90pc cut in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by 2040, from a 1990 baseline — but this was not a formal proposal. The commission had scheduled an amendment to the European Climate Law for the first quarter of 2025. That amendment would write an intermediate target for 2040 into EU law. The 2040 target would also provide the basis for the EU's updated nationally determined contribution (NDC) — or climate plan — to UN climate body the UNFCCC. Countries and jurisdictions were expected to submit updated NDCs, covering up to 2035, to the UNFCCC by 10 February. Officials said work is "ongoing" on the bloc's 2040 climate target. It would be presented "sooner rather than later" and there is still "time left until the end of the first quarter". An EU source indicated reluctance to present a 2040 climate plan before Poland's presidential elections on 18 May, which may have a runoff on 1 June. Poland chairs meetings of EU ministers until 1 July. The source also said several other parties to the UNFCCC have missed the 10 February deadline to submit their 2035 emissions reduction targets. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil to pilot reforestation concession


17/03/25
News
17/03/25

Brazil to pilot reforestation concession

Sao Paulo, 17 March (Argus) — Brazil's Para state in the Amazon basin will concede reforesting 10,000 hectares (ha) in the Triunfo do Xingu environmental reserve as part of efforts to protect more rainforest ahead of the UN Cop 30 climate summit in November. The 40-year concession will require R258.3mn ($45.3mn) in investments and capture an estimated 3.7mn metric tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e)/yr, according to the Para state government. The 1.6mn ha Triunfo do Xingu reserve, which was created in 2006, has seen significant environmental degradation in recent years from illegal deforestation. Last year, the reserve lost 1,400km² (870 mi²) to illegal deforestation, the bulk of which was converted into pastureland. The concession, which will be Brazil's first for reforestation, will be a test case for the government's efforts to recover its tropical forests and is possible because of legislation approved in 2023, which allows carbon offsets to be issued on public lands. The auction will take place on 28 March at the B3 stock exchange, in Sao Paulo state. The winner of the project will be allowed to sell carbon offsets and environmental services credits, which will be generated by reforesting and preserving the forest. The sale of some forestry products is also approved. The Para state government estimates that the concession will generate gross revenues of R21.7mn/yr. Para will also sell two other 10,000ha concessions later this year, it said. Brazil has continued to reduce deforestation in the Amazon forest. It lost just 80.9km² of Amazon rainforest in February, down more than 64pc from the same month last year. February deforestation was the lowest on record, according to the science and technology ministry's national space institute INPE. Brazil's goal is to eliminate all deforestation by 2030. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German climate fund to get €100bn under new government


14/03/25
News
14/03/25

German climate fund to get €100bn under new government

Berlin, 14 March (Argus) — The parties likely to form Germany's next government today doubled their proposed climate action share to €100bn to reach an agreement with the Green party to secure the passing of their debt-financed defence and infrastructure package. The right-of-centre CDU/CSU, centre-left SPD and Green parties today announced that the latter had agreed to the former's budget proposals, paving the way for a successful vote in the lower house of parliament on 18 March. The prospective coalition parties for Germany's next government following last month's federal elections need the Green party for a vote on three changes to the federal constitution, which now appears certain to be won, barring protest votes by too many CDU/CSU deputies or absences. In addition to the proposed €500bn special fund for infrastructure, the coalition parties propose to exempt defence spending from the constitutionally enshrined debt brake, and to lift the debt limits on federal states. The CDU/CSU and SPD had yesterday offered the Greens an allocation of "up to" €50bn from the infrastructure fund to the climate and transformation fund KTF. According to the final agreement, the infrastructure fund will be valid for 12 years instead of 10 as originally planned. This is equivalent to some €41.6bn/yr, of which €33bn will be allocated to the federal government and the remainder to the federal states. A limit of 10pc of the federal budget will apply, with the federal ministry to clarify the details. The infrastructure fund bill stipulates funding be made available only for "additional" tasks. Outgoing economy minister Robert Habeck said in Berlin before the agreement was announced that the Greens would not accept the possibility, under the infrastructure fund, of incurring debt only to be able to then cut taxes. Habeck noted the "irony" of the fact that the transport sector's dismal performance in cutting emissions , owing in part to last year's sharp drop in electric vehicle (EV) sales, can be partly attributed to the same CDU/CSU that is now proposing EV buyer's premiums and a huge increase to the KTF. The CDU/CSU in 2023 sued the outgoing government over its attempt to transfer remaining money earmarked for fighting the Covid-19 pandemic into the KTF. The constitutional court's ruling in November 2023 against this transfer of about €60bn threw the government's climate and spending plans into disarray, leading among other things to a swift axing of Germany's EV buyer's premium. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK, Chinese ministers to meet for formal climate talks


14/03/25
News
14/03/25

UK, Chinese ministers to meet for formal climate talks

London, 14 March (Argus) — UK energy minister Ed Miliband will visit Beijing to meet Chinese ministers for "formal talks to accelerate climate action", the UK government said today. Miliband will meet China's national energy administrator minister Wang Hongzhi and ecology and environment minister Huang Runqiu. "The UK is expected to launch a formal climate dialogue with Chinese counterparts, inviting Chinese ministers to London later this year, and for the first time institutionalising climate change talks between both countries moving forward," the UK government said. Miliband will "urge continued action from China," the government added. The UK also plans to "refresh" a clean energy partnership with China, which will set out areas on which the two governments could "securely collaborate", such as hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and phasing out coal. China is the world's biggest emitter but is also the biggest supplier of renewable energy globally and has significant refining and processing capacity for critical minerals that are key for the energy transition. And the country is rapidly increasing its renewable power. China's installed renewable power capacity rose to nearly 1.85TW at the end of 2024 , accounting for 55pc of total installed power capacity. The UK is typically viewed as a leader on climate action at talks such as UN Cop summits — a role the government has made clear it is keen to build on. A strong working relationship with China is more crucial than ever to ensure progress at climate talks this year, as US president Donald Trump's decision to pull his country out of the Paris climate agreement will shift the focus to other major economies. China portrayed itself as a reliable leader on climate at Cop 29 in November last year, including making concessions on the language used to describe its climate finance contributions. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more