Singapore spot bunker demand dries up as IMO looms

Market: Oil products
12/11/19

Spot supplies of high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) are drying up in Singapore as more buyers turn to term contracts ahead of the global implementation of the IMO 2020 sulphur cap.

Most shipowners have not installed scrubbers and are instead planning to burn whatever HSFO supplies they still have on board their vessels by Christmas at the latest.

"We buy less HSFO on spot these days, as most of our bigger vessels were filled up recently before the persistent prompt constraints in Singapore", one buyer said.

Singapore prompt supplies of HSFO started to tighten significantly in July as the market adjusted to the IMO rules, which will cap sulphur content in marine fuels at 0.5pc on 1 January, down from 3.5pc now.

Delivered bunker premiums have stayed elevated levels on concerns about supply availability in Singapore, the world's largest bunker port. The premium of delivered 380cst HSFO to cargo prices has averaged $81/t so far in November, a tenfold increase from the average premium in the first six months of this year, according to Argus data.

"The switchover is making it difficult to optimise barges, and the few players that still have HSFO in storage tanks and are able to deliver it are basically determining prices and earning very good margins. Prices have not yet come down in line with fundamentals", a trader said.

The tightness in the HSFO market in Singapore has also affected other ports in Asia, with several Chinese ports struggling with terminal and barge congestion. Delivered HSFO in Shanghai, Zhoushan and Hong Kong has averaged a $41/t, $24/t and $15/t premium to Singapore so far this month, Argus data show.

Some shipowners have instead sought to bunker in Fujairah, where HSFO bunker prices are nearing a $100/t discount to Singapore, mainly as a result of abundant regional supplies.

Demand for LSFO has picked up strongly in Singapore since early October. Consumption is no longer limited to those using the fuel for testing purposes or voyages to China's emission control areas (ECAs). Owners have instead started cleaning out their tanks in earnest and are now consuming larger sized LSFO stems for longer journeys.

A growing share of LSFO demand is being met by supplies that were earlier locked in on a term basis, with fewer owners willing to buy on the spot market. "One must be mad to buy LSFO on the spot market", said one buyer, referring to the higher prices of spot supplies.

This trend will intensify further in the coming months, as shipowners grow increasingly concerned about LSFO availability beyond the first quarter of 2020. This will lead buyers to tie up the majority of their requirements for IMO-compliant fuels through term contracts for the second quarter and beyond.

Owners have agreed term contracts for LSFO until March at discounts of around $40-50/t to gasoil cargo prices. Spot prices for LSFO have averaged a discount of $30/t to delivered low-sulphur marine gasoil (LSMGO) so far in November, according to Argus data. "Since quite a few barges are still getting cleaned and are not in service yet, some LSFO stems for prompt delivery have been sold at discounts of up to $15-20/t to LSMGO after trading hours", another trader said.

"The majors have been locking in term in order to secure volume, which we have done too, but we have made sure to have some HSFO and LSFO spot barrels for sale as well in order to enjoy these high premiums", a supplier said.

Argus has reported an average of 16 bunker deals a day so far in November for all grades, down from 24 during October, reflecting lower spot market activity.

By Sammy Six

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

06/01/25

German fuel prices rise with new GHG quota, CO2 levy

Hamburg, 6 January (Argus) — Prices for road fuels and heating oil in Germany rose at the start of the year as a result of an increased greenhouse gas (GHG) quota and CO2 levy, as well as higher Ice gasoil futures. Many filling stations are replenishing stocks, and low temperatures have led to more heating oil orders. German wholesale prices for heating oil, diesel, and gasoline increased because of a 1.25 percentage point increase in the GHG quota and a €10/t CO2 increase in the CO2 levy, which came in on 1 January. The increase in heating oil was €4.94/100l, in diesel €6.79/100l, and in gasoline €5.36/100l. Heating oil is excluded from Germany's GHG mandate. This price rise roughly matches Argus ' estimates from December. But higher Ice gasoil futures since the turn of the year led to a bigger price increase than originally expected. Lower gasoil imports from east of Suez into the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub in December are lending support to futures. Heating oil consumer stocks are on average 57pc full nationwide, but more was ordered in the first week of the new year than many traders had expected. Traders reported deal volumes of nearly 13,000m³ on January 2, the highest for a day since 15 December. One reason for this is the cold weather that has hit many regions in Germany, another is the price increase at the beginning of the year, which has boosted buying interest. Many market sources said diesel demand will only begin to pick up from the second half of January. Many wholesalers had sufficiently stocked up in December in expectation of the increased GHG quota and CO2 levy. Diesel stocks of commercial consumers were at a 12-month high of just under 59pc on 1 January, according to Argus MDX data. But stockbuilding towards the end of 2024 does not seem to have had a dampening effect on demand from filling stations. These are being resupplied since 2 January, and daily diesel amounts reported to Argus on that day were the highest since 19 December. Ship owners on the Rhine river said business will not fully resume until the second week of the year, and they expect January to remain quiet because of wholesalers' high diesel stocks. Importers' anticipated restocking with biodiesel will also not initially lead to price pressure, as the Rhine is deep enough for transit. By Johannes Guhlke Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Indonesia’s Pertamina launches B40 bunker prices

06/01/25

News

06/01/25

Indonesia’s Pertamina launches B40 bunker prices

Singapore, 6 January (Argus) — Indonesia's state-owned refiner Pertamina issued posted bunker prices for 40pc biodiesel blend (B40) for the first time on 6 January, in line with the country's mandate . Pertamina issued B40 prices today for five locations — Jakarta, Benoa, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Batam. They are effective for the first two weeks of January. The prices issued by Pertamina are for a blend of 500ppm (0.05pc) sulphur marine gasoil (MGO) and palm oil-based biodiesel . Prices were posted at $1,103/t for the port of Jakarta, $1,085/t for Benoa, $1,049/t for Surabaya, $1,087/t for Balikpapan and $910/t for Batam. Indonesia's biodiesel sector has been preparing for the transition from B35 to B40 on 1 January . Biodiesel producers have been given until the end of February to make the transition to B40 blends for all sectors. Pertamina produces three kinds of MGO at its refineries, two grades with 500ppm sulphur content and a third grade with 50ppm. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US Congress begins with focus on energy, taxes

03/01/25

News

03/01/25

US Congress begins with focus on energy, taxes

Some Republicans worry that their razor-thin House majority could soon see their caucus fractured, writes Chris Knight Washington, 3 January (Argus) — The new Republican majority in US Congress has set its sights on passing legislation to grow energy production, unwind climate policies and cut trillions of dollars in taxes, but doing so will require the party to overcome its history of infighting. That disharmony was on display last month, when Republicans in the House of Representatives nearly forced a government shutdown by scuttling a spending deal negotiated by their own leaders. Similar dynamics have been at play for the past two years, as rifts over how to govern made it difficult for House Republican leaders to use a tiny majority to extract policy concessions during negotiations. The first test of party unity in the 119th Congress — sworn in on 3 January — will come as House Republicans vote on whether to re-elect Mike Johnson as speaker with an even smaller majority than last year. Johnson can only afford to lose a handful of votes, assuming all Democrats vote against him, before Republicans risk a repeat of 2023, when far-right members ousted the last speaker but could not agree on a replacement for weeks. A lengthy voting impasse could delay the 6 January certification of the election victory of president-elect Donald Trump, who this week endorsed Johnson. Trump campaigned on passing legislation to allow industry to "drill, baby, drill" by increasing federal oil and gas lease sales, removing regulations and unwinding parts of outgoing president Joe Biden's signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Among the options are rescinding a fee on methane emissions that started at $900/t, and requiring more oil and gas lease sales in the US Gulf of Mexico. On taxes, Trump has proposed extending $4 trillion in cuts due to expire at the end of 2025, in addition to cutting corporate rates to as low as 15pc from 20pc, rescinding clean energy credits, and putting a 20pc tariff on all imports. Other items on Congress' to-do list include passing legislation to fund the government and raising the statutory limit on federal debt. Republicans also say they want to pass a bill to expedite federal permitting, after a bipartisan effort to do so failed to advance in December. Learning to two-step Republican leaders have floated a two-step plan to pass Trump's legislative agenda that would use "budget reconciliation" — a legislative manoeuvre that will prevent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate, but which limits the bill to provisions that will affect the federal budget. Senate majority leader John Thune, a Republican from Texas, has suggested packaging immigration, border security and energy policy into a first budget bill that would pass early this year. Republicans would then have more time to debate a separate — and far more complex — budget bill that would focus on taxes and spending. But some Republicans, mindful of a slim 220-215 House majority that will temporarily shrink because of upcoming vacancies, worry the two-part strategy could fracture the caucus. Republicans have yet to decide the changes to the IRA, which includes hundreds of billions of dollars of tax credits for wind, solar, electric vehicles, battery manufacturing, carbon capture and clean hydrogen. A group of 18 House Republicans last year said they opposed a "full repeal" of the law, which disproportionately benefits districts represented by Republicans. Republicans plan to use their expanded influence to push changes at all levels of government and the work it supports. Incoming Republican chairman of the Senate energy committee John Barrasso has issued a report urging OECD energy watchdog the IEA to revive the inclusion of a "business-as-usual" reference case in its annual World Energy Outlook. Barrasso says the IEA has lost its focus on energy security and instead become a "cheerleader" for the energy transition. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: India bitumen demand growth prospects mixed

03/01/25

News

03/01/25

Viewpoint: India bitumen demand growth prospects mixed

Singapore, 3 January (Argus) — Prospects of India's 2025 bitumen consumption growth are mixed, as state governments' delayed disbursement of project funds are likely to persist and weigh on demand while the many incomplete projects could boost consumption. India is a net bitumen importer and the biggest consumer of Middle East origin bitumen, especially from Iran. India's bitumen consumption had touched record highs in 2022 and 2023 and surpassed 8mn t/yr, despite prolonged payment delays, as importers had offered atypically longer credit terms to road contractors. All importers and traders are "struggling with payment recovery", an Indian importer said. Many contractors are demanding credit as several state governments have not released funds, the importer added. "Demand is not bad, but it really depends on funding. Demand won't increase by a lot [next year], but it should be quite stable [to 2024]." High inventory pressure forced importers to offer atypically bigger discounts to liquidate cargoes, which squeezed their profit margins, especially as import costs increased given a supply crunch in Iran. But there is no dearth of projects as many were delayed because of funding constrains, importers said. Some state-controlled refiners anticipate consumption to grow next year, albeit marginally. Refiners were previously forced to offer larger discounts against listed values to attract more customers, which weighed on their profit margins this year. This could continue into 2025 would ultimately pressure refiners to reduce bitumen output and increase production of other higher valued oil products. Indian refiners typically produce around 5mn t/yr, which accounts for around 55-60pc of total bitumen consumption. "We are only expecting a 3-4pc increase in demand on year as no new major road projects have been announced, so it is hard to see a larger growth," a source close to a state-refiner said. "But imports will increase if we reduce production, given growth will still be in [the] positive. So next year will not be that fantastic in comparison and there would not be any capacity augmentation for bitumen." This indicates that the central government's expectation that Indian bitumen consumption will rise by 14pc on the year to 10mn t during the ongoing financial year ending March 2025 could be at risk. Limited Middle East exports Vacuum bottom feedstock supply has been erratic in Iran, and feedstock transportation from national refineries to private bitumen producers has also been delayed this year, which market participants expect to persist in the coming year. This will limit feedstock availability and in turn bitumen output, increasing export cost especially for higher priced VG40 grade, which is imported by India. Tight supply has also increased congestions at the Bandar Abbas port, forcing vessel owners and importers to incur higher demurrage, increasing costs and weighing on import appetite. There are also fears that the new Trump administration may impose more sanctions and other political measures on Iran next year, further clouding the export outlook. Iranian central bank's recent announcement to phase out the Nima foreign exchange platform has increased uncertainty on the rials' value against the US dollar as importers and exporters will now have to trade based on mutually agreed exchange rates, with the free market rate still depressed. Meanwhile, Baghdad's recent directive to stop oil and other oil products from entering Iran, unless the exports are licensed by state-owned Somo, could also limit drummed bitumen exports as bitumen producers do not typically possess a Somo licence. Iraqi drums are generally transshipped out of Bandar Abbas. The recent upgrade of Bahrain's state-owned Sitra refinery to 380,000 b/d from 267,000 b/d will primarily boost middle distillate and naphtha output, weighing on bitumen production. Middle East cargoes are also typically exported to southeast and east Asia during low demand periods in India. Seaborne prices in Asia rose to multi-year highs in 2022 and import appetite for relatively cheaper Middle East-origin bulk cargoes increased, which continued in 2023. Appetite from Asia this year was mostly from China and Vietnam, as other buyers preferred Asia-origin cargoes because of compatible specifications and proximity. "The Middle East-Asia arbitrage is closed, and we will see very little-to-no cargoes from the UAE to Asia," a southeast Asia-based trader said. This is because Middle East-origin cargo cfr prices are not likely to be competitive to Asian cargoes, with supply and loading constraints in Iran adding to the uncertainties. By Maedeh Mazinani, Sathya Narayanan and Chloe Choo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US oil sector sues Vermont over new climate law

02/01/25

News

02/01/25

US oil sector sues Vermont over new climate law

Washington, 2 January (Argus) — Oil industry and business groups are challenging a first-of-its-kind law in Vermont that would require fossil fuel producers to pay potentially billions of dollars in fines based on greenhouse gas emissions over the past 30 years. Vermont's law is "unprecedented" and attempts to "pin blame" on a narrow set of out-of-state energy producers for climate-related damages for decades of alleged greenhouse gas emissions, the American Petroleum Institute and the US Chamber of Commerce wrote in a lawsuit filed on 30 December. They argue the law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act and violates the US Constitution's ban on excessive fines. "It punishes covered energy producers for greenhouse gas emissions related to the lawful production and use of their products and those emissions' purported impacts on climate change," the lawsuit said. Vermont's "Climate Superfund Act" was enacted last year and applies to oil, natural gas and coal producers and refineries found to have emitted at least 1bn metric tonnes (t) of greenhouse gases from 1995-2024. Under the law, Vermont will issue a "cost recovery demand" to those companies based on their emissions that will pay for climate adaptation projects. Vermont will have until 1 January 2027 to finalize specifics of how the program will work, including how to calculate the charge. The lawsuit, filed in a federal district court in Vermont, argues the state had exceeded its authority by trying to impose financial penalties on fossil fuel companies located "well beyond" its borders. The law also imposes an "overly harsh and oppressive retroactive penalty" and is based on an "arbitrary" calculation that focuses on the last 30 years of emissions, the lawsuit argues. Vermont governor Phil Scott (R), who allowed the law to take effect last summer without his signature, has raised concerns about the state's "go-it-alone" approach toward taking on "Big Oil". But New York governor Kathy Hochul (D) last week signed the state's own climate "Superfund" law, which is expected to raise $75bn over the next 25 years from fees on companies that exceed 1bn t of greenhouse gas emissions from 2000-2018. Massachusetts and Maryland are considering similar laws. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more