Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Bolivia hopes to revive Acron urea, gas deal

  • Market: Fertilizers, Natural gas
  • 06/12/19

Bolivia's interim government is hoping to salvage a commercial agreement with Russian fertilizer giant Acron to produce and distribute urea in Brazil.

Bolivia's state-owned YPFB and Acron signed a deal in October to acquire a urea plant from Brazilian state-controlled Petrobras. YPFB would supply 2.2mn cm/d of natural gas to the plant, located in Brazil's Mato Grosso do Sul state, and take a 12pc share in the operation. Acron signed on to distribute urea from the Bolivian company's 700,000 t/yr Bulo Bulo urea plant in the central Bolivia department of Cochabamba. Acron's investment was pegged at around $1bn.

The deal collapsed in early December, when Brazilian authorities blocked the plan for Petrobras to sell the urea plant, and another in Parana state, to Acron.

Despite the setback, Bolivia's new interim authorities are hoping the Acron deal can be revived.

"We have not closed the door on this and will try to reactivate it," Antonio Pino, Bolivia's deputy minister of hydrocarbons production and industrialization, told Argus.

Pino said the agreement was one of the casualties of the political crisis that gripped Bolivia after controversial 20 October elections and leftist former president Evo Morales' resignation on 10 November. Conservative interim president Jeanine Anez took over after Morales and his closest allies received political asylum in Mexico.

Unrest broke out after the elections that Morales claimed to have won. His supporters were blamed for attacking a domestic gas pipeline, forcing the shutdown of Bolivian industries, including the Bulo Bulo urea plant. The line was repaired this week, allowing the plant to resume operations, but distribution is stalled because of transportation problems, with some roadblocks erected by protesters still to be cleared and, more recently, trucking companies seeking higher pay.

Pino said the conflict spooked the Brazilians and they refused to go along with the YPFB-Acron deal because of concerns, which he described as unfounded, that Bolivia lacks sufficient gas reserves to sustain the project.

Under the new transition government, Bolivia's hydrocarbons ministry revised down the country's proven gas reserves to 8.95 Tcf in 2017 instead of 10.7 Tcf used by the previous government, applying a more conservative interpretation of certification data provided by Canadian consultancy Sproule.

Pino said Bolivia has enough gas reserves to satisfy the Acron project, as well to cover local demand and meet export contracts to Argentina and Brazil.

While still bullish on the potential deal with Acron, Pino said his office was reviewing a series of other projects, including the addition of methane and formaldehyde units at the Bulo Bulo site, and construction of a $2bn petrochemical complex in eastern Santa Cruz department to produce propylene, polypropylene, ethylene and polyethylene.

"We are commissioning feasible studies to look at markets and the cost of production. We need to make decisions based on technical criteria and market realities, not political considerations," he said.

By Lucien Chauvin


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

India’s DOF proposes additional phosphate subsidies


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

India’s DOF proposes additional phosphate subsidies

London, 10 April (Argus) — India's Department of Fertilizers (DOF) has proposed additional subsidies on DAP and imported TSP for the April-September Kharif season, according to a document seen by Argus . The proposed compensations are on top of the current nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) and the 3,500 rupees/t special additional subsidy (other costs) on DAP that are already in place. If approved, they would balance DAP importers' losses at current rates. The DOF has proposed returning to DAP importers and producers 4pc of the maximum retail price (MRP), plus a rebate on the goods and services tax (GST) on the MRP. The DOF also has suggested paying importers the difference between the cfr prices for cargoes imported during this Kharif season and the average cfr price for DAP imports over the October 2024-March 2025 Rabi season. At current exchange rates, this would add $81-82/t to the subsidy on DAP imported in the mid-$670s/t cfr, broadly equal to the losses currently faced by importers. Importers buying DAP in the mid-$670s/t cfr are facing losses of about $84/t, given the US dollar/rupee exchange rate, the MRP of Rs27,000/t, the NBS of Rs27,799/t and the special additional subsidy of Rs3,500/t. The 4pc return on the MRP, plus GST, will fall slightly short of covering the $33/t losses incurred by DAP producers importing phosphoric acid at $1,153/t P2O5 cfr and ammonia at $350/t cfr. Producers making DAP with 30-31pc P2O5 phosphate rock imported at $153/t cfr, sulphur received at $300/t cfr and ammonia delivered at $350/t cfr already are making profits of about $50/t. But they also would still receive the 4pc MRP return and GST rebate. The same proposal applies to imported TSP. The DOF suggests paying 4pc of the Rs25,000/t MRP, and the GST, plus the increase from the average Rabi import cost to importers. By Tom Hampson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?

Some countries are considering retaliatory tariffs, while others hope to reduce their trade deficit in order to negotiate lower rates London, 9 April (Argus) — Newly announced US tariffs on goods entering the country and some of the countermeasures already announced by large trade partners are unlikely to cause any direct disruptions to global gas markets. But the indirect effects on gas supply and demand may be huge, stemming from a weaker macroeconomic outlook, fuel substitution and inflationary pressures on infrastructure development. US president Donald Trump on 2 April imposed a minimum 10pc tax on all foreign imports from 5 April,with much higher tariffs on selected countries that briefly came into force on 9 April, before Trump announced a 90-day pause. China is the only exception. It has announced retaliatory tariffs that could disrupt US energy exports, resulting in an escalation that has already brought up the respective levies to 125pc in the US and 84pc in China. These are unlikely to have any direct impact on LNG trade flows, as China had already stopped importing US LNG earlier this year. But disruptions to trade between the world's two largest economies may weigh heavily on manufacturing activity in China, in turn reducing industrial gas demand. And the ripple effects of disruptions to US LPG exports to China may alter fuel-switching economics in the region and beyond. Most other countries in Asia-Pacific have opted not to follow China's lead by retaliating against US tariffs, even though many have warned about the potential for long-term economic disruption. The Japanese government intends to negotiate a better tariff deal and is considering investing in the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project as part of wider efforts to reduce its trade surplus with the US. Countries in Asia-Pacific have been hit with some of the highest of Trump's targeted duties. The EU is keeping retaliatory measures on the table, but these are unlikely to include any levy on US LNG. Europe has become much more reliant on LNG imports after losing the bulk of its Russian pipeline supply, and imposing tariffs on energy imports would only reignite inflationary pressures that European countries have tried to curb over the past three years. The bloc says it is ready to negotiate on possibly increasing its US LNG imports to reduce its trade surplus and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agrees to do the same. But Trump says this offer is not enough, citing the EU's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justifies a tariff response. Nerves of steel Much greater risks for gas markets may stem from rising infrastructure costs in the US' upstream and midstream sectors, particularly as a result of earlier tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum imports. These present an immediate risk for US LNG developers, particularly for the five projects under construction and the six others expected to reach final investment decisions this year. Metals account for up to 30pc of the cost of building an LNG export plant. An LNG terminal can cost $5bn-25bn to build, depending on its size, with steel used for pipelines, tanks and other structural frameworks. US facilities can be built using some domestic metal, but higher prices for this may lead to construction and final investment decision delays for the country's planned liquefaction projects. US tariffs' primary effect on the domestic gas market stems from duties levied on non-energy goods used by the oil and gas industry, including steel and specialised pipeline components such as valves and compressors, which are imported from overseas. The US remains a net natural gas importer from Canada , but these flows are unlikely to be affected by trade tariffs given the lack of alternative supply sources available to some northern US states. US LNG project pipeline mn t/yr Project Capacity Expected start/FID Under construction Plaquemines 19.2 2025 Corpus Christi stage 3 12.0 2025 Golden Pass 18.1 2026 Rio Grande 17.6 2027 Port Arthur 13.5 2027 Waiting for final investment decision Delfin FLNG 1 13.2 mid-2025 Texas LNG 4.0 2025 Calcasieu Pass 2 28.0 mid-2025 Corpus Christi train 8-9 3.3 2025 Louisiana LNG 16.5 mid-2025 Cameron train 4 6.8 mid-2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Tokyo may use Alaska LNG as leverage in US tariff talks


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Tokyo may use Alaska LNG as leverage in US tariff talks

Osaka, 9 April (Argus) — Tokyo will likely use the possibility of purchases from the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project, as part of wider efforts to reduce the US' trade deficit with Japan, to negotiate for a better tariff deal. US president Donald Trump's 10pc tariff on imports from all countries took effect on 5 April, with exemptions for some commodities . The higher "reciprocal" taxes are due to enter into force at 12:01 ET (04:01 GMT) on 9 April, including Japan at 24pc. The Japanese government on 8 April held its first ministerial task force with prime minister Shigeru Ishiba attending, to discuss potential measures against new US tariffs. Details are still under consideration, but Ishiba is ready to use every possible method to mitigate the impact of looming US tariffs on the Japanese economy, as he sees this as a "national disaster". Japan, a long-standing ally of the US, is unlikely to respond in kind to the US tariff and will instead seek mutually beneficial solutions. Ishiba is aiming to present Trump with a package of measures across a wide range of issues, such as in the energy, agriculture, shipbuilding and automobile sectors, rather than piecemeal requests. The package could include Japan's stance on the Alaska LNG project and ethanol developments, Ishiba stated on 7 April when responding to questions in the Diet. Tokyo may use the Alaska LNG as part of its tariff negotiation, as buying more US LNG could ease Japan's trade surplus against the US. The trade imbalance between Japan and the US stood at ¥8.64 trillion in 2024, equivalent to about $58.6bn at current exchange rates, Japanese customs data show. Japan's LNG purchases from the US rose by 15pc on the year to 6.34mn t in 2024, accounting for nearly 10pc of the country's total LNG imports. Japan has committed to continuing strengthening energy security and co-operation with the US, as well as South Korea, leveraging US LNG along with other energy sources and technologies in a mutually beneficial manner, the countries said in a joint statement after the trilateral foreign ministers' meeting in Brussels on 3 April, just after Trump announced the baseline 10pc taxes on 2 April. Ishiba had already mentioned the idea of ramping up purchases of US LNG, as well as ethanol, ammonia and other resources, when he visited Trump in Washington in February . But he emphasised the importance of stable and reasonable prices for such LNG imports. Alaska LNG has made little progress in recent years and is yet to secure any offtake agreements. But it has drawn interest, after Trump devoted one of his first executive orders to the development of Alaskan energy. South Korea's energy minister expressed the country's interest in the project during a visit in late March , while Taiwan's state-owned CPC signed an initial agreement to invest in and purchase LNG from the project, according to Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs . Auto deal But it remains unclear if a possible purchase of Alaska LNG alone would satisfy Washington and help reduce tariffs. The Trump administration has expressed strong dissatisfaction against Japanese non-tariff barriers on US car deliveries. "US automakers face a variety of non-tariff barriers that impede access to the Japanese and Korean automotive markets, including non-acceptance of certain US standards, duplicative testing and certification requirements, and transparency issues", the US government said on 2 April. Japan imported around 23,000 units of passenger vehicles from the US in 2023, according to the industry group Japan Automobile Importers Association, and this is near one-tenth of all deliveries from European nations. Tokyo appears to be struggling to find breakthrough solutions on this decades-long bilateral economic issue. There must be a variety of reasons on why American cars are not coming into the Japanese market, while Japanese cars are selling well in the US, said the Japanese minister for trade and industry Yoji Muto on 8 April. "We still need more time to figure that out." Ishiba on 8 April appointed the minister of state for Economic and Fiscal Policy, Ryosei Akazawa, as a negotiator for the trade talks with the US government. By Motoko Hasegawa and Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more