Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US shale mergers slow to develop

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 31/08/20

Economic downturns usually spur a surge in mergers in the US oil and natural gas business, but several factors may be holding up another round of deal-making.

Before this spring's crude price crash caused by the Opec+ conflict and Covid-related demand drop, deals such as Occidental's 2019 purchase of Anadarko were seen as likely repeat transactions. Independents Pioneer Natural Resources and Concho Resources were among those seen as possible targets for larger peers.

But the global recession has created a chaotic corporate landscape for US exploration and production, as debt-laden giants stumble amid distressed assets, and a shrinking number of smaller, healthier firms maneuver to avoid damage. The uncertainty of the demand and price recovery, and a turn away from a "growth for growth's sake" mentality has led to the idea of big mergers falling out of favor.

More likely scenarios are narrowly focused asset acquisitions in specific fields — like ConocoPhillips' acquisition of 140,000 acres (556mn m²) in Canada's Montney region last month from Calgary-based Kelt Exploration for $375mn. A steady trickle of bankruptcies of smaller firms is putting acreage in play for even more such one-off purchases.

Also possible are mergers of equals — the pairing of two similarly matched companies with complementary assets. Some analysts have mused over Devon Energy and Cimarex as potential partners, seeing Devon's midcontinent assets as a good fit with Cimarex's Permian basin position.

The two largest deals in recent months may have broken the ice — Chevron's $5bn all-stock deal for Noble and Southwestern Energy's $865mn takeover of fellow natural gas producer Montage. But a major like Chevron buying a smaller competitor may be hard to replicate, as the wheels on the Noble deal started turning last year, well before Covid-19. And with stock prices depressed by the downturn, management teams may feel less motivation to do a deal given that their compensation in change-of-control situations is usually in stock.

Melinda Yee, a partner in consultancy Deloitte's oil and gas mergers and acquisitions (M&A) practice, doubts there will be many more deals this year. The challenge of firms finding the right partner, with complementary assets, takes longer.

"Companies need a transaction to be immediately accretive, so they have to be pickier, make sure it's the right fit," Yee says. They are more likely to wait for Chapter 11 bankruptcies to get debt issues cleaned up, which can take months.

Some firms are eager to shop. Continental Resources has "teams working very diligently, looking for these unique opportunities in this unique window of time. And they are getting some traction," president Jack Stark says. But with many finding a new faith in higher shareholder returns and more modest output growth, taking on more capacity and acreage can be a questionable decision.

Rock it to 'em

Cimarex chief executive Tom Jorden notes that growth through the drillbit — raising output by fully developing the acreage already under lease — is more predictable and manageable than growth through acquisition. "M&A is more episodic," he says. "It's pretty tough to predict the kind of consistent value generation through M&A that we found through drillbit growth. Not that we're not open to it."

And acquisitions do not make sense for Diamondback Energy chief executive Travis Stice, because debt for publicly traded upstream firms that he might consider buying is trading so poorly. Following second-quarter earnings, many firms have returned to debt markets to retire pending notes for later-maturing ones. But the fundamentals are still in doubt.

"It's all about the rock," Stice says, referring to the underlying geology of a company's acreage. "If you find good rock, you shouldn't care whether it's public or private. There's just not a lot of tier 1 rock out there."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/05/25

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

Updates with report, EIA staff reduction. New York, 1 May (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said a technical issue with third-party software was the reason a key natural gas storage report was delayed today. The Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report , which is closely watched by traders and often moves markets, did not appear until 2pm ET, later than its regular scheduled time of 10:30am ET. Inventories grew by 107 Bcf (3bn m³) in the week ended 25 April, according to the report. The latest delay comes amid a flurry of staff departures at the EIA, the energy statistics arm of the US government, as part of ongoing efforts by President Donald Trump's administration to slash the size of the federal work force and curb spending. Around a third of the agency's 350 staff have taken voluntary buyouts, according to a person familiar with the situation. The staff exodus raises concerns about the agency's ability to gather and report timely data and continue providing independent forecasts covering energy production, stocks, demand and prices. Last month, the EIA delayed its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) by two days to take into account significant changes in markets following Trump's sweeping tariffs. And the EIA's release of its 2025 Annual Energy Outlook did not include the in-depth analysis that usually accompanies the report. It was accompanied by a statement from the Department of Energy that said the report reflects the "disastrous path" US energy production was on under the administration of former president Joseph Biden. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Ukraine, US sign reconstruction deal


01/05/25
News
01/05/25

Ukraine, US sign reconstruction deal

London, 1 May (Argus) — The government of Ukraine has agreed a "reconstruction" deal with the US that will establish a fund to be filled with proceeds from new mineral extraction licenses. There are few firm details about how much money will be involved, or how any future extraction contracts will be structured. It appears to be the same agreement that came close to being signed in February , which collapsed after an awkward meeting in the White House between Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his US counterpart Donald Trump. Washington had pitched the deal in advance as providing stakes in Ukraine's mineral rights, as a form of repayment for past US support and a deterrence against future military incursions by Russia. There is no firm indication from either side that this is the case. Ukraine's economy minister Yulia Svyrydenko said today that 50pc of state budget revenues from new licences will flow into the fund, and the fund would then invest in projects in Ukraine itself. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said the deal "allows the US to invest alongside Ukraine, to unlock Ukraine's growth assets, mobilise American talent, capital and governance standards", suggesting US companies will be involved in the new licenses. He said the fund will be established with the assistance of the US International Development Finance Corporation. Ukraine was eager to show the deal as a success. Svyrydenko said Kyiv will retain ownership of all resources, and "will decide where and what to extract." Neither does the agreement allow for privatisation of state-owned oil and gas company Ukrnafta or power company Energoatom, nor does it mention any debt obligation to the US, she said. The depth of Ukraine's resources are unclear. The country's geological survey shows deposits of 24 of the EU's list of critical minerals, including titanium, zirconium, graphite, and manganese, along with proven reserves of metals such as lithium, beryllium, rare earth elements and nickel. The IEA estimates Ukraine's oil reserves at more than 6.2bn bl and its gas reserves at 5.4 trillion m³, although it said Russia's annexation of Crimea means Kyiv no longer has access to "significant offshore gas resources". By Ben Winkley, John Gawthrop and James Keates Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil's energy transition spending drops in 2024


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

Brazil's energy transition spending drops in 2024

Sao Paulo, 30 April (Argus) — Brazil's mines and energy ministry's (MME) energy transition spending shrank by 83pc in 2024 from the prior year, while resources for fossil fuel incentives remained unchanged, according to the institute of socioeconomic studies Inesc. The MME's energy transition budget was R141,413 ($24,980) in 2024, down from R835,237 in the year prior. MME had only two energy transition-oriented projects under its umbrella last year: biofuels industry studies and renewable power incentives, which represented a combined 0.002pc of its total R7bn budget. Still, despite available resources, MME did not approve any projects for renewable power incentives. It also only used 50pc of its budget for biofuel studies, Inesc said. Even as supply from non-conventional power sources advances , most spending in Brazil's grid revamp — including enhancements to better integrate solar and wind generation — comes from charges paid by consumers through power tariffs, Inesc said. Diverging energy spending Brazil's federal government also cut its energy transition budget for 2025 by 17pc from last year and created a new energy transition program that also pushes for increased fossil fuel usage. The country's energy transition budget for 2025 is R3.64bn, down from R4.44bn in 2024. The new program — also under MME's umbrella — has a budget of around R10mn, with more than half of it destined to studies related to the oil and natural gas industry, Inesc said. A second MME program — which invests in studies in the oil, natural gas, products and biofuels sectors — has an approved budget of R53.1mn. The science and technology ministry is the only in Brazil that increased its energy transition spending for 2025, with R3.03bn approved, a near threefold hike from R800mn in 2024. Spending will focus on the domestic industry sector's energy transition, Inesc said. Despite hosting the UN Cop 30 summit in November, Brazil has constantly neglected to address the phase-out of fossil fuels, drawing the ire of climate activists . By Maria Frazatto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mexican economy grows 0.6pc in 1Q


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

Mexican economy grows 0.6pc in 1Q

Mexico City, 30 April (Argus) — Mexico's economy expanded at an annualized rate of 0.6pc in the first quarter, with solid growth in the agriculture sector offsetting a slowdown in industry. The result came in at the high end of analyst estimates and slightly above the 0.5pc GDP growth reported by statistics agency Inegi for the fourth quarter of 2024. Still, it marks the second-slowest quarterly growth in the past 16 quarters. Most of the first quarter's GDP growth came from a 6pc expansion in the agricultural sector, which more than reversed the 4.6pc contraction recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024. The industrial sector — including mining, manufacturing and construction — shrank for a second straight quarter, contracting by 1.4pc after a 1.2pc drop in the previous quarter. Manufacturing faced tariff-related uncertainty during the quarter, though investment in the sector had already been slowing for months. The contraction was softened by manufacturers ramping up production ahead of US tariffs, with the risk of trade-driven inflation also pushing builders to contain construction costs, according to market sources. These effects are expected to fade in the second quarter and worsen in the third if high US tariffs on Mexican goods persist, said Victor Herrera, head of economic studies at finance executive association IMEF, "especially as supply chains are hit by dwindling inventories." Services expanded by an annualized 1.3pc in the first quarter, compared with a 2.1pc growth in the fourth quarter of 2024. This marks the slowest growth in services since the end of Covid-19 restrictions in early 2021. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US LNG developers seek tariff loophole in FTZs


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

US LNG developers seek tariff loophole in FTZs

Construction costs for planned LNG projects could shoot up as a result of new import tariffs on key metals, writes Tray Swanson London, 30 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's ultra-protectionist trade policies are pushing developers of LNG export projects to consider using foreign-trade zones (FTZs), in a bid to avoid or defer tariff bills on imported materials. Trump's imposition of wide-ranging import tariffs this year raises the risk of cost inflation for LNG projects, particularly for the six terminals that are already under construction and the seven expected to reach a final investment decision (FID) this year. The 25pc levy on all foreign-sourced steel and aluminium introduced in March is likely to have the greatest impact on LNG projects, given that steel and aluminium can account for about 30pc of a facility's $5bn-25bn construction costs. Steel is required for liquefaction units, pipelines, tanks, structural frameworks and cryogenic hoses, and aluminum is used in heat exchangers. Many LNG developers are seeking to reduce or defer paying the new duties by establishing foreign-trade zones (FTZs) — designated areas in which foreign inputs can avoid import tariffs, at least temporarily, if they fulfil certain criteria. FTZs were introduced in the US nearly a century ago to counteract domestic protectionist trade policy and help US companies remain internationally competitive. US developer Cheniere's 33mn t/yr Sabine Pass plant in Louisiana has already been operating as an FTZ since 2015, according to the US FTZ Board. And Australian independent Woodside Energy's 16.5mn t/yr Louisiana LNG facility in Calcasieu Parish near Lake Charles is in an FTZ, a company spokesman told Argus. The project reached an FID on 29 April and is expected to cost $17.5bn, up from a weeks-old estimate of $16bn. About a quarter of Louisiana LNG's capital expenditure is for equipment and construction materials, roughly half of which will need to be imported so are subject to tariffs, Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill told investors on 23 April. Other planned projects in Louisiana are looking to establish or join FTZs. US developer Commonwealth LNG's proposed 9.5mn t/yr terminal in Cameron Parish is in the process of joining the same trade zone as Sabine Pass LNG and compatriot firm Venture Global's 12.4mn t/yr Calcasieu Pass facility. Midstream firm Energy Transfer's 16.5mn t/yr Lake Charles LNG facility has been approved by the US FTZ Board, although it has not been activated as an FTZ as no significant construction has taken place yet. The project is awaiting federal permits ahead of likely reaching an FID later this year. On the Texas side of the Sabine river, state-run QatarEnergy and ExxonMobil's 18.1mn t/yr Golden Pass facility, set to come on line in 2026, and US developer Sempra's 13.5mn t/yr Port Arthur LNG terminal, expected on line in 2027, have joined the southeast Texas FTZ. Call of duties FTZs are treated as though they are outside of US Customs territory for purposes of duty payments. This enables companies to defer or reduce tariff payments until the imported product is used commercially. For LNG projects in FTZs, developers do not need to pay tariffs on imported steel or modular liquefaction trains until the unit comes on line and begins producing LNG. Terminals with multiple trains can stagger the payments. Most onshore project developers import materials and components and build their trains on site. Cheniere's Sabine Pass facility used this approach and required 89,000t of structural steel for its six trains. Port Arthur LNG and US firm NextDecade's 17.6mn t/yr Rio Grande LNG plant intend to do the same. But NextDecade is not active in the Port of Brownsville's FTZ, according to the FTZ Board, meaning it is probably the project at greatest immediate risk from the metals tariffs. By late February, NextDecade had secured only 69pc of the materials it needs for the project's first two trains and 33pc for its third train. NextDecade and the Port of Brownsville declined a request for comment. Some projects choose to use smaller, prefabricated trains that are built elsewhere and imported. Venture Global took this approach for its Calcasieu Pass and 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines plants, using imported trains built by oil field services provider Baker Hughes in Italy, and it intends to use the same technology for its proposed CP2 terminal, on track to reach an FID this year. Under such arrangements, the LNG developer must pay the US' import tariffs. Baker Hughes' customers take ownership of the products it makes in Italy, the company said on 23 April. Calcasieu Pass, which began commercial service on 15 April , is in an FTZ, but Venture Global will need to expand its boundaries to include the adjacent CP2 project. FTZs also have a so-called inverted tariff benefit that allows companies to pay the duty on the finished unit if it is cheaper than the rate for the components. But Trump's executive orders outlining the tariffs essentially prevent the use of the inverted benefit, outlining a special status requirement that import duties be applied to the components, trade group the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones' director of advocacy and strategic relations, Melissa Irmen, tells Argus. If the tariffs are lifted, firms that had deferred payments would still be required to pay the duties when they reach commercial service unless the order that removes or modifies the tariffs specifically dictates otherwise, Irmen says. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more