Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Azerbaijan claims new pipeline attack thwarted

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 19/10/20

Azerbaijan claims to have thwarted an Armenian attack on the Baku-Novorossiysk crude export pipeline.

The country's general prosecutor's office says that Azeri air defence forces "neutralised" Armenian rockets fired in the direction of the Khizi region to the north of Baku. "Some parts of the missiles fell at a distance of 250m from the strategic Baku-Novorossiysk oil pipeline passing through the village Sitalchay," it said.

This information could not be verified. Azerbaijan says it was an attempt "to deliberately destroy a large number of infrastructure facilities, creating a dangerous environment for crude oil and export condensate pipelines, the destruction of which could cause significant material damage".

Armenia has denied targeting pipelines during the renewed conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which began on 27 September.

The 160,000 b/d Baku-Novorossiysk pipeline carries crude produced by Azerbaijan's state-owned Socar to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. Shipments are scheduled at around 18,000 b/d in the fourth quarter.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
19/02/25

Trump asserts power over independent agencies

Trump asserts power over independent agencies

Washington, 19 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that claims to give him sweeping control over the budgets, policies and regulations of independent US agencies that oversee the energy sector, financial markets, trade and transportation. The order seeks to give the White House unprecedented control over the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and more than a dozen other independent agencies. Trump's order asserts that "so-called independent agencies" lack sufficient accountability and should be brought under his direct control. "For the federal government to be truly accountable to the American people, officials who wield vast executive power must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected president," according to the executive order, which was signed on Tuesday. FERC, the CFTC and the SEC did not respond to a request for comment. Trump's order would all but end years of attempts by the US Congress to shield agencies that oversee energy markets, trading, finance, maritime trade, railroads, and other businesses from excessive political influence. Congress made those agencies independent — often with a bipartisan board serving years-long terms — to ensure a degree of independence when agencies resolve business disputes, set market rules and issue new regulations. In Trump's first term, FERC's commissioners and Republican chairman rejected the administration's plan to push through market rules to bail out coal and nuclear power plants, based partly on the concerns that doing so would destabilize power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars. It remains unclear if the agency in the future could assert that degree of independence under the order. Trump's order would give the White House the ability to control independent agency budgets and require the appointment of a White House "liaison" in each agency. The order would require agency chairs to align their policies with the White House, subject all significant regulations to review by the administration, and would establish "performance standards" for agency leaders. The order provides an exception for the US Federal Reserve for monetary policy, but the agency's budget and its regulatory actions would come under White House control. Other agencies also covered by the executive order include the US Surface Transportation Board, the US Federal Trade Commission, the US Chemical Safety Board, the US Export-Import Bank, the US Federal Maritime Commission and the US National Transportation Safety Board. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Investor group urges BP to allow new climate vote


19/02/25
News
19/02/25

Investor group urges BP to allow new climate vote

London, 19 February (Argus) — A group of 46 BP institutional investors has voiced concerns that the company may ditch a target to reduce its oil and gas production to 2mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) by the end of the decade, urging a new shareholder vote be allowed on its net-zero strategy. The letter's signatories include several UK and European pension fund managers and other investors, including Aegon, Investec and Robeco. It comes ahead of BP's capital markets day on 26 February, when the company has said it will "fundamentally reset" its strategy. The group calls on BP to give another opportunity to vote on its net-zero plans at its 2025 annual general meeting, pointing out that shareholders in 2022 endorsed a BP plan to cut hydrocarbon production by 40pc, to 1.5mn boe/d, by 2030. That achieved 88.5pc support from shareholders, but the group of investors behind the letter note that nine months later BP revised upwards its target for 2030 to 2mn boe/d. BP's output averaged 2.36mn boe/d in 2024. The investors are now concerned that increased spending by BP on oil and gas output, due to subsequent strategy tweaks, will raise "potential exposure to stranded assets as the energy transition progresses." The letter notes there is opportunity for BP to explain how emissions budgets in Paris Agreement-aligned scenarios are considered in the sanctioning of new projects. "Showing where projects will sit on the global merit curve of producing assets would also allow investors to assess the relative competitiveness and resilience of BP's portfolio and capital expenditure," it states. In a statement to Argus a signatory to the letter, Royal London Asset Management, said it recognised BP's past efforts toward the energy transition but it is "concerned about the company's continued investment in fossil fuel expansion. "If BP has decided to scrap its production target, we seek clarity on how capital allocation will shift to ensure resilience through the energy transition," it said. "Will BP scale up investments in renewable energy, carbon capture, and emerging technologies to future-proof the business against regulatory, market, and climate risks?" Royal London urged BP "to strengthen governance and transparency around transition planning, ensuring that future capex decisions align with a net-zero pathway rather than locking in further emissions growth." It added: "Robust oversight and clear long-term strategies are essential to delivering value while managing the risks of an accelerating energy transition." A BP spokesman said the company had received the letter and "will respond in due course." Environmental pressure group Greenpeace said BP can expect this kind of pushback and challenge from its shareholders "at every turn if it doubles down on fossil fuels". "Government policies will also need to prioritise renewable power, and as extreme weather puts pressure on insurance models policymakers will be looking to fossil fuel profits as a way to fund extreme weather recovery," Greenpeace said. "BP might want to seriously put the brakes on this U-turn." Earlier this month BP's shares jumped on media reports that activist hedge fund Elliott Investment Management was building a stake in the UK major. Investment bank analysts that follow BP expect Elliott to attempt to bring about a boardroom shake-up as it has at other resources companies, including at Canadian oil sands business Suncor Energy in 2022. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK Gulfsands Petroleum eyes return to Syria's upstream


19/02/25
News
19/02/25

UK Gulfsands Petroleum eyes return to Syria's upstream

Dubai, 19 February (Argus) — London-listed Gulfsands Petroleum plans to return to Syria's upstream as soon as sanctions on the country are lifted and "circumstances allow," the company's managing director John Bell said. "Sanctions discussions are occurring not only in the EU, but also in the UK and US," Bell told Argus . "In summary, we view these developments as generally positive. Gulfsands has always intended to return to its operation in Syria when the circumstances allow." Gulfsands holds a 50pc operating stake in two oil fields in Syria's block 26, in the country's northeast near the border with Iraq, an area long controlled by the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Chinese state-owned Sinochem holds the remaining 50pc. Force majeure was declared in December 2011 with respect to the contract after the introduction of EU sanctions against Syria. The fields were producing 24,000 b/d at the time. Since then, control of the fields has been unclear at times. By 2017 Gulfsands said production was averaging around 15,000-20,000 b/d, although it added that was without its participation. Bell said the company can only return "if the current relevant energy sanctions in the EU, UK and US as revised and hence international companies are permitted to return to their operations, bringing with them vital investment, people, equipment and know-how." In January, the EU's high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas said the bloc would begin easing sanctions against Syria within weeks , starting with economic and energy restrictions. More recently she said the EU would meet on 24 February to discuss the lifting of sanctions on Syria, and told Argus the prospect of this "is looking promising" albeit internal European politics could slow the process. Road to recovery Once a 600,000 b/d-plus producer, Syria's crude output has been on the decline over the past three decades. Just before the start of the civil war in 2011, production had was below 400,000 b/d, and by May 2012 it had fallen to 200,000 b/d, the Syrian government said. Today it is less than 100,000 b/d, with only around 16,000 b/d or so coming from fields in areas under the former Assad government's control. "At the moment, oil production in Syria is largely opaque, illicit, unsafe, destined for the black market and causing enormous environmental damage… [and] production volumes have decreased recently due to these unsustainable practices," Gulfsands' Bell said. Whether Syria can reverse this downward production trend "will depend on the approach taken by the new Syrian government," he said. If they properly leverage existing centralised government institutions and work with returning international energy companies, Bell said he could see crude output returning to not only pre-2011 levels, but even as high as 500,000 b/d "within several years." By Nader Itayim and Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Guyana unfazed by Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ vow


18/02/25
News
18/02/25

Guyana unfazed by Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ vow

Georgetown, 18 February (Argus) — Guyana, one of the fastest-growing crude producers in the world, sees little threat from US President Donald Trump's pledge to flood global markets with cheap supplies. Despite Trump's vow to scrap a slew of regulations he claims are holding back US oil producers, Guyana's vice president Bharrat Jagdeo does not expect there to be a "major supply response." "If the prices come down, as President Trump wants, then it would also make some of the existing operations in the US — particular with (hydraulic fracturing) fracking — it may make them not feasible," Jagdeo said on the first day of the Guyana Energy Conference and Supply Chain Expo in Georgetown, Guyana, on Tuesday. Guyana's low breakeven costs and the quality of its crude will help it to maintain a competitive advantage going forward, he said. The vice president shrugged off concerns over the oil market as concerns grow over waning demand from China, the top importer. He pointed out that ExxonMobil just started the approval process for its seventh and eighth projects in the giant Stabroek block offshore Guyana, where the discovery of oil in 2015 has transformed the economic fortunes of the tiny South American nation. "They (ExxonMobil) study the oil markets, they probably know the oil markets more than any government official," Jagdeo said. "Clearly they see in the future a demand for fossil fuel, and they believe that in Guyana we have a unique opportunity to supply that market." Demand for fossil fuels is likely to remain "relatively high" for the foreseeable future while renewable sources lag behind, he said. Guyana, located on South America's northern coast bordering Venezuela, Suriname, and Brazil, has become a fast-growing non-Opec supplier since oil was first pumped in 2019. Output has accelerated to 650,000 b/d from zero in the space of around five years. And gross output is seen growing further to 1.3mn b/d by the end of the decade as new projects come online. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US to seek 'disapproval' of California tailpipe rule


18/02/25
News
18/02/25

US to seek 'disapproval' of California tailpipe rule

Washington, 18 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is taking a procedural step to enable the Republican-led US Congress to block a California program requiring 100pc of in-state sales of new cars and trucks to be electric, plug-in hybrid and hydrogen models by 2035. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it plans to subject its previous approval of the program to "disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act, which could allow a vote to halt the standards without a potential filibuster. Oil groups backed such an approach, hoping to kill off a state program that threatened long-term demand for gasoline and diesel in California and nearly a dozen other states that are following its lead. California's program, called Advanced Clean Cars II, requires 35pc of new vehicles sold in the state in model year 2026 to be zero emission vehicles, rising to 100pc of vehicles by 2035. Under former president Joe Biden, EPA granted federal waivers that authorized the program and a separate California plan for limiting emissions from heavy-duty trucks. The Biden administration said its approval of the waivers were not subject to the Congressional Review Act, which aligned with a formal opinion by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO). But EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, on 14 February, said he would reverse course and "submit" all the waivers for potential disapproval. The prior administration attempted to prevent Congress from having input on an "extremely consequential action", Zeldin said, "and the Trump administration is "transparently correcting this wrong". It remains unclear the pathway for a vote to disapprove the EPA waivers, given the conflicting opinion by GAO, which for years has served as an independent arbiter of what actions Congress could disapprove. But some outside attorneys have argued that once an agency action is made subject to the Congressional Review Act, federal courts would not have jurisdiction to "second-guess" a decision to hold a vote. The US Supreme Court separately plans to hold oral arguments in the coming months on a lawsuit by refiners and biofuel producers that want the ability to sue EPA over its approval of an earlier version of the tailpipe program that runs through model year 2025. A federal appeals court last year said the case could not proceed. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more