Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Biden presidency could indirectly help Australian coal

  • Market: Coal
  • 10/11/20

US president-elect Joe Biden's election victory could indirectly ease Australian coal suppliers' access to China by dampening geopolitical tensions, although this is unlikely to be immediate and could hinge on actions that outgoing President Donald Trump may take before next January's handover.

Although vote counting is not officially over in a few swing states, most mainstream US media outlets have called the election after concluding that Biden has secured sufficient electoral college votes to secure victory.

China has imposed an informal ban on Australian coal since April, which some market participants said is rooted in wider geopolitical tensions between Beijing's and Australia's ally the US. This started with a trade war between the two countries before intensifying with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Beijing has refrained from officially clarifying its ban on Australian imports, presumably to avoid violating its World Trade Organisation obligations. Many Chinese coal consumers have told Argus that they were verbally warned by Beijing not to sign any term contracts for Australian coal at a recent trade fair in Shanghai.

More predictability

A Biden presidency is unlikely to immediately reverse US-China tensions as both major parties in Congress have reached a consensus on taking a tougher stance on China. But Biden has been regarded by Beijing as a more predictable president to deal with than Trump.

Biden has previously described Russia, rather than China, as a greater threat to the US. This suggests that a Biden presidency could take a more conciliatory approach towards China compared with the incumbent president, even though any such approach is likely to develop with caution against a backdrop of US-China rivalries.

Some Chinese traders and importers are cautiously optimistic that any de-escalation of US-China tensions could provide the basis for Australia-China tensions to ease, given that Australia and the US have been allies. But some traders said it will may take a long time to heal the China-Australia rift and say they will proceed carefully. Beijing does not want to risk losing face by importing Australian material after strongly objecting to Canberra's call for an independent inquiry into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Trump could also take steps that escalate tensions with China before handing over to Biden in January. But Beijing is likely to remain calm in the face of such actions, as it prepares to deal with a new incoming US administration.

A Biden presidency is expected to strive to promote renewable energy and clean energy infrastructure under a long-term target of net-zero emissions by 2050. His administration will aim to reduce coal consumption under the US's original commitments to the Paris climate change agreement concluded in 2016. He can be expected to rejoin the Paris agreement after Trump withdrew the US from the climate pact.

China still needs Australian coal

But China's appetite for coal is unlikely to be dampened in the short term as the country cannot immediately replace its coal-fired plants with renewables, despite setting a carbon-neutrality target by 2060 and promoting renewable energy. China is likely to remain an important market for Australian coal in the short term, should tensions between the two countries ease.

China's informal restrictions on seaborne coal, especially from Australia, have caused domestic shortages and spot prices to soar in the face of winter restocking demand, with coastal utilities the hardest hit.

Delivering domestic coal, which is mostly produced in north China's inland provinces, to coastal utilities by rail is expensive and logistically complicated, although rail remains the viable mode of delivery for most inland utilities. Many of China's coastal utilities are reluctant to significantly increase their spot purchases from the key coal transshipment ports of Qinhuangdao and Caofeidian despite the impending winter because current domestic spot prices have risen well above the government-set upper limit of 600 yuan/t ($90.75/t), which is deemed too high.

Beijing's informal curbs on Australian coal imports have tightened so much that a Chinese state-owned utility possibly bought a rare Capesize cargo of South African NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal at a price that is well above offer levels of similar quality Australian coal. Freight costs for transporting South African coal to China are usually also significantly higher than for Australian material because of the longer sailing time involved.

Although China has also increased its imports of Russian coal recently, both South African and Russian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg material contain some trace elements that make them less appealing to typical Chinese customers than Australian coal.

Australian coal commands a special market position in China that makes it difficult to be replaced by material from other origins in the longer term. But even with a current wider theoretical arbitrage for Australian spot coal into China of nearly Yn280/t, many Chinese consumers remain worried about the risk of getting the coal through customs.

Although China has touted self-sufficiency in the face of deteriorating international relations with other countries, it has come at a heavier price for utilities that rely on seaborne coal. This winter could be a bitter one for Chinese utilities that have lost access to competitively priced Australian product but are reluctant to pay more for increasingly expensive domestic coal.

If trade and diplomatic tensions between Australia and China ease slowly on the back of better US-China relations under a Biden administration, Beijing could, out of necessity, gradually and quietly relax its restrictions against Australian coal.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
20/02/25

US cites 'energy emergency' to expedite water permits

US cites 'energy emergency' to expedite water permits

Washington, 20 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is citing an "energy emergency" as the basis to fast-track nearly 700 water permits, including those tied to a tunnel for Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline, LNG infrastructure projects, solar farms and electric transmission lines. Trump declared a national energy emergency on his first day in office, unlocking permitting powers that are typically used in response to natural disasters. The US Army Corps of Engineers has subsequently reclassified hundreds of permit applications for review under expedited emergency procedures, in a move that environmentalists say they plan to challenge in court based on violations of the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act. "The Trump administration is planning to skirt legally-required review processes in order to fast-track permits for dirty energy projects under the guise of an energy ‘emergency'", Sierra Club policy director Mahyar Sorour said. The Corps is responsible for issuing water permits for projects that cross streams, rivers, wetlands and other water bodies. Issuing permits sometimes requires the agency to prepare a detailed environmental review that is open to comment and can take years to finish. The water permits classified for emergency treatment include a repair project for Sabine Pass LNG in Louisiana, dredging for Elba Island LNG in Georgia, temporary construction related to Port Arthur LNG in Texas, solar projects in dozens of states, and pipeline projects ExxonMobil is pursuing in Texas. Enbridge delayed construction of a protective tunnel for its Line 5 pipeline to 2026 because of water permitting delays . But environmentalists say the administration cannot cite an energy emergency — which they say does not exist — as justification to bypass permitting rules prescribed by the US Congress. The Corps has also provided emergency treatment to projects with no apparent connection to energy production, such as a housing project in southern California and a gold mine in Idaho, according to an online database. The Corps did not respond to detailed questions but said it was "in the process of reviewing active permit applications relative to the executive order." Congress is continuing to lay groundwork for a bipartisan permitting bill that supporters say could make it faster and cheaper to build pipelines, power plants, electric transmission lines, renewable energy projects and transportation infrastructure. But Democratic leaders are threatening to vote against such a bill so long as Trump continues to "pause" billions of dollars in funding for clean energy projects provided by the Inflation Reduction Act and other laws. "Until the administration shows it will honor its oath to faithfully and impartially execute the laws, we can have zero confidence that any legislative compromise on permitting reform will be executed lawfully," US senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) said at a permitting hearing on 19 February. Oil industry and renewable groups are continuing to push for a comprehensive permitting bill, which they say would bring down project costs and help the US meet surging electricity demand from data centers and manufacturers. Permitting changes are "needed for all technologies, and they are needed to meet our energy demand in the future," Business Council for Sustainable Energy president Lisa Jacobson said. "You can't walk away from those facts or that imperative." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Low water likely to persist at St Louis into March


19/02/25
News
19/02/25

Low water likely to persist at St Louis into March

Houston, 19 February (Argus) — Low water conditions are expected to persist at St Louis harbor on the Mississippi River through March, causing barge loading issues for both carriers and shippers. Minimal precipitation coupled with increased ice formation along the harbor decreased water levels to -3.3ft on 19 February at St Louis, according to the National Weather Service (NWS). Some terminals at the harbor have been unable to load and unload barges because of the low water. Carriers expect this to become a larger issue when barges carrying northbound products reach St Louis in March. Although low water has been an issue at the harbor since early January, more barge carriers and shippers began to prepare for slipping water levels when grain barge movement picked up later that month. Some barge carriers have reduced the amount of product placed in barges in order to keep drafts from dipping below 9.6ft this week. Low water levels are anticipated to remain through 4 March, which may hinder barge loadings and increase delays at St Louis. St Louis has received less than an inch of rainfall over the past seven days, according to the NWS. There has been even less precipitation upriver in the Northern Plains over the past week. Larger ice formations have appeared in the harbor on account of freezing conditions. The city of St Louis is under winter weather advisory, and is forecast to receive 1-3in of snow between 18-19 February, according to NWS. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump asserts power over independent agencies


19/02/25
News
19/02/25

Trump asserts power over independent agencies

Washington, 19 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that claims to give him sweeping control over the budgets, policies and regulations of independent US agencies that oversee the energy sector, financial markets, trade and transportation. The order seeks to give the White House unprecedented control over the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and more than a dozen other independent agencies. Trump's order asserts that "so-called independent agencies" lack sufficient accountability and should be brought under his direct control. "For the federal government to be truly accountable to the American people, officials who wield vast executive power must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected president," according to the executive order, which was signed on Tuesday. FERC, the CFTC and the SEC did not respond to a request for comment. Trump's order would all but end years of attempts by the US Congress to shield agencies that oversee energy markets, trading, finance, maritime trade, railroads, and other businesses from excessive political influence. Congress made those agencies independent — often with a bipartisan board serving years-long terms — to ensure a degree of independence when agencies resolve business disputes, set market rules and issue new regulations. In Trump's first term, FERC's commissioners and Republican chairman rejected the administration's plan to push through market rules to bail out coal and nuclear power plants, based partly on the concerns that doing so would destabilize power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars. It remains unclear if the agency in the future could assert that degree of independence under the order. Trump's order would give the White House the ability to control independent agency budgets and require the appointment of a White House "liaison" in each agency. The order would require agency chairs to align their policies with the White House, subject all significant regulations to review by the administration, and would establish "performance standards" for agency leaders. The order provides an exception for the US Federal Reserve for monetary policy, but the agency's budget and its regulatory actions would come under White House control. Other agencies also covered by the executive order include the US Surface Transportation Board, the US Federal Trade Commission, the US Chemical Safety Board, the US Export-Import Bank, the US Federal Maritime Commission and the US National Transportation Safety Board. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan sets stricter climate goal in government sector


19/02/25
News
19/02/25

Japan sets stricter climate goal in government sector

Osaka, 19 February (Argus) — The Japanese government is planning to boost the use of renewable electricity at ministries and state-owned facilities, setting a tougher goal to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from public sector operations. The government aims to reduce its own GHG emissions by 79pc in the April 2040-March 2041 fiscal year against the 2013-14 level, it said in a plan approved on 18 February. This objective comes after the intermediate goal of a 50pc reduction in 2030-31 and 65pc in 2035-36. The government's climate plans are more ambitious compared with Japan's nationally determined contribution (NDC) , which was submitted to the UN climate body the UNFCCC on 18 February, because it wants to take the initiative to accelerate the country's decarbonisation drive. Japan's new NDC targets for a 73pc reduction in GHG emissions by 2040-41, after a 60pc cut in 2035-36. Tokyo plans to ensure at least 60pc of its power use comes from renewable sources in 2030-31 and more than 80pc from zero-emission power sources in 2040-41. Renewable power use at ministries was 27pc in 2021-22. The government aims to install solar power systems at more than 50pc of its own facilities and lands by 2030-31 and ensure 100pc penetration by 2040-41, actively adopting perovskite, the Japanese innovation for solar panel manufacture that uses iodine instead of conventional raw material silicon. Tokyo will also gear up efforts to improve energy efficiency at its buildings and switch all official vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs), fuel cell vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHVs) and hybrid vehicles (HVs). Japan plans to generate 40-50pc of its electricity from renewables in 2040-41, up from 22.9pc in 2023-24. The share of thermal power will fall to around 30-40pc from 68.6pc, while the share nuclear power will increase to around 20pc from 8.5pc over the same period. The 2040-41 target is based on the expected Japanese power demand of 1,100-1,200 TWh, which is higher by 12-22pc from 2023-24. The breakdown of thermal output for 2040-41 is unclear. But gas-fed output is expected to hold the majority share, given that gas has already outpaced coal in power generation and Tokyo has pledged to phase out inefficient coal-fired plants by 2030. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India's domestic coal supply to utilities rises in Jan


18/02/25
News
18/02/25

India's domestic coal supply to utilities rises in Jan

Singapore, 18 February (Argus) — Domestic thermal coal supplies to Indian utilities rose in January as power plants continued to boost inventories. Combined coal supplies to utilities from domestic sources such as state-controlled Coal India (CIL), Singareni Collieries (SCCL) and captive blocks stood at 76.41mn t, up by 5.8pc from a year earlier, provisional data from India's coal ministry show. Supply was also up from 76.04mn t in December. Indian utilities continued to restock, although coal consumption at utilities was weaker than initially anticipated, as temperatures in most parts of the country were higher last month compared to historical averages, curbing power demand. India's coal-fired generation — which meets most of its power requirements — stood at 109.68TWh during January, down from 111.72TWh a year earlier, but up from 104.30TWh in December, Central Electricity Authority (CEA) data show. Higher domestic coal supplies and weaker coal burn supported stock positions at utilities. Combined coal inventories at Indian power plants stood at around 50.5mn t on 31 January, up from 45.2mn t on 31 December and higher from 38.59mn t as of 31 January 2024, according to CEA data. The inventory as of the end of January would last for over 17 days at the current daily coal consumption rate at utilities. Higher stocks and a steady uptick in domestic supplies might have pressured utility demand for imported coal and India's overall seaborne receipts last month. India imported 11.63mn t of thermal coal last month, down from 13.34mn t a year earlier, according to data from analytics firm Kpler. Imports reached 163mn t in 2024, down from 168.2mn t in 2023, Kpler data show. Indian power sector imports, which account for more than 40pc of the country's overall imports, dropped on the year for the fourth straight month in December , and might have eased in January. Combined thermal coal imports by Indian utilities, excluding captive power plants, stood at 3.25mn t in December, down by 2.17mn t or 49pc from a year earlier, CEA data show. Imports could come under pressure if the government does not extend its directive to imported coal-fired plants, which have a combined capacity of 17.7GW, to boost generation under Section 11 of the Indian electricity law, which also gives some flexibility to such generators to sell excess production in the power market. The directive is due to expire on 28 February. Production, supply mix The increased supplies to utilities were supported by higher overall thermal production. India's coal output rose by 4.4pc in January from a year earlier to 104.49mn t. The country's supplies to all sectors stood at 93.21mn t last month, up by 6.7pc on the year. CIL produced 77.79mn t in January, down from around 78.41mn t a year earlier, while it supplied 69.26mn t, rising from 67.52mn t last year, ministry data show. Of this, 55.01mn t of coal was supplied to the power sector in January, easing from 55.15mn t a year earlier. Meanwhile, output at coal producer SCCL rose by 5pc from a year earlier to 6.97mn t in January. But its overall supplies in January fell by about 1.5pc on the year to 6.12mn t, while dispatches to the power sector rose by 2.2pc on the year to 5.6mn t. Captive coal block producers and other small government mining entities comprised the remainder of the supplies to utilities in January. Output from captive coal blocks and other mining companies rose by over 31pc on the year to 19.72mn t in January, while supplies rose by nearly 30.7pc to 17.83mn t. Data on domestic coal supplies to Indian utilities do not include dispatches to captive power plants set up by industries. Supplies to such captive utilities — from sources such as CIL, SCCL and captive coal blocks — reached 6.29mn t in January, up by almost 9pc from a year earlier. Domestic supplies to steel and cement sector in January rose by 4.5pc and 31pc from a year earlier to 860,000t and 900,000t respectively, the ministry data show. By Saurabh Chaturvedi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more