China takes fossil fuel projects off green bond list

Market: Coal, Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
26/04/21

China's central bank has excluded fossil fuel projects from those eligible for green bond financing, marking a key step in the country's shift towards non-fossil energy sources.

The central bank last week released a list of projects considered eligible for green bond financing in China's 2021 green bond catalogue, which removes fossil fuel investments, including for ultra-supercritical coal power plants, coal-fired units above 300MW generation capacity, clean coal use, and refining units to produce clean gasoline and diesel. The latest catalogue takes effect from 1 July and replaces the one published in 2015.

The announcement came ahead of the US-hosted virtual climate summit on 22-23 April, in a sign that China might be willing to cooperate with the US on the climate crisis. Chinese president Xi Jinping also last year set targets for China's carbon emissions to peak before 2030 and the country to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. And China's five-year plan for 2021-25 aims to raise non-fossil fuel energy to around 20pc of the primary energy mix from 15.8pc last year.

Independent greenfield refinery and petrochemical projects such as private-sector refiner Rongsheng's 800,000 b/d Zhejiang Petrochemical (ZPC) and private-sector Shenghong Petrochemical's under-construction 320,000 b/d Lianyungang refineries previously received government approval to issue green bonds capped at 4bn yuan ($616mn) and Yn3bn respectively. These refineries were deemed eligible under the terms of energy-saving and cleaner upgrades for oil and petrochemical units in the 2015 catalog.

Wind, solar and hydropower remain in the latest catalog, along with nuclear, biomass and hydrogen utilisation projects, with fuel cell manufacturing included for the first time.

Other additions to the latest catalog include long-distance gas pipelines, peak shaving facilities for gas storage, LNG receiving terminals, carbon capture, utilisation and storage projects, clean-heating energy projects for rural areas, and service providers for China's emissions trading scheme.

Fossil fuel projects are still a major source of carbon emissions even if cleaner production techniques are used, a central bank official said in a briefing note.

"Most of the mainstream global green bond issuances have excluded such items already, [and] the latest catalog will make China's green bond issuance more regulated and restricted in line with global practices," the central bank said.

China's total green bond balance was Yn813.2bn as of the end of last year, the second globally, according to figures from the Shanghai Clearing House.

More than 40 tranches of carbon-neutral bonds have been issued so far this year, with total values exceeding $10bn. The central bank estimates that China will invest Yn2.2 trillion/yr by 2030 to reduce carbon emissions, according to the official China Daily.

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

03/04/25

South Korea’s GS Energy seeks term LNG from 2028

Singapore, 3 April (Argus) — South Korean private-sector firm GS Energy's subsidiary GS Energy Trading Singapore is seeking LNG deliveries starting from 1 January 2028, over a 5-15 year period. The first round of offers will be due on 25 April and the second to close on 1 August later this year. The firm has requested volumes of up to 0.81mn t/yr in 2028 and up to 0.97mn t/yr from 2029 onwards. This is equivalent to around 13-14 cargoes/yr in 2028 and about 16-17 cargoes/yr from 2029 onwards, assuming an average LNG cargo size of 60,000t. The cargoes will be delivered to the country's 10.8mn t/yr Boryeong terminal, which is owned by power producers SK E&S and GS Energy. The firm has also specified for offers to be linked to Brent or a hybrid of Brent and Henry Hub. South Korean utility Korea South-East Power in June 2024 also signed an agreement with TotalEnergies for a five-year term delivery of up to 500,000 t/yr of LNG to South Korea from 2027. Meanwhile, state-owned gas incumbent Kogas is expected to operate with a smaller pool of long-term LNG supplies from 2025, with the government granting it more flexibility in its procurement strategy. Long-term contracted supply volumes may typically be priced at a higher premium, and could be deemed as a small price for buyers to secure supply security, traders said. By Naomi Ong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Oil futures, stock markets fall on Trump tariffs

03/04/25

News

03/04/25

Oil futures, stock markets fall on Trump tariffs

Singapore, 3 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping new tariffs on all US imports has sparked an immediate sell-off in oil futures and stock markets. Crude oil futures fell by almost 3.5pc in Asian trading and some stock markets in the region fell by a similar amount, after Trump unveiled the new import tariffs on 2 April. All foreign imports into the US will be subject to a minimum 10pc tax, with levels as high as 34pc for China and 20pc for the EU, Trump said. But energy and some mineral products have been excluded from the new tariffs. Tariffs on Japan and South Korea, both major trading partners and long-standing US allies in Asia, have been set at 24pc and 25pc respectively. Indonesia, Vietnam, Taiwan and Thailand also face tariffs of more than 30pc. Tariffs on imports from China will be subject to a 54pc rate, after taking into account the 20pc tariffs imposed by Trump over the last two months. Some imports from China that are subject to pre-existing tariffs will face an even higher effective rate. The blanket 10pc tariffs will take effect on 5 April. Any additional country-specific rates will come into force on 9 April. Oil futures fell despite the exemption for energy products. The June Brent contract on the Ice exchange fell by as much as 3.2pc to a low of $72.52/bl in Asian trading, while May Nymex WTI dropped by 3.4pc to $69.27/bl. The prospect that the US tariffs could disrupt global trade and hit export-focused economies in Asia sent stock markets in Tokyo, Hong Kong and South Korea down by 2-3pc or more. US stock futures also fell sharply. By Kevin Foster Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mexico manufacturing extends contraction in March

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Mexico manufacturing extends contraction in March

Mexico City, 2 April (Argus) — Mexico's manufacturing sector contracted for a 12th consecutive month in March, with production and employment both deepening their slides, according to a survey released today. The manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) ticked up to 47.2 in March from 47.1 in February, but remained below the 50-point threshold between contraction and expansion, according to the latest PMI survey from the finance executive association IMEF. Manufacturing, which accounts for about a fifth of Mexico's economy, is led by the auto sector, contributing about 18pc of manufacturing GDP. Within the manufacturing PMI, the new orders index rose by 1.3 points to 45.3, still deep in contraction. Meanwhile, production fell by 0.6 points to 44.6. The employment index also declined 0.6 points to 46.4 in March, now in contraction for 14 consecutive months. Meanwhile, the non-manufacturing PMI — covering services and commerce — declined 0.8 points to 48.8 in March from 49.6 in February, holding in contraction for a fourth consecutive month. Within the non-manufacturing PMI, new orders fell 1.5 points to 48.2 and production declined 1 point to 47.5 with employment down a point as well in March to 47.5, as all three pushed deeper into contraction. In contrast, the inventories component rose 3.5 points to 50.6 into expansion territory in March. But this may be the result of company strategies to stockpile inventories ahead of US tariffs and the reciprocal measures Mexico is set to announce on 3 April, IMEF technical advisory board member Sergio Luna said. PMI data show that the economic stagnation that began in late 2024 persisted through March, with results from January and February pointing to a sharp slowdown in the first quarter, IMEF said. This follows annualized GDP growth of 0.5pc in the fourth quarter of 2024, slowing from 1.7pc in the third quarter, according to national statistics agency data. Luna said concerns over US tariffs continue to drive much of the uncertainty reflected in the PMI data. Internal factors — such as reduced government spending to contain the fiscal deficit and investor unease over judicial reforms passed last year — are also weighing on activity, Luna added. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

Lisbon, 2 April (Argus) — Allowing the use of credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement for compliance with the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) could provide flexibility for developing countries that lack the capacity to set up their own carbon pricing systems in response to the measure, delegates at a conference in Lisbon, Portugal, heard today. The CBAM regulation provides for a carbon price already paid on a product in its country of origin to be deducted from CBAM costs, providing an incentive for countries importing products covered by the measure to the EU to introduce equivalent carbon pricing systems. But developing countries often lack the capacity to enact such policies, the chief sustainability and innovation officer at ACT Group, Federico di Credico, told delegates, and allowing the use of Article 6 credits for compliance could provide an alternative. This could in one form take place implicitly, di Credico said, if CBAM liabilities are adjusted down in relation to pricing systems that themselves allow some compliance using Article 6 credits. An example of this is Singapore, where 5pc of the country's carbon tax can be offset through the purchase of Article 6 internationally traded mitigation outcomes (Itmos). A more direct inclusion of Article 6 credits for compliance could entail a calculation on a euro-for-euro basis, di Credico suggested, for example reducing a CBAM liability of €100 to €50 if the importer has purchased €50-worth of Article 6 credits. Using a tonne-for-tonne basis would not work because the CBAM is not volume based, he said. But the uncertainty surrounding Article 6 credits means that their inclusion would bring an added layer of complexity to the CBAM, Cedric de Meeus of cement producer Holcim said. Article 6 credits are not usable in the EU emissions trading system (ETS), which forms the reference price for the CBAM, he pointed out, while not all activities producing Article 6 credits would be equivalent to the deep decarbonisation being carried out by European industry. It remains unclear how the EU will take into account carbon prices in other jurisdictions for the purposes of the CBAM. The CBAM regulation includes the ability to credit a "carbon price… effectively paid in the country of origin" but does not define what falls within this term, and the implementing regulation that will provide further detail on the matter has not yet been tabled. Article 6 of the Paris deal provides for two carbon pricing mechanisms allowing countries to collaborate voluntarily to reduce their emissions. Article 6.2, which is already fully operational, produces Itmos through bilateral agreements on emissions reduction or removal projects, while Article 6.4 establishes the soon-to-be-implemented Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (Pacm), a UN-regulated global carbon crediting system. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

02/04/25

News

02/04/25

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

London, 2 April (Argus) — Public and corporate spending on energy research and development (R&D) is "trending upwards", with a focus on "low-emissions" technology, but venture capital investment in energy start-ups dropped last year, energy watchdog the IEA found. Government and corporate energy R&D spending increased to $50bn and over $160bn, respectively, in 2023 — the latest year for which full data are available, the IEA said. There are "early indications of continued growth in 2024", although the pace of growth has "slowed slightly" since 2022, it added. But "the momentum of investing in low-emissions energy technologies has been maintained", partly on the back of climate policy goals, the IEA noted. The share of "low-emissions" energy R&D spending has held at "roughly four-fifths of the global total" in recent years, the IEA said. It defines low-emissions energy as renewable power, grids and storage, energy efficiency, nuclear and "low-emissions fuels". Venture capital investments in energy start-ups totalled around $27bn in 2024, 23pc lower on the year, the IEA found. This reflects the "cyclical nature" of venture capital, as well as a drop in funding owed to inflation, but the trend "could have long-term negative impacts as innovators struggle to scale up high-potential technologies without access to affordable capital", the watchdog noted. The IEA also suggested that "the situation is compounded by uncertainties about political commitments to the climate policies that many start-ups depend on to drive demand". But venture capital financing rose in 2024 for start-ups focused on nuclear, synthetic fuels and carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS), it found. CCUS and "novel CDR" — carbon removal — technologies have drawn more venture capital funding in recent years, and sector R&D "is being spurred on by private capital mobilised by carbon credits", the IEA said. There are multiple ways to capture and store CO2, but many are at very early stages, while most funding goes towards just two approaches — direct air capture and bioenergy with CCS, its report found. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more