Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US energy secretary urges oil sector to diversify

  • Market: Crude oil, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 26/04/21

Oil companies that are slow to shift toward cleaner energy source risk of being left behind as the world reduces carbon emissions, US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm said.

Her remarks today are the latest from cabinet members serving under President Joe Biden who are urging the industry to decarbonize. Granholm said diversifying would help the oil sector remain competitive over the long term, as the US steps up efforts to reach new commitments under the Paris climate accord.

"The bottom line is you have got to move," Granholm said today during an event hosted by news outlet Politico. "You cannot hang on and be the Kodak or the Blockbuster Video of the energy world. You have got to diversify."

Blockbuster and Kodak were household names in video rental and film but lost business as their industries went digital. The companies sought bankruptcy protection in 2010 and 2012, respectively.

The US over time will shift to clean electricity as it reduces carbon emissions, Granholm said, with a likely continued role for biofuels in hard-to-decarbonize industries such as air travel. Granholm said companies like ExxonMobil are offering proposals like a hub for carbon capture in Houston because they see where the world is headed.

"Some of the oil companies have decided that they are going to diversify and become diversified energy companies," she said. "The proof will be in the pudding. You do not want to just assume that somebody is greenwashing."

ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP and other major oil companies have urged the US to put a price on carbon emissions to achieve its climate goals. Biden has sought to increase an existing tax credit for carbon sequestration as part of a $2 trillion infrastructure plan named the "American Jobs Plan," but he has yet to embrace an economy-wide price on carbon.

"A lot of economists believe this is the most efficient thing to do, but this administration is not there yet," Granholm said. "They want to use the American Jobs Plan using the carrots that they have to incentivize and move away from carbon polluting industries."

Despite the lack of an existing price on carbon, Biden is "particularly interested" in evaluating whether to deploy a US border adjustment mechanism that would reflect carbon emissions, White House climate envoy John Kerry said last week during an interview with Bloomberg TV. The EU is considering its own carbon adjustment on trade, which could offset the economic incentive to shift carbon-intensive businesses outside of the trading bloc to avoid carbon pricing.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/01/25

US still eyes 1 February for Canada, Mexico tariffs

US still eyes 1 February for Canada, Mexico tariffs

Washington, 28 January (Argus) — President Donald Trump is still keen to impose tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico as soon as 1 February, the White House said today. Trump in multiple public comments since taking office on 20 January said he was still considering a 25pc tariff on Canada and Mexico, even though his administration has yet to provide any details on the proposal. Trump spent much of his meeting on Monday with Republican lawmakers at their annual retreat in Florida blasting Canada and Mexico over their allegedly unfair trade practices. Tariffs should become a key source of income for the US government, just as they were in the nineteenth and early twentieth century before being supplanted by income taxes, Trump told the lawmakers, who are looking at ways to extend tax cuts enacted during his first term and set to expire at the end of 2025. Trump also said he would impose tariffs on all imported computer chips, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Trump's messaging on China tariffs has been more mixed. He said last week he would go on with his initial plans to impose a 10pc tax on all imports from China, but he also said he preferred to avoid a trade war with Beijing. An executive order Trump signed on 20 January lays out a process suggesting timelines of June-July for imposing tariffs on the US' key trading partners, with no reference to the 1 February deadline. But Trump has the legal authority to impose tariffs on imports from any country by a variety of executive actions and with very short notice, as he demonstrated over the weekend during a high-profile confrontation with Colombia over deporting migrants from the US. Trump told the lawmakers on Monday that he expects to wield the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tool often, because even "a very strong country" like Colombia caved in to his demands. Canada and Mexico appear to be preparing for a protracted trade confrontation with the US if Trump follows through on his threat, with retaliatory measures targeting specific US products and companies. The looming faceoff has unnerved the US oil producers and refiners, which are warning of severe impacts to the integrated North American energy markets if taxes are imposed on flows from Canada and Mexico to the US. Industry group American Petroleum Institute is lobbying the Trump administration to exempt crude and other energy products from any tariffs he plans to impose. Trump last week shrugged off the arguments from the US energy industry about potential negative impacts from confronting Canada and Mexico. "We don't need their oil and gas," Trump said. "We have our own, we have more than anybody." Almost all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US through November are waterborne, targeting Gulf coast refiners, and can be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility — more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Only around 900,000 b/d can be directed away from the US via the recently expanded Trans Mountain pipeline system to the Pacific coast, although late-2024 flows were actually closer to 400,000 b/d, split evenly between the US west coast and Asia. Conversely, many refineries in the US midcontinent have no practical alternative to the Canadian crude. US gasoline prices would move higher by 30-70¢/USG if the 25pc tariffs that Trump has threatened were applied to Canada's oil, Canada's TD Bank projects. Trump's commerce secretary nominee Howard Lutnick will face a confirmation hearing at the Senate Commerce committee on Wednesday, with trade wars likely to feature high among the questions lawmakers direct at him. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Traders expect low uptake of 5-year Latvian gas storage


28/01/25
News
28/01/25

Traders expect low uptake of 5-year Latvian gas storage

London, 28 January (Argus) — Market participants expect limited demand for a new five-year gas storage product that Latvian operator Conexus will begin offering later this year. Conexus will offer a five-year product for its 25TWh Incukalns storage site for the first time ever on 11 February. This five-year offering will be in addition to the one and two-year products already previously offered by Conexus, along with the storage transfer and interruptible capacity products. All market participants surveyed by Argus expect weak demand for the five-year product, mostly because of unfavourable summer-winter spreads and traders' lack of willingness to commit to bookings that far ahead. Several respondents highlighted that only a limited pool of firms would be interested in planning their activities five years out. Most traders "do not look to the so distant future in the gas storage business", one said. "Not so many market players are ready to tie themselves to local gas markets for five storage cycles in a row," another said. Several respondents criticised the product's rules, with one noting that it could even lead to storage utilisation falling, "considering the fines for inventory transfer between storage seasons". Traders would try to "squeeze out the pipeline/LNG supply potential, rather than over-injecting", they added. Another said they were concerned that the share of the overall storage capacity allocated to the five-year product was "too high" and would make it possible for some market participants to "hijack this very much needed capacity in a similar way" to what happens at the Latvian-Lithuanian border point of Kiemenai. Several traders have expressed frustration that annual capacity at Kiemenai has been fully booked but only a small part is at times used , blocking other shippers from accessing the capacity and resulting in low utilisation rates. Another trader highlighted the product's limitation of only allowing a user to transfer up to 50pc of the total booked capacity from one storage cycle to the next without having to pay additional fees. The previous set of capacity products has been "tested for years and proven to be working", another market participant said, arguing that "imperfect but certain conditions are better than uncertain ones". One trader pointed out that a lack of interest in the five-year product could increase demand for the traditional one and two-year products, increasing the premium at these auctions further. Two other traders pointed out that given prevailing inverted summer-winter spreads, there is little financial incentive to book any capacity products, let alone make a five-year commitment. Ultimately, the "behaviour of local players is and will continue to be influenced by the closest summer-winter spread and the difference between this spread and the one-year storage tariff, not by long-term storage capacity of injection/withdrawal limits," one concluded. By Brendan A'Hearn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Capacity markets need to reduce emissions: Aurora


28/01/25
News
28/01/25

Capacity markets need to reduce emissions: Aurora

London, 28 January (Argus) — European capacity markets focus too much attention on fossil fuel-fired plants and not enough on renewable sources of security of supply, according to a report issued by research firm Aurora that was commissioned by campaign group Beyond Fossil Fuels. Capacity markets in the six European countries that have them — the UK, France, Italy, Poland, Ireland and Belgium — have made payments totalling €89.6bn since a mechanism of this kind was first established in the UK in 2015, the report says. The mechanisms are intended to allow firm sources of generation to remain financially viable, even as increasing intermittent renewable generation reduces the number of hours that these types of plants can run profitably. Of this, nearly half went to support gas-fired capacity and 8pc to coal-fired plants, although there is some uncertainty over precise amounts because of data unavailability. Nuclear plants, mostly in France, received 12pc of the support, while storage — located mostly in the UK and Poland — took 13pc. Renewables, interconnectors and demand-side response took only 7pc, 5pc and 2pc, respectively. And 19GW of newbuild gas-fired plants have been funded through the schemes, with another 11GW of newbuild gas-fired plants having been awarded a contract for delivery in the next three years. Some of the plants will continue receiving funding until the 2040s, Aurora said, putting at risk European states' plans to move towards net zero greenhouse gas emissions. Payments for some assets in five of the countries studied continue until 2037-43, although France's unique decentralised system does not provide incentives beyond the front year. Payments to operators of battery energy storage systems (Bess) make up only a small part of the total, even though these units can provide zero-emissions short-term energy storage. Regulators should set up schemes to prioritise zero-emissions forms of security of supply, the report says. And alternative schemes, such as capacity reserves, in which fossil-fired capacity is kept back to resolve supply-demand imbalances but not allowed to act in wholesale markets, can ensure these plants do not lead to emissions increases. At the same time, a lack of viable long-term storage options could mean fossil fuel-fired technologies are needed for longer periods. Bess systems too can suffer from an inability to charge during long periods of low renewables output, which prompted Polish grid operator PSE to increase the technology's de-rating in an auction held last year. Other countries are considering setting up capacity markets, with discussions under way in Spain, Germany and Greece. Spain's planned market, which is under consultation , will allow payments for thermal generators only for a year in advance and in particular circumstances, with only renewables, storage and demand response being eligible for long-term support. By Rhys Talbot Capacity market spending by technology Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Republican floats repeal of 45Z clean fuel credit


27/01/25
News
27/01/25

Republican floats repeal of 45Z clean fuel credit

New York, 27 January (Argus) — A Republican lawmaker has quietly introduced a bill to repeal a key subsidy for low-carbon fuels, complicating a debate among lawmakers on what to do with clean energy incentives provided by the Inflation Reduction Act. The bill, HR 549, introduced this month by US representative Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas) would repeal the 2022 climate law's "45Z" incentive for clean fuels, which offers increasingly generous subsidies to fuels as they produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions. While the credit is currently in effect, the legislation as written would apply retroactively, striking the credit from the tax code after 2024. The proposal comes as Republicans prepare to pass major legislation this year through the Senate's reconciliation process, which bypasses the 100-member chamber's 60-vote requirement to advance most bills. Intent on extending tax breaks passed during President Donald Trump's first term but wary of adding to budget deficits, lawmakers are searching for ways to cut government spending. While changes to at least some Inflation Reduction Act programs are expected, biofuels policy is seen as a less likely target for Republicans than other climate policies. And even members supportive of scrapping clean energy subsidies might be wary of repealing incentives retroactively. Still, the new bill suggests that a full repeal of 45Z could at least be part of legislative discussions this year. The bill was referred on 16 January to the House Ways and Means Committee, of which Van Duyne is a member. Other Republicans on the Ways and Means Committee have expressed openness to updating but not necessarily eliminating the credit, with six members opening a request for information last year on options such as limiting foreign feedstocks or encouraging more "climate-smart" farm practices. Industry groups generally supportive of 45Z might even welcome some legislative changes, particularly those frustrated by incomplete guidance on qualifying for the credit issued in the waning days of former president Joe Biden's term. More information on lawmakers' plans could come soon, with House Republicans on Monday attending a policy retreat with Trump in Florida. Whatever changes are proposed, Republicans' slim majorities leaves them with little room for dissent and could give farm-state lawmakers leverage to ensure some type of biofuel tax credit survives legislative negotiations. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

France imported record amount of US crude in November


27/01/25
News
27/01/25

France imported record amount of US crude in November

Barcelona, 27 January (Argus) — French crude imports in November included a new high from the US. Customs data show imports at 4.3mn t (1.04mn b/d), up by 7pc on the year and down from 4.5mn t a month earlier. Deliveries of US crude were just over 1.25mn t, up from the previous record of slightly more than 1.2mn t in October and December 2023. The latter month had been the highest, but a downwards revision gave that spot to November 2024. US crude imports have been arriving on very large crude carriers (VLCC) at the Mediterranean port of Fos-Lavera. A VLCC of WTI grade crude unloaded there in October, in November and in January. Argus ' tracking shows US crude as the largest single source of imports at the port . Each delivery has been for Rhone Energies' 133,000 b/d Fos refinery. This has been operated since November by a consortium comprising trading firm Trafigura and US-based energy infrastructure company Entara. Kpler data show all three VLCCs were arranged by trading firm Vitol. The US is now by far the biggest supplier to France. It provided 10.2mn t of crude in the January-November period, up from 7.8mn t on the year, ahead of Nigeria with 5.8mn t, Kazakhstan on 4.9mn t and Algeria on 4mn t (see chart) . There is the possibility of further increases in US shipments this year. Rival light sweet grades from Libya are prone to disruption, Nigerian demand for domestic crude is growing as the 600,000 b/d Dangote refinery ramps up, and Kazakhstan is under pressure to compensate for exceeding its Opec+ output target and could limit deliveries of CPC Blend. While imports were high in October, overall French crude receipts in the first 11 months of last year were 42.9mn t, lower by 2.4pc on the year, the result of planned and unplanned refinery downtime. By Adam Porter French crude imports mn bl Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more