Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Australian government sees net zero and coal coexisting

  • Market: Coal, Coking coal, Emissions, Hydrogen
  • 13/10/21

Australia is moving towards a carbon neutral by 2050 target but parts of the federal government say this can coexist with a vibrant domestic coal industry, with some suggesting a taxpayer-funded loan scheme to ensure continuing investment in the sector.

Australian prime minister Scott Morrison is expected to take a net zero by 2050 target to the UN Cop 26 climate conference in the UK's Glasgow later this month, although it will be a target based on offsets and carbon sequestration, rather than the closure of the nation's coal industry. The government's main goal is to protect coal, gas, heavy manufacturing and agriculture, while promoting the use of hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and soil carbon, federal energy minister Angus Taylor said this week. Canberra will provide incentives to cut emissions rather than punishing polluters, Taylor added.

Others have gone further, with federal resources minister Keith Pitt last week suggesting that the government provide an A$250bn ($180bn) lending facility to firms wishing to invest in coal mining in Australia. This will fill the gap left by the exit of traditional lenders from the sector.

The last of Australia's four largest banks ANZ committed a year ago to exiting lending to thermal coal activities from 2030, leaving a small number of private equity firms, overseas corporates and private investors providing finance to the sector, with some banks also declining to finance metallurgical coal projects.

Record breaking thermal coal prices, while driven by firm demand ahead of the northern hemisphere winter, are exacerbated by low investment in the coal mining sector. Some mining firms are unable to expand because of regulatory delays, while most cannot balance the current strong prices against the risk of over investing in an asset that could become stranded in a low-carbon economy.

This investment equation is made more complex by the volatility in coal prices over the past two years, where most Australian thermal coal mines were operating at a significant loss in 2020, and by the ever shrinking pool of investors prepared to provide financing. The uncertainty caused by the change in trade flows, because of Beijing's informal ban on Australian coal imports, adds to why even the most bullish of coal supporters have been looking elsewhere for opportunities to invest over the past couple of years.

States go their own way

While the federal government is balancing the needs of its parliamentarians representing coal-producing regions against a wider community desire for action on climate change, some states are moving forward with their own plans. New South Wales, which exports the most thermal coal of all the Australian states, today announced an A$3bn hydrogen investment plan focused on developing green hydrogen hubs in the coal-producing regions of the Hunter valley and the Illawarra.

High-grade thermal coal prices continue to hit new highs on concerns about energy supplies heading into the northern hemisphere winter. Argus last assessed the high-grade 6,000 kcal/kg NAR thermal coal price at $228.21/t fob Newcastle on 8 October, up from $174.46/t on 10 September, $151.90/t on 30 July and $47.56/t a year previously. It assessed lower grade coal at $142.60/t fob Newcastle for NAR 5,500 kcal/kg on 8 October, up from $108.67/t on 10 September and $42.08/t a year earlier.

Premium hard coking coal prices have more than trebled from early May to hit $409.75/t fob Australia in mid-September before easing slightly. Argus last assessed the premium hard low-volatile coking coal price at $402/t fob Australia on 12 October, up from $110.95/t on 11 May. Lower grade metallurgical coal prices have also increased at a slightly lower rate.

Thermal coal prices ($/t)

Metallurgical coal prices ($/t)

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
10/04/25

US absence unlikely to derail IMO talks

US absence unlikely to derail IMO talks

London, 10 April (Argus) — The US delegation's absence from the 83rd International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting is unlikely to derail the outcome of discussions on a greenhouse gas (GHG) economic pricing mechanism, market participants told Argus . This comes after the US sent a statement to foreign embassies of countries partaking in the IMO GHG economic pricing mechanism talks, confirming the US' absence from the negotiations. The statement says: "President Trump has made it clear that the US will not accept any international environmental agreement that unduly or unfairly burdens the US or the interests of the American people," according to a document seen by Argus . It adds: "Should such a blatantly unfair measure go forward, our government will consider reciprocal measures so as to offset any fees charged to US ships and compensate the American people for any other economic harm from any adopted GHG emissions measures". The statement ends: "The US will engage with partners on energy and investment issues of common interest. We stand ready to work with you to advance our shared commitment to energy security and economic growth". "The US will not be engaging in negotiations at the IMO's 83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee. Consistent with President Trump's executive orders on international environmental agreements and on energy dominance, it is the administration's policy to put the interests of the US and the American people first in the development and negotiation of any international agreements", the US State Department told Argus . IMO member countries are voting this week on the economic pricing mechanism for marine GHG emissions, for which the structure is expected to be agreed by 11 April, according to IMO secretary-general Arsenio Dominguez. Even if the US does not engage in the GHG talks, it cannot unilaterally block decisions at the IMO, a spokesperson told Argus . Many of the GHG measures remain under discussion, with final approvals from the working group expected by 11 April. "The US doesn't have a huge share of the global ocean-going fleet, so their absence or opposition probably won't change the broader [IMO members] consensus", a Chile-based ship owner told Argus . US imposing "reciprocal" costs on foreign ships calling at US ports will almost certainly get passed on to [US] consumers, which could lead to higher prices for goods in the US, the owner said. If the measures are ratified by IMO member nations, US-flagged ships will probably not adhere to IMO's regulations when they call into ports of member countries, a Singapore-based shipbroker said. "We are not expecting any impacting on Asia-Pacific region yet, and it's subject to what is agreed at the MEPC and how levies are calculated," the shipbroker added. Despite not having veto power, the US remains the largest financial contributor to the UN, a Greece-based shipowner told Argus . If international shipbuilding credit lines begin to tighten under US influence, other countries may align with Washington's stance, it added. The IMO has 176 member countries. Greece, China and Japan account for the largest shares of the global ocean-going fleet. During the ongoing session, member states have approved interim guidance on the carriage of biofuel blends. The guidance allows conventional bunker ships certified for carriage of oil fuels under Marpol Annex I to transport blends of not more than 30pc by volume of biofuel , as long as all residues or tank washings are discharged ashore, unless the oil discharge monitoring equipment is approved for the biofuel blends being shipped. By Hussein Al-Khalisy, Madeleine Jenkins, Stefka Wechsler, Mahua Mitra, Natália Coelho, and Gabriel Tassi Lara Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Norway plans to cut GHGs, but remain oil, gas producer


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

Norway plans to cut GHGs, but remain oil, gas producer

London, 10 April (Argus) — Norway's government has proposed a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction of a minimum 70-75pc by 2035, from a 1990 baseline, but has also committed to the country remaining "a stable and predictable supplier of oil and gas produced with low emissions". The government today set out plans for a 2035 GHG reduction target, as well as a wider climate plan for the country. The 2035 GHG reduction targets build on Norway's 2030 goal of "at least" a 55pc reduction in GHGs, again from 1990 levels. Norway has a legislated goal of "a low-emission society" by 2050 — GHG reductions of 90-95pc from the 1990 baseline. Norway's government underlined its commitment to Paris climate agreement goals and phasing out the use of fossil fuels "towards 2050", but also said that it would "not prepare a strategy for the end phase of Norwegian oil and gas". "The government's plan is about phasing out emissions, not industries", it said, noting that Norway is "a significant contributor to Europe's energy security". Norway is the largest producer and only net exporter of oil and gas in Europe. "The government will further develop the petroleum industry and facilitate the future provision of fields… production will continue to be efficient and with low emissions," the government said. It aims for the country's oil and gas sector — the country's highest-emitting industry — to bring emissions from production to net zero in 2050. The bulk of oil and gas emissions are from downstream use — known as scope 3. Norway plans to achieve the majority of its proposed 70-75pc GHG cuts through national measures, including reduced fossil fuel use and both technical and nature-based carbon removals. It also plans to purchase emissions reductions from outside the EU and European Economic Area. This refers to internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs) — emission credits — under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement. Norway's parliament will consider the proposals. Once legislated in the country's climate act, Norway plans to communicate its updated plans to the UN. Signatories to the Paris climate agreement are expected to submit updated climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — to UN climate body the UNFCCC every five years. The deadline for NDCs setting out climate goals up to 2035 was in February, but many countries have yet to submit plans . By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March


10/04/25
News
10/04/25

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — US inflation slowed more than forecast in March, pulled lower by falling gasoline prices and slowing shelter inflation, as the new US administration's tariff policies have prompted concerns of a global economic slowdown. The consumer price index (CPI) slowed to an annual rate of 2.4pc in March, down from 2.8pc in February and the lowest rate since November 2024, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Analysts surveyed by Trading Economics had forecast a 2.6pc rate for March. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy, rose at a 2.8pc annual rate, down from a 3pc annual rate the prior month and the lowest since March 2021. The deceleration in inflation came a month after President Donald Trump began to levy tariffs on imports from China and on steel, aluminum and automobiles, starting in February. Several tariff deadlines were pushed back, including a three-month pause enacted this week on much steeper tariffs for most countries. The tariffs have prompted companies and consumers to pull back on investments and some purchases while shaking up financial markets, and heightening concerns of a global recession. The energy index fell by an annual 3.3pc in March following a 0.2pc annual decline in February. Gasoline fell by 9.8pc after a 3.1pc decline. Piped natural gas rose by 9.4pc. Food rose by an annual 3pc, accelerating from 2.6pc. Eggs surged by an annual 60.4pc, as avian flu has slashed supply. Shelter rose by an annual 4pc in March, slowing from 4.2pc in February and the smallest increase since November 2021. Services less energy services rose by 3.7pc, slowing from 4.1pc in February. New vehicles were unchanged after an annual 0.3pc drop in February. Transportation services, which includes what maintenance and repair, insurance and airfares, rose by an annual 3.1pc, slowing from 6pc in February. Car insurance was up by an annual 7.5pc and airline fares fell by 5.2pc. CPI fell by 0.1pc in March after a monthly 0.2pc gain in February. Core inflation rose by 0.1pc for the month. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits

Berlin, 9 April (Argus) — The parties likely to form Germany's next government today presented their coalition treaty, which pledges to allow the use of foreign carbon credits to reach the country's 2040 climate target. The treaty, presented in Berlin by the four party leaders Friedrich Merz of the CDU — the likely next federal chancellor — Lars Klingbeil and Saskia Esken of the SPD, and Markus Soeder of the CDU's Bavarian sister party CSU, stresses the parties' commitment to German and European climate targets, the Paris climate agreement, and reaching climate neutrality in Germany by 2045 "by combining climate action, economic competitiveness and social balance, and by focusing on innovation". "We want to remain an industrialised country and become climate neutral," the treaty reads. The parties' support for the EU's suggested interim target to reduce its emissions 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990 levels is conditional on two points. Germany must not be expected to go beyond its 88pc reduction target for 2040 enshrined in the country's climate action law. And its companies must be allowed, with a view to reducing their residual emissions in an "economically viable" way, to resort to "permanent and sustainable negative emissions", and to "credible CO2 reduction through highly qualified, certified and permanent projects" in "non-European partner countries". Making use of the latter activities should be permissible for up to three percentage points of the 2040 reduction target, although the "priority" for companies will be to reduce carbon emissions. And allowing these options must be reflected in the European Climate Law and the EU emissions trading system (ETS), the parties stipulate. The treaty also underlines the importance of "effective" carbon leakage protection to preserve Germany's "industrial value creation". The treaty calls for the European Green Deal and Clean Industrial Act to be further developed to "bring competitiveness and climate action together", and stresses the importance of carbon pricing instruments, which more countries should be persuaded to introduce. The parties also flag the importance of social acceptance, advocating an "economically viable price development" and pledging to ensure the smooth transition of Germany's domestic carbon price for the heating and transport sectors into the EU ETS 2 on the latter's launch in 2027. The parties pledge "immediately" to adopt a legislative package that enables carbon capture, transport, use and storage (CCU/CCS), particularly for industrial emissions that are difficult to avoid, and also for gas-fired power plants — a disputed issue within the SPD, and the reason why CCS legislation did not pass under the outgoing SPD-Green-led federal government. The new government said it will legally enshrine the "overriding public interest" of the construction of CCS infrastructure, as well as pledging to give the "highest priority" to ratifying the [amendment to the] London Protocol, allowing cross-border CO2 transportation, and to enter bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries on storing carbon. The new government will enable CO2 storage offshore in Germany's exclusive economic zone and the North Sea, as well as onshore where geologically suitable and accepted. The parties see direct air capture as a "possible" future technology to "leverage negative emissions". By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more