Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US House approves $1 trillion infrastructure bill

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 06/11/21

President Joe Biden has secured final passage of a bipartisan $1 trillion bill that will boost funding for highways and other traditional infrastructure, while directing tens of billions of dollars to climate-related programs such as electric vehicle charging and carbon capture.

The US House of Representatives voted 228-206 tonight in favor of the infrastructure package, with 13 Republicans joining Democrats to support the bill. The Senate easily approved the measure back in August.

The bill's passage after months of Democratic squabbling gives Biden and his party a major legislative win just three days after a bruising, off-year election in which Democrats lost the governorship in Virginia and Republicans turned out in force in races across the country.

Biden's popularity has slipped significantly in recent months, amid supply shortages and rising consumer prices. Those economic troubles, coupled with the US' messy withdrawal from Afghanistan, have largely overshadowed the boost Biden had received earlier in the year from passage of a major stimulus bill and from the rapid distribution of Covid-19 vaccines.

The vote followed some positive economic news earlier in the day, when the Labor Department reported the US added 531,000 jobs in October, up from 312,000 in September and the most in three months.

The infrastructure bill, which drew the support of major business and oil industry groups, will increase baseline funding on infrastructure by $550bn over the next five years and reauthorize surface transportation programs until the end of fiscal year 2026. The package includes $110bn in new funds for roads and bridges, $66bn for freight and passenger rail, $25bn for airports, and $17bn for ports and waterways.

The bill will fund this spending, in part, by reinstating or extending cleanup fees for chemical and mining companies, and by selling 87.6mn bl of crude from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve in fiscal years 2028-2031.

Congress opted not to raise the federal 18.4¢/USG excise tax on gasoline and the 24.4¢/USG tax on diesel fuel to help pay for the infrastructure package. Biden said raising those taxes would have violated his pledge not to increase the tax burden on most families. Those taxes have not been increased since 1993.

The White House and Democratic lawmakers have cited other parts of the bill as a down payment on the investments the US will need to scale up clean energy use and reach Biden's ambitious climate goals. Those investments include $65bn to modernize the electric grid, $14.6bn for carbon capture, $7.5bn for electric vehicle charging, $6bn in nuclear power support, $5bn for clean buses and $4.7bn to plug orphaned oil and gas wells.

House Democrats are hoping to hold a vote as early as the week of 15 November on a separate, $1.85 trillion budget bill known as the Build Back Better Act. That measure would include billions of dollars in tax credits for renewables, biofuels, carbon capture and sustainable aviation fuel, along with higher royalties on federal oil and gas leasing and a "fee" on methane emissions.

The timing of that vote could depend on how quickly the Congressional Budget Office can analyze the Build Back Better Act's effects on government revenues and spending.

"If your number one issue is cost of living, the number one priority should be seeing Congress pass these bills," Biden said.

If the House passes the Build Back Better Act, Democrats in the evenly-divided Senate will have to show uncharacteristic unity on companion bill if they hope to avoid a Republican filibuster.

The months of Democratic infighting over the two bills reflect the conflicting currents within their caucus.

Negotiations over the infrastructure package bogged down earlier this year as Biden sought Republican support in the Senate. That led Democrats to shift most of their climate policies into a separate budget bill initially pegged at $3.5 trillion. House progressives wanted to see progress on the Build Back Better Act as a condition for their votes for the infrastructure package.

But opposition from two Democratic senators Joe Manchin (West Virginia) and Kyrsten Sinema (Arizona) forced the White House and Democratic congressional leaders to trim their ambitions. They scaled their plan back to a $1.85 trillion budget framework that includes the $550bn for clean energy and climate funds. Manchin remains noncommittal on his vote.

Biden hopes the final budget agreement will resolve Manchin's concerns about inflation and increasing debt levels. In a nod to moderate Democrats concerned about the high cost of such major social and climate programs in the budget bill, the Treasury Department released a projection that contends that the tax measures in the bill would offset more than $2 trillion in spending and reduce the budget deficit in the long term.

House Democrats so far have sought to keep in the budget bill a "fee" on oil and gas methane emissions that would hit $1,500/metric ton, along with higher royalties on federal oil and gas leases, but it remains unclear whether that provision will survive in upcoming negotiations.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
08/04/25

Oil companies far from Paris accord alignment: Report

Oil companies far from Paris accord alignment: Report

London, 8 April (Argus) — None of the 30 oil and gas producers assessed are close to being in line with Paris climate agreement targets "and some have regressed", a report from think-tank Carbon Tracker found today. Carbon Tracker flagged "backsliding, particularly around oil and gas production plans" from the producers assessed in its report, Paris Maligned III . The think-tank assessed 30 of the largest producers — a mixture of corporations and national oil companies — against six metrics. These included production plans, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets and methane reduction targets. It did not assess producers based in countries subject to international sanctions. "Almost all producers are planning to increase oil and gas production in the coming years… Such growth plans are at odds with the Paris Agreement's 1.5˚C target and many are incompatible with a below 2˚C scenario", the report found. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — seen as the overarching consensus on climate science — notes that a substantial reduction in fossil fuels is needed in order to reach climate goals. The Paris agreement seeks to limit the rise in global temperatures to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels and preferably to 1.5°C. The only producers assessed that are not planning to increase production are London-listed independent Harbour Energy and Spain's Repsol, Carbon Tracker found. Carbon Tracker ranked Repsol highest overall for alignment with Paris agreement goals and Harbour Energy in second place. European companies were ranked more highly in line with Paris goals, with seven of the top 10 places. Three state-owned oil companies — Mexico's Pemex, Algeria's Sonatrach and Kuwait's KPC — and US firms ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips took the five lowest places in the ranking table. "Despite some political and market headwinds, investor engagement on climate risk remains strong, particularly in Europe", the report noted. Carbon Tracker this year scored companies on the extent to which they planned to cut methane emissions — specifically "near-zero methane by 2030" across upstream activities and "midstream gas assets where applicable", it said. This is in line with the decarbonisation charter which many of the companies assessed signed up to at the UN Cop 28 climate summit in December 2023. Companies' methane reduction plans "are typically more climate-aligned than their overall GHG targets", the report found. But "there is still considerable room for improvement because significant sources of methane emissions are overlooked", it added. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Flooding on US rivers mires barge transit


07/04/25
News
07/04/25

Flooding on US rivers mires barge transit

Houston, 7 April (Argus) — Barge transit slowed across the Arkansas, Ohio and lower Mississippi rivers over the weekend because of flooding, which prompted the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to close locks and issue transit restrictions along the waterways. The Corps advised all small craft to limit or halt transit on the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (MCKARNS) in Arkansas because flows reached above 200,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), nearly three times the high-water flow. The heavy flow is expected to persist throughout the week, posing risks to those transiting the river system, said the Corps. Some barges have halted movement on the river, temporarily miring fertilizer resupply efforts in Arkansas and Oklahoma in the middle of the urea application season. The Corps forecasts high flows to continue into Friday, and the National Weather Service predicts several locations along the MCKARNS will maintain a moderate to minor flood stage into Friday as well. Both the Arthur V Ormond Lock and the Toad Suck Ferry Lock, upriver from Little Rock, Arkansas, shut on 6 April because of the high flows. Flows along the Little Rock Corps district reached 271,600cfs on 7 April. The Corps forecasts high flows to continue into Friday. Ohio and lower Mississippi rivers The Corps restricted barge transit between Cincinnati, Ohio, and Cairo, Illinois, on the Ohio River to mitigate barge transportation risks, with the Corps closing two locks on the Ohio River on 6 April and potentially four more in the coming days. Major barge carrier American Commercial Barge Line (ACBL) anticipates dock and fleeting operations will be suspended at certain locations along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers as a result of the flooding. NWS forecasters anticipate major flooding levels to persist through the following week. Barge carriers also expect a backlog of up to two weeks in the region. To alleviate flooding at Cairo, Illinois, where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers meet, the Corps increased water releases at the Barkley Dam on the Cumberland River and the Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The Markland Lock, downriver from Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Newburgh lock near Owensboro, Kentucky, closed on 6 April. The Corps expects the full closure to remain until each location reaches its crest of nearly 57ft, which could occur on 8 or 9 April, according to the National Weather Service (NWS). Around 50 vessels or more are waiting to transit each lock, according to the Lock Status Report published by the Corps on 7 April. The Corps also shut a chamber at both Cannelton and McAlpine locks. The John T Myers and Smithland locks may close on 7 April as well, the Corps said. The Olmsted Lock, the final lock before the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, will require a 3mph limit for any traffic passing through. The NWS expects roughly 10-15 inches of precipitation fell along the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys earlier this month, inducing severe flooding across the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys. A preliminary estimate from AccuWeather stated an estimated loss of $80-90bn in damages from the extreme flooding. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US producers look overseas as shale stalls


07/04/25
News
07/04/25

US producers look overseas as shale stalls

New York, 7 April (Argus) — US shale producers are seeking to deploy their expertise around hydraulic fracturing in international markets, in a marked departure from their recent strategy and one that is set to accelerate as domestic output slows. Continental Resources — whose billionaire founder and executive chairman Harold Hamm was one of the driving forces behind the shale revolution after figuring out how to unlock the vast resources of North Dakota's Bakken basin with horizontal drilling — recently announced plans to explore for unconventional resources in Turkey. And EOG Resources aims to kick-start a drilling campaign in Bahrain. Early successes could prompt a scramble by peers to follow suit, which would be a reversal of the trend seen in the early days of the shale boom when the industry largely retrenched from overseas investments to concentrate on exploiting domestic plays. And while decisions to venture abroad have been mainly based on individual company strategies up until now — and investors have been lukewarm at best — forecasts for shale to start plateauing in the coming years could lend them greater impetus. "Maybe, as they have success, that will draw others in," energy investment firm Bison Interests chief investment officer and founder Josh Young says. "It could be the start of something big." The caveat is that a potential international push at scale is unlikely to happen overnight, and companies such as Murphy Oil and APA — which already have exploration campaigns under way from Vietnam to Ivory Coast and Suriname — have underperformed compared with their rivals. "You are not seeing that market acceptance or market credit for international projects," Young says. That perception may shift if international exploration yields above-average returns for shareholders, boosting the case for producers to seek to build out their inventory further afield as growth in the shale patch slowly grinds to a halt. International exploration may have its own risks, given shale's success story has largely been confined to the US and Argentina to date. But the "cost of entry is relatively low compared to a North American landscape with little room for exploration and high premiums for solid assets in the Permian", consultancy Rystad Energy vice-president for North America oil and gas Matthew Bernstein says. Hamm, who took Continental private more than two years ago after tiring of public markets, recently warned that US shale is beginning to plateau . "What we really need to concentrate on is where we go as we crest right here in America, what the downside looks like," he told the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference in Houston. He also signalled a greater openness to drill outside North America. Talking Turkey Continental recently announced a joint venture with Turkey's national oil company and US-based TransAtlantic Petroleum to develop oil and gas resources in southeast and northwest Turkey. State-owned Turkish Petroleum has pegged initial estimates from the Diyarbakir basin in the southeast that could reach 6bn bl of oil and 12 trillion-20 trillion ft³ (340bn-570bn m³) of gas. The Thrace basin in northwest Turkey may hold up to 20 trillion-45 trillion ft³. "We see immense potential in Turkey's untapped resources," Continental's chief executive, Doug Lawler, says. And in February, EOG Resources announced a tie-in with state-owned Bapco Energies to evaluate a gas prospect in Bahrain. EOG will take on the role of operator, and the venture is awaiting further government approvals. "The formation has previously been tested using horizontal technology, delivering positive results," EOG chief executive Ezra Yacob says. By deploying its existing skillset around horizontal drilling and completions, EOG is confident of achieving results that are competitive with projects in its domestic portfolio. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Asian governments hold fire on tariff retaliation


07/04/25
News
07/04/25

Asian governments hold fire on tariff retaliation

Singapore, 7 April (Argus) — Governments in Asia-Pacific have so far not followed China's lead by retaliating against US president Donald Trump's import tariffs, even as they warn of the potential for long-term economic disruption. The leaders of Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Taiwan and Singapore said over the weekend that they are not planning to respond in kind to the US tariffs. The restrained reactions came despite China's decision to match Trump's targeted tariffs with duties of 34pc on all imports from the US. China's tariffs, announced late last week, take effect on 10 April, a day after what Trump is calling his "reciprocal" duties on a range of countries. Countries in Asia-Pacific have been hit with some of the highest of Trump's targeted duties. Vietnam, which is facing one of the highest targeted tariff rates of any country at 46pc, is considering removing all its own tariffs on US imports, Trump said following a call with To Lam, general secretary of Vietnam's communist party, on 4 April. The offer has not been officially confirmed by Hanoi. Vietnam benefitted from the tariffs that Trump imposed on China during his first term in office, as some manufacturing and exports were shifted to the country. That helped send its trade surplus with the US to a record $123bn last year, the third-highest of any single country behind China and Mexico, according to US customs data. Malaysia, which faces a 24pc tariff, will not levy retaliatory duties, prime minister Anwar Ibrahim said on 6 April. The US duties are a major threat to the world economy and could force Kuala Lumpur to reduce its forecast for gross domestic product (GDP) growth this year, he warned. The direct impact of the US tariffs on commodity exporters like Malaysia and its neighbour Indonesia has been reduced by the extensive exemptions announced for energy, metals and other commodities. Still, the prospect of a global economic slowdown and disruption to trade flows threatens to have a major impact. Despite their measured approach, governments of emerging Asian economies may struggle to quickly negotiate lower tariffs given Trump's focus on reducing bilateral trade deficits, analysts at UK bank Barclays said on 7 April. The bank has reduced its 2025 forecast for GDP growth in emerging Asia by 0.2 percentage points to 3.3pc and warned of the risk of deeper cuts. Australia eyes price hit The government of Australia, another large commodity exporter, warned on 7 April that the uncertainty caused by Trump's tariffs could reduce consumer confidence and potentially damage the budget by causing a decline in commodity prices. Trump's so-called "liberation day" tariffs are more significant than expected when it released its budget in March, the Australian Treasury said in its economic and fiscal outlook released ahead of federal elections next month. The direct impact of the tariffs on Australia would be limited, but indirect effects would be larger because of the hit imposed on the country's major trading partners, including China, it said. "The potential magnitude and persistence of the economic effects of these announcements has resulted in greater-than-usual uncertainty around the outlook," the Treasury said. Trump has targeted Australia with the minimum 10pc tariff, but this could still disrupt its exports of beef and tallow, among other products. Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese has also pledged not to retaliate with tariffs on US imports. Japan and South Korea, long-standing allies which nevertheless have been singled out for higher US tariff rates of 24pc and 25pc respectively, have also indicated they will not respond in kind. The US accounted for almost 19pc of South Korea's total exports in 2024, including passenger cars, auto parts and lithium-ion batteries. Seoul is considering measures to support its automobile industry in the wake of the tariffs, the trade and industry ministry said. India, which faces a 26pc rate, is considering lowering import tariffs on US goods, including a 2.75pc duty on LNG, to ease tensions. By Kevin Foster, Tom Major and Joseph Ho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump shakes global trade order, exempts energy


07/04/25
News
07/04/25

Trump shakes global trade order, exempts energy

Washington, 7 April (Argus) — The US energy industry may feel relieved after President Donald Trump spared oil and other energy commodities from the punitive taxes he announced on nearly all US trading partners on 2 April. But global economic fallout from a drastic protectionist measure will affect the energy industry indirectly, and countries looking for ways to retaliate against Trump's trade actions may follow China's lead in targeting the US' oil, LNG and LPG exports. Trump on 2 April imposed a minimum 10pc tax on all foreign imports from 5 April, with the tariff as high as 34pc for China and 20pc for the EU after 9 April. Trump's executive order exempts all energy commodities and many metals and critical minerals. The 2 April tariffs will not apply to steel and aluminum, cars, trucks and auto parts, as these are already subject to separate tariffs. A 25pc tariff on all imported cars and trucks came into force on 3 April, while a 25pc tax on auto parts will take effect on 3 May. Trump calls his new tariffs "reciprocal", suggesting that foreign countries —which he alleges have high tariffs on US products — will be forced to negotiate to lower their barriers to trade. But Trump and his key allies in Congress have left little doubt that the tariffs are here to stay. The projected tariff revenue, which Trump's administration claims will be as high as $600bn/yr, is a key metric as Congress is advancing a bill to extend tax cuts and other economic priorities, Senate Republican majority leader John Thune says. Consultancy Oxford Economics is likely to lower its 2025 global economic growth forecast by 0.6 percentage points in the wake of the tariffs. But the Trump administration has dismissed the negative reaction from stock markets as a short-term adjustment. "The gravy train is over for the globalist elites, who have profited on the backs of hard-working Americans, looting us of our industries and hollowing out our heartlands," government agency Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler says. Loeffler's pre-Trump administration credentials include senior positions at financial firms with global reach, including the Ice exchange. Negotiate or fight back? China is the biggest casualty of Trump's protectionist turn. Including tariffs Trump imposed in February-March , all US imports from China will now be subject to a 54pc tariff, with some products taxed even higher — electric vehicles face a 154pc tax. The previous bout of Trump's trade war saw some of the bilateral trade shift to other east Asian economies, especially Vietnam — but US imports from that country will now be subject to a 46pc tariff. Conflicting messages — Trump said on 3 April he could make a deal over tariffs if it is "phenomenal", even though his White House is inputting tariff revenue in planned budgetary process — have led many key US trading partners to hope that a major trade war could be averted. The EU is preparing countermeasures, including punitive taxes on US technology giants, but European officials are also weighing concessions before the 20pc tariff starts on 9 April. The UK, which is subject to a 10pc import tax, is hoping to strike an "economic prosperity deal" with Trump, prime minister Keir Starmer says. Beijing on 4 April announced a 34pc retaliatory tax on all US imports, with no exemptions, even though Chinese petrochemicals firms have no ready alternative sources for US LPG supply. Ottawa's similarly strong retaliation seems to have worked — Trump spared Canada and Mexico from additional penalties on 2 April and did not revive the tariffs, imposed briefly last month, that were set to upend a highly integrated North American energy market. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more