Varo targets net zero by 2040, ups transition funding

Market: Biofuels, Crude oil, Emissions, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Oil products
05/07/22

Swiss refiner Varo Energy plans to reach net zero emissions by 2040 and will spend the bulk of a committed $3.5bn in investment between 2022-26 on sustainable energy.

Varo will focus on two sectors — conventional energy and sustainable energy. It expects "high levels of cash flow" from the former, which it will invest in biofuels, biomethane and bio-LNG, hydrogen, e-mobility and carbon removals. Two-thirds of the $3.5bn in planned investment will go to its sustainable energy sector, while it envisages capital expenditure of around $140mn/yr in the conventional fuels segment.

Conventional energy covers manufacturing, storage, trading, marketing and distribution. Varo plans to reduce carbon intensity in this sector, although it emphasised the energy security it provided. The company plans to move "decarbonised assets" into its sustainable energy section.

This "twin-engine" approach will increase Varo's earnings before interest, taxes, interest, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) threefold by 2026 to $1bn, the company said. It aims for sustainable energy to account for more than half of Ebitda in the same timeframe.

Varo has set an interim target of a 40pc absolute reduction in its scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030, and a 15pc cut in carbon intensity for scope 3 emissions by 2030.

Low-carbon fuels ambitions

Varo plans to ramp up its biofuels production, with a goal of over 250,000 t/yr of net biofuels capacity by 2026 and a longer-term target of more than 500,000 t/yr. It will build new production facilities and "repurpose older assets," it said. The company also eyes expansion in the biomethane and bio-LNG sector, through acquisition and development.

It aims to develop hydrogen production and will add an electrolyser at the 207,000 b/d Neustadt-Vohburg refinery in southern Germany to this end. The plant is operated in a joint venture with Russia's state-controlled Rosneft and Italy's Eni.

Varo will also look to increase its stake in the e-mobility market through partnerships and acquisitions, and plans to invest in forestry projects to drive carbon removal. It owns a majority stake in SilviCarbon, which focuses on forest-based carbon removal projects.

Varo is owned by trading firm Vitol and investment firm Carlyle.

By Georgia Gratton

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

09/01/25

Canadian govt approves Northern Gateway pipeline

Houston, 9 January (Argus) — The Canadian government today approved Enbridge's C$7.9bn ($7.3bn) Northern Gateway pipeline to link landlocked Alberta crude supply with Asia-Pacific markets, finding that the contentious project is in the public interest. Natural resources minister Greg Rickford said today the approval was subject to Enbridge showing Canada's National Energy Board it could meet 209 conditions around safety, environmental protection and consultations with local communities, including First Nations. "The proponent clearly has more work to do in order to fulfil the public commitment it has made to engage with Aboriginal groups and local communities along the route," Rickford said. The pipeline would carry 525,000 b/d of bitumen from Alberta to the port of Kitimat, British Columbia (BC), and then to primarily Asian markets via tankers. A second twinned line would carry condensate back to Alberta. Proponents of the pipeline call it a nation-builder, opening new export markets and reducing Canada's dependency on the United States as its prime market for crude. Meanwhile, TransCanada's plan to build the 830,000 b/d Keystone XL pipeline linking Alberta with the US Gulf coast remains mired in legal and regulatory delays. In Alberta, seat of Canada's energy industry, premier Dave Hancock said the Northern Gateway decision would create jobs and generate revenue for public services such as health care and education. "Alberta will continue to support all safe and viable options to diversify and expand market access for Canada's resources," Hancock said. Opponents argue the risk of a bitumen spill polluting land and waterways outweighs the economic benefits of the pipeline, and pledged to fight the proposal in court. "Despite cabinet's approval, the pipeline will not be built," said Tim Gray, with activist group Environmental Defense. "These conditions cannot be met – an approval with conditions is as good as a no." Opposition leaders condemned the Conservative party's approval, vowing to attempt to overturn the decision. Enbridge first proposed the bitumen line in the early 2000s, but shelved the project because of a lack of backers until 2006. The company submitted a formal application to federal regulators in 2010, after which a review panel hosted consultations with affected parties along the proposed route and terminus. The hearings were the most extensive in the National Energy Board's history, with more than 4,000 people giving testimony. In 2013 the panel recommended approving the pipeline, with 209 conditions. dom/dcb Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Denmark invites applications for CO2 storage permits

09/01/25

News

09/01/25

Denmark invites applications for CO2 storage permits

London, 9 January (Argus) — The Danish Energy Agency has launched its fourth tender inviting applications for exploration and CO2 storage, in three areas off the northwest coast of Denmark. The blocks, in the Danish North Sea, are geologically "particularly suitable for storing CO2", Denmark's geological survey found. The application deadline is 6 March. The Danish government issues permits with two phases — an exploration and a storage phase. If granted an exploration permit, developers have up to six years to investigate and assess the suitability and CO2 storage capacity of the area. They are then able to apply for a storage permit, which will be valid for up to 30 years. The Danish state holds a 20pc stake in all exploration and storage permits. Denmark awarded three CO2 exploration permits in February 2023, and three more in June last year. UK company Ineos took a final investment decision for the first phase of the Greensand CO2 storage project in December. The site's developers successfully demonstrated a pilot CO2 injection in March 2023. The carbon capture and storage (CCS) industry is gradually developing, led by northern Europe. The region has a geological advantage, in its declining oil and gas fields, as well as government funding from countries including Denmark and Norway. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Q&A: Germany's PtX Fund to ramp up in round 2

09/01/25

News

09/01/25

Q&A: Germany's PtX Fund to ramp up in round 2

London, 9 January (Argus) — Germany's state-backed Power-to-X (PtX) Development Fund aims to help unlock investment decisions for a handful of mature renewable hydrogen and derivatives (power-to-X) projects in select countries, thereby advancing environmental and social development goals. Berlin picked Bavaria-based fund manager KGAL to control the €270mn ($279mn) purse, and it recently awarded its first €30mn to a €500mn Egyptian project that will produce 70,000 t/yr renewable ammonia. Argus spoke with the fund's managing director Thomas Engelmann about lessons learned from the first round and hopes for round two, which opens 8 January – 5 March 2025. Edited highlights follow: Which countries are eligible in round 2, how is that decided? It is the mostly the same as round one — South Africa, Brazil, Morocco, Kenya, India, Egypt — plus Colombia as a new addition. The German government selects the countries most suited for this instrument from more than 60 partner countries co-operating with the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Not all countries have the right ecological conditions. Participating countries ideally have a workforce that is prepared to support PtX, and some potential domestic offtakers in the country. Why was Colombia added for this round? Colombia has good conditions for renewables — its electricity mix is currently 65pc hydroelectric, 4pc solar, and 30pc fossil fuels. And it plans to add 3GW offshore wind in future via government-run auctions. So Colombia should have among the cheapest PtX production. Costs in northern Colombia may reach €3.3/kg ($2.7/kg) in 2030 and €2.7/kg ($2.2/kg) by 2040, according to German research institute Fraunhofer ISE. The strong government support from Colombia also helps our goal of social transformation. What size projects will the fund support? We haven't set a minimum size, but ideally the total capital costs should be in the range of €100mn–500mn. That means €5bn 'white elephant' projects are probably not for us. We have up to €30mn available, which is definitely not enough to change the investment decision for a €5bn project. What is the €30mn grant designed to do? We bridge the gap to financial close, so our €30mn grant agreement supports the banks, supports the sponsors, acting like an airbag for the project to mitigate any kind of risks or uncertainties in the project. For us, it's non-refundable — in return we expect to see ecological and social transformation that comes from financial close and commercial operation. What key ingredients do you look for in projects? We are bound by EU state aid law, so we check very early in the process if projects are eligible. Project feasibility and technical readiness are important. We check the source of the renewable power. We check it's a profitable and reasonable business model. Clearly, we are not seeking return on investment for the PtX Development Fund, but we need to check that the equity sponsors and debt partners see a project that is economically viable. We want projects that have secured land and will reach financial close in 6-12, maybe 15 months. If a project is further away, that doesn't mean it's a bad project, it's just not ready for the purposes of this instrument. Each project must do a very intensive environmental and social impact assessment based on the lending standards of the World Bank via its International Finance Corporation (IFC). That is the minimum for eligibility before we consider its level of positive impact. Regarding impact, we want greenhouse gas emission reduction or avoidance. We want replacement of fossil fuel resources, in particular coal. We want job creation in the country and a 'just transition'. It's interesting if a project is scalable, for example, if we help with a €200mn first phase that unlocks future phases for the partners even without us. Are those criteria typical for many financiers? Correct, so it's a huge plus for a project if our fund awards a grant, as it shows the overall concept of the project has been checked according to World Bank and IFC standards. Other banks coming later or in parallel to us know the project is sustainable, complies with renewable power additionality principles, does not conflict with local water uses, and its land is free from social or ecological conflicts. Does the fund have rules on who the offtaker should be? Ideally the project would have offtakers in the country to support our target of local value creation. But not all seven countries have the possibility to absorb 100pc of the product, and clearly, we need economically viable projects. In our first-round project, part of the ammonia stays in Egypt and part will go to Europe. What lessons can developers take from round one? We realised the name PtX Development Fund could be misinterpreted, as we often had to explain that we don't have development money available — our name just means we are supporting developing countries. Hopefully in round two, those projects will return with an extra year of maturity. Second, we must clarify that the environmental and social impact assessment is of utmost importance. We very often had discussions with developers that said, "my local government is not interested in doing impact assessments on ecological or social impacts," but we, as the PtX Development Fund, cannot accept that. On technology, the starting point must be electrolysis since this instrument aims to help bring it to market and lower its cost. Yes, e-fuels production needs some carbon molecules, but we don't want projects that are completely biomass with no electrolysis involved. And what did you learn about the wider PtX industry? We were positively surprised to get 98 expressions of interest totalling €150bn potential investment and 56GW electrolyser capacity across these countries. But most projects were still in feasibility studies. We followed up with around 10pc of interested parties, then after deeper due diligence, held negotiations with 2-3 projects. We see the technology for PtX is ready, but finding offtakers able to pay the premium for CO2-neutral products is hard. Mandates with penalties, like the EU's e-SAF quota, definitely stimulate the market, but it would be better if they started in 2025-26 rather than 2030. Green ammonia buying for now is mainly voluntary and it depends on fertilizer companies being able to attract a premium for it to work. A green steel market is emerging in Sweden, as carmakers can attract a premium for 'green' products. We hope the EU's Renewable Energy Directive III will set quotas for ammonia and steel, but the carbon border adjustment mechanism is of utmost necessity to ensure European industry is not disadvantaged. What are your expectations for round two? Round one gave us an overview of the countries, so we really know about the quality of the projects. Now in round two, we want to support possibly several projects. Projects may enter multiple rounds and increase their quality each time until they reach an attractive level. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Tidewater seeks Canadian import duties on US RD

08/01/25

News

08/01/25

Tidewater seeks Canadian import duties on US RD

Seattle, 8 January (Argus) — Canadian biofuels producer Tidewater Renewables is asking the federal government to impose countervailing and anti-dumping duties on renewable diesel (RD) imported from the US. Tidewater's complaint to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) alleges the nation's renewable diesel market is being pressured by US producers who export volumes to Canada at artificially low prices because of US tax incentives — the now-retired blender's tax credit and pending Clean Fuel Production Credit. The complaint is also intended to alleviate pressure on emissions credits issued by British Columbia's low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) and Canada's Clean Fuel Regulation, Tidewater said Monday in a statement. Tidewater said duties of C$0.50-0.80/liter (35-56¢/liter) could be imposed at the border on US renewable diesel if the complain it upheld, reflecting an estimated subsidy and dumping benefit to US producers of 40-60pc. CBSA is charged with investigating and verifying the complaints, while the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) is responsible for determining if those activities have harmed the Canadian industry. For a CBSA investigation to proceed, the complaint must have support from producers representing at least 25pc of Canadian output. Evidence of injury could then include lower prices and lost sales, reduced market share or decreased profits, among other factors. An affirmative finding by the CITT would grant the CBSA authority to impose import duties, in this case intended to offset the alleged unfair price advantage held by US exporters. Preliminary duties could be imposed as early as May, following a preliminary injury finding by the CITT. Final duties — dependent on the ruling by the CITT — could be imposed by September, Tidewater said. The company in December cited challenging economic conditions in its decision to re-evaluate its renewable diesel production from March-onward at its 3,000 b/d renewable diesel plant in British Columbia. Tidewater's profitability is dependent on sales of British Columbia LCFS credits, and its credit purchase and sales agreement with parent company Tidewater Midstream is due to end in March. By Jasmine Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German gas demand edges up in 2024

08/01/25

News

08/01/25

German gas demand edges up in 2024

London, 8 January (Argus) — German gas demand remained largely unchanged on the year in 2024, as a recovery in industrial and power-sector burn was almost completely offset by lower residential and commercial consumption amid mild weather. Germany used about 2.285 TWh/d of gas in 2024, up by 6.6 GWh/d from 2.278 TWh/d in 2023, according to data from market area manager THE ( see yearly graph ). But total gas use remained below the 2018-21 average of 2.7 TWh/d, with the drop in wholesale prices from 2022-23 not supporting a rebound in aggregate consumption. Residential and commercial demand — largely for heating purposes — fell by 5pc year on year in 2024 to 894 GWh/d. Household gas prices remain high and are about double those in 2016-21, according to data from grid regulator Bnetza, which may have weighed on gas use by households and small businesses. Mild weather — especially in the first quarter of the year — also pushed down gas demand from households and small businesses. Temperatures were higher than in 2023 in all but three months in the first three quarters of the year, according to data released by German energy and water association BDEW in late December. The number of heating degree days (HDDs) in Germany was about 4pc below the previous year in 2024, and about 14pc below the 10-year average, according to data from Berlin-based think-tank Agora Energiewende. That said, colder weather in September-December supported a year-on-year increase in heating demand during these months ( see monthly year-on-year graph ). According to preliminary calculations published by Agora Energiewende on Tuesday, mild weather and high consumer prices continue to drive the majority of low heating demand, rather than energy-saving efforts. Without the effect of mild weather, emissions from the built environment — largely caused by heating — would have been higher in 2024 than a year earlier, according to Agora. A return of temperature-adjusted heating patterns to pre-crisis levels as well as slow structural changes, such as plummeting heat pump sales , led Agora to urge for more measures in heat transition policy to drive down gas demand from the built environment. Industrial gas demand up by 7pc despite economic woes German gas demand for use in industrial processes rose on the year, according to Argus estimates, supported by a slight recovery in energy-intensive industry. German industry used about 737 GWh/d for industrial processes in 2024, up from 688 GWh/d in 2023 but well below the 2018-21 average of 877 GWh/d, according to Argus analysis. While German GDP stagnated in 2024 and industrial production continued its downward trend, output from energy-intensive industries such as the chemicals sector recovered slightly, especially in the first half of the year. In addition, gas prices falling below LPG in January and remaining cheaper than LPG for most of the year until the fourth quarter may have encouraged some industrial firms to return to gas where they had previously switched to LPG to reduce energy costs. That said, gas prices rising back above propane and butane parity ( see LPG fuel-switching graph ) and lower output from the chemicals industry in recent months may have slowed the German industrial gas demand recovery . And several plant closures in recent years may similarly constrain any future rebound . Power-sector gas burn up Gas-fired generation increased in 2024 from a year earlier on more favourable generation economics than lignite and hard coal, despite a record renewables share reducing the overall call on thermal generation. Gas-fired generation reached 5.96GW last year, up from 5.88GW in 2023, leading to about 16 GWh/d in additional gas demand for power generation, according to Argus estimates. Gas-fired generation increased year on year despite renewables making up a record 62pc of German power generation. Fossil fuel generation was used to meet 17.1GW of power demand in 2024, down from 19.3GW in 2023. While overall power demand remained roughly unchanged from a year earlier, Germany lifted power imports, pushing down domestic generation ( see power mix graph ). But gas increased its share of the thermal mix, partly on lignite and coal plant closures as Germany's coal phase-out progresses. Gas prices at the bottom of the coal-to-gas fuel-switching range for most of the year until the fourth quarter, even outperforming lignite plants in January-July, supported the call on gas for dispatchable generation. Recent gas price rises have put coal and lignite firmly ahead of gas in the power-generation merit order for all forward periods until 2026, suggesting scope for the share of gas in thermal output to be lower this year. By Till Stehr German power generation mix by year GW TTF versus LPG prices, energy equivalence basis $/mn Btu Monthly year-on-year change in gas demand by sector GWh/d German gas demand by year TWh/d Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more