Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

India cuts fuel export levy, raises crude windfall tax

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 03/08/22

India has cut duties on exports of diesel and jet fuel but increased its windfall tax on domestic crude production.

The government has removed a levy of 4 rupees/litre ($8/bl) on jet fuel exports. Tax rates on diesel exports will be cut further to Rs4/l from Rs10/l, the finance ministry said on 2 August.

But Delhi has increased its windfall tax on domestic crude production to Rs17,750/t, up by 4pc from 19 July, when it reduced the levy by 27pc from the initial Rs23,250/t.

The changes will take effect on 3 August.

Fuel shortages in the country led India to impose duties on oil product exports on 1 July. Delhi also levied a windfall tax on crude production because domestic producers had been able to sell crude to Indian refineries at international parity prices and make windfall gains, the finance ministry said. The taxes will be reviewed every 15 days based on international prices. Brent crude prices have dropped by about 7pc since 19 July to around $100/bl.

India is a major regional exporter of oil products. Refiners in the country exported 630,000 b/d of gasoil and 390,000 b/d of gasoline in the first half of this year, according to data from oil analytics firm Vortexa.

Gasoline was selling at Rs96.72/l and diesel at Rs89.62/l in Delhi on 3 August, unchanged since 22 May.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
25/02/25

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms

Washington, 25 February (Argus) — US president Donald Trump has given little indication on whether he will delay or implement his plan to impose stiff import duties on Canadian and Mexican energy commodities and other products on 4 March. Some market participants are hopeful for another extension or cancellation of Trump's executive order that would impose a 10pc tax on Canadian energy imports, a 25pc tariff on non-energy imports from Canada and a 25pc tariff on all imports from Mexico. The uncertainty over the implementation has had vast segments of the energy industry — oil and gas producers, refiners, pipeline operators, traders — bracing for potentially disruptive outcomes. The three governments are negotiating to avert a full-blown trade war, addressing Trump's pretext for imposing the tariffs — Mexico's and Canada's alleged unwillingness to cut flows of fentanyl and immigrants into the US. Trump and Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau last spoke on 23 February, with the two leaders noting that the flow of fentanyl across the shared border had fallen in the preceding month. But Trump, speaking the following day, said that "the tariffs are going forward on time, on schedule". And on Tuesday, Trump repeated to reporters at the White House his previous off-the-cuff remarks about Canada becoming "the 51st US state". "We don't need their oil," Trump said. "We don't need their lumber." Even without the broad tariffs in place, trade disputes will pick up pace next month when Trump's 25pc tariff on all imported steel and aluminum goes into effect on 12 March. The imposition of tariffs after decades of free trade in energy across North America is expected to create legal uncertainty in contractual obligations related to the payment of tariffs and reporting requirements. The current US import duties on crude are set at 5.25¢/bl and 10.5¢/bl, depending on crude quality. The new tariff would be based on the value of the commodity — without specifying how that will be calculated and at what specific point during the transportation process. US government agencies are not expected to clarify the implementation details until Trump's executive order on tariffs goes into effect. US oil industry groups have lobbied the Trump administration to exempt energy imports from tariffs. Trump instead lowered the planned tariff on Canadian energy imports to 10pc, from the originally proposed 25pc. US lawmakers, including close Trump allies, have expressed concern about the potential impact of tariffs. But the Republican lawmakers have shied away from confronting Trump over the issue. "Texas' number one trading partner is Mexico, number two is Canada, so what happens will have an impact on us," US representative Randy Weber (R-Texas) said today at an event hosted by Politico. But Weber added that Texas governor Greg Abbott (R) is "on top of this stuff" and that "if it was going to be a problem for Texas, I think [Abbott] would have been either singing out loud, or he would have gone to talk to the president directly". Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US last year were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian producers also have expressed concern about the uncertain impact of tariffs on crude volumes trans-shipped through the US, either for exports to third country destinations from Gulf coast ports or transported on US pipelines to destinations in eastern Canada. India is a key destination for trans-shipped Canadian crude. Buyers in India loaded 150,000 b/d from the US ports last year, including around 40,000 b/d of trans-shipped Canadian heavy sour crude, data from oil analytics firms Vortexa and Kpler show. By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Deadline nears for Dutch marine fuel parallel claims


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Deadline nears for Dutch marine fuel parallel claims

London, 25 February (Argus) — Shipowners bunkering in the Netherlands have just three days to register the required data to make a so-called "parallel claim" for use of advanced biodiesel blends last year under the EU's emissions trading system (ETS). But with the deadline fast approaching, it is still not certain if parallel claims can be applied across the board for 2024 emissions, according to the Dutch Emissions Authority (NEa). The legal basis for these claims within the scope of the ETS scope will be provided by an amendment to the Emissions Trading Regulation, NEa said. Until such an amendment has been ratified, no "rights can be derived" for parallel claims, it added. Market participants told Argus that the 28 February data entry deadline will apply primarily to Dutch-flagged vessels and international vessels that disembark in the Netherlands most frequently during a reporting year. Parallel claims refer to advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) marine biodiesel blends bunkered in the Netherlands, which are eligible for both Dutch renewable HBE-G tickets and a zero CO2 emission factor under the EU ETS. HBE-G tickets are a class of Dutch renewable fuels units used by companies that bring liquid or gaseous fossil fuels into general circulation and are obligated to pay excise duty/energy tax on fuels. These tickets are typically obtained by the bunker fuel supplier, and the process would usually include submitting Proof of Sustainability (PoS) documentation. The shipowner buying advanced Fame marine biodiesel blends would typically not receive the PoS at the point of delivery. But PoS documentation is generally required for EU ETS purposes, including obtaining a zero CO2 emission factor for eligible biofuels. The Netherlands' Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management has decided to allow parallel claims for maritime fuels, and the NEa said it communicated instructions on this to relevant bookers last month. But the uncertainty surrounding the application of parallel claims for 2024 could weigh on marine biodiesel demand in the Netherlands, where regional price dynamics have led to a shift in demand away from northwest Europe and towards Singapore. Prolonged uncertainty could further support demand in Singapore, where parallel claims would usually not be necessary under EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime regulations. The International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC) recently issued a framework for a Proof of Compliance (PoC) document, intended to address challenges arising from the unavailability of PoS documentation for downstream operators, such as airlines and shipowners. NEa said it expects a temporary solution such as the PoC to be available for compliance year 2025. In the longer run, the plan is for the Union database to facilitate claims, it said. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India’s bitumen imports, consumption slip in 2024


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

India’s bitumen imports, consumption slip in 2024

Mumbai, 25 February (Argus) — India's bitumen consumption in 2024 fell by 4pc on the year, while imports fell by 16pc on the year, as national elections and delays in the disbursement of project funds by some state governments hampered project works. Consumption totalled 8.44mnt in 2024, down from a record high of 8.81mnt in 2023 , according to preliminary oil ministry data. Imports totalled 2.8mnt in 2024, down from 3.32mnt in 2023 , the data showed. State governments have been using the infrastructure funds for other verticals and subsidy schemes, said market participants, and this has delayed the disbursement of project funds. Imports also fell as higher outstanding payment receivables from contractors forced importers to not sell cargoes on a credit basis, but contractors were not ready to purchase on cash basis because of the fund crunch. "Inventories are adequate and demand for cargoes is good but we cannot sell on credit as payment outstanding is higher," a major Indian importer said, adding that they would be immediately sold out if they sell with a longer-than-usual credit period. Meanwhile, vessel-owning traders have been importing cargoes to avoid vessel idling costs. This has increased inventories in some parts of the country. "Demand is not that great, and tanks are high," a west coast India-based importer said. "We are selling on credit [to offload stocks], so the shipment turnaround time is less. [But] that doesn't mean it is all profitable, the margins are bad," the importer added. Some Middle East cargoes earmarked for southeast Asia were also redirected to India in the last quarter as the price arbitrage window was closed. This increased inventories for the short term, but this did not increase import volumes for the year as overall demand was weak, market participants added. Indian importers expect consumption in 2025 to be higher than last year, with some expecting it to surpass 2023 levels as there are projects pending. But this will be contingent on the timely disbursement of funds . Some market participants are expecting imports to surge this year as demand for imported cargoes is stronger because of competitive offers, compared to cargoes from state-controlled refiners. This could pressure refiners to cut production, which would in turn support imports, the participants added. Bitumen production rose by 1pc on the year in 2024 to 5.2mn t, from 5.13mn t in 2023. This is unlikely to change in 2025 as there will not be any capacity augmentation for bitumen, but producers are mulling output cuts and may instead import cargoes at a relatively cheaper levels from the Middle East, a source close to a state-controlled refinery told Argus . By Sathya Narayanan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG

Sydney, 25 February (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy sees LNG demand exceeding supply into the 2030s as project delays lead timelines for nearly 30mn t/yr of new capacity to slip into the next decade, chief executive Meg O'Neill said after releasing the firm's 2024 annual results today. Headwinds affecting some projects and "ongoing, robust demand" within Asia-Pacific will prevent any LNG supply glut, despite easing regulatory hurdles under the Trump administration, O'Neill told investors. Such headwinds could also impact Woodside. The company's 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) terminal is still waiting for federal consent to continue operations past 2030, after passing state government scrutiny last year following six years of assessments. And the planned 11.4mn t/yr Browse project hinges on NWS approvals being granted, with Woodside preferring a decision is made before Australia's elections in May, in which Green and other climate-conscious MPs may win a balance of power. O'Neill said the fully-priced engineering, procurement and construction contract with engineering firm Bechtel for the initial stage of its Louisiana LNG project was "differentiating" with other nearby proposed terminals requiring re-pricing, as Woodside aims to sell down 50pc of the terminal. Woodside will not take a final investment decision (FID) on Louisiana unless it is confident it has partners signed up or extremely close, O'Neill said, referencing the sale of 49pc of Pluto train 2 at FID before it later offloaded part of the Scarborough gas field that will supply the project. "I think there's potential for us to have the whole 50pc [target] sold-down by FID," O'Neill said, adding that "deep negotiations" were underway as the project aims for FID-readiness by 31 March. Woodside said it will cut expenditure on exploration and its New Energy division by $150mn to focus on producing assets. Exploration outlay was $342mn in 2024 and is guided at $200mn for 2025, while the savings from New Energy will mainly come from pausing its 60 t/d H2OK project in the US . In New Energy, Woodside will prioritise its 83pc complete, 1.1mn t/yr US Beaumont ammonia project ahead of first output in July-December and first low-carbon or blue ammonia using carbon capture and storage in the second half of 2026. Cost of production for phase 1 will be $260-$300/t, based on assumed costs after start-up from 2027-29 at 96pc uptime, a fixed/variable split of 70/30pc, a range of Henry hub gas pricing and the 45Q tax credit that grants $85/t of CO2 stored. Woodside made a profit of $3.57bn in 2024, up from $1.66bn for 2023 but below 2022's record of $6.5bn. It posted lower realised oil and gas prices of $63.6/bl of oil equivalent (boe) in 2024 from $68.6/boe in 2023, despite its output rising to 530,000 boe/d. The firm kept its 2025 guidance unchanged at 186mn-196mn boe (510,000-537,000 boe/d). Forecast capital expenditure of $4.5bn-5bn is focused on its 80pc complete Scarborough and 20pc complete Trion projects. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Reopening New Zealand refinery could cost $4bn: Study


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Reopening New Zealand refinery could cost $4bn: Study

Sydney, 25 February (Argus) — Reopening New Zealand's mothballed 135,000 b/d Marsden Point refinery (MPR) could take six years and cost up to NZ$7.3bn ($4.2bn), according to a government-commissioned study. MPR, New Zealand's only refinery that is located north of largest city of Auckland, was converted to an oil product import terminal in 2022. The interim report, which was commissioned by New Zealand's National-led government last year, cited Australian professional services firm Worley's estimates that reestablishing refining would require NZ$4.9bn-7.3bn. This imposes significant risks and costs on MPR owner Channel Infrastructure, which has imported oil products since refining ended in 2022. A reopening would provide more resilience against quality issues with imported fuels, increase stockholding and provide local employment. But this is offset by a dependence on crude imports, with MPR becoming a single point of failure risk, and increased greenhouse gas emissions associated with refining. Fuel Security Study The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment on 25 February separately released a Fuel Security Study, which found that fuel security remains threatened by supply disruption. It recommends that the nation instead focus on increased storage and zero-emission vehicles instead of reopening MPR. The strategies considered for improving New Zealand's fuel supply security included reopening the refinery or building a new one, increasing jet fuel and diesel storages, expanding trucking capacity to mitigate against infrastructure failures, investing in biofuels production and increasing uptake of zero-emissions transport. Resurrecting MPR or building a new refinery for locally produced crude would be inefficient given either expense or the limited effectiveness that a new facility would have in supplying all fuel types required, the study found. The most cost-effective security enhancement is increasing storage levels of diesel and jet fuel, while gasoline was less of a concern given generally high stocks, with more gasoline storages to be converted to other fuels as demand falls owing to electric vehicle (EV) uptake. EVs will likely diminish New Zealand's reliance on gasoline but diesel use will taper off more slowly given less advanced alternatives, while jet fuel demand is likely to rise without other realistic options in the short term. Biofuels were found to be viable for securing domestic jet fuel and diesel supply, but further study is required and developing this sector would cost more. About 70pc of New Zealand's fuel imports are from Singapore or South Korea, exposing the country to shipping disruptions, but fuel companies' ability to adjust supply chains would mitigate any major impacts, the study said. Internally, the threat of natural disasters impacting pipelines or import terminals should lead to more thorough planning for such events. New Zealand would carefully weigh the costs and benefits of the actions suggested in the fuel study, associate energy minister Shane Jones said on 25 February, including considering the creation of energy precincts and special economic zones to spur a domestic biofuels sector. Jones, a member of the NZ First party in coalition with National, added that creating such zones with special regulations and investment support could help attract overseas investors. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more