Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Australia, Japan agree critical minerals pact

  • Market: Electricity, Fertilizers, Hydrogen, Metals
  • 25/10/22

Australia and Japan have agreed a critical minerals pact, setting out a commercial framework under which Australia will supply Japan with rare earths, lithium and other materials used for manufacturing low-emissions energy technology such as batteries, wind turbines and solar panels.

The agreement will help develop Australia's domestic critical minerals sector and supply Japan's advanced manufacturing industry, as well as helping both countries meet their respective greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese said.

The pact follows on from talks in Sydney in July between Australia, Japan, India and the US – the four members of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) - about setting up supply chains for clean energy systems that do not rely on non-democratic nations.

Australia and Japan have deep trading ties, particularly in energy. Japan was key to the development of Australia's LNG sector and remains one of its largest customers, while the two countries have a similar development and trading relationship in Australia's iron ore and thermal and coking coal sectors.

The partnership is a natural progression of Australia's role as a stable and reliable supplier of minerals and energy to Japan, and underlines Australia's growing role as a global supplier of critical minerals, Australian resources minister Madeleine King said.

The pact was announced after Albanese met with Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida in Perth, where they also discussed economic and national security issues.

"The leaders recognised climate change is a major security and economic challenge for the region, as well as a source of economic opportunity in new clean energy industries and trade and committed to deepen co-operation on climate as a priority," Albanese and Kishida said in a joint statement.

Japan and Australia also pledged to work together towards effectively implementing their respective Paris Agreement commitments and to reach net zero emissions by 2050. The two leaders pledged to continue to support initiatives that will advance clean energy technologies and supply chains, including hydrogen and ammonia, under the Japan-Australia Partnership on decarbonisation through technology, as well as through regional multilateral initiatives including the Quad.

Australian and Japanese firms are working on several joint projects to produce hydrogen in Australia for shipment to Japan.

Albanese and Kishida also said they would help build capacity for Indo-Pacific countries to meet their transparency commitments and advance high-integrity carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, which targets the development of an international carbon permit trading market.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/04/25

UK to sign remaining CfDs for first H2 round in May

UK to sign remaining CfDs for first H2 round in May

Birmingham, 2 April (Argus) — The UK hopes to sign long-awaited subsidy contracts with the remaining projects from its first hydrogen allocation round (HAR1) in May, minister of state for the department of energy security and net zero, Sarah Jones, said. The UK will also "very shortly" unveil a shortlist of projects selected for subsidies of a larger second round (HAR2), Jones said at the Hydrogen UK conference in Birmingham today. But the announcement will hardly satisfy UK developers who have been expecting the shortlist any day since late 2024 . The missing list was the top talking point among delegates at the event. The UK has signed 15-year contracts-for-difference (CfDs) with four of the 11 renewable hydrogen projects selected in HAR1 , according to the latest information from the Low Carbon Contracts Company (LCCC), the government-backed counterparty. Finalising the rest of the CfDs is long-overdue in the eyes of many developers because the UK first announced its winners in December 2023. The process was delayed by the general election last summer and concerns around the Climate Change Levy (CCL) charged on electricity supply, among other issues. The new government took a step towards assuaging concerns about the CCL last week which might allow more projects to sign contracts. But HAR1 developers have warned that signing a CfD does not guarantee they will build projects straight away, since there is hardly any penalty for signing the subsidy deal. Some still need to finalise deals for power supply, construction contracts and financing, meaning it could still take time for signatories to take their final investment decisions. The UK will also update its hydrogen strategy later this year, Jones said. "New evidence has emerged on cost, demand and expected operating patterns, and our understanding has evolved with time," including on "how we can expect the hydrogen economy to develop over time," Jones said. The statements could indicate that the Labour government might amend the 10GW clean hydrogen production target set by the previous administration for 2030, according to one industry participant. The Conservative government's 10GW goal from 2022 had included a sub-target for 6GW electrolytic production capacity. The government will also reconsider the role of hydrogen in making steel in the UK, Jones said. The idea of using hydrogen for steel appeared to have little future in the UK under the previous government as concepts from the UK's steel plants had made no tangible progress . By Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Market mulls 'limited' EU strategic project funding


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Market mulls 'limited' EU strategic project funding

London, 2 April (Argus) — Market participants had mixed reactions after the European Commission granted Strategic Project status to 47 critical materials projects, securing €22.5bn investment to bolster the bloc's homegrown battery supply chain. The listed €22.5bn is not yet allocated, but the commission will work with funding bodies such as the European Investment Bank and other private institutions to advise on distribution. The commission did not offer a deadline for funding allocations, but stated that permit-granting will be cut to 27 months for extraction and 15 months for processing or recycling projects, down from current waiting times of up to 10 years. The commission also maintains that the sum of expected overall capital investment will be enough to bring all 47 projects on line (see map) . "Securing Strategic Project status is likely to bring key advantages, including better access to finance and investment," Vulcan Energy chief executive Cris Moreno told Argus . "It will enable us to scale our operations and ensure long-term sustainable lithium production for Europe's mobility transition." One carmaker told Argus the commission's decision offers projects more of a "seal of quality" than a decisive cash injection, the significance of which has divided participants. "Funding is indeed limited considering the size of individual investments," a spokesperson from Finnish-state-owned battery recycler Fortum told Argus . "In general, one could say that cost of refinery or battery materials manufacturing capacities are easily 1bn — each." Others estimate the average cost for a project closer to $2.5bn . The EU's fast-tracked timelines for these projects might also be delayed by the handling of appeals against its permitting decisions, Fortum added, perhaps over the climate and local community. EU funding dwarfed by China, US The EU's €22.5bn of earmarked funding pales in comparison with China and the US. Chinese state subsidies into the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain tipped $45bn in 2023 alone, while the US invested more than $50bn last year into all clean energy under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) (see graphs) . "From a lithium perspective, it is nice to see some action in Europe but many of the projects are at best mediocre," Global Lithium podcast host Joe Lowry told Argus , citing high costs and an overall "mining unfriendly continent". "I welcome it, I think it's very good news", consultancy EV Outlook founder Roger Atkins said. "Almost inevitably, some will fail, some will thrive — they would've anyway, but this definitely helps." Participants speculated as to whether EU Strategic Project status will encourage enough additional investment to get projects under way. "I don't know all 47, but for [Swedish graphite producer] Talga, this will allow it to attract the investment it's been looking to close in on, but I'm certain production in Europe could benefit from more collaboration — even between competitors," Atkins added. "There is an annual forum in China going on since 2015, called China EV100, to get industry actors and politicians in the room. It's not for profit, so it's open to everyone, just an organic process of managing change. It wouldn't harm Europe to basically copy it." By Chris Welch EU's 47 strategic projects Annual Chinese state subsidy estimates $bn US manufacturing investments by stage of supply chain $bn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Sulacid demand from Indonesian buyer muted: Correction


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Sulacid demand from Indonesian buyer muted: Correction

Corrects volume in paragraph 5 to 106,000t from 160,000t London, 2 April (Argus) — Sulphuric acid demand from Indonesian battery metals producer PT QMB New Energy Materials (QMB) slowed in March and into April, with the firm carrying out plant maintenance following a landslide. Morowali Industrial Park in central Sulawesi was hit by a landslide after heavy rain on 22 March, resulting in three fatalities. QMB's high-pressure acid leaching plants are likely to be off line for a minimum of three weeks. The company was approached for comment. A large vessel line-up at Bahodopi has also curbed demand from one of Indonesia's largest acid importers. There are currently six vessels waiting to discharge at Bahodopi, carrying a combined 106,000t of acid. Some have been waiting since early March. It is unclear when the congestion will ease, given the QMB outage. Some traders are looking at diverting cargoes to destinations including India's east coast or Chile. QMB's Bahodopi sulphuric acid receipts were disrupted earlier this year after the company exhausted its import quota — this was only renewed in mid-February, for up to 600,000 t/yr. Indonesian sulphuric acid imports totalled 1.08mn t in 2024, slightly down from 2023's record 1.09mn t, with QMB receiving much of this. By Lili Minton and Deon Ngee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention


02/04/25
News
02/04/25

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Senior figures in Australia's upstream gas sector have hit out at plans for intervention in the heavily regulated industry, as debate continues on how to best address domestic supply shortfalls later this decade. The federal Coalition in March announced National Gas Plan including a 50-100 PJ/yr (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) domestic reservation system aimed at forcing the three LNG exporters based in Queensland's Gladstone to direct more supply to the eastern states' market. But oversupplying the market to drive down prices would destroy the viability of smaller gas projects, Australian independent Beach Energy's chief executive Brett Woods said at a conference in Sydney on 1 April. The domestic-focused firm, which will export some LNG volumes via its Waitsia project in 2025, warns that such a move by the Peter Dutton-led opposition would reduce export incomes while harming Australia's international reputation. The volumes impacted by the policy could reach around 900,000-1.8mn t/yr. Expropriation of developed reserves is equivalent to breaking contracts with LNG buyers and with the foreign and local investors that the country needs for ongoing economic security, Woods said on 1 April. Domestic gas reservation systems put in place by the state governments of Western Australia (WA) and Queensland, designed to keep local markets well supplied, were "clearly supportable", Woods said, but only future supply should be subject to the regulations. LNG terminals, which represent about 70pc of eastern Australia's total gas consumption and shipped 24mn t in 2024 , should not be blamed for the failure of governments to expedite new supply and plan for Australia's gas future, head of Shell Australia Cecile Wake said in response to the Coalition's proposal. Shell's QGC business supplied 15pc of its volumes to the local grid, with the remainder shipped from its 8.5mn t/yr Queensland Curtis LNG project, Wake added. Canberra has moved to promote gas use as a transition fuel to firm renewable energy in line with its 2030 emissions reduction targets, but progress has been slow as reforming laws appear to be hampering development . The state governments, particularly in gas-poor Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), must recognise the need for locally-produced supply and streamline the approvals processes, especially environmental permits, executives said. But despite pleas for an end to years of interventionist policy — including the governing Labor party's measures to cap the price of domestic gas at A$12/GJ , Australia's fractured political environment and rising cost of living has sparked largely populist responses from its leaders. A so-called "hung" parliament is likely to result from the 3 May poll , with a variety of mainly left-leaning independents representing an anti-fossil fuel agenda expected to control the balance of power in Australia's parliament. LNG debate sharpens Debate on the causes of southern Australia's gas deficit has persisted, and the ironic outcome of underinvestment in gas supply could be LNG re-imports from Gladstone to NSW, Victoria and South Australia, making fracked coal-bed methane — liquefied in Queensland and regasified — a likely higher-emissions alternative to pipeline supply. Several developers are readying for this possibility , which is considered inevitable without action to increase supply in Victoria or NSW, increase winter storages or raise north-south pipeline capacity. Australian pipeline operator APA appears to have the most to lose out of the active firms in the gas sector. APA chief executive Adam Watson this week criticised plans for imports, because relying on LNG will set the price of domestic gas at a detrimental level, raise emissions and decrease reliability of supply, Watson said. The firm is planning to increase its eastern pipeline capacity by 25pc to bring new supplies from the Bass, Surat and Beetaloo basins to market. But investment certainty is needed or Australia will risk needing to subsidise coal-fired power for longer if sufficient gas is unavailable to back up wind and solar generators with peaking power, Watson said. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Next US tariffs to take effect 'immediately'


01/04/25
News
01/04/25

Next US tariffs to take effect 'immediately'

Washington, 1 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump plans to announce a sweeping batch of tariffs on Wednesday afternoon that will take effect "immediately", the White House said today. Trump will unveil his much anticipated tariff decision Wednesday at 4pm ET during a ceremony at the White House Rose Garden. While the administration has announced the effective date, there is little clarity on what goods will face tariffs at what rates and against which countries, leaving the government agencies that will be tasked with enforcing new tariffs largely in the dark. "The president has a brilliant team of advisers who have been studying these issues for decades, and we are focused on restoring the golden age of America and making America a manufacturing superpower," the White House said today, brushing off criticism from economists, industry groups and investors. Economic activity in the US manufacturing sector contracted in March as businesses braced for Trump's tariff threats. Trump has previewed or announced multiple tariff actions since taking office. The barriers in place now include a 20pc tariff on all imports from China, in effect since 4 March, and a 25pc tax on all imported steel and aluminum, in effect since 12 March. A 25pc tariff on all imported cars, trucks and auto parts, is scheduled to go into effect on 3 April, the White House confirmed today. Trump and his advisers have previewed two possible courses of action for 2 April. Trump has suggested that all major US trading partners are likely to see a broad increase in tariffs in an effort to reduce the US trade deficit and to raise more revenue for the US federal budget. But Trump separately has talked about the need for "reciprocal tariffs", contending that most foreign countries typically charge higher rates of tariffs on US exports than the US applies to imports from those countries. In that scenario, high tariffs become a negotiating tool to bring down alleged foreign barriers to US exports. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on Monday night that the second course is the one Trump is more likely to take. Trump will announce "reciprocal tariffs" and "everyone will have the opportunity to lower their tariffs, lower their non-tariff barriers, stop the currency manipulation" and "make the global trading system fair for American workers again", Bessent said. But the White House insisted today that the new tariffs will not be a negotiating tool. Trump is "always up for a good negotiation, but he is very much focused on fixing the wrongs of the past and showing that American workers have a fair shake", the White House said. Trump's words and actions already have drawn retaliatory tariffs from Canada and China, and the EU is preparing to implement its first batch of counter-tariffs in April. Trump, for now, has deferred his tariff plans for imported Canadian and Mexican oil and other energy commodities. But the US oil and gas sector, which depends on pipelines and foreign-flagged vessels to transport its crude, natural gas, refined products and LNG, will feel the effects of tariffs on imported steel and proposed fees on Chinese-made and owned vessels calling at US ports. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more