October Venezuela oil output up with condensate
Venezuela October oil production reached 765,000 b/d, according to an analysis of PdV figures seen by Argus, a gain of more than 100,000 b/d on figures PdV reported in September.
Iranian condensate, which is used to dilute heavy Venezuelan crudes to make them flow more easily from the wellhead, has played a key role in rising production, according to PdV, its foreign partners and analysts. From January to October about 53,000 b/d of Iranian condensate arrived in Venezuela, up from 25,000 b/d in the same period a year earlier, according to oil analytics firm Vortexa. This may exclude some shipments, such as those from vessels in dark fleets which turn off shipping signals. Iranian condensate imports to Venezuela reached 66,200 b/d in October.
The most recent shipments include a 2mn bl cargo at the Jose port on the tanker Herby on 11 August, a 1.95mn bl cargo on the Serena on 15 August and 2.1mn bl on the Huge on 3 October, according to Vortexa. Another cargo is expected in mid-November, a source at one of PdV's international partners told Argus.
Venezuela is paying for the condensate by barter, trading three barrels of Merey 16°API crude for every single barrel of Iranian condensate, according to the source.
PdV tries to separate out the condensate when it goes through upgraders, so it can be reused at the wellhead to dilute heavy crude for transport. But that has not been happening consistently, and sometimes the condensate is refined into finished fuels.
The 765,000 b/d figure is an analysis of PdV data done by Caracas-based analysts Gas Energy.
PdV is drawing production from new wells in the area south of Maracaibo Lake in Zulia state starting in October, Gas Energy told Argus, which has stopped a noticeable decline in production from the country's Occidente division. But flooding and an uptick in street crime in the region cut output there to 98,180 b/d, down from nearly 150,000 b/d.
The Orinoco belt produced 490,000 b/d in October, foreign and minority stake holders were told last week, while the Oriente produced more than 180,000 b/d.
Related news posts
US Supreme Court limits SEC enforcement power
US Supreme Court limits SEC enforcement power
Washington, 27 June (Argus) — The US Supreme Court has thrown out the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) ability to use in-house proceedings to seek civil penalties for securities fraud, finding those cases must instead be brought before a jury trial in federal court. The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling in the case SEC v Jarkesy , said continuing to adjudicate those cases internally would be a violation of the the Seventh Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects the right to a jury trial in some cases. The court's ruling marks a win for conservatives that have pushed to curtail the powers at the SEC and other federal agencies, which often rely on in-house administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate enforcement cases that can be complicated and highly technical. The Supreme Court's ruling centered around an enforcement case filed in 2013 against an investment fund owner named George Jarkesy, who the SEC alleged defrauded investors by misrepresenting investment strategies and inflating the claimed value of the fund. The SEC relied on part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law to pursue the case internally through an ALJ, which imposed a $300,000 civil penalty against Jarkesy, which he then challenged in federal court. But chief justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the securities fraud charges could only be brought through a lawsuit in federal court, where there would be an independent judge, a jury trial and broader due process protections. Roberts said that the US Congress had exceeded its powers when it said that securities fraud lawsuits could be adjudicated internally by the SEC, which he said would concentrate the roles of "prosecutor, judge and jury in the hands of the executive branch." The court's opinion could have ramifications across the federal government for enforcement cases that also used ALJs, and which have been put on hold awaiting the Supreme Court ruling. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relied on an ALJ when it sought $40mn in penalties from the owner of the Rover natural gas pipeline and a separate case that is seeking up to $223mn in fines from France's TotalEnergies for natural gas trades in 2009-12. FERC chairman Willie Phillips said the agency would take a "careful look" at the opinion but did not have an immediate comment. Although the SEC and other agencies can still pursue the same enforcement cases under the Supreme Court's holding, a jury trial can be more resource-intensive and unpredictable than a case brought before an ALJ, who usually has years of experience in the technicalities of securities and energy laws. Public interest groups have worried the result will be reduced enforcement of federal laws meant to protect the public from fraud and manipulation, particularly in cases where penalties are small. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who wrote the dissent, said the court's decision was a "power grab" that ignored the policy considerations that Congress made when it authorized the SEC to pursue securities fraud cases internally, such as greater efficiency, expertise, predictability and uniformity in how federal securities laws are enforced. Sotomayor said the court had also disregarded its own precedent, set in a case in 1977, that affirmed agencies could pursue civil penalties internally. The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of other issues in Jarkesy, such as the claim that the process for appointing ALJs was unconstitutional. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Bolivia coup attempt exposes instability
Bolivia coup attempt exposes instability
Montevideo, 27 June (Argus) — Bolivia's government quickly thwarted an attempted coup on Wednesday, but the military action deepened the country's economic and political problems. President Luis Arce fired the commander of the joint chiefs of staff, army general Juan Jose Zuniga, who was subsequently arrested. The government claimed that an "anti-democratic network" in the armed forces involved around 10,000 troops. While the coup failed, it added to the instability that has gripped the country as it transitions away from being a major natural gas supplier and tries to monetize its vast lithium resources. The administration attempted to calm fears as long lines remained at banks and retail fuel stations the day after the coup. The hydrocarbons and energy ministry released a statement on 27 June that everything was normal with fuel supply around the country. It called on the population to refrain from panic buying. State-owned oil and natural gas company YPFB reiterated the message. The company had already been dealing with a strike by truck drivers and road blockades around the country that slowed distribution of gasoline and diesel, as well as 10kg LPG cylinders for household use. Bolivia has seen a sharp decline in natural gas and oil production, with the country now importing close to 80pc of diesel. Crude production was 21,780 b/d in March, down from 50,170 b/d in 2025. Natural gas production is now hovering around 40mn m³/d, down from a peak of 56mn m³/d in 2006, according to YPFB. Gas exported through pipelines to neighboring Argentina and Brazil has been an economic mainstay, but that is changing. Bolivia will stop exports to Argentina in September, and it has a deal to export up to 20mn m³/d to Brazil. Gas exports to Argentina earned Bolivia $223 mn in the first four months of 2023, falling to $164mn this year; it exported $423.5mn to Brazil between this January-April, down from $518mn in 2023. The government wants to replace gas revenues with those from lithium. It has signed direct lithium extraction deals with Chinese and Russian companies, but production is not expected for several years. Bolivia has an estimated 23mn short tons of lithium resources, the largest in the world, according to the US Geological Survey. By Lucien Chauvin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Bolivia's Arce faces coup attempt
Bolivia's Arce faces coup attempt
Montevideo, 26 June (Argus) — Bolivia's president fired the commander of the country's army, warning that a coup was in the making after military forces thronged the capital amid infighting in his political party. President Luis Arce sacked the commander of the joint chiefs of staff, army general Juan Jose Zuniga, as tanks were weaving through the streets around the presidential office building and congress in La Paz. The president, flanked by his cabinet ministers, called for the country to unite. "We need the Bolivian people to organize and mobilize against the coup and in favor of democracy," the president said. Brazil denounced the attempted coup and called for support for Arce. The potential coup came amid rising tensions between Arce and former president Evo Morales for control of the ruling MAS party ahead of the 2025 general elections. Morales was president from 2006-2019, when he resigned after winning a new term in controversial elections. An interim government ran the country until Arce's 2020 election. He and Morales have been feuding since then, with the situation spilling over in recent weeks. The government blames Morales for recent roadblocks and a strike by truck drivers that the administration claims is costing the country a daily $50mn in losses. State-owned oil and natural gas company YPFB has been one of the hardest hit by the strike, unable to deliver gasoline and 10kg LPG cylinders to service stations. Arce also accuses Morales of mishandling the country's natural gas industry and inflating reserve figures. Natural gas production has been falling, going from a high of 56mn m³/d in 2006 to around 40mn m³/d in April, according to YPFB. Bolivia has considered reversing the flow of some of its oil and natural gas pipelineS to import rather than export as its production has declined, and plans to tap its extensive lithium reserves have lagged. By Lucien Chauvin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Union asks UK Labour to drop North Sea exploration ban
Union asks UK Labour to drop North Sea exploration ban
Edinburgh, 26 June (Argus) — UK union Unite, backed by 200 local businesses in Scotland, is calling on the opposition Labour party to abandon a planned policy to stop new fossil fuel exploration in the North Sea "until a plan to replace jobs is operational". "UK Labour's current policy on net zero for the North Sea is to ban all new licences but currently, they have no detailed plan on a fair 'workers' transition to greener energy and to save 30,000 jobs in Scotland," the letter reads. Labour in its manifesto outlined plans to stop issuing any new licences for oil, gas and coal, but said it will not revoke existing licences if elected in the 4 July general election. The party is far ahead in polling. The letter warned that stopping oil and gas exploration in the North Sea could lead to importing more fossil fuel. Although most of the crude produced in the UK North Sea is exported, around half of UK gas demand is met by already-dwindling domestic fields. Unite and the local businesses called for an additional £1.1bn/yr ($1.39bn/yr) in investments in wind power, manufacturing and operation, hydrogen, carbon capture and decommissioning. "That's just a fraction of the £36bn in profits oil companies made from the North Sea last year," it said. "There is still absolutely no plan on wind power manufacture, in Scotland and the UK, or commensurate new 'green' jobs for North Sea workers," the letter said, asking for the creation of 35,000 new energy transition jobs in Scotland by 2030. Delicate balance Separately, more than 60 climate groups in a letter backed by Unite and other unions including the RMT today called on the incoming UK government for "a clear and funded transition plan for workers and communities reliant on the oil and gas industry." "The longer we wait to implement a worker-led just transition in the North Sea — and other high carbon industries — the worse off communities that rely on these industries will be", the letter said, pointing to upcoming job losses at Chinese-UK venture Petroineos' 150,000 b/d Grangemouth refinery in Scotland and at Port Talbot Steelworks in Wales . Since Petroineos announced last November that it would close Grangemouth, Unite has repeatedly criticised the Scottish and UK governments for failing to support workers and for "empty promises about the just transition". The climate groups' letter called for a phase out of oil and gas in the North Sea as a "crucial step to meet the legally binding climate commitments, address the UK's historic role as a disproportionate producer of emissions". "There are areas where the UK has to set an example," UK Labour shadow secretary of state for foreign, commonwealth and development affairs, David Lammy said on 25 June about his party's commitment to no new licences. Almost 200 countries agreed in December at the UN Cop 28 climate summit to transition away from fossil fuels, with developing nations urging richer countries to take the lead. But for communities whose livelihood depends on the fossil fuel sector, the prospect of phasing out oil and gas is reminiscent of the UK coal industry's decline. Lammy noted the importance of the private sector in the energy transition. "The handling of plans to close the Grangemouth refinery underlines the risk of omitting meaningful dialogue between communities, industry and government," the UK's Climate Change Commission (CCC) said in March, when pointing out that Scotland's 2030 climate goals were no longer credible . By Caroline Varin and Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more