US debuts new guidance for environmental reviews
Pipelines, federal oil and gas leases, electric transmission lines and other major projects will be subject to more exhaustive climate scrutiny during permitting, the White House said in guidance released today.
The interim guidance offers federal agencies far more explicit instructions on how to analyze greenhouse gas emissions and climate effects when reviewing projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The guidance will take effect on 9 January. The White House intends to make revisions after it receives public comment.
The guidance is part of President Joe Biden's administration push to make climate considerations an explicit part of how the government reaches decisions, following up on past actions prodding agencies to use renewable energy and buy low-carbon materials. The more specific climate guidance will help "avoid legal setbacks" and allow regulators to make more informed decisions, the White House said.
"These updated guidelines will provide greater certainty and predictability for green infrastructure projects" Council on Environmental Quality chair Brenda Mallory said.
The guidance seeks to offer a "common approach" to analyze climate change as part of NEPA reviews, following a period of uneven reviews and former president Donald Trump's administration trying to eliminate climate considerations altogether. Federal regulators have said the lack of explicit guidance in the past have made it hard to decide the level of detail for climate reviews.
The guidance offers best practices for climate reviews, including recommendations to quantify indirect emissions from projects and using a metric named the "social cost of carbon" to provide a dollar estimate of climate effects. The guidance also says federal agencies should the NEPA process to mitigate gas emissions "to the greatest extent possible."
But the White House wants to avoid requiring exhaustive studies of projects likely to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The guidance emphasizes a "rule of reason" that says the depth of climate reviews should be proportional to a project's effects, and it says some renewable projects can have a less detailed climate analysis.
Renewable energy groups applauded the guidance. The American Clean Power Association said the guidance recognizes that agencies should not spend time and resources reviewing "relatively minor and short-term greenhouse gas emissions" of building clean energy projects that will reduce emissions over the long term.
Oil and gas industry groups have opposed past attempts for agencies to consider indirect greenhouse gas emissions and seek emission mitigation during the NEPA process. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission last year faced intense backlash from the industry over a similar proposal related to natural gas pipeline permitting.
Related news posts
New York picks WCI for carbon market platform
New York picks WCI for carbon market platform
New York, 26 September (Argus) — New York state will use the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) platform when administering its economy-wide carbon market, the latest sign that regulators in the state are looking to align program elements with systems in other North American carbon markets. Regulators from Quebec and New York announced the agreement on Wednesday at the International Emissions Trading Association's North American Climate Summit, an event on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and Climate Week NYC. After a competitive process to select a platform for its market, New York state reached a deal this week to lean on the WCI for its "market registry platform, the auction platform, and financial services", New York State Department of Environmental Conservation deputy commissioner Jon Binder said. The WCI nonprofit provides the market infrastructure for California and Quebec's linked carbon market, as well as for a similar program in Washington state where regulators are weighing a potential linkage with the other two. Any eventual linkage with New York's program, which could see compliance obligations start in 2026, would be made easier by all the jurisdictions utilizing the same system for administering their respective programs. The decision does not "necessarily mean these programs are linking," but New York is "happy to keep those conversations going in that regard," Binder said. Nova Scotia, which wound down its cap-and-trade program last year, used the WCI platform for auctions without linking its programs with any other jurisdictions. "It doesn't mean that New York will link with us," said Jean-Yves Benoit, chair of the WCI board and the director general of carbon regulation and emissions data at Quebec's environment ministry. "Although I would be very happy if we issue a joint press release next year saying that." By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Opec+, Saudis have no target oil price: sources
Opec+, Saudis have no target oil price: sources
Dubai, 26 September (Argus) — Neither Saudi Arabia nor the wider Opec+ group have any specific target for oil prices, and no member of the producers' alliance is about to abandon output discipline in favour of chasing market share, multiple Opec+ sources have told Argus . Oil prices fell earlier on Thursday following unconfirmed press reports that Saudi Arabia may be willing to tolerate lower oil prices as part of a plan to increase crude output to regain market share. Sources within Opec+ have since dismissed those assertions outright, insisting that the basis for the group's collective decision-making will always be market fundamentals, and in particular the five-year average of crude inventories, rather than targeting any particular oil price. "Neither Opec+, Opec nor the Saudis have any price target, let alone $100/bl," one source said, in response to a Financial Times report that stated Saudi Arabia is ready to "abandon its unofficial price target of $100/bl". A second source said the $100/bl figure being reported is not a target but is more likely to refer to a recent estimate issued by banks and other financial institutions of Saudi Arabia's "so-called break-even oil price" — that is, the price the kingdom needs to cover its spending plans. In April, the IMF estimated Saudi Arabia's breakeven oil price at $96.20 for 2024, almost 20pc above the previous year and around a third higher than current Ice Brent futures. "The breakeven is, at best, indicative, but does not tell the full story," the source said. Focusing on it "is totally devoid of the idea that a government has a host of other tools to manage an economy — issuing bonds, borrowing, adjusting one's budget". Eight Opec+ producers, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, were due to begin a phased return of around 2.2mn b/d of "voluntary" output cuts from the start of next month. But mounting concerns over the strength of the global economy, and in turn oil demand, prompted the group to defer the plan by two months to December. With worries around oil demand not going away, and the market looking likely to flip into a surplus from the start of next year, some observers are questioning whether there will be any need for an increase in Opec+ supply from December. And if the eight members go ahead with unwinding the cuts regardless, whether that would signal a shift in the group's focus to chasing market share. But a third source rejected that view, as the group would "only be reversing what we have cut". "As a group, we have said time and time again that these cuts were both voluntary and temporary, and always stressed that they could be paused or reversed," the source said. "And earlier this month, that's exactly what we did with the two-month deferral to December." December or bust? The rationale to delay the increase in production to December was twofold, according to Opec+ sources. It not only reflected the uncertainty around the global economy, the US and Chinese economies, interest rates and demand. But more importantly, the decision was made to allow Opec+ members that have overproduced this year ꟷ namely Iraq, Kazakhstan and Russia ꟷ more time to show they are serious about compensating for exceeding their output targets. "There is so much uncertainty today which we, as Opec+, have no control over," one of the sources said. "But what we do control is our own affairs." Iraq and Kazakhstan have been under intense pressure in recent months to not only adhere to their pledged targets, but also compensate for past overproduction. While Kazakhstan did manage to produce below its target in August, Iraq continued to struggle. All eyes will be on how these countries do in September. "The overproduction is impacting our credibility, and we need to tackle that. Discipline is paramount," the source said. Reports that Saudi Arabia is committed to start unwinding cuts from December, come what may, are wide of the mark for several reasons, another source said. "First, this is not a decision for Saudi Arabia to make. It is for all eight to decide," he said. The group also still has several weeks before it has to decide whether to proceed with the plan, or defer again, the source added. A decision is due in the first week of November, by which time the group should have better visibility on market fundamentals and Iraqi and Kazakh compensation efforts. "How could we make a decision now when we don't even have September production figures?" the source said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Hurricane Helene shuts in 29pc of US Gulf oil
Hurricane Helene shuts in 29pc of US Gulf oil
New York, 25 September (Argus) — Hurricane Helene, which is forecast to intensify as it heads for a late Thursday landfall in Florida, has shut in about 29pc of US Gulf of Mexico oil output. Around 511,000 b/d of US offshore oil output was off line as of 12:30pm ET, according to the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), while 313mn cf/d of natural gas production, or 17pc of the region's output, was also off line. Operators have so far evacuated workers from 17 offshore platforms. Helene was last about 110 miles north-northeast of Cozumel, Mexico, according to a 2pm ET advisory from the US National Hurricane Center, with maximum sustained winds of 80 mph. Helene is expected to be a major hurricane, with winds of at least 111mph, when it reaches the eastern Florida coast on Thursday evening. "A turn toward the north and north-northeast with an increase in forward speed is expected later today through Thursday, bringing the center of Helene across the eastern Gulf of Mexico and to the Florida Big Bend coast by Thursday evening," the center said. Shell restarting some production Although the hurricane will largely pass to the east of most offshore oil and gas production areas, companies have taken precautionary measures. Given a shift in the forecast track, Shell said late Tuesday that it had started to ramp up production at the Appomattox platform to normal levels, and was in the process of restoring output at the Stones facility, both off the coast of Louisiana. It paused some drilling operations. Chevron said earlier it was shutting in production at company-operated facilities in the Gulf of Mexico, and evacuating all workers. Equinor said it was shutting down the Titan oil platform. BP had earlier this week started to shut in production at its Na Kika and Thunder Horse platforms, southeast of New Orleans, and was curtailing output from its Argos and Atlantis facilities, as well as removing non-essential staff. US offshore production was disrupted earlier this month when Hurricane Francine made landfall, with up to 42pc of production was offline at one point. The offshore Gulf of Mexico accounts for around 15pc of total US crude output and 5pc of US natural gas production. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
LNG glut coming and may catch many by surprise: Orsted
LNG glut coming and may catch many by surprise: Orsted
London, 25 September (Argus) — There will be an oversupply of LNG on the global market in the coming years, which may contribute further to "the decade of turmoil", Danish utility Orsted senior vice-president Rune Sonne Bundgaard-Jorgensen told Argus . "The [energy] crisis is absolutely not over. To me, an energy crisis is one of uncertainty and volatility," Bundgaard-Jorgensen said on the sidelines of the Energy Trading Week conference in London. "We are going to see an LNG glut which we all in this [conference] room see is coming but the rest of the world does not necessarily. That is going to catch a lot of people by surprise," he said, adding that "surprises are never good when it comes to energy". According to Bundgaard-Jorgensen, "we are going to see an ongoing decade of turmoil. Who knows where the war in the Middle East with the latest attacks on Hezbollah and Israel is going to take us," he said. Among other concerns, he mentioned "uncertainties in the Far East, around the South China Sea". "So, though the current energy crisis of decoupling from Russian pipe gas is over, the continued crisis of where we are going to get sustainable, long-term energy from is far from over," Bundgaard-Jorgensen said. Commenting on Orsted's long-term gas plans, Bundgaard-Jorgensen stressed that Orsted is "constantly evaluating" its gas portfolio. He refused to say whether Orsted is negotiating another long-term deal with Norwegian state-controlled Equinor after their previous contract expired in April. Orsted entered an agreement with Equinor at the end of 2022, after Russian state-controlled Gazprom halted deliveries to the firm from June 2022 following Orsted's refusal to pay for its supply in roubles . "We are quite happy that we are out of our long-term contract with Gazprom," Bundgaard-Jorgensen said. "As a company we believe in decarbonisation — but I also need to believe in a resilient portfolio. So, we are constantly looking to optimise. Gas is not a strategic core of Orsted but it is a very important tool of securing our portfolio," he said. Bundgaard-Jorgensen refused to comment on whether the firm is planning to appeal a decision made by the Danish Supply Authority in July that the tariff levied by Orsted on the Tyra-Nybro pipeline to Denmark from 2011 to October 2012 was too high. The authority reduced the tariff in the period by almost 30pc to 7.20 Danish kroner/m³ from DKr10/m³. By Alexandra Vladimirova Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more