Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

India to launch programme to boost coal gasification

  • Market: Biofuels, Coal, Emissions, Fertilizers, Hydrogen, Natural gas
  • 17/07/23

India plans to launch a programme to bolster coal and lignite gasification projects in the country, as part of its broader push to reduce reliance on natural gas imports and promote cleaner sources of energy.

The programme will involve use of 100mn t of domestic coal and lignite in gasification projects. Coal gasification is the process of converting coal into syngas — a mixture of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, natural gas, and water vapour. The syngas can be processed to produce energy fuel, methanol, and products such as ammonia and urea.

The comprehensive coal gasification programme will incur an estimated investment of 60bn rupees ($730mn) by 2030, the coal ministry said. The plan is part of Delhi's broader vision of reducing imports and attaining self-reliance, as the country currently imports about 50pc of its natural gas requirement, the ministry said. Imports account for over 90pc of India's methanol consumption and as much as 13-15pc of ammonia demand, it said.

But the ministry did not provide any timeline for the launch of the programme.

India has been making efforts towards coal gasification, with state-controlled coal producer Coal India (CIL) initiating surface coal gasification projects in its coalfields. CIL signed agreement with state-controlled power equipment maker Bhel in October 2022, besides entering into initial pacts with state-controlled refiner IOC and state-controlled natural gas transmission and distribution company Gail. CIL has accepted pre-feasibility reports for three joint venture projects and has approved pre-project activities for the same.

The methanol produced could be used for blending with gasoline, CIL said. CIL had earlier held discussions with IOC and other state-controlled oil companies for long-term tie-ups to market the methanol and boost fuel blending, given wider ambitions of cutting India's dependency on crude oil imports.

Indian policy makers have also been considering coal liquefaction projects. In 2020, the coal ministry said coal-gasification and coal liquefaction projects could together entail a total investment of Rs4 trillion by 2030.

Bidding process

The government programme will involve auctioning of coal and lignite blocks for gasification projects, the ministry said.

The Indian government could provide fiscal support such as reimbursement of goods and services tax compensation cess on coal for a period of 10 years from the date of commissioning of the project, the ministry added.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/05/25

Mexico bets on new contract model to lift gas output

Mexico bets on new contract model to lift gas output

Mexico City, 2 May (Argus) — Mexico's push to raise domestic gas output to 5 Bcf/d by 2030 depends on a new shared participation model designed to attract private investment, with four strategic gas fields prioritized as tenders begin. State-owned Pemex this week released the detailed guidelines for the mixed production scheme, first introduced in February. The model guarantees Pemex at least a 40pc share of production and gives the company wide discretion to set contract terms and choose the bidding process — including no-bid awards. But interest in the new contracts is expected to center on Mexican firms with close ties to President Claudia Sheinbaum's administration, such as Carlos Slim's Grupo Carso, according to market sources. "With these guidelines, Pemex can finally pick and choose who they want, how they want," said Miriam Grunstein, a former adviser to energy regulator CRE and senior partner at Brilliant Energy Consulting. "The downside is they are likely to turn to Mexican firms that lack the technical experience for complex projects, rather than international companies with the know-how for deep-water or unconventional plays," Grunstein said. "This scheme isn't made for companies like BHP, Total, or Eni," added Eduardo Prud'homme, former technical director at Cenagas and co-partner at consultancy Gadex. "Pemex doesn't want operators as partners. Though it is perfect for Carso." A relative newcomer to the upstream sector, Carso is one of the government's most important contractors for infrastructure projects and stands to gain on future business whether or not the upstream partnerships succeed. Prud'homme doubts international majors looking for a one-off deal would be willing to take on the heavily regulated, high-risk projects when the maximum stake is 60pc. "If you fail, Pemex will not share the loss," said Prud'homme. "If you succeed, Pemex decides how much to share." Pemex management said it plans to launch 17 projects under the new scheme this year. It remains unclear how many of these will focus on gas development. Still, gas is a core focus. Pemex's 2025–2030 business plan allocates Ps238bn (US$12.1bn) to gas projects in pursuit of the 5 Bcf/d goal. Four key fields — Burgos, Quesqui, Ixachi and Bakte — are expected to provide 54pc of total projected output. Carso is already active, partnering with Pemex on the complex deep-water Lakach gas project, which is now expected to migrate from a service contract to the new mixed contract model. Slim began renegotiations in February after the model was announced. Carso has also expanded upstream, buying into the oil-rich Zama project in December. In March, Sheinbaum confirmed the government is in talks with Carso to partner on Ixachi. Turning the tide Still, gas output continues to decline. An analysis by Mexican think tank IMCO found that Pemex and its farmout partners this year posted their lowest first-quarter gas production in 15 years. In the first quarter, Pemex produced 4.408 Bcf/d of gas, down by 8pc from the same period in 2024 and 12pc lower compared with the same quarter 2023. The 367 MMcf/d annual decline marks the steepest first-quarter drop since 2018, when output fell by 536 MMcf/d year over year. On the positive side, Pemex's natural gas production in March ticked 0.3pc higher from the previous month to 4.39 Bcf/d – marking the second consecutive month of increases after February output was up 1.3pc from January. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Shell says can deliver solid returns below $50/bl


02/05/25
News
02/05/25

Shell says can deliver solid returns below $50/bl

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell can pull on several levers to maintain shareholder returns in a sub-$50/bl oil price environment, including adjusting capital expenditure (capex), chief financial officer Sinead Gorman said today. Shell is facing questions about contingency plans for lower oil prices after Ice Brent crude futures briefly dipped below $60/bl in intraday trading earlier this week for only the second time in more than four years. Oil prices are not only under pressure from weakening global economic growth prospects due to US import tariffs, but also from the Opec+ group's decision to bring back production faster than previously flagged. At $50/bl, Shell's commitment to return 40-50pc of its cash flows to shareholders would mean $8bn/yr of dividends and $6bn-7bn/yr of share buybacks, while only having to pull back "a little bit" on capex, Gorman said. In a $40/bl oil price environment, Gorman expects Shell's operating cash flow to still cover the $8bn/yr in dividends. "But of course, for us, the important thing is to be able to try and maintain the buyback for as long as we can," she said. At these lower oil prices, Shell can make use of its comparatively strong balance sheet to support share buybacks. Shell's debt gearing remained below 19pc at the end of the first quarter despite the company increasing its net debt during the period. "Are we comfortable leaning on the balance sheet? Yes," chief executive Wael Sawan said. The balance sheet has been positioned so it can be used to generate shareholder value, "whether that shareholder value is best created through more buybacks, or whether that shareholder value is created through an inorganic [investment] or the like", he said. For now, Shell is sticking to its $20bn-$22bn capex budget for 2025 and expects to carry on with planned investments in projects and other commitments. But the company has demonstrated in the recent past "a strong ability to be able to pull many levers" should oil prices fall futher, Gordon said, referencing the reduction in capex to below $18bn during the Covid pandemic. "So, the flex is there, but that's not the position we're in at the moment. We don't need to do that and we see great opportunities for value," she said, pointing to the company's announcement earlier this year that it is raising its stake in the Ursa oil project in the US Gulf of Mexico. Earlier today, Shell said it is maintaining its quarterly dividend at 35.8¢/share and will continue to buy back its shares at a rate of $3.5bn/quarter, despite a 35pc drop in its first-quarter profit to $4.8bn. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up


02/05/25
News
02/05/25

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell's European gas production for sale in January-March slightly stepped up on the year, but the company expects works to limit global oil and gas production this quarter. Shell produced 24.9mn m³/d in the first quarter, up from 24.8mn m³/d a year earlier but below the 25.2mn m³/d in fourth-quarter 2024. Shell has stakes in UK and Dutch fields, as well as a 17.8pc share in Norway's Ormen Lange field and an 8.1pc stake in the giant Troll field. Output from the two Norwegian fields was down on the year in January-February, the latest months for which data are available. Ormen Lange produced 19.8mn m³/d in January-February, down from 22.6mn m³/d a year earlier. Troll production averaged 123.6mn m³/d over those two months, also down from 126.2mn m³/d a year earlier. Shell's integrated gas business was the company's top performing segment with profits of $2.8bn, slightly higher on the year. Lighter maintenance at the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar supported production, but unplanned works and weather constraints in Australia left the company's LNG volumes at 6.6mn t in January-March from 7.6mn t a year earlier, Shell said. Meanwhile, Shell's upstream division posted $2.1bn in profit, down 8.5pc on the year earlier but double compared with the fourth quarter 2024. The segment was hit with a $509mn tax bill related to the UK's Energy Profits Levy in the first quarter, partially offset by gains from asset sales. Across the entire company, Shell reported first-quarter profits adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items of $5.6bn, surpassing analysts' expectations of $5.3bn . Shell's first-quarter worldwide oil, liquids and gas production was 2.84mn boe/d, down from 2.91mn boe/d a year earlier but up from 2.82mn boe/d in the previous quarter. The company expects lower oil and gas production this quarter in a 2.45mn-2.71mn boe/d range because of maintenance across its integrated gas portfolio and an absence of volumes from its SPDC business in Nigeria, which Shell sold off in March. By Aleksandra Godlewska and Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shell’s 1Q profit falls but beats expectations


02/05/25
News
02/05/25

Shell’s 1Q profit falls but beats expectations

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell's Integrated Gas business segment delivered a solid performance in the first quarter, helping the UK major exceed analysts' earnings estimates despite ongoing struggles in its downstream Chemicals and Products business. Shell reported a first-quarter profit of $4.8bn, down from $7.4bn a year earlier. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, profit was $5.6bn, surpassing analysts' expectations of $5.3bn. Integrated Gas was Shell's top-performing segment, with a profit of $2.8bn, slightly higher than the first quarter of 2024. Production was down by 6.6pc year-on-year at 927,000 b/d oil equivalent (boe/d), but up 2pc from the previous quarter. Less maintenance at the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar had a positive impact on production, Shell said. But the company's LNG volumes were affected by unplanned maintenance and weather constraints in Australia, falling to 6.6mn t from 7.6mn t a year earlier. The Upstream segment posted a profit of $2.1bn, down by 8.5pc on a year earlier but double what it made in the fourth quarter of 2024. The segment was hit with a $509mn tax charge related to the UK's Energy Profits Levy in the first quarter, partially offset by gains from asset sales. Production for the segment was slightly down compared to a year earlier at 1.86mn boe/d, partly due to the divestment of Shell's SPDC business in Nigeria. Overall, Shell's first-quarter production was 2.84mn boe/d, down from 2.91mn boe/d a year earlier but up from 2.82mn boe/d in the previous quarter. Shell expects lower production in the current quarter, ranging from 2.45mn boe/d to 2.71mn boe/d due to maintenance across its Integrated Gas portfolio and the absence of volumes from the SPDC business. The Chemicals and Products segment reported a $77mn loss for the first quarter, compared to a $1.3bn profit a year earlier. Refinery runs were down by 4.8pc year-on-year, and chemicals sales volumes were marginally lower. Despite persistent low margins in the downstream, Shell noted that refining and chemicals margins improved compared to the fourth quarter. Shell expects capital spending for 2025 to be within a $20bn-$22bn range, in line with last year's spending. The company is maintaining its dividend at 35.8¢/share and its share buyback programme at $3.5bn a quarter. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

South Australia closes Hydrogen Power SA office


02/05/25
News
02/05/25

South Australia closes Hydrogen Power SA office

Sydney, 2 May (Argus) — The state government of South Australia has rolled its Office of Hydrogen Power SA (OHPSA) into the Department of Energy and Mining (DEM), after scrapping plans for a 250MW electrolyser and 200MW hydrogen-fired power station. The OHPSA has been absorbed into the other state department, a spokesperson for SA energy minister Tom Koutsantonis said on 2 May. This comes after the state cut the A$593mn ($381mn) it had promised for its Hydrogen Jobs Plan in early 2025. The funds were reallocated to subsidise the 1.2mn t/yr Whyalla steelworks, which entered administration on 19 February . The associated Office of Northern Water Delivery, which was intended to support the green hydrogen sector in the state's upper Spencer Gulf region with new water pipeline supply, has also been incorporated within the DEM, Koutsantonis said on 1 May. SA's other major hydrogen hub planned at nearby Port Bonython was also overseen by the OHPSA. Development agreements with five companies have been signed for Port Bonython, including with London-based energy company Zero Petroleum for an e-SAF plant . SA is aiming to transition the ageing Whyalla steelworks to develop low emissions iron and steel products, but administrator KordaMentha is yet to finalise a buyer for Whyalla's controlling company OneSteel, which was formerly owned by UK-based GFG Alliance. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more