Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Viewpoint: Australian LNG exports to slide in 2024

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 27/12/23

Australia's LNG exports are set to decline in 2024, as an increasingly complex regulatory environment frustrates producers' plans to offset field declines by backfilling projects.

Shipments from the world's third largest seaborne gas exporter are set to fall to 81mn t in the year to 30 June 2024 and further to 79mn t in the 2024-25 fiscal year, compared with 82mn t in 2022-23, according to Australia's Office of the Chief Economist.

Australian independent Woodside Energy is likely to take one 2.5mn t/yr train of its five-train, 16.9mn t/yr North West Shelf LNG off line in 2024, while fellow domestic operator Santos' 3.7mn t/yr Darwin LNG will sit idle as it prepares for backfill from the $3.6bn Barossa field, scheduled for first gas in 2025.

But the firms, Australia's largest listed gas exporters, face headwinds as they grapple with an environmental movement aiming to curtail Australia's fossil fuel exports.

Litigation by climate activists has delayed Barossa and the $12bn Scarborough field, Woodside's Carnarvon basin project to fill a second 5mn t/yr train at Pluto LNG.

Barossa's field drilling and laying of most of the gas export pipeline (GEP) have been paused all year, following a federal court ruling that Santos must hold consultations with native title holders regarding underwater cultural heritage.

A challenge to the Barossa GEP environmental plan (EP) is likely to lead to a delay in Barossa's completion, with Santos previously advising that first gas during the first half of 2025 was contingent on completing the laying of the GEP in 2023 and commencing drilling activities. It now appears neither can proceed before January 2024.

But Woodside received fresh approvals for seismic testing at Scarborough on 1 December.

Both firms have appealed for legislation to clarify EP requirements. But "times have changed" and industry must improve consultation and engagement, federal Labor resources minister Madeleine King has said. This is despite the government promising a review of offshore regulations. King's office has not detailed a timeline for the conduct of the review.

In a year marked by significant policy interventions in the energy market, Canberra also announced changes to taxes on gas export profits which are yet to pass parliament, with both the centre-right opposition Coalition and left-wing Green Party calling for compromises to pass the bill in 2024.

Australia's three east coast LNG projects will likely see supplies of onshore coal-bed methane rise after three consecutive La Nina years caused wet weather disruptions, with a 9pc forecasted rise in January-March exports.

Upstream production at Santos' 7.8mn t/yr Gladstone LNG reached a record 692 TJ/d in January-June 2023, while the upstream operator of the 9mn t/yr Australia Pacific LNG recently said output would be at the upper end of the 680-710PJ estimate for the year to 30 June 2024.

But with southern Australia increasingly reliant on Queensland gas owing to field depletion in Victoria's Bass Strait, the federal government could seek further domestic supply under its Domestic Gas Security Mechanism, despite recently securing 300PJ of extra gas until 2030

The Northern Territory (NT) government's approval of hydraulic fracturing in May has led to the commissioning of an engineering study for the proposed 6.6mn t/yr NTLNG plant — likely to be completed in the first half of 2024.

Fellow NT independent Empire Energy is aiming for a final investment decision on its 25 TJ/d Carpentaria pilot project early next year. But construction remains contingent on establishment of commercial flow rates from the untapped Beetaloo gas basin.

Elsewhere in the region, the 5.6mn t/yr Papua LNG in Papua New Guinea (PNG) is likely to reach final investment decision in early 2024 ahead of an early 2028 production start, while the 6.9mn t/yr ExxonMobil-operated PNG LNG facility expects to receive first gas from the Angore field in 2024.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/05/25

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

Updates with report, EIA staff reduction. New York, 1 May (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said a technical issue with third-party software was the reason a key natural gas storage report was delayed today. The Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report , which is closely watched by traders and often moves markets, did not appear until 2pm ET, later than its regular scheduled time of 10:30am ET. Inventories grew by 107 Bcf (3bn m³) in the week ended 25 April, according to the report. The latest delay comes amid a flurry of staff departures at the EIA, the energy statistics arm of the US government, as part of ongoing efforts by President Donald Trump's administration to slash the size of the federal work force and curb spending. Around a third of the agency's 350 staff have taken voluntary buyouts, according to a person familiar with the situation. The staff exodus raises concerns about the agency's ability to gather and report timely data and continue providing independent forecasts covering energy production, stocks, demand and prices. Last month, the EIA delayed its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) by two days to take into account significant changes in markets following Trump's sweeping tariffs. And the EIA's release of its 2025 Annual Energy Outlook did not include the in-depth analysis that usually accompanies the report. It was accompanied by a statement from the Department of Energy that said the report reflects the "disastrous path" US energy production was on under the administration of former president Joseph Biden. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Ukraine, US sign reconstruction deal


01/05/25
News
01/05/25

Ukraine, US sign reconstruction deal

London, 1 May (Argus) — The government of Ukraine has agreed a "reconstruction" deal with the US that will establish a fund to be filled with proceeds from new mineral extraction licenses. There are few firm details about how much money will be involved, or how any future extraction contracts will be structured. It appears to be the same agreement that came close to being signed in February , which collapsed after an awkward meeting in the White House between Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his US counterpart Donald Trump. Washington had pitched the deal in advance as providing stakes in Ukraine's mineral rights, as a form of repayment for past US support and a deterrence against future military incursions by Russia. There is no firm indication from either side that this is the case. Ukraine's economy minister Yulia Svyrydenko said today that 50pc of state budget revenues from new licences will flow into the fund, and the fund would then invest in projects in Ukraine itself. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said the deal "allows the US to invest alongside Ukraine, to unlock Ukraine's growth assets, mobilise American talent, capital and governance standards", suggesting US companies will be involved in the new licenses. He said the fund will be established with the assistance of the US International Development Finance Corporation. Ukraine was eager to show the deal as a success. Svyrydenko said Kyiv will retain ownership of all resources, and "will decide where and what to extract." Neither does the agreement allow for privatisation of state-owned oil and gas company Ukrnafta or power company Energoatom, nor does it mention any debt obligation to the US, she said. The depth of Ukraine's resources are unclear. The country's geological survey shows deposits of 24 of the EU's list of critical minerals, including titanium, zirconium, graphite, and manganese, along with proven reserves of metals such as lithium, beryllium, rare earth elements and nickel. The IEA estimates Ukraine's oil reserves at more than 6.2bn bl and its gas reserves at 5.4 trillion m³, although it said Russia's annexation of Crimea means Kyiv no longer has access to "significant offshore gas resources". By Ben Winkley, John Gawthrop and James Keates Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil's energy transition spending drops in 2024


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

Brazil's energy transition spending drops in 2024

Sao Paulo, 30 April (Argus) — Brazil's mines and energy ministry's (MME) energy transition spending shrank by 83pc in 2024 from the prior year, while resources for fossil fuel incentives remained unchanged, according to the institute of socioeconomic studies Inesc. The MME's energy transition budget was R141,413 ($24,980) in 2024, down from R835,237 in the year prior. MME had only two energy transition-oriented projects under its umbrella last year: biofuels industry studies and renewable power incentives, which represented a combined 0.002pc of its total R7bn budget. Still, despite available resources, MME did not approve any projects for renewable power incentives. It also only used 50pc of its budget for biofuel studies, Inesc said. Even as supply from non-conventional power sources advances , most spending in Brazil's grid revamp — including enhancements to better integrate solar and wind generation — comes from charges paid by consumers through power tariffs, Inesc said. Diverging energy spending Brazil's federal government also cut its energy transition budget for 2025 by 17pc from last year and created a new energy transition program that also pushes for increased fossil fuel usage. The country's energy transition budget for 2025 is R3.64bn, down from R4.44bn in 2024. The new program — also under MME's umbrella — has a budget of around R10mn, with more than half of it destined to studies related to the oil and natural gas industry, Inesc said. A second MME program — which invests in studies in the oil, natural gas, products and biofuels sectors — has an approved budget of R53.1mn. The science and technology ministry is the only in Brazil that increased its energy transition spending for 2025, with R3.03bn approved, a near threefold hike from R800mn in 2024. Spending will focus on the domestic industry sector's energy transition, Inesc said. Despite hosting the UN Cop 30 summit in November, Brazil has constantly neglected to address the phase-out of fossil fuels, drawing the ire of climate activists . By Maria Frazatto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US LNG developers seek tariff loophole in FTZs


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

US LNG developers seek tariff loophole in FTZs

Construction costs for planned LNG projects could shoot up as a result of new import tariffs on key metals, writes Tray Swanson London, 30 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's ultra-protectionist trade policies are pushing developers of LNG export projects to consider using foreign-trade zones (FTZs), in a bid to avoid or defer tariff bills on imported materials. Trump's imposition of wide-ranging import tariffs this year raises the risk of cost inflation for LNG projects, particularly for the six terminals that are already under construction and the seven expected to reach a final investment decision (FID) this year. The 25pc levy on all foreign-sourced steel and aluminium introduced in March is likely to have the greatest impact on LNG projects, given that steel and aluminium can account for about 30pc of a facility's $5bn-25bn construction costs. Steel is required for liquefaction units, pipelines, tanks, structural frameworks and cryogenic hoses, and aluminum is used in heat exchangers. Many LNG developers are seeking to reduce or defer paying the new duties by establishing foreign-trade zones (FTZs) — designated areas in which foreign inputs can avoid import tariffs, at least temporarily, if they fulfil certain criteria. FTZs were introduced in the US nearly a century ago to counteract domestic protectionist trade policy and help US companies remain internationally competitive. US developer Cheniere's 33mn t/yr Sabine Pass plant in Louisiana has already been operating as an FTZ since 2015, according to the US FTZ Board. And Australian independent Woodside Energy's 16.5mn t/yr Louisiana LNG facility in Calcasieu Parish near Lake Charles is in an FTZ, a company spokesman told Argus. The project reached an FID on 29 April and is expected to cost $17.5bn, up from a weeks-old estimate of $16bn. About a quarter of Louisiana LNG's capital expenditure is for equipment and construction materials, roughly half of which will need to be imported so are subject to tariffs, Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill told investors on 23 April. Other planned projects in Louisiana are looking to establish or join FTZs. US developer Commonwealth LNG's proposed 9.5mn t/yr terminal in Cameron Parish is in the process of joining the same trade zone as Sabine Pass LNG and compatriot firm Venture Global's 12.4mn t/yr Calcasieu Pass facility. Midstream firm Energy Transfer's 16.5mn t/yr Lake Charles LNG facility has been approved by the US FTZ Board, although it has not been activated as an FTZ as no significant construction has taken place yet. The project is awaiting federal permits ahead of likely reaching an FID later this year. On the Texas side of the Sabine river, state-run QatarEnergy and ExxonMobil's 18.1mn t/yr Golden Pass facility, set to come on line in 2026, and US developer Sempra's 13.5mn t/yr Port Arthur LNG terminal, expected on line in 2027, have joined the southeast Texas FTZ. Call of duties FTZs are treated as though they are outside of US Customs territory for purposes of duty payments. This enables companies to defer or reduce tariff payments until the imported product is used commercially. For LNG projects in FTZs, developers do not need to pay tariffs on imported steel or modular liquefaction trains until the unit comes on line and begins producing LNG. Terminals with multiple trains can stagger the payments. Most onshore project developers import materials and components and build their trains on site. Cheniere's Sabine Pass facility used this approach and required 89,000t of structural steel for its six trains. Port Arthur LNG and US firm NextDecade's 17.6mn t/yr Rio Grande LNG plant intend to do the same. But NextDecade is not active in the Port of Brownsville's FTZ, according to the FTZ Board, meaning it is probably the project at greatest immediate risk from the metals tariffs. By late February, NextDecade had secured only 69pc of the materials it needs for the project's first two trains and 33pc for its third train. NextDecade and the Port of Brownsville declined a request for comment. Some projects choose to use smaller, prefabricated trains that are built elsewhere and imported. Venture Global took this approach for its Calcasieu Pass and 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines plants, using imported trains built by oil field services provider Baker Hughes in Italy, and it intends to use the same technology for its proposed CP2 terminal, on track to reach an FID this year. Under such arrangements, the LNG developer must pay the US' import tariffs. Baker Hughes' customers take ownership of the products it makes in Italy, the company said on 23 April. Calcasieu Pass, which began commercial service on 15 April , is in an FTZ, but Venture Global will need to expand its boundaries to include the adjacent CP2 project. FTZs also have a so-called inverted tariff benefit that allows companies to pay the duty on the finished unit if it is cheaper than the rate for the components. But Trump's executive orders outlining the tariffs essentially prevent the use of the inverted benefit, outlining a special status requirement that import duties be applied to the components, trade group the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones' director of advocacy and strategic relations, Melissa Irmen, tells Argus. If the tariffs are lifted, firms that had deferred payments would still be required to pay the duties when they reach commercial service unless the order that removes or modifies the tariffs specifically dictates otherwise, Irmen says. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Germany approves decree to lower gas storage target


30/04/25
News
30/04/25

Germany approves decree to lower gas storage target

London, 30 April (Argus) — The German government has passed a decree to reduce the national start-of-November target to 70pc from the existing 90pc, the economy and climate ministry BMWK said today. The Gas Storage Level decree was submitted to the federal cabinet as a ministerial decree and does not need parliamentary approval. It will come into force "upon promulgation". The decree sets out a 70pc gas storage fill level for the country as a whole, but imposes an 80pc fill level requirement for cavern storage and a 45pc target for porous storage sites, with the exception of four facilities in southern Germany which will abide to the 80pc obligation in order to maintain "supply security in Austria and Switzerland". BMWK presented the decree alongside the ongoing EU legislative process to allow more flexibility in bloc-wide storage regulation. It was developed in "close consultation with the EU institutions", BMWK said. But the EU's final legal text still needs to be agreed between the parliament and member states . Mixed response from industry associations Most German gas associations welcomed the reduction of fill level requirements. German gas grid operators association FNB backed the introduction of the decree as it supports security of supply while "gradually transferring responsibility back to the market". The timeframe and regional differentiation will enable preparation for the coming winter, FNB said. Energy association BDEW welcomed the bill, but said that it is also essential that the relevant EU framework be "established in a timely manner". The association also said it would be sensible to consider the flexibility proposed at the EU level, in which countries can meet the start-of-winter target at any date between 1 October and 1 December. Energy Traders Germany welcomed the reduction, it told Argus . But it added that the new changes should not reduce the discussion about which instruments can reliably ensure security of supply in the EU and German gas markets. And "constant changes to requirements that lead to market distortions must be avoided", it said. By Alejandro Moreano Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more