Indonesian Samarinda port sets tug, pilotage tariffs

Market: Coal
17/02/23

Indonesia's Samarinda anchorage has implemented tariffs for pilotage and tug assist services on 17 February at 00:01 local time (17:01 GMT, 16 February).

This came after an agreement between port company Pelabuhan Tiga Bersaudara and the branch committee of the Indonesian National Shipowners Association.

Tariffs will be charged a minimum of two hours each way going in and out of the anchorage, and have separate structures for Indonesian-flagged vessels and foreign-flagged vessels. Tariffs for tug assist services have two components, a fixed tariff and a variable tariff. For example, a foreign-flagged 82,000 deadweight tonnes (dwt) Kamsarmax vessel that is about 43,000 gross tonnage (GT), will be charged a fixed tariff of $2,442/hour, and a variable tariff of $0.0372/GT for each hour. The tariff incurred for tug assist services for the Kamsarmax moving in and out of the anchorage for a minimum of four hours would be $16,166.40.

Pilotage tariffs also have two components, a fixed tariff and a variable tariff. Using the same foreign-flagged Kamsarmax vessel, the fixed tariff will be $131.35 for each vessel movement, and a variable tariff will be $0.0557/GT for each vessel movement. The pilotage tariff subsequently incurred for the vessel moving in and out of the anchorage would be $5,052.90.

So the total additional cost for the Kamsarmax performing a cargo operation at Samarinda would be $21,219.30.

By Andrew Khaw

Table 1: Tug assist services tariff (Indonesian rupiah, USD)

Table 2: Pilotage Tariff (Indonesian rupiah, USD)

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

07/01/25

Trump wants policy of 'no windmills' being built

Washington, 7 January (Argus) — President-elect Donald Trump wants to pursue a policy to stop the construction of wind turbines, a move that could limit the growth of a resource projected to soon overtake coal and nuclear as the largest source of power in the the US. Trump has spent years attacking the development of wind, which accounted for 10pc of electricity production in the US in 2023, often by citing misleading complaints about its cost, harm to wildlife and health threats. In a press conference today, Trump reiterated some of those concerns and said he wants the government to halt new development. "It's the most expensive energy there is. It's many, many times more expensive than clean natural gas," Trump said. "So we're going to try and have a policy where no windmills are being built." The US is on track to add more than 90GW of wind capacity by 2028, a nearly 60pc increase compared to 2024, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in latest Annual Energy Outlook report. If that growth materializes, wind will become the second largest source of electricity in the US at the end of of Trump's term, overtaking coal and nuclear in 2027 and 2028, respectively, according to the EIA forecast. Trump did not offer specifics on the policy, which he did not run on during his campaign. But the vast majority of wind capacity in the US is built on private land such as farms — largely in rural districts represented by Republicans — limiting the federal government's role. Trump could still threaten wind development by blocking projects on federal land, such as offshore wind projects, and working to repeal federal tax credits that subsidize wind. Democratic lawmakers said blocking wind development will raise costs for consumers and reduce energy production. "Trump is against wind energy because he doesn't understand our country's energy needs and dislikes the sight of turbines near his private country clubs," said US Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who helped expand federal tax credits for wind through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Wind energy industry officials also raised concerns with the policy, which they said conflicted with an all-of-the-above energy strategy. "American presidents shouldn't be taking American resources away from the American people," American Clean Power chief executive Jason Grumet said. 'Gulf of America' Trump today separately reiterated his vow to "immediately" reverse Biden's withdrawal of more than 625mn acres of waters for offshore drilling, and also said he would rename the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America", which he said was a "beautiful name". In addition to expanding oil and gas production offshore, Trump said he will seek to drill in "a lot of other locations" as a way to lower prices. "The energy costs are going to come way down," Trump said. "They'll be brought down to a very low level, and that's going to bring everything else down." US consumers paid an average of $3.02/USG for regular grade gasoline in December, the lowest monthly price in more than three years. Henry Hub spot natural gas prices dropped to $2.19/mmBtu in 2024, the lowest price in four years. During his campaign, Trump said he would cut the price of energy in half within 12 months of taking office. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

US oil sector sues Vermont over new climate law

02/01/25

News

02/01/25

US oil sector sues Vermont over new climate law

Washington, 2 January (Argus) — Oil industry and business groups are challenging a first-of-its-kind law in Vermont that would require fossil fuel producers to pay potentially billions of dollars in fines based on greenhouse gas emissions over the past 30 years. Vermont's law is "unprecedented" and attempts to "pin blame" on a narrow set of out-of-state energy producers for climate-related damages for decades of alleged greenhouse gas emissions, the American Petroleum Institute and the US Chamber of Commerce wrote in a lawsuit filed on 30 December. They argue the law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act and violates the US Constitution's ban on excessive fines. "It punishes covered energy producers for greenhouse gas emissions related to the lawful production and use of their products and those emissions' purported impacts on climate change," the lawsuit said. Vermont's "Climate Superfund Act" was enacted last year and applies to oil, natural gas and coal producers and refineries found to have emitted at least 1bn metric tonnes (t) of greenhouse gases from 1995-2024. Under the law, Vermont will issue a "cost recovery demand" to those companies based on their emissions that will pay for climate adaptation projects. Vermont will have until 1 January 2027 to finalize specifics of how the program will work, including how to calculate the charge. The lawsuit, filed in a federal district court in Vermont, argues the state had exceeded its authority by trying to impose financial penalties on fossil fuel companies located "well beyond" its borders. The law also imposes an "overly harsh and oppressive retroactive penalty" and is based on an "arbitrary" calculation that focuses on the last 30 years of emissions, the lawsuit argues. Vermont governor Phil Scott (R), who allowed the law to take effect last summer without his signature, has raised concerns about the state's "go-it-alone" approach toward taking on "Big Oil". But New York governor Kathy Hochul (D) last week signed the state's own climate "Superfund" law, which is expected to raise $75bn over the next 25 years from fees on companies that exceed 1bn t of greenhouse gas emissions from 2000-2018. Massachusetts and Maryland are considering similar laws. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply

02/01/25

News

02/01/25

Viewpoint: US utilities worry over railcar supply

Washington, 2 January (Argus) — US utilities are concerned that they may not have enough railcars to haul coal in the future as multiple power plants are seeking to remain in operation longer than expected. Power demand is forecast to rise in the coming years because of planned data centers in multiple parts of the country. Many data centers are expected to open before new generation, including natural gas, wind and solar-power units, go into service. A number of utilities want to avert the temporary power shortage by extending the life of coal-fired power plants beyond planned retirement dates. In response, demand is "poised to shift to a slight growth in the need for coal cars", according to railcar expert Richard Kloster, president of Integrity Rail Partners. Longer power plant lives as well as expectations of increased metallurgical coal exports are likely to provide demand for equipment. But the supply of railcars for coal has been slowly shrinking. No new railcars for the coal industry — primarily gondolas or open-top hoppers — have been built in nearly a decade. Utilities and leasing companies have had little interest in ordering new railcars for a shrinking sector. Many existing cars have also been scrapped, particularly during periods of low coal demand and high scrap prices during the last few years. There also are thousands of coal railcars in storage, but those do not really count towards demand, Kloster said. The cost of pulling those cars out of storage and making them service-ready is not necessarily cost effective, he said. About 21pc of North American coal cars were in storage at the beginning of August, up from 15pc in November 2022, according to Association of American Railroads data. In comparison, about 35pc of the coal car fleet was in storage at the start of July 2020, near the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Possibilities of new construction There is a chance that "in the next 10 years, there will be coal cars built again", because many coal cars in the fleet are nearing 50 years of age, Kloster said. The retirement of many cars means that equipment must be pulled from storage or new units built, driving potential construction. Under Association of American Railroads (AAR) rules, railcars built after June 1974 can only be interchanged with other railroads for 50 years. After that, those cars are generally limited to operating on only one carrier. Some of those older cars may be retired early if they need repairs. Maintenance expenses could cause car owners to take units out of service. Utilities strategize Some utilities are already implementing plans to secure railcars, but others think taking additional steps will be unnecessary, according to railcar expert Darell Luther, chief executive of rail transportation firm Tealinc. The differing views are tied in part to whether utilities are regulated by states or merchant-owned, Luther said. Public utilities need to prove to regulators they can meet generating needs, including having enough coal and railcars. Privately owned operators have more flexibility in terms of contracting for coal and railcars. Several utility rail managers told Argus they do not see the need to take extra steps to secure railcars, confident that they already have plenty or can lease whatever they need in the future. But other utilities said they have taken steps to ensure they have coal cars in the future. Some utilities have purchased single or multiple cars as other generators sell them off. Others are increasingly leasing cars, with one utility saying that having more cars than needed is a cheap way of ensuring future supply. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: US coal supply may tighten

Houston, 31 December (Argus) — More US coal production cuts may be on the horizon, setting up thermal coal supply to potentially be lower than demand starting in late 2025. US coal producers have been scaling back mining operations since at least mid-2023 in response to lackluster demand. Market participants are continuing to contend with elevated power plant inventories following relatively mild winters and more competitive natural gas prices. Some producers are signaling more production cuts are coming in the next few months. As a result, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently forecast the country's coal output in 2025 would fall by 7.2pc from this year to 472.3mn short tons (428.5mn metric tonnes), the lowest level in agency data going back to 1949. But US coal-fired generation and coal consumption is expected to grow modestly next year, to 643.7bn kWh and 409.4mn st, respectively, from 641.6bn kWh and 406mn st in 2024, because of greater electricity and industrial demand. Coal consumption for the electric power sector alone is expected to rise to 371.5mn st from an estimated 369.4mn st in 2024, EIA data show. Generators are expected to draw from their existing coal inventories for the majority of the year to meet the slightly higher electricity demand, potentially bringing power plant stockpiles down to more normal levels. Coal producers also are expected to have less inventory at mines and loadout facilities as volumes that had been deferred to 2025 are delivered. If the inventory withdrawals and expected slight increase in domestic consumption are coupled with higher export market prices and demand, "there could be an impetus for a slight ramp-up in domestic production, but currently, that prospect does not appear to be visibly on the horizon", EIA chief economist Jonathan Church said. For example, Argus assessments for calendar year 2025 API 2 coal swaps averaged $112.85/t from 1-24 December, compared with $104.19/t for all of December last year. The response from coal producers to any improvement in demand could be uneven, which could constrict competition and boost prices. While larger producers with longwall mining equipment, primarily in northern Appalachia and the Illinois basin, can somewhat efficiently resume or increase production, other companies may struggle to ramp up operations. Producers also may not have the financial support to increase coal output. A number of market participants expect smaller producers with higher-cost operations to be forced out of business as major banks continue to pull back on lending money to coal mining companies. In the nearer term, recent or planned coal mine closures could further limit supply. Alliance Resource Partners said in November that it intends to retire its central Appalachian coal-producing MC Mining complex in Kentucky, and the company has already cut operations to two of its four production units. Earlier in 2024, American Consolidated Natural Resources closed its Pride Mine in western Kentucky and Hallador Energy idled two small Indiana mines in February. Other producers have scaled back operations but kept mines open. Coal miners worked an average 45.5 hours/wk in October when not adjusted for seasonal factors, preliminary figures from the US Labor Department show. A year earlier, coal miners averaged 48.3 hours/wk. Producers also have to contend with an uncertain outlook beyond 2025, including an expected shift in environmental policies under president-elect Donald Trump, how new data centers will affect electricity demand, and timelines for installing new generation and transmission upgrades. Alliant Energy, Vistra Energy, Duke Energy and Louisville Gas & Electric and Kentucky Utilities are among utilities that recently announced plans to potentially delay retiring coal-fired generating units or plans to remodel coal units to co-fired natural gas and coal to try to meet load growth projections for the next few years. This could keep coal-fired generation and demand at least somewhat stable, but it may not provid long-term support. "To have increased coal demand, you would have to have load growth outpacing new supply," said Robert Godby, associate professor in the economics department at the University of Wyoming. He and others expect new renewable generation and transmission projects to eventually accommodate projected electricity demand growth. Increased load growth will be "at best just a reprieve from the ongoing downward trend in coal production and coal demand", Godby said. As such, producers may continue to try to limit output in 2025, which could partially raise domestic prices from current levels that straddle the line of profitability for many coal mining companies. But the increases will likely be modest as alternative energy sources are expected to continue to suppress demand for coal generation. By Anna Harmon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

Washington, 31 December (Argus) — The US Supreme Court is on track for another term that could significantly affect the energy sector, with rulings anticipated in the new year that could narrow environmental reviews and challenge California's authority to set its own tailpipe standards. The Supreme Court earlier this month held arguments in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v Eagle County, Colorado , a case in which the justices are being asked to decide whether federal rail regulators adequately studied the environmental effects of a proposed 88-mile railway that would transport 80,000 b/d of crude. A lower court last year found the review, prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), should have analyzed how building the project would affect drilling and refining. Business groups want the Supreme Court to issue an expansive ruling that would limit NEPA reviews only to "proximate" effects, such as how rail traffic could affect nearby wildlife, rather than reviewing distance effects. The court recently agreed to hear a separate case that could restrict California's unique authority under the Clean Air Act to issue its own greenhouse gas regulations for newly sold cars and pickup trucks that are more stringent than federal standards. Oil refiners and biofuel producers in that case, Diamond Alternative Energy v EPA , say they should have "standing" to advance a lawsuit challenging those standards — even though they could now show prevailing in the case would change fuel demand — based on the alleged "coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties". These two cases, likely to be decided by the end of June, follow on the heels of the court's blockbuster decision in June overturning the decades-old "Chevron deference", a foundation for administration law that had given federal agencies greater flexibility when writing regulations. Last term, the court also limited agency enforcement powers and halted a rule targeting cross-state air pollution sources. This term's cases are unlikely to have as far-reaching consequences for the energy sector as overturning Chevron. But industry officials hope the two pending cases will provide clarity on issues that have been problematic for developers, including the scope of federal environmental reviews and the ability of industry to win legal "standing" to bring lawsuits. Two other cases could have significant effects for the oil sector, if the court agrees to consider them at a conference set for 10 January. Utah has a pending complaint before the court designed to force the US to dispose of 18.5mn acres of "unappropriated" federal land in the state, including oil-producing acreage. Utah argues that indefinitely retaining the land — which covers about a third of Utah — is unconstitutional. In another pending case, Sunoco and other oil companies have asked for a ruling that could halt a series of lawsuits filed against them in state courts for alleged damages from greenhouse gas emissions. President-elect Donald Trump's re-election could create complications for cases pending before the Supreme Court, if the incoming administration adopts new legal positions. Trump plans to nominate John Sauer, who successfully represented Trump in his presidential immunity case, as his solicitor general before the Supreme Court. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more