Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

India gears up for peak power demand in April

  • Market: Coal, Electricity, Natural gas
  • 10/03/23

The Indian power ministry is stepping up preparations, with India facing a peak power demand forecast of 229GW in April with the onset of summer.

Several states already witnessed record-high temperatures in February. The India Meteorological Department has indicated that summers months are likely to be hotter, predicting heat waves between March and May.

The government has invoked an emergency rule that enables some of the biggest coal-fired power plants to operate at full capacity. It has directed power utilities to carry out maintenance for coal-fired power plants in advance to avoid any maintenance shutdown during the crunch period.

All imported coal-fired power plants are to run at full capacity from 16 March as the power ministry aims to buy 1,500MW of coal-fired electricity capacity using imported coal to meet an anticipated deficit during the peak summer month. The government earlier this year ordered utilities to import 6pc of their thermal coal requirements for blending until September.

An additional capacity of 2.92GW of newly commissioned coal-fired power plants is likely to be operational by the end of March, besides two units with a coal-fired power capacity of 110MW each at Barauni in east India's Bihar state during the crunch period, according to a government notification on 9 March. The railway ministry is to provide 418 rakes and more to different subsidiaries of state-controlled Coal India (CIL), along with captive blocks to meet the coal required at plants.

Gas-fired power generation will also meet peak demand. State-controlled utility NTPC has been instructed to generate 5GW from its gas-fired power plants during April-May, in addition to 4GW of additional gas-fired power capacity that will be added by other entities.

State-controlled gas distributor Gail has already assured the power ministry that it will supply 248mn m³ of gas during the summer months.

But some in the market see a possible power shortage because of a hotter than usual summer this year.

"There is high probability of having a shortage of approximately 5GW during the month of April 2023 in the night-time peak demand hours wherein the requirement would be 216.9GW and the effective available capacity is expected to be 211.89GW," said associate vice-president of coal commercial strategy and regulatory affairs at Jindal Group Saunak Dey.

India's power consumption was 116.7TWh in February, up by 9pc from a year earlier, according to data from the power ministry. India's power consumption was 1,375.5TWh between April 2022 and February 2023.

Mumbai-based Crisil Market Intelligence and Analytics forecasts India's power consumption rising by 5.5-6pc in the April 2022-March 2023 fiscal year from over 1,320TWh a year earlier.

Available stocks

A total a 204GW of India's coal-fired thermal power plants had 33.85mn t of coal stocks left as on 7 March, which is sufficient for 12 days, data from the Central Electricity Authority showed.

To meet the rising summer demand, domestic coal requirements for April-June are expected to be 222mn t against anticipated supplies of 204.5mn t, Dey said, adding that the 6pc blending mandate will cover up the shortfall. But he also said that an approximate 1GW of coal-fired thermal generation capacity may also be forced to shut down in April.

A sharp rise in electricity consumption and tighter coal availability last year resulted in lengthy power cuts in parts of the country, prompting authorities to increase the supply of domestic coal to utilities. The Indian government also mandated CIL to import coal for the blending requirements of all domestic power utilities for the first time since 2015.

Coal accounted for 50pc of India's power generation feedstock in 2022. Gas' share was 6pc out of the 60bn m³ demand last year, the majority of which were for sectors including fertiliser and city gas.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
14/04/25

Japan’s Renova boosts renewable power sales in March

Japan’s Renova boosts renewable power sales in March

Tokyo, 14 April (Argus) — Japanese renewable energy developer Renova's electricity sales rose in March from a year earlier, according to data published by the company on 11 April. Renova sold around 256GWh of renewable electricity in March, including solar, biomass, and geothermal. This is up by around 26pc from the same month in 2024. Electricity sales generated by biomass-fired power plants totalled around 222GWh in March. Ronova's biomass-fired power capacity was 395GW with six plants at the end of March. The company sells electricity from the 75MW Sendai Gamo plant, the 75MW Kanda plant, the 75GW Omaezaki Kou plant, and the 75MW Tokushima Tsuda plant under Japan's feed in tariff (FiT) scheme. Electricity generated by the 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino plant and the 21MW Akita plant is sold under the county's feed in premium (FiP) scheme, based on long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs). Renova delayed the start-up of the 50MW Karatsu plant in southern Japan's Saga prefecture, which is expected to generate up to 350GWh/yr of electricity, from March to September 2025 because of technical issues. The plant will sell electricity under the FiP scheme based on a long-term PPA with its client from the beginning of commercial operations, according to the company. By Takeshi Maeda Renova's biomass-fired electricity sales in March 2025 Capacity (MW) Electricity sales (GWh) Start of operations Akita 21 13 Jul-16 Ishinomaki Hibarino 75 37 Mar-24 Sendai Gamo 75 51 Nov-23 Tokushima Tsuda 75 41 Dec-23 Omaezaki Kou 75 30 Jan-25 Kanda 75 50 Jun-21 Total 395 222 Source : Renova Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Brunei LNG undergoes unplanned downtime


14/04/25
News
14/04/25

Brunei LNG undergoes unplanned downtime

Singapore, 14 April (Argus) — Brunei's 7.2mn t/yr Brunei LNG export terminal experienced an operational upset on 11 April, but there were no reported injuries or damages to its assets, the firm said in a notice. "Normalisation process is currently in progress," the firm added. Visible flaring and black smoke from the plant may be observed during this time, but the situation is under control and poses no risk to the surrounding community or environment, the firm reported. Brunei LNG cancelled its tender offering a cargo on a fob basis for loading on 22 June , likely as a result of the operational upset. The tender was initially due to close on 17 April. It is still uncertain when the export terminal will resume normal operations. By Joey Chan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US tariffs cast a shadow on global gas market


11/04/25
News
11/04/25

US tariffs cast a shadow on global gas market

Steel can make up nearly a third of an LNG terminal's pricetag, so the new levies could push up costs and push back start-up dates, writes Xiaoyi Deng London, 11 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's volatile tariff policy and some of the countermeasures already announced by large trade partners are unlikely to cause any direct disruption to global gas markets. But they will have a direct impact on future US liquefaction capacity. And the indirect effects on gas supply and demand could be huge, stemming from a weaker macroeconomic outlook, fuel substitution and inflationary pressures on infrastructure development. US LNG developers hailed Trump's return to office, after complaining that his predecessor complicated the issuance of additional export licences. But Trump's imposition of 25pc tariffs on all foreign-sourced steel and aluminum, from 12 March, will increase infrastructure costs in the US' upstream and midstream sectors. These present an immediate risk for US LNG developers, particularly for the five projects under construction and the six others expected to reach final investment decisions (FIDs) this year. Metals account for up to 30pc of the cost of an LNG export plant. A terminal can cost $5bn-25bn to build, depending on its size, with steel used for pipelines, tanks and other structural frameworks. Facilities can be built using some domestically produced metal, but higher prices for this might lead to construction and FID delays for the country's planned liquefaction projects. US tariffs' primary effect on the domestic gas market stems from duties levied on non-energy goods used by the oil and gas industry, including steel and specialised pipeline components such as valves and compressors, which are imported. The US remains a net natural gas importer from Canada , but these flows are unlikely to be affected by trade tariffs, given the lack of alternative supply sources available to some northern US states. Tariff baiting Trump's latest tariff round , unveiled on 2 April, involves a a minimum 10pc on all foreign imports from 5 April,with much higher tariffs on selected countries that briefly came into force on 9 April, before Trump bowed to panic in financial markets and announced a 90-day pause. China is the key exception. It has announced retaliatory tariffs that could disrupt US energy exports, resulting in an escalation that leaves the overall levy at 145pc in the US and 125pc in China. China had already stopped importing US LNG earlier this year. But disruption to trade between the world's two largest economies may weigh heavily on manufacturing activity in China, in turn reducing industrial gas demand. And the ripple effects of disruption to US LPG exports to China may alter fuel-switching economics in the region and beyond. Most other countries in Asia-Pacific have opted not to follow China's lead by retaliating. The Japanese government intends to negotiate a better tariff deal and is considering investing in the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project as part of wider efforts to reduce its trade surplus with the US. Countries in Asia-Pacific have been hit with some of the highest of Trump's targeted duties. The EU is keeping retaliatory measures on the table, but these are unlikely to involve US LNG. Europe has become much more reliant on LNG imports after losing the bulk of its Russian pipeline supply, and imposing tariffs on energy imports would only reignite inflationary pressures that European countries have tried to curb over the past three years. The bloc says it is ready to negotiate on possibly increasing its US LNG imports to reduce its trade surplus and would axe tariffs on industrial imports if the US agrees to do the same. But Trump says this is not enough, citing the EU's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justifies a tariff response. US LNG project pipeline mn t/yr Project Capacity Expected start/FID Under construction Plaquemines 19.2 2025 Corpus Christi stage 3 12.0 2025 Golden Pass 18.1 2026 Rio Grande 17.6 2027 Port Arthur 13.5 2027 Waiting for final investment decision Delfin FLNG 1 13.2 mid-2025 Texas LNG 4.0 2025 Calcasieu Pass 2 28.0 mid-2025 Corpus Christi train 8-9 3.3 2025 Louisiana LNG 16.5 mid-2025 Cameron train 4 6.8 mid-2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Q&A: IMO GHG scheme in EU ETS could be 'challenging'


11/04/25
News
11/04/25

Q&A: IMO GHG scheme in EU ETS could be 'challenging'

London, 11 April (Argus) — Delegates have approved the global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism proposal at the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) 83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting. Argus Media spoke to ministerial adviser and Finland's head representative at the IMO delegation talks, Anita Irmeli, on the sidelines of the London MEPC meeting. What is your initial reaction to the text? We are happy and satisfied about the content of the agreed text, so far. But we need to be careful. This week, all member states were able to vote. But in October, when adaption will take place, only those states which are parties to Marpol Annex VI will be able to vote if indeed a vote is called for, and that changes the situation a little bit. Here when we were voting, a minority was enough — 40 votes. But if or when we vote in October, then we need two thirds of those party to Marpol Annex VI to be in favour of the text. Will enthusiasm for the decision today remain by October? I'm pretty sure it will. But you never know what will happen between now and and the next six months. What is the effect of the decision on FuelEU Maritime and the EU ETS? Both FuelEU Maritime and the EU ETS have a review clause. This review clause states that if we are ambitious enough at the IMO, then the EU can review or amend the regulation. So of course, it is very important that we first consider if the approved Marpol amendments are ambitious enough to meet EU standards. Only after that evaluation, which won't be until well after October, can we consider these possible changes. Do you think the EU will be able to adopt these the text as it stands today? My personal view is that we can perhaps incorporate this text under FuelEU Maritime, but it may be more challenging for the EU ETS, where shipping is now included. What was the impact of US President Donald Trump's letter on the proceedings? EU states were not impacted, but it's difficult to say what the impact was on other states. By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

IMO approves two-tier GHG pricing mechanism


11/04/25
News
11/04/25

IMO approves two-tier GHG pricing mechanism

London, 11 April (Argus) — Delegates have approved the global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism proposal at the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) 83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting, pending an adoption vote at the next MEPC in October. The proposal passed by a majority vote, with 63 nations in favor including EU states, the UK, China and India, and 16 members opposed, including Mideast Gulf states, Russia, and Venezuela. The US was absent from the MEPC 83 meeting, and 24 member states abstained. The proposal was accompanied by an amendment to implement the regulation, which was approved for circulation ahead of an anticipated adoption at the October MEPC. Approval was not unanimous, which is rare. If adoption is approved in October at a vote that will require a two-thirds majority, the maritime industry will become the first transport sector to implement internationally mandated targets to reduce GHG emissions. The text says ships must initially reduce their fuel intensity by a "base target" of 4pc in 2028 ( see table ) against 93.3 gCO2e/MJ, the latter representing the average GHG fuel intensity value of international shipping in 2008. This gradually tightens to 30pc by 2035. The text defines a "direct compliance target", that starts at 17pc for 2028 and grows to 43pc by 2035. The pricing mechanism establishes a levy for excessive emissions at $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) for ships compliant with the minimum 'base' target, called Tier 2. For ships in Tier 1 — those compliant with the base target but that still have emission levels higher than the direct compliance target — the price was set at $100/tCO2e. Over-compliant vessels will receive 'surplus units' equal to their positive compliance balance, expressed in tCO2e, valid for two years after emission. Ships then will be able to use the surplus units in the following reporting periods; transfer to other vessels as a credit; or voluntarily cancel as a mitigation contribution. IMO secretary general Arsenio Dominguez said while it would have been more preferable to have a unanimous outcome, this outcome is a good result nonetheless. "We work on consensus, not unanimity," he said. "We demonstrated that we will continue to work as an organization despite the concerns." Looking at the MEPC session in October, Dominguez said: "Different member states have different positions, and there is time for us to remain in the process and address those concerns, including those that were against and those that were expecting more." Dominguez said the regulation is set to come into force in 2027, with first revenues collected in 2028 of an estimated $11bn-13bn. Dominguez also said there is a clause within the regulation that ensures a review at least every five years. By Hussein Al-Khalisy, Natália Coelho, and Gabriel Tassi Lara IMO GHG reduction targets Year Base Target Direct Compliance Target 2028 4% 17% 2029 6% 19% 2030 8% 21% 2031 12% 25% 2032 17% 30% 2033 21% 34% 2034 26% 39% 2035 30% 43% Source: IMO Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more