N Dakota CO2 pipeline project awaits new hearing

Market: Emissions
20/10/23

North Dakota regulators will soon reconsider the once-rejected Midwest Carbon Express CO2 Pipeline Project, but opposition remains for the $5.5bn carbon dioxide (CO2) transport and storage project in the state and beyond.

Summit Carbon Solutions wants to link CO2-producing ethanol plants in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota to underground storage north of Bismarck, North Dakota, via a 2,000 mile (3,218km) pipeline system. The project could store up to 12mn tons of CO2 annually, according to the developers.

The scope of the project has required a considerable amount of public and landowner consultation for Summit which has encountered resistance in several jurisdictions. Summit's original application in North Dakota was rejected on 4 August, with the North Dakota Public Service Commission (PSC) citing Summit's unresponsiveness to "outstanding legitimate impacts" by concerned landowners. At issue were eminent domain, safety, property valuation and CO2 sequestration storage policy concerns, among others in the application that was filed in October 2022.

Summit on 18 August filed a revised permit application with several changes including reroutes, reducing the width of the project's corridor and workarounds with several key landowners. The PSC agreed to rehear the application, but a hearing date for the Iowa-based company to make its case is still to be decided, as another motion on another issue by Summit has yet to be argued.

That issue is outlined in a 29 September request by Summit to the PSC to supersede and preempt ordinances in two counties, Burleigh and Emmons, that it says conflict with both state law relating to carbon sequestration and the federal Pipeline Safety Act. Opponents of the project, led by former Bismarck mayor John Warford, say the request should not be entertained because the project has not even been approved.

"Summit's latest effort to waste the Commission's and the parties' resources should not be rewarded, and the motion can and should be denied on this basis alone," the opposition group, the Bismarck Area Intervenors, wrote in a 12 October letter to the PSC.

Summit has also not demonstrated how existing county ordinances prevent the company from building the pipeline, according to the coalition that also includes two prominent Bismarck-based property developers.

The Laborers District Council of Minnesota and North Dakota, a union representing about 13,000 workers, said it supports Summit's request to supersede and preempt the county ordinances, saying "regulatory patchwork from one jurisdiction to another" deters investment and complicates development.

The PSC on 16 October motioned to set a hearing date for Summit's ordinance request, but that, along with a date for the rehearing of Summit's permit application, has yet to be decided.

The North Dakota PSC this week also said it needed more information from Summit, asking for detailed maps, easements granted by county, number of suppliers signed up to utilize the proposed pipeline, among other items. Summit has until the end of the month to provide these details.

South Dakota last month denied Summit's permit application for the pipeline in that state for failing to work with counties and their ordinances. Another CO2 pipeline and storage project, the Heartland Greenway pipeline, was cancelled today because of ongoing regulatory challenges, citing in part a denied permit in South Dakota.

Minnesota and Iowa are still going through the hearing process for parts of the Summit project there, with landowners in each state voicing concern over the project.

By Brett Holmes

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

08/04/25

Singapore, Chile sign Article 6 carbon credit deal

Singapore, 8 April (Argus) — Singapore and Chile signed an implementation agreement on 7 April to collaborate on carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The countries will begin the ratification process and operationalise the agreement following the signing, according to Singapore's Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI). The collaboration will involve financing towards unlocking additional mitigation potential in Chile, and "will help Singapore to meet our climate target while bringing climate investments into Chile," said Singapore's minister for sustainability and the environment, Grace Fu. The implementation agreement sets up a framework for the generation and transfer of carbon credits from carbon mitigation projects under Article 6. More information on the authorisation process for the carbon credit projects and eligible carbon crediting methodologies will be published in due course, according to the MTI. Carbon credits traded under Article 6 count towards the buyer's nationally determined contribution (NDC). Singapore submitted its new emissions reduction target in February, aiming to reduce emissions to 45mn-50mn t of CO2 equivalent in 2035 as part of its NDC. This is Singapore's second deal with a Latin American country, following an agreement signed on 1 April with Peru . Singapore has signed similar agreements with Papua New Guinea, Ghana and Bhutan. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Oil companies far from Paris accord alignment: Report

08/04/25

News

08/04/25

Oil companies far from Paris accord alignment: Report

London, 8 April (Argus) — None of the 30 oil and gas producers assessed are close to being in line with Paris climate agreement targets "and some have regressed", a report from think-tank Carbon Tracker found today. Carbon Tracker flagged "backsliding, particularly around oil and gas production plans" from the producers assessed in its report, Paris Maligned III . The think-tank assessed 30 of the largest producers — a mixture of corporations and national oil companies — against six metrics. These included production plans, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets and methane reduction targets. It did not assess producers based in countries subject to international sanctions. "Almost all producers are planning to increase oil and gas production in the coming years… Such growth plans are at odds with the Paris Agreement's 1.5˚C target and many are incompatible with a below 2˚C scenario", the report found. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — seen as the overarching consensus on climate science — notes that a substantial reduction in fossil fuels is needed in order to reach climate goals. The Paris agreement seeks to limit the rise in global temperatures to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels and preferably to 1.5°C. The only producers assessed that are not planning to increase production are London-listed independent Harbour Energy and Spain's Repsol, Carbon Tracker found. Carbon Tracker ranked Repsol highest overall for alignment with Paris agreement goals and Harbour Energy in second place. European companies were ranked more highly in line with Paris goals, with seven of the top 10 places. Three state-owned oil companies — Mexico's Pemex, Algeria's Sonatrach and Kuwait's KPC — and US firms ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips took the five lowest places in the ranking table. "Despite some political and market headwinds, investor engagement on climate risk remains strong, particularly in Europe", the report noted. Carbon Tracker this year scored companies on the extent to which they planned to cut methane emissions — specifically "near-zero methane by 2030" across upstream activities and "midstream gas assets where applicable", it said. This is in line with the decarbonisation charter which many of the companies assessed signed up to at the UN Cop 28 climate summit in December 2023. Companies' methane reduction plans "are typically more climate-aligned than their overall GHG targets", the report found. But "there is still considerable room for improvement because significant sources of methane emissions are overlooked", it added. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

USDA to release paused funds for higher biofuel blends

04/04/25

News

04/04/25

USDA to release paused funds for higher biofuel blends

New York, 4 April (Argus) — The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) said this week that the agency would release $537mn for 543 projects meant to expand infrastructure for higher biofuel blends, reviving many projects that were funded by former US president Joe Biden and then paused by the new administration. The grants will help support the installation of biofuel storage tanks and dispensers of higher ethanol blends, including E15 and E85, and higher biodiesel blends, including B20 and B99. They come from the Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program, which started during US president Donald Trump's first term to help reduce the cost of installing biofuel infrastructure but was more recently expanded in scope with new funds from the Inflation Reduction Act. Project funding had been stalled after Trump pressed federal agencies to pause the disbursement of funds appropriated by that 2022 climate law. That directive affected projects due for funding under the higher blends program, including some approved in the final days of the Biden administration. Trump's efforts to freeze legislatively-approved funding is the subject of multiple court cases. USDA said that of the 543 projects approved for support, 188 projects — amounting to nearly $260mn of spending — were new commitments under the Trump administration. The largest of the new projects is a $14.3mn grant for QuikTrip to install E15 and B20 dispensers at 75 fueling stations across 13 states. More projects received funds in California than in any other state. USDA said releasing the funds — at the same time as various other government programs remain on hold — is part of its commitment to "aggressively exploring ways to unleash American energy and incentivize the production and use of homegrown US biofuels." Biofuel groups see potential for supportive policy under the Trump administration and lobbied US officials at a meeting this week for a steep increase in biomass-based diesel blend mandates. Ethanol lobbyists are privately optimistic too that the administration will soon start issuing emergency waivers to bypass typical summertime limits on nationwide E15 access. Support for biofuels is one way the Trump administration could reduce the toll on US farmers from an increasingly volatile trade war that threatens to cut off export markets for US corn and soy. USDA noted that the higher blends program, by allowing for more ethanol and biodiesel consumption, "protects American farmers from retaliatory trade practices." By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU sees no credibility issue in 2040 GHG target delay

04/04/25

News

04/04/25

EU sees no credibility issue in 2040 GHG target delay

Brussels, 4 April (Argus) — The lack of a proposal for a 2040 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target is not a credibility issue for the European Commission, officials said. The commission will have an "ambitious" 2040 GHG proposal in time to derive a 2035 climate plan for the EU "well in time" for the UN Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil, over 10-21 November. The commission was expected to make a legislative proposal for a 2040 EU climate target no later than six months after the conclusion of the first global stocktake under the Paris climate agreement, which concluded at Cop 28 in December 2023, as per the bloc's European Climate Law. The process is "quite late nationally and also globally", the commission acknowledged. But officials insist that the update to the climate law, setting a 2040 GHG target, will come "well in time" for the Cop process. The EU will then derive its nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris deal for 2035 from 2040. The official deadline for parties to submit their updated NDC was 10 February, but only 12 countries made timely submissions. "The credibility issue is much less to do with the agenda now," climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen said. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has made "very, very clear" that the commission is preparing for an "ambitious climate law". "Ninety per cent is currently in the political guidelines," Itkonen said. "It is the starting point for these discussions," she added, underlining the extreme importance of presenting a 2040 proposal that has a "substantial majority". Another EU source noted that the commission is discussing various options and scenarios with EU member states and the European Parliament. "We want to keep the ambition as high as possible. So our starting point of discussion is 90pc," the source said. Discussion of 2040 flexibility — such as following a weaker trajectory toward climate neutrality, or using international credits — would have "severely negative" implications for the EU's standing in international climate action, NGO Bellona Europa's senior manager for carbon accounting, Mark Preston Aragones, said. "The commission should not come with an already watered-down proposal even before negotiations formally begin with the European Parliament and EU member states," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports

03/04/25

News

03/04/25

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports

New York, 3 April (Argus) — New US tariffs on nearly all foreign products could deter further imports of beef tallow, a fast-rising biofuel feedstock and food ingredient that had until now largely evaded President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape global trade. Tallow was the most used feedstock for US biomass-based diesel production in January for the first month ever, with consumption by pound rising month to month despite sharp declines in actual biorefining and in use of competing feedstocks. The beef byproduct benefits from US policies, including a new federal tax credit known as "45Z", that offer greater subsidies to fuel derived from waste than fuel derived from first-generation crops. Much of that tallow is sourced domestically, but the US also imported more than 880,000t of tallow last year, up 29pc from just two years earlier. The majority of those imports last year came from Brazil, which until now has faced a small 0.43¢/kg (19.5¢/lb) tariff, and from Australia, which was exempt from any tallow-specific tariffs under a free trade agreement with US. But starting on 5 April, both countries will be subject to at least the new 10pc charge on foreign imports. There are some carveouts from tariffs for certain energy products, but animal fats are not included. Some other major suppliers — like Argentina, Uruguay, and New Zealand — will soon have new tariffs in place too, although tallow from Canada is for now unaffected because it is covered by the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Brazil tallow shipments to the US totaled around 300,000t in 2024, marking an all-time high, but tallow shipments during the fourth quarter of 2024 fell under the 2023 levels as uncertainty about future tax policy slowed buying interest. Feedstock demand in general in the US has remained muted to start this year because of poor biofuel production margins, and that has extended to global tallow flows. Tallow suppliers in Brazil for instance were already experiencing decreased interest from US producers before tariffs. Brazil tallow prices for export last closed at $1,080/t on 28 March, rising about 4pc year-to-date amid support from the 45Z guidance and aid from Brazil's growing biodiesel industry, which is paying a hefty premium for tallow compared to exports. While the large majority of Brazilian tallow exports end up in the US, Australian suppliers have more flexibility and could send more volume to Singapore instead if tariffs deter US buyers. Export prices out of Australia peaked this year at $1,185/t on 4 March but have since trended lower to last close at $1,050/t on 1 April. In general, market participants say international tallow suppliers would have to drop offers to keep trade flows intact. Other policy shifts affect flows Even as US farm groups clamored for more muscular foreign feedstock limits over much of the last year, tallow had until now largely dodged any significant restrictions. Recent US guidance around 45Z treats all tallow, whether produced in the US or shipped long distances to reach the US, the same. Other foreign feedstocks were treated more harshly, with the same guidance providing no pathway at all for road fuels from foreign used cooking oil and also pinning the carbon intensity of canola oil — largely from Canada — as generally too high to claim any subsidy. But tariffs on major suppliers of tallow to the US, and the threat of additional charges if countries retaliate, could give refiners pause. Demand could rise for domestic animal fats or alternatively for domestic vegetable oils that can also be refined into fuel, especially if retaliatory tariffs cut off global markets for US farm products like soybean oil. There is also risk if Republicans in the Trump administration or Congress reshape rules around 45Z to penalize foreign feedstocks. At the same time, a minimum 10pc charge for tallow outside North America is a more manageable price to pay compared to other feedstocks — including a collection of charges amounting to a possible 69.5pc tax on Chinese used cooking oil. And if the US sets biofuel blend mandates as high as some oil and farm groups are pushing , strong demand could leave producers with little choice but to continue importing at least some feedstock from abroad to continue making fuel. Not all US renewable diesel producers will be equally impacted by tariffs either. Diamond Green Diesel operates Gulf Coast biorefineries in foreign-trade zones, which allow companies to avoid tariffs on foreign inputs for products that are ultimately exported. Biofuel producers in these zones could theoretically refine foreign tallow, claim a 45Z subsidy, and avoid feedstock tariffs as long as they ship the fuel abroad. Jurisdictions like the EU and UK, where sustainable aviation fuel mandates took effect this year, are attractive destinations. And there is still strong demand from the US food sector, with edible tallow prices in Chicago up 18pc so far this year. Trump allies, including his top health official, have pushed tallow as an alternative to seed oils. By Cole Martin and Jamuna Gautam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more