Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Competition, lower costs escalate China's EV price war

  • Market: Battery materials, Metals
  • 03/04/24

Chinese electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers have escalated a price war over the past couple of months, mainly prompted by intensifying market competition and falling battery manufacturing costs, according to market participants.

Chinese EV producer Nio, whose sales surged by 31pc year-on-year to 160,000 units in 2023, on 1 April began offering a 1bn yuan ($138mn) package of subsidies to encourage gas-fuelled car owners to trade in their cars for a Nio-produced EV. Fellow automaker Chery on the same day also announced a "10bn yuan subsidy" campaign to offer discounts, coupons and purchase tax credits to car buyers.

Nio, founded in 2014, took the lead in adopting an aggressive money-burning strategy to expand its share in the Chinese new energy vehicle (NEV) market, to take advantage of the country's ambitions to accelerate vehicle electrification. The strategy proved to be unsustainable and the firm faced financial issues around late 2019 when it had accumulated a loss of Yn26bn. This forced Nio to look for investors, and it received Yn7bn from the Hefei municipal government in April 2020.

These promotion campaigns are in response to a plan introduced by the Chinese government in early March to promote the replacement of industrial equipment and consumer goods through large-scale trade-ins, as part of Beijing's efforts to meet its economic growth target. China in early March set this year's economic growth target at 5pc, stable from the previous year's target, but lower than the actual growth of 5.2pc achieved in 2023.

The automakers' promotion campaigns are adding fuel to the flames of competition in the Chinese EV market. China's largest EV producer BYD has reduced prices by as much as Yn20,000/unit for some NEV models to boost sales after the 10-17 February lunar new year holiday, with many of its domestic NEV counterparts, including SAIC GM-Wuling, Neta, X-Peng and Zeekr, following suit by cutting vehicle prices to attract orders.

China has led global EV sales over the past decade, driven by its 2030 and 2060 decarbonisation targets, but the Chinese EV market is facing a higher risk of overcapacity given an increasing number of new participants in the industry, which are called "new car-building forces" in China. There are more than 20 of such companies, with the major ones being Li Auto, X-Peng, Nio, AITO, Leapmotor, Zeekr and Xiaomi.

Chinese technology firm Xiaomi, which designs and manufactures consumer electronics and home appliances, on 28 March launched its first EV model, the Xiaomi SU7, a battery electric full-sized sedan, that marked the firm's entry into China's fiercely competitive EV market. Xiaomi adjusted the debut prices for the SU7 down by more than Yn20,000 at the last minute, in view of the ongoing price war.

Domestic EV manufacturers' promotions are also part of their efforts to compete with vehicles running on fossil fuels, as EVs have not yet gained dominance in the Chinese automotive market, despite increased consumer adoption in recent years. A lack of public charging facilities is the main reason for consumers' dissatisfaction with EVs, especially in the country's third- and fourth-tier cities, as well as rural areas.

The competition between internal combustion engine vehicles and EVs is expected to continue in the longer term. China's growing sales of NEVs — mostly battery electric vehicles — are eliminating gasoline demand by 25,000 b/d, according to Argus estimates. BYD last month unveiled a forecast that China's NEV penetration in weekly sales is likely to exceed 50pc in the coming three months.

Falling battery manufacturing costs resulting from lower feedstock prices have created room for EV manufacturers to make price concessions. Argus-assessed costs for battery cathode active material lithium iron phosphate have fallen by nearly 80pc from November 2022 when lithium feedstock prices hit a record high, to $13.95/kwh currently. Continuous output expansions at Chinese lithium refineries and overseas mining firms have outweighed demand growth from the EV battery segment, causing lithium feedstock prices to fall significantly over the same period. Argus-assessed prices for key battery feedstock lithium carbonate decreased by 80pc to Yn109,500-113,500/t ex-works over the same period.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/04/25

US manufacturing contracts in March: ISM

US manufacturing contracts in March: ISM

Houston, 1 April (Argus) — Economic activity in the US manufacturing sector fell back into contraction in March after a brief expansion as businesses braced for US president Donald Trump's threatened tariffs on imports. The manufacturing purchasing managers' index fell to 49 in March, down from the 50.3 in February, the Institute for Supply Management reported Tuesday. That followed three months of expansion — above the breakeven threshold of 50 — following 26 months of contraction. The new orders index contracted for a second month in a row, falling to 45.2, down by 3.4 points from the prior month. Production fell to 48.3 from 50.7. New export orders fell to 49.6 in March from 51.4 the prior month. "Demand and production retreated and destaffing continued, as panelists' companies responded to demand confusion," ISM said. "Prices growth accelerated due to tariffs, causing new order placement backlogs, supplier delivery slowdowns and manufacturing inventory growth." The prices index surged to 69.4, up from 62.4 in February and the highest since mid-2022. Employment fell by 2.9 points to 47.6. The supplier delivery index fell by 1 point to 53.5, indicating ongoing slowing in deliveries and slowing demand. Trump plans to unveil sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs on major foreign trade partners on 2 April after previewing or announcing multiple tariff actions since taking office, including a 20pc tariff on all imports from China and a 25pc tax on all imported steel and aluminum that both took effect last month. Trump last month also announced a 25pc tariff on all imported cars, trucks and auto parts, scheduled to go into effect on 3 April. The measures, together with mass federal government layoffs and spending cuts, spooked US equity markets, which last month posted heavy losses. Comments focus on tariff confusion Comments from survey participants highlighted uncertainty over how Trump's tariff plans would effect operations and the economy. "Acute shortages continue to impact supply chain continuity," a transportation equipment executive said. "Chinese restrictions on critical minerals such as germanium have caused major shortages, resulting in all supply needed in 2025 already assumed — and, not surprisingly, significant price increases as a result." "Customers are pulling in orders due to anxiety about continued tariffs and pricing pressures," according to a computer and electronic products executive. "Business condition is deteriorating at a fast pace," a machinery executive commented. "Tariffs and economic uncertainty are making the current business environment challenging." "New order levels have increased and are better than expected," a fabricated metals executive said. "We suspect that our customers are trying to build inventory at current prices to get ahead of expected tariff and related cost increases." By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal


01/04/25
News
01/04/25

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal

Brussels, 1 April (Argus) — The European Commission has published the long-awaited proposal to give automobile manufacturers more flexibility in complying with the bloc's CO2 reduction targets for cars and passenger vehicles in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Those three years would be assessed jointly, rather than annually, averaging out fleet emission performance. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the additional compliance flexibility shows that the commission has "listened" but the EU is still maintaining its zero-emission targets [for new vehicles from 2035]. "Predictability in the sector is crucial for long-term investments," said Hoekstra. The commission urged the European Parliament and EU member states to reach agreement on the targeted amendment "without delay". German centre-right member Jens Gieseke said there is a "broad majority" in parliament to fast-track approval for May. He noted that the car industry faces over €15bn ($16bn) in penalties for non-compliance with the CO2 standards. A member of parliament's largest EPP group, Gieseke also called for the commission to go further towards technological neutrality. "We need different kinds of fuels, e-fuels, biofuels, every fuel which could help to reduce CO2 should be recognized," he added. This second step, withdrawing the phase-out of internal combustion engines (ICE) from 2035 onwards, Gieseke noted, should come in the last quarter of 2025. German Green MEP Michael Bloss disputed the figure of €15bn in potential fines put forward by automotive industry association ACEA. "Even in the worst-case scenario, the total fines for all car manufacturers would not exceed €1bn," said Bloss. "Car manufacturers have had enough time to adjust their production planning. Many have done so," Bloss said, pointing to Automaker Volvo. Under the current 2019 regulation, fines should be imposed on manufacturers for each year in 2025–2029 when they do not reach their specific fleet-wide target CO2 reductions, compared to 2021 values. But manufacturers have the option to form compliance pools with other firms. "European car manufacturers are already talking to Tesla or Chinese manufacturers about so-called pooling, which must be stopped quickly," said EPP climate and environment spokesman Peter Liese. "We want to maintain climate targets, but not make Elon Musk richer through European legislation," said Liese. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ArcelorMittal raises NW EU HRC offer to €700/t


01/04/25
News
01/04/25

ArcelorMittal raises NW EU HRC offer to €700/t

London, 1 April (Argus) — European market leader ArcelorMittal has raised its hot-rolled coil (HRC) offer to €700/t base in the north. Its previous offer was €680/t base. The producer recently has seen an increase in enquiries and bookings, aided by the steel safeguard review. This trend has been most prevalent on HRC in the north, as well as cold-rolled and hot-dip galvanised across Europe. European mills have been in no rush to sell, with delivery performances under pressure from some as a result of low utilisation rates and issues at some producers causing backlogs. At the same time, mills expect import arrivals to fall in the coming months, although there could be some overhang this quota period, after the safeguard review and imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on Egypt, Japan and Vietnam. In the futures market today, a fourth-quarter strip traded at €670/t, broadly in line with the settlement on 31 March. The physical market is largely quiet, as participants wait to see how much material clears today and what tariffs are announced by US president Donald Trump. North EU mill margins have nearly reached a year-long high in recent days, with the spread for NW EU HRC over blast furnace costs having reached €181/ on 31 March, the highest level since €189/t on 5 April. By Colin Richardson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU stainless safeguards, metal plan meet mixed reaction


31/03/25
News
31/03/25

EU stainless safeguards, metal plan meet mixed reaction

London, 31 March (Argus) — Europe's stainless steel industry has had a mixed reaction to the European Commission's safeguard steel review and its action plan to protect the bloc's metals industry, both announced on 11 March. Steelmakers have welcomed greater commitment from policy makers to support the sector, but are still concerned at a lack of concrete commitment to significant protectionist measures, while traders, service centres and scrap suppliers are worried the most radical proposals could severely damage their businesses. The European Commission's review of definitive safeguard measures on imports of certain steel products identified no new import pressure for stainless cold rolled sheets and strips, and left tariff rate quotas for the next 15 months virtually unchanged even as carryovers and unused quota access were removed. And the commission's European Steel and Metals Action Plan included proposals to curb imports of finished steel and exports of scrap alongside the extension of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to potentially include raw material exports and downstream products. European stainless steel flat producers — battling weak medium-term demand and a high cost structure — expressed disappointment on the absence of protectionism in the safeguard review through to July 2026, but told Argus they were encouraged by proposals in the Action Plan that acknowledge the need to to curb imports for domestic industry's long term health. "The industry remains threatened by global excess capacities and by global distortions from China and other countries that artificially support their domestic industries or circumvent the current measures," Finnish producer Outokumpu told Argus . "These challenges need to be mitigated with more assertive solutions, including replacing current safeguards with more effective measures from July 2026." European trading groups surveyed by Argus welcomed the stability offered by the unchanged import quotas as the industry navigates other pressures — such as high energy prices and US tariffs — but said they expect lobbying by producers to drive a wave of new measures in the fourth quarter of this year, with stainless steel-specific safeguards likely to be implemented from next year. "Current quotas will only last this year, if you ask me," a trader said. "We expect new regulation to be announced in September/October." A key area of focus for the industry is the possible introduction of the melt-and-pour clause, which determines the origin of goods by the location at which the metal is originally melted, and disregards third countries where further processing may take place for circumvention of anti-dumping duties. The EU stopped short of immediately implementing this clause as part of the Action Plan, and will conduct further assessment of the action. But market participants expect [consultation](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2670486] on the policy will start after the current safeguard period ends. Several large European stainless steel producers are heard to be importing slab from Asia, and traders told Argus they were relieved that melt and pour is not coming into play this year. A Spanish trader said the clause will level the playing field for European producers, but a hasty implementation this year would have simply added to costs for both producers and consumers in the near term. Outokumpu said it welcomes the melt-and-pour proposals as part of a wider anti-circumvention drive that it said is required in Europe. The EU's Action Plan also calls for the need to address carbon leakage of exported steel through a potential extension of the CBAM to include exports. Trading groups told Argus this will be difficult to implement across the spectrum of trading partners, and may render exports uncompetitive to the detriment of European service centre groups. Outokumpu called upon the need to leverage the EU's competitive advantage by including Scope 2 emissions within any CBAM regulation for downstream products. "It is critical to prevent European steel producers from being placed at a disadvantage from imports with higher emissions from energy usage," the group said. "Outokumpu uses low-carbon energy across its operations with a high-recycling rate, so a fair benchmark definition is necessary to ensure that our low-emission production receives the competitive advantage it deserves." The EU's action plan also proposes the potential introduction of export duties for all steel scrap in order to limit scrap leakage from the bloc. Stainless steel scrap traders surveyed by Argus said there was no chance such a move would ever be implemented as Europe simply cannot consume all the scrap it produces, and that recyclers use exports to keep prices at a level that encourages further investment. "We would drown in scrap if exports fell," a trader said. "Prices would decrease sharply and work like a subsidiary for an antique industry. High-end recycling plants need high prices to process complex materials which would end up in landfill otherwise. No investments would be made if prices are pushed into the ground." Trade bodies BIR and EuRIC suggested a more rational move could be to introduce mandatory recycled content targets for metals products that incentivises domestic demand and usage for scrap, while also allowing scrap to move freely to export markets. By Raghav Jain Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US consumer confidence down on policy angst


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

US consumer confidence down on policy angst

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — The University of Michigan's gauge of consumer sentiment fell in March to the lowest level since November 2022, led by a slump in expectations over the "potential for pain" from US economic policies introduced by the new administration. Sentiment fell to 57, down from 64.7 in February and 79.4 in March 2024, according to the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey released Friday. The final reading for March was lower than the preliminary reading. The sentiment index fell to a record low of 50 in June 2022 on inflation concerns. The index of consumer expectations fell to 52.6, the lowest since July 2022, from 64 in February and 77.4 in March last year. The expectations index has lost more than 30pc since November last year. "Consumers continue to worry about the potential for pain amid ongoing economic policy developments," the survey director Joanne Hsu said. The decline "reflects a clear consensus across all demographic and political affiliations: Republicans joined independents and Democrats in expressing worsening expectations … for their personal finances, business conditions, unemployment and inflation," Hsu said. Current economic conditions slipped to 63.8 in March from 65.7 in February and 82.5 last March. Two thirds of consumers expect unemployment to rise in the year ahead, the highest reading since 2009. Year-ahead inflation expectations jumped to 5pc this month, the highest reading since November 2022, from 4.3pc last month. The University of Michigan survey comes three days after The Conference Board's preliminary Consumer Expectations Index fell in March to its lowest in 12 years, to below a threshold that "usually signals" a recession. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more