Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Iran rebukes G7 over nuclear warning: Update

  • Market: Crude oil, Electricity
  • 17/06/24

Adds quotes from IAEA director general

Iran's foreign ministry has called on the G7 to distance itself from "destructive policies of the past" after the group issued a statement condemning Tehran's recent nuclear programme escalation.

"Unfortunately, some countries, driven by political motives and by resorting to baseless and unproven claims, attempt to continue their failed and ineffective policy of imposing and maintaining sanctions against the Iranian nation," the foreign ministry's spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said on 16 June. Kanaani advised the G7 "to learn from past experiences and distance itself from destructive past policies".

His comments were in response to a joint statement from G7 leaders on 14 June warning Iran against advancing its nuclear enrichment programme. The leaders said they would be ready to enforce new measures if Tehran were to transfer ballistic missiles to Russia.

The G7's reference to Iran comes on the heels of a new resolution passed by the board of governors of the UN's nuclear watchdog the IAEA. The resolution calls on Iran to step up co-operation and reverse its decision to restrict the agency access to nuclear facilities by de-designating inspectors.

Kanaani said "any attempt to link the war in Ukraine to the bilateral co-operation between Iran and Russia is an act with only biased political goals", adding that some countries are "resorting to false claims to continue sanctions" against Iran.

Tehran will continue its "constructive interaction and technical co-operation" with the IAEA, Kanaani said. But the agency's resolution is "politically biased", he said.

Not an "anti-Iran" policy

In an interview with the Russian daily newspaper Izvestia published today, IAEA director general Rafael Grossi refused claims of political bias.

"We do co-operate with Iran. I don't deny this. This is important for inspection. My Iranian colleagues often say that Iran is the most inspected country in the world. Well, it is, and for good reason. But this is not enough," Grossi said, adding that the IAEA does not adhere to an "anti-Iran policy".

Grossi also stressed the need for countries to return to diplomacy with Iran, while expressing concerns over the expansion of its nuclear programme.

"Russia plays a very important role in this diplomacy, trying to keep the Iranian programme within a predictable and peaceful framework. But again, everything needs to be controlled," he said.

The IAEA's new resolution and the reference to Iran in the G7 statement could be the start of a more concerted effort to raise pressure on Tehran over its nuclear programme.

"What is happening right now is the process of accumulation of resolutions, so that when the day comes and the IAEA makes a referral to the UN Security Council, there will be enough resolutions to make a case for action at the security council level," a diplomatic source told Argus.

Iran is enriching uranium to as high as 60pc purity. Near 90pc is considered to be weapons grade, according to the IAEA.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
24/02/25

Italy's Saipem to merge with Norway's Subsea 7

Italy's Saipem to merge with Norway's Subsea 7

London, 24 February (Argus) — Italy's Saipem and Norway's Subsea 7 have agreed to merge, creating a global energy services company with revenues of around €20bn/yr ($21bn/yr) and an order backlog of €43bn. The move is designed to create the scale to tackle large and complex energy projects focused on engineering and construction (E&C) but also on energy transition projects such as wind and carbon capture. Saipem held talks with Subsea 7 over a possible tie-up several years ago but failed to reach an agreement. "The combination will give us a scale that is more in harmony with the magnitude of the projects in offshore energy for oil and gas and renewables industries," said Kristian Siem, chairman of Subsea 7. Under the merger, Subsea 7 will be folded into its Italian rival, with shareholders of the Norwegian company receiving 6.688 Saipem shares for each share they own, along with an extraordinary dividend of €450mn. Each set of shareholders will hold 50pc of the new company on completion. Saipem's largest shareholders — oil and gas firm Eni and state lender CDP — and Subsea 7's largest shareholder Siem Industries have all entered into a separate agreement to support the deal. The new company, Saipem 7, will have a fleet of more than 60 vessels which management says will give it the flexibility to better respond to client requests. "The new company is very, very much an offshore E&C company," said Subsea 7 chief executive John Evans, noting that over 80pc of its operating income comes from this segment. "The two fleets are very compatible and complementary and will allow clients to have a single global service provider to provide everything from ultra-shallow water in the Middle East to ultra-deep in some of the newer provinces," he said. Asked if the new company would be asset light by leasing more of its vessels, Evans said the model of combining older company-owned ships and leased units would continue. "You have to remember that with our backlogs we will be very busy for the next 2-3 years," he said. The merger is expected to generate annual synergies of around €300m in the third year after completion, driven in large part by fleet optimisation and procurement. It is scheduled to close in the second half of 2026 with a binding merger agreement expected mid-2025. Saipem 7 will be listed in both Milan and Oslo and will be headquartered in Milan, although the offshore E&C business will be run as a separate business based in London. Saipem chief executive Alessandro Puliti, who will take over the role of chief executive at Saipem 7, said any decision to spin off the offshore E&C division at a later stage would be evaluated on an opportunistic basis. Puliti said the new company is expected to pay a dividend of at least 40pc of free cash flow after repayment of lease liabilities. By Stephen Jewkes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Grangemouth refinery site to get $253mn in public funds


24/02/25
News
24/02/25

Grangemouth refinery site to get $253mn in public funds

Edinburgh, 24 February (Argus) — The UK government has committed £200mn ($253mn) for investment in clean energy for the site where UK-Chinese firm Petroineos' 150,000 b/d Grangemouth refinery, due to be permanently shut this year, is located. The government said on 23 February that it will work alongside private sector partners to develop new industries and leverage additional funding through the £200mn in public investment allocated from the UK's National Wealth Fund (NWF). The NWF was set up last year by the government to support investment in clean energy industries and mobilise private sector involvement across the UK. "The funding will be available for co-investment with the private sector to help unlock Grangemouth's full potential and secure our clean energy future," UK prime minister Keir Starmer said. Petroineos is planning to close the Grangemouth refinery in Scotland, this year and turn it into an import terminal because of high costs and declining fuel demand in Europe. Refineries in Europe have long faced competitiveness issues from larger and newer refineries in other regions including the Mideast Gulf, Asia-Pacific and Africa. Around 30 refineries have closed in Europe since 2000, while 2.5mn b/d of crude distillation capacity was added outside the region in the past three years alone. Only around 65 workers will be retained by Petroineos to run the terminal once the Grangemouth refinery closes. The government committed to provide a training guarantee for the staff at the refinery to gain new skills at local colleges. UK union Unite welcomed the announcement, saying that the "significant investment should be the start of a real industrial plan for Grangemouth that both safeguards Scotland's energy security and delivers the jobs of the future." But the union warned that clear timescales for the development of Grangemouth and details on jobs were needed. Unite is supporting the conversion of the refinery into a biorefinery for the production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Petroineos said last year that it did not deem the refinery conversion viable, after having considered it. The firm did not immediately reply to a request for comment following the release of the new government funding. The UK government announcement comes after Scotland's first minister John Swinney committed to allocate £25mn from the proceeds of the Scottish offshore wind leasing round ScotWind to establish a just transition fund for Grangemouth. "The aim is to expedite any of the potential solutions that will be set out in the Project Willow report, as well as other proposals that will give Grangemouth a secure and sustainable future," he said last week. Project Willow is a feasibility study commissioned by the UK and Scottish governments to identify long-term industrial options for the site. The report is due to be released this spring. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Republicans target US energy rules for disapproval


21/02/25
News
21/02/25

Republicans target US energy rules for disapproval

Washington, 21 February (Argus) — Republican leaders in the US House of Representatives hope to disapprove at least seven energy-related measures issued under former president Joe Biden using a filibuster-proof process created under the Congressional Review Act. House majority leader Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana) on Thursday released a list of 10 rules that his party has prioritized as "potential targets" for disapproval votes, which require only a simple majority to pass in each chamber. Republicans previously used the law in 2017 to successfully unwind more than a dozen rules, and they hope to do so again to repeal Biden-era rules they say will unnecessarily raise costs on businesses and consumers. A US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation that implements a $900/t charge on oil and gas sector methane leaks is among the rules that Republicans want to disapprove. If those implementing rules are scrapped, it would provide a temporary reprieve from a 31 August deadline for operators having to pay billions of dollars in potential fees on methane emitted in 2024. Republicans hope to vote later this year to permanently end the methane charge, which was created by the Inflation Reduction Act. House Republicans also hope to disapprove an offshore oil and gas safety rule for drilling in deepwater "high pressure, high temperature" environments that Scalise's office says will increase "burdens on energy operations". Other rules that Republicans will target for disapproval are energy conservation for gas water heaters, energy efficiency labeling standards and air pollution restrictions on rubber tire manufactures. Two of the energy measures House Republicans say they plan to target might not qualify for disapproval under the Congressional Review Act, which can only be used on a "rule". The first is a waiver that would allow California to boost in-state sales of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, and that President Donald Trump's administration has tried to make eligible for repeal. The second is the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission's decision to release voluntary guidance for exchanges that allow trading of carbon offset futures. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German power industry split on capacity market design


21/02/25
News
21/02/25

German power industry split on capacity market design

London, 21 February (Argus) — Stakeholders in the German power market are divided on how best to implement a capacity market in Germany, or whether it is needed at all, Argus heard on the sidelines of the E-World conference in Essen last week. Instead of entertaining the "misleading" debate over centralised versus decentralised mechanisms, in which the government tries to "delegate accountability for security of supply", what is really needed is "centralised accountability with decentralised assets", Stefan Joerg-Goebel, senior vice-president for Germany at utility Statkraft, said. "The market should be centrally organised but technologies bidding into the market should include, for example, decentralised demand-side response and batteries," he said. But "only the state can really secure supply". Transmission system operator Amprion prefers a centralised capacity segment with a "local component" over the combined capacity market proposal, according to Peter Lopion, consultant in the firm's international regulation management and market development team. He emphasised the importance of knowing "when and where" power plants will come on line. Amprion also stressed that "incentives for grid-serving behaviour" are needed for batteries in particular . In contrast, a decentralised capacity market — not too dissimilar to that of France — is the "best solution" for Germany, although it would first need to adapt to the "German reality", Davide Orifici, director of public and regulatory affairs at energy exchange Epex, said. Such a system would "better help to integrate flexibility" and "further develop demand response", he said, adding that the impression that a centralised system would be simpler is "false". And a decentralised element is "crucial" to "fully leveraging the potential of the demand side", according to Jan Bruebach, managing director at utility MVV. Nevertheless, the addition of the centralised element would add "long-term security" and thus the German energy ministry BMWK's combined proposal is "fine". And while not specifying a particular design, "something at least similar to a capacity market" is important for security of supply and to "provide incentives to hold capacity on stand-by" during periods of low renewable generation, said Andre Jaeger, senior vice-president of product management at trading and risk management firm Ion Commodities. Kerstin Andreae of energy and water association BDEW agreed at a press conference that Germany "needs" the transition to a capacity market. But Peter Reitz, chief executive of energy exchange EEX, does not see the introduction of a capacity market in Germany as being essential. "The same effect can be achieved much more cheaply by introducing the obligation to deliver into the energy-only market," he said, although a decentralised market would "interfere the least with liquidity". And the introduction of a capacity market in Germany would be "costly", Andy Sommer, head of fundamental analysis and modelling at utility Axpo, said. The costs would probably be absorbed by grid operators and the state, and eventually offloaded on to end-consumers, he said. Energy ministry BMWK in August opened a consultation on the country's future power market system, with four options to finance controllable power capacities: a capacity-hedging mechanism through peak price hedging, a decentralised capacity market, a centralised capacity market, and finally, the ministry's preferred option of a "combined capacity market". Despite the deadline for member states to incorporate the EU-mandated electricity market design having passed on 17 January, the design will "probably" be implemented by the next government, BMWK deputy director Andre Poschmann said at an industry event last month . The capacity market question is likely to draw the most political attention after the federal election on 23 February, Joerg-Goebel said, adding that the successful continuation of the coal phase-out — which is currently an "uncomfortable issue" for market participants — can be "fixed" only with new capacity. And without a capacity mechanism, it will be "very difficult" to invest in new peak generation plants, Bruebach said, with Lopion adding that the coal phase-out is "dependent on" new capacity mechanisms. A bidding zone split would harm liquidity And the decision over whether to split Germany into multiple bidding zones remains a concern, with Argus having heard a general consensus that a bidding zone split would negatively affect liquidity in power trading. Larger price zones acting as a "larger mass" are better for liquidity, according to Reitz, citing the German-Austrian bidding zone split and subsequent reduction in Austrian power liquidity. A split would cause "disruption" to the entire market, owing to regulatory changes and the loss in liquidity, agreed Joachim Bertsch, senior business development manager at utility RWE, while Bruebach said it would "crush" liquidity, disadvantage smaller market participants and drive up costs for industries in the south of the country. While BMWK in August rejected the "reconfiguration" of the single German-Luxembourg bidding zone , the "pressure" to introduce multiple bidding zones will intensify if grid expansion does not, according to Joerg-Goebel, while Parasram said he believes "some form of split" will happen. By Bea Leverett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Uruguay eyes oil, gas E&P within energy transition


21/02/25
News
21/02/25

Uruguay eyes oil, gas E&P within energy transition

Montevideo, 21 February (Argus) — Uruguay's state-run Ancap has hopes for an offshore oil or gas discovery, even as the country gears up for its second energy transition. Uruguay has had only three exploratory wells drilled in its history, two in 1976 and one in 2017, and they all came up dry. Companies have completed 13,000 km² of 2D and 41,000 km² of 3D seismic testing this century. Today, its seven offshore blocks have contracts, plans are underway for a new round of seismic testing and one company, US-based APA, wants to spud an exploratory well in its wholly operated block 6 in late 2026 or early 2027. "For the first time in history, we have contracts in place for all the blocks and there is a great deal of interest that resources can be found" in Uruguay, Santiago Ferro, Ancap's energy transition manager, told Argus . A public hearing on seismic testing was held 13 February and the environment ministry is reviewing proposals for permits. Ferro said seismic testing will only be done in areas lacking data. "We want to take advantage of existing information and complement it with new data to encourage drilling," he said. The plan is for approximately 5,000 km² (1,930 mi²) of new seismic testing on two areas — block 1, operated by Chevron and UK-based Challenger Energy Group, and block 4, operated by Shell and APA. The work will likely happen in the final quarter of this year. Ancap's plans will unfold under the new left-wing government of president-elect Yamandu Orsi, who takes office on 1 March. The Oris administration is committed to deepening Uruguay's energy transition. It already has one of the greenest power grids, with 99pc of power coming from renewables, and the Orsi government wants to guarantee electrification of the transportation sector. He will arrive at his inauguration in an elective vehicle as a sign of the government's commitment. The administration wants to decarbonize transportation in 10 years, which will require incentives for vehicles and investment in additional renewable power, principally solar energy. It has not taken a public stand on oil and gas exploration or what it would do if recoverable resources were discovered. By Lucien Chauvin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more