Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: Chevron sees global exploration revival

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 18/11/24

US major Chevron and its peers are taking a more prominent role in global frontier exploration as they push for scale and value in oil and gas output in the face of an uncertain energy transition. Chevron vice-president of global exploration Liz Schwarze spoke to Aydin Calik at the African Energy Week conference in Cape Town, South Africa, earlier this month, Edited highlights follow:

How much of a role do you think exploration will play for Chevron and the wider sector in the next 10 years?

We believe the future of energy is lower carbon, and we're leveraging our strengths to grow energy delivery to an energy-hungry world. We see oil and gas being part of the energy mix for longer, investing to reduce the carbon intensity of our existing operations. Growing our oil and gas for longer, because it's a declining business — as you produce it, you have to replace it.

We replace our resources to underpin our future in three ways. Exploration is one; M&A, buying other companies, is another; and then technology is the third. So think in terms of shale and tight development in the US, with drilling and completions technologies; and the Anchor technology, bringing on the world's first 20k [20,000 lb/inch², ultra-high pressure deepwater] production platform in the Gulf of Mexico. That's technology. It's a new development, but it will help in the long term.

For exploration, at Chevron, we invest in exploring in our existing assets — if we can find new oil and gas pools that we can tie into existing infrastructure, it's a win... it comes on faster, creates a lot of value, leverages existing infrastructure — but we're [also] increasing our investment in more frontier areas, where we can build big, material positions at scale, early and if successful, really build new businesses. That's what you see us doing in places we've added acreage recently, like Brazil and Uruguay. We have the block in Namibia, we're going to drill, and we're in Egypt and so forth. So exploration is a very important part of Chevron's future, and because it's a bit of a long-cycle game, yes, for exploration, 10 years is an easy horizon.

And do you think things might change in terms of what you're exploring for — more oil, more gas?

Oil is relatively straightforward to get to markets, because there's a global market for liquids. If we're going to explore for gas, it'll be in a place that has either an existing market or existing assets to market, for the most part. Sometimes you explore for oil and you find gas. Sometimes search for gas and you find oil — because it's model based particularly in these frontier areas. So, you know, whatever mix we find we have to look at the development scenario for that, so that we can bring as much of that product to market with the highest returns possible for our shareholders.

What are the biggest challenges for explorers today?

We'll focus on the frontier first. Chevron looks at entering a new country or a new basin for exploration, really looking for four things to be there. First, of course, are the rocks — a compelling hypothesis that there are hydrocarbons at commercial scale. Second is a supportive fiscal environment, with which, upon discovery, you'd have the opportunity to create value for everyone. The third is access — the country has to offer a way for an operator like Chevron to enter, whether that's through a competitive bid round or through a direct negotiation; we'll also do farm-ins to other people's acreage. And regular access. That hypothesis of where hydrocarbons are can change through time. Having regular, predictable opportunities to access acreage is important, and it is sometimes a challenge. Some countries have opportunities for a while, and then they'll take things off the market, and then you don't really have another way to invest, and that creates a challenge. And then the fourth consideration is just the overall welcomeness for us to deliver the work programme that we commit to — functioning governmental organisations, all the way from environmental to operational permitting.

Where is the most exciting place to explore at the moment? Are there any new Namibias around the corner?

I hope so! Everywhere we enter, we have a story. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't work. But we've got a well drilling in in Egypt now, so west of the Nile in the Herodotus basin — it's called the Khendjer well. So Egypt, we're excited. Namibia, it's the hot story of the past few years. In the Orange basin, we're in PEL90, and that well will start notionally [on a] December timeframe. Think of a big deepwater exploration well. Think of 90 days as an average. [We are] really very keen to see what our block holds. Certainly, high hopes.

And then we've added new acreage in Brazil, the South Santos and the Pelotas basin, we signed a block last week in Uruguay. And so, you know, some of that geology is what we call conjugate margin in Namibia.

And Angola and Nigeria. There are places in the world that are very successful hydrocarbon provinces that are still under explored and we think have a tremendous potential. And Nigeria deepwater is one. We had a lovely discovery on the Nigeria shelf a few weeks ago — the Meji well. And then we added two blocks in Angola earlier this year, deepwater.

I'm getting a sense, not just from Chevron, that exploration around the world is picking up?

I think this is true across the board. And one of the reasons that you explore is the idea that there's likely a further advantaged barrel relative to some of the existing discoveries. So there are a lot of stranded discoveries — either cost-prohibitive, geopolitically challenged, any number of issues that prevent some of the really big discoveries around the world from coming to market. From an exploration standpoint, if you are able to discover at scale, develop that and then bring it to market, it will be lower in the supply stack from a breakeven perspective. And lower carbon intensity as well from the get go, and it will find a place in the market.

On Namibia, what we have heard from some other operators is high gas content. This might make it more challenging. Have you thought about that?

So when we're thinking about entering a new basin, and then when we're thinking about drilling the well, before we make those investments, we're always thinking about what the development scenario might look like. Because we've got to test that development scenario against our range of resource outcomes and test, you know, whether it's going to be economically viable. Or how would we make it economically viable?

So for Namibia, we have considered, what would you do at various gas contents? The first, simplest, development is that you bring your production flow to your FPSO, compress the gas and reinject it. You can do that, given the resource volumes at a commercial outcome, Over time, I think it'll be interesting to see if there's a broader-basin scale gas solution that comes to bear, whether that's pipe to shore or LNG. It depends on the GOR [gas-oil ratio] and then it'll depend upon the gas terms that the government provides.

In the eastern Mediterranean, is Egypt your main exploration prospect?

Our focus is Egypt for exploration. When we go into an area like Egypt, we try to pick something at scale, and then high-grade from there. And so you relinquish the leases that, with additional data, don't look as prospective as the other ones. Right now, our focus is on block four. We're going to drill, and then we're also in [a block] north of that, that someone else operates on our behalf, and we have a minority interest.

What about Algeria and its shale potential? To what extent do you think you'll be able exploit those resources? And will you be signing something soon?

Chevron has been in conversations with the ministry, upstream regulator Alnaft and Sonatrach since 2020. We signed MOUs, that was in the news. And then the big milestone was 13 June of this year, where we aligned on two areas of interest. And we signed heads of agreement to negotiate Chevron's entry into these two areas of interest. And so that's ongoing now, and that's all I can say about that. We have two areas, one in the Ahnet and one in the Berkine, and seeing if there's a negotiated agreement that would have Chevron enter the country, working with Sontrach to explore and develop those.

Algeria is, again, one of these very hydrocarbon-rich countries in Africa. A tremendous gas resource. So we think it's a really strategic opportunity for Chevron, if we can get to a negotiated agreement that's amenable to both parties. You know, significant resources in an existing, vibrant oil and gas sector, access to markets through pipelines and LNG for the gas. And so we believe at Chevron that we can bring our global experience, and in particular our shale and tight expertise to bear in Algeria. To help them explore and ultimately develop.

But you think you can do shale development there?

Yes. I mean, the first piece would be exploration, right? So, you know, even in shale and tight, the molecules are there, or you're fairly confident the molecules are there. It's just, are the molecules producible at a commercial scale? And so that's always the first phase — you drill some pilots, look at your flow back, then optimise. And we believe everything that we do in the Permian is potentially applicable, especially from a factory perspective, right? And then the challenges are going to be things like supply chain.

How much more exploration potential is there left in the Gulf of Mexico? Would you say, is it mature, or is it still much to play for?

The Gulf of Mexico tends to reinvent itself. So we still see plenty of potential there. What's going on in the Gulf of Mexico right now are two critical technologies. One is on the geophysics side — ocean bottom node acquisition for exploration, which is giving us much better images of very complicated geology. That's a critical technology evolution. And we believe that that will help discern between prospects — point the way of where not to drill, and where maybe to drill. And then the other one is, of course, the Anchor platform, which is the world's first 20k. We are currently the only operator in the world that's operating a 20k field, and so I don't know where that technology would be applicable globally yet. But you know what we see? You've got to build the technology, you put it on production, and then you realise, oh, okay, now I can use this to really unlock some other areas. Still pretty, pretty excited about the Gulf of Mexico.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Kurdish gas plans may boost Iraqi oil exports


25/04/25
News
25/04/25

Kurdish gas plans may boost Iraqi oil exports

Dubai, 25 April (Argus) — Plans for a significant increase in natural gas production in Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdistan region over the next 18 months could not only help address the country's chronic power shortages but also enable Baghdad to boost its oil exports. The Pearl Petroleum consortium — which comprises Abu Dhabi-listed Dana Gas, Sharjah-based Crescent Petroleum, Austria's OMV, Hungary's Mol, and Germany's RWE — aims to increase gas production capacity in Kurdistan to 825mn ft³/d by the end of next year, representing a more than 50pc increase from current output. The plan involves expanding the capacity of the region's sole gas-producing field, Khor Mor, to 750mn ft³/d by the first quarter of 2026, and adding up to 75mn ft³/d from the Chemchemal field by the end of 2026. According to a source at Pearl, the development of Chemchemal is a key priority for the companies, as it is believed to have reservoirs comparable to those of Khor Mor. Under a 2019 agreement, the additional gas from the expansion project will be sold to the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) for a 20-year term, which should help eliminate the region's frequent power outages, particularly during peak summer months when demand for air conditioning is high. The Kurdistan region will also be well-positioned to supply any excess gas to the rest of Iraq. The federal government in Baghdad had previously approved a plan to import approximately 100mn ft³/d of gas from Khor Mor to power a 620MW plant in Kirkuk province, but no formal agreement has been signed to date. "The federal ministry of electricity and Crescent Petroleum have already met to finalise the agreement, which is ready for signature and awaiting implementation," the Pearl source said. "The infrastructure needed to support the sale of this quantity of gas is also in place." The plan has faced delays partly because of Iran's long-standing influence over Iraq and the potential impact such an agreement with the Kurdistan region could have on Baghdad's reliance on Iranian gas and power. However, the revival of US president Donald Trump's ‘maximum pressure' campaign against Tehran is forcing Baghdad to get serious about seeking alternative energy sources, with the Kurdistan region emerging as a viable option. Crude Export Boost Formalising the deal to import Kurdish gas would allow Baghdad to allocate more oil for export, as it would reduce the need to burn crude for power generation. Argus estimates that Iraq typically burns between 50,000 b/d and 100,000 b/d of crude in its power stations, depending on the season, and has recently increased imports of gasoil for power generation. By the time Iraqi Kurdistan has fully ramped up its additional gas capacity, Iraq's Opec+ crude output target will be 200,000 b/d higher than it is today, based on the group's latest production plans. By Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Water levels delay Tennessee River lock reopening


24/04/25
News
24/04/25

Water levels delay Tennessee River lock reopening

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will delay the reopening of the Tennessee River's Wilson Lock by three weeks after high floodwater disrupted repair plans. The Wilson Lock is now planned to reopen in mid-June or July, the Corps said this week. The lock's main chamber has been closed since September after severe cracks were found in the structure. The Corps initiated evacuation procedures so personnel and equipment could be removed before any water entered the dewatered lock and ruined repairs after high water appeared too close to the lock's edge. The water did not crest above the temporary barrier the Corps installed to keep water out. Delays at the lock averaged around 10 days as of 24 April, according to the Corps. Barge carriers fees have been in place for each barge that must pass through the auxiliary chamber of the lock since 25 September, when the lock first closed. Restricted barge movement placed upward pressure on fertilizer prices in surrounding areas as well. The lock still requires structural repairs to the main chamber gates, including the replacement of the pintle components, the Corps said. This is the fourth opening delay the Corps have issued for the Wilson Lock, with the prior opening dates being in November , then April and then in June . The Wilson Lock will enter its eighth month of repairs next month. By Meghan Yoyotte and Sneha Kumar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Investment funds slash net long position on Ice TTF


24/04/25
News
24/04/25

Investment funds slash net long position on Ice TTF

London, 24 April (Argus) — Investment funds have slashed their TTF net long positions on the Intercontinental Exchange (Ice) nearly in half so far in April, with commercial undertakings' net long position conversely rising. Investment funds' net long position on Ice dropped to 86TWh in the week ending 17 April, well below the 146TWh at the end of March, and was as low as 73TWh on 11 April ( see net positions graph ). The near-halving of their net position was driven entirely by the closing of longs, which dropped to 308TWh by 17 April from 383TWh on 28 March. In contrast, shorts dropped by only 16TWh in the same period, the exchange's most recent Commitments of Traders report shows. This left investment funds' total amount of open positions at 529TWh by 17 April, well down from 620TWh on 28 March. Global commodity market turmoil in recent weeks following the US' ‘liberation day' on which president Donald Trump announced tariffs on nearly every country may have prompted funds to reduce their exposure to gas market. The resulting fallout in global commodity, stock, bond and currency markets would have hit multi-strategy hedge funds in particular, which had exposure to many different assets, some of which are thought to be among the largest players in the overall investment fund category of participant. Wider macroeconomic factors rather than market fundamentals have driven the TTF this month, according to many traders, with daily TTF movements frequently having tracked wider moves across global macroeconomic indicators such as the S&P 500 index. In contrast with investment funds' sharply reduced net long position, commercial undertakings — the other largest category of market participant, mostly comprising firms with retail portfolios — more than doubled their net long position to 85TWh on 17 April from 33TWh on 28 March. This means commercial undertakings' and investment funds' net positions now have nearly exactly converged, with the difference between them having been as wide as nearly 350TWh as recently as early February. Commercial undertakings first flipped to a net long position in the week ending 28 February, and the net long has steadily increased every week since then. While investment funds significantly reduced their overall exposure to the TTF, commercial undertakings increased both their long and short positions in April. Total shorts rose by about 34TWh between 28 March and 17 April to 1.055PWh, while longs soared by 86TWh to 1.140PWh. This leaves their total open positions at about 2.195PWh, more than quadruple investment funds' 529TWh. The data could suggest that commercial undertakings took advantage of hedge funds unwinding their long positions, leading to a reallocation of about 90TWh of liquidity from speculative positions to risk reduction contracts. The large majority of commercial undertakings' overall open positions are risk reduction contracts, which total 1.457PWh out of aggregate open positions of 2.195PWh, or 66pc. In contrast, investment funds hold zero risk reduction contracts, making it likely that all of their interest is speculative. Commercial undertakings' risk reduction shorts increased only by about 7TWh between 28 March and 17 April to 747TWh, but longs soared by 92TWh over the same period to an all-time high of 710TWh. As recently as 28 February, risk reduction longs were as low as 550TWh, meaning an overall increase of nearly 200TWh in less than two months. The only other time in recent history when risk reduction longs increased at such a rapid pace was in 2018, when they jumped from 445TWh on 30 July to a peak of 644TWh on 15 October ( see risk reduction graph ). One explanation for such a distinct increase in risk reduction longs while shorts remained roughly even could simply be that utilities have purchased winter contracts instead of the more usual practice of hedging physical gas bought for summer injection by selling winter contracts. Typically, summer prices are below winter thanks to lower seasonal consumption, so a utility would buy the summer to inject the gas and sell the winter for when it will be withdrawn, locking in a profit margin. But because summer prices this year remained above winter, there was no commercial incentive to lock in a negative spread, meaning utilities may simply have opted to buy winter contracts to cover their expected demand. But since the turn of April, TTF summer-month prices have increased their discount to the front-winter, providing more of an incentive to inject gas. By Brendan A'Hearn Net positions on ICE TTF TWh Commercial undertakings' risk reduction positions TWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Eni cuts capex on macro headwinds, tariff uncertainty


24/04/25
News
24/04/25

Eni cuts capex on macro headwinds, tariff uncertainty

London, 24 April (Argus) — Italy's Eni has cut its spending plans for this year in response to macroeconomic headwinds, uncertainty around trade tariffs and a lower oil price outlook. The company is planning a series of "mitigation measures" worth over €2bn [$2.28bn], a key element of which is a reduction in 2025 capex to below €8.5bn from previous guidance of €9bn. Eni now expects net capex — which takes into account acquisitions and asset sales — to come in below €6bn this year, compared with its initial plan of €6.5bn-7bn. Other savings will come from "mitigating actions" around its portfolio, operating costs and "other cash initiatives", the firm said. Eni's plan reflects a tariff-driven deterioration in the outlook for the global economy and, in turn, global oil demand and oil prices. The company has revised its Brent crude price assumption for 2025 down to $65/bl from $75/bl previously. It has also lowered its refining margin indicator assumption for the year to $3.5/bl from $4.7/bl. The lower oil price assumption has not changed the company's upstream production forecast — it still expects 2025 output to average 1.7mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). But Eni's production in the first quarter was only 1.65mn boe/d, 5pc lower than the same period last year. The firm's gas production took the biggest hit, falling by 9pc on the year to 4.5bn ft³/d (861,000 boe/d) as a result of divestments and natural decline at mature fields. Liquids output fell by 1pc year on year to 786,000 boe/d. Eni reported a profit of €1.17bn for January-March, 3pc lower than the same period last year. Underlying profit— which strips out inventory valuation effects and other one off-items — fell by 11pc on the year to €1.41bn. Eni said the fall in profits was mainly due to lower oil prices. The company also had to contend with weaker refining margins and throughputs, as well as a continuing downturn in the European chemicals sector. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more