Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Ukraine grain outlook bolstered by trade disputes

  • Market: Biofuels, Fertilizers
  • 15/04/19

The outcome of trade disputes between China and the US and Canada will be a key determinant of Ukrainian export flows in the coming months and years, delegates heard at the Black Sea Grain conference in Kiev.

Negotiations between US and Chinese trade officials could draw to a close at the end of this month. Whatever the outcome, the end of the process is likely to dictate the direction of global grain prices and redirect international grain trade flows.

If a trade deal is reached China will import up to 4.3mn t/yr of corn from the US, Chinese trading firm Donlink Grain and Oil's director Renault Quach told the conference. If no deal is struck, the offtake will be well below that, and this could open opportunities for Ukraine to further increase its market share in China. Ukraine has been the largest single corn supplier to China since 2015, and does have theoretical capacity to export more — its overall exports were around 4.5mn t below production in 2018-19, according to the USDA.

Trade tensions could affect the fundamentals for barley also. China could import feed barley, which it uses interchangeably with sorghum, from Ukraine should no agreement with the US be reached. China also has stable demand for malting barley, for which it depends on imports from Australia and Canada. But Beijing has a trade dispute over Canadian canola exports, and is carrying out an anti-dumping investigation into Australian malting barley. Quach sees an opening for Ukraine here as well.

"There is a big opportunity for Ukraine to export [malting barley] to China", he said. However, Ukrainian feed grains are likely to lose Chinese market share if a deal is reached before mid-2019.

Ukraine's rapeseed growers could find a new opening from the trade conflict between Canada and China, according to UkrAgroConsult's oilseed expert Julia Garkavenko. Although Ukraine does not have a permit to import rapeseed into China, this could change.

"Ukraine's representatives have already left for China to solve this issue", Garkavenko told Argus. Until such time as a permit is granted, Ukraine sends rapeseed oil (RSO) to China.

"Ukraine could be an attractive alternative" for China, Garkavenko told the conference, adding that RSO exports to China have already picked up pace in the past year.

The prospect of a trade deal between China and the US is already buoying global grains markets, US agricultural advisory AgResource's president Dan Basse said in Kiev. With world stocks at long-term highs, grain prices should really be lower than they are, Basse said. He sees the chances of a trade deal as fairly high. Quach agreed, telling Argus: "I believe there will be a deal".

Quach said while the importance of US feed grain for China has been in steady decline, "There is no other market in the world to replace [Chinese] import volumes of soybean and sorghum" and therefore China is in a strong negotiating position. However, while China's grain sector could adjust to a no-deal scenario, trade disputes particularly threaten the country's manufacturing sectors, said Quach. Therefore "from an economic point of view, our country does need agreement with the US", he said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/25

India approves P and K subsidy for kharif 2025

India approves P and K subsidy for kharif 2025

London, 28 March (Argus) — The Indian government has approved the nutrient-based subsidy for phosphates and potash fertilizers for the kharif season, which runs from April until September. It has approved a total budget of 372.16bn rupees ($4.35bn) for the kharif season, which is 130bn rupees higher than the subsidy for rabi 2024-25 and around 128bn rupees higher than the allocation for kharif last year . The government said that the increased subsidy reflects the recent trends in international prices of fertilizers and inputs. The new rates are largely in line with the proposal made by the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) in February, although the rate for DAP is slightly lower than the initial proposals as are the rates for the NPK grades, which moved according to the hike in the rate for P2O5. The subsidy for MOP will remain at Rs2.38/kg, unchanged on the level for the rabi season as proposed in September. This will give a per tonne subsidy rate for MOP of Rs1,428. The subsidy for phosphate will rise by 42pc from Rs30.80/kg for the rabi season to Rs43.60/kg. The subsidy for nitrogen will remain at Rs43.02/kg. This will give a per tonne subsidy rate for DAP of Rs27,799, a rise of Rs5,888/t from the base subsidy for rabi, slightly lower than the expected rise of around Rs6,000/t. The government will probably extend the Rs3,500/t special additional subsidy for DAP into kharif, bringing the total subsidy for DAP up to Rs31,299/t. The maximum retail price for DAP will remain at Rs27,000/t. At current market prices, DAP importers' margins will remain negative. The government will probably continue to compensate importers for losses on DAP, but there is no indication that Indian DAP producers will also receive compensation for losses. The rates for NPK grades have moved up according to the hike in the rate for P2O5. The new subsidies are as follows for the following key import grades when compared with the rates for rabi: 10-26-26 - Rs16,257/t, up by 26pc 20-20-0+13 – Rs17,663/t, up by 18pc 12-32-16 – Rs19,495/t, up by 27pc 15-15-15+9S – Rs13,585/t, up by 19pc A total of 28 fertilizer grades are included in the scheme. By Julia Campbell and Tom Hampson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

ISCC aware EU mulling certification recognition: Update


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

ISCC aware EU mulling certification recognition: Update

Adds comment from the European Commission London, 28 March (Argus) — The ISCC, an international certification system for sustainability, said today that it is aware of discussions in an EU committee about future recognition of its certification for waste-based biofuels. It said there is no legal basis for any planned measures. Industry participants said yesterday that the EU Committee on Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids, and Biomass Fuels is drafting implementing regulations that would include a two-and-a-half year pause to obligatory acceptance of ISCC EU certification for waste-based biofuels. "This action is said to be subject to further legal scrutiny and will need approval by member states," the ISCC said. Currently, member states accept EU-recognised voluntary scheme certification as proof that fuel or feedstocks are compliant with the bloc's Renewable Energy Directive (RED) sustainability criteria. Market participants told Argus that discussions have centred around giving individual countries more choice. "Other voluntary schemes would not be able to fill the gap. The measure would be a severe blow to the entire market for waste-based biofuels and would seriously jeopardise the ability of the obligated parties to comply with blending mandates," the ISCC said. The ISCC has been singled out in a discriminatory way and has supported European Commission and member states' investigations into alleged fraud, it said. "We are more than surprised by this step […and] are unable to see the rationale of the planned measure, which seems ad hoc and baseless," it added. Secretary-general of the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) Xavier Noyon told Argus that, if confirmed, the suspension would affect thousands of operators. "At this time, member states are refusing to comment, and we call on the commission to urgently clarify any decisions of this nature that are on the table," he said. The EBB published its own proposed revision to the RED implementing legislation last month, which expanded the supervisory power of member states over voluntary schemes and certification bodies. The European Commission confirmed that the committee met on 26 March to discuss sustainable certification, promotion of biofuels, avoidance of double counting, and alleged fraud. "We are still working on our examination of this alleged fraud in biodiesel imports from China," said commission energy spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen. But the commission has not taken any decision yet and cannot allude to "possible" scenarios, she said. By John Houghton-Brown, Simone Burgin and Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ISCC aware of EU talks on certification recognition


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

ISCC aware of EU talks on certification recognition

London, 28 March (Argus) — The ISCC, an international certification system for sustainability, said today that it is aware of discussions in an EU committee about future recognition of its certification for waste-based biofuels. It said there is no legal basis for any planned measures. Industry participants said yesterday that the EU Committee on Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids, and Biomass Fuels is drafting implementing regulations that would include a two-and-a-half year pause to obligatory acceptance of ISCC EU certification for waste-based biofuels. "This action is said to be subject to further legal scrutiny and will need approval by member states," the ISCC said. Currently, member states accept EU-recognised voluntary scheme certification as proof that fuel or feedstocks are compliant with the bloc's Renewable Energy Directive (RED) sustainability criteria. There has been no official statement from the European Commission but market participants told Argus that discussions have centred around giving individual countries more choice. "Other voluntary schemes would not be able to fill the gap. The measure would be a severe blow to the entire market for waste-based biofuels and would seriously jeopardise the ability of the obligated parties to comply with blending mandates," the ISCC said. The ISCC has been singled out in a discriminatory way and has supported European Commission and member states' investigations into alleged fraud, it said. "We are more than surprised by this step […and] are unable to see the rationale of the planned measure, which seems ad hoc and baseless," it added. Secretary-general of the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) Xavier Noyon told Argus that, if confirmed, the suspension would affect thousands of operators. "At this time, member states are refusing to comment, and we call on the commission to urgently clarify any decisions of this nature that are on the table," he said. The EBB published its own proposed revision to the RED implementing legislation last month, which expanded the supervisory power of member states over voluntary schemes and certification bodies. By John Houghton-Brown and Simone Burgin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Oil, biofuel groups meet to align on RFS policy


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

Oil, biofuel groups meet to align on RFS policy

New York, 27 March (Argus) — Energy and farm groups met last week at the American Petroleum Institute to negotiate a joint request for President Donald Trump's administration as it develops new biofuel blend mandates, according to five people familiar with the matter. The private meeting involved groups from across the supply chain, including representatives of feedstock suppliers, biofuel producers, fuel marketers, and oil refiners with Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) obligations. The groups coordinated earlier this year around a letter to the Trump administration on the need to update the RFS and are now seeking agreement on other program elements. According to the people familiar with the matter, the groups agree on pushing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set higher blend mandates under the program's D4 biomass-based diesel and D5 advanced biofuel categories. Groups support slightly different volume targets that are nevertheless all in "a rounding number of each other" in the D4 category, according to one lobbyist. But there is still disagreement about whether to ramp up mandates quickly in 2026 or provide a longer runway to higher volumes. Clean Fuels Alliance America and farm groups have publicly supported a biomass-based diesel mandate of at least 5.25bn USG starting next year, which could justify a broader advanced biofuel mandate above 9bn USG, according to the people familiar, though others worry about fuel cost impacts if mandates spike so quickly. The current mandate for 2025 is 7.33bn USG in the advanced biofuels category, including a 3.35bn USG mandate for the biomass-based diesel subcategory, so the volumes being pushed for future years would be a steep increase. The RFS, highly influential for fuel and commodity crop prices, requires oil refiners and importers to blend annual amounts of biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits from those who do. The idea behind the groups' coordination is that the Trump administration might more quickly finalize RFS updates if lobbyists with a history of sparring over biofuel policy can articulate a shared vision of the program's future. One person familiar said the effort comes after the Trump administration directed industry to align biofuel policy goals, though others said they understood the coordination as largely voluntary. EPA did not provide comment. There is less agreement around the program's D6 conventional biofuel category, which is mostly met by corn ethanol. Oil groups have in the past criticized EPA for setting the implied D6 mandate at 15bn USG, above the amount of ethanol that can feasibly be blended into gasoline, though excess biofuels from lower-carbon categories can be used to meet conventional obligations. Ethanol interests support setting the D6 mandate even higher than 15bn USG, which could be a tough sell. The discussions to date have not involved targets for D3 cellulosic biofuels, a relatively small part of the program. A proposal to lower 2024 volumes has hurt D3 credit prices, signaling that future mandates are effectively optional, according to frustrated biogas executives , and has reduced the salience of the issue for other groups. A proposal from President Joe Biden's administration to create a new category called "eRINs" to credit biogas used to power electric vehicles has similarly not come up. "We're not expecting to see any attempt to include eRINs in this next [RFS] proposal," Renewable Fuels Association president Geoff Cooper told Argus earlier this month. The meeting last week was largely oriented around the RFS, though a National Association of Truck Stop Operators representative raised the issue of tax policy too. The group has been frustrated by the expiration of a long-running blenders credit and the introduction this year of a less generous credit for refiners, which is only partially implemented and has spurred a sharp decline in biomass-based diesel production. But others involved in negotiations, while they acknowledge tax uncertainty could hurt their case for strong mandates, are trying to avoid contentious topics and focus mostly on volumes. Republican lawmakers are separately weighing whether to keep, repeal, or adjust that credit to help out fuel from domestic crops, and there is no telling how long that debate might take to resolve. Another thorny issue discussed at the meeting is RFS exemptions for small refineries. Biofuel producers strongly oppose such waivers and say that exempted volumes should at least be reallocated among facilities that still have obligations. Oil groups have their own views, though it is unclear how involved the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers — which represents some small refiners and has generally been more critical of the RFS than the American Petroleum Institute — are in discussions. EPA is aiming to finalize new volume mandates by the end of this year , people familiar with the administration's thinking have said, though timing for a proposal is still unclear. Future conversations among energy and farm groups to solidify points of unity — and strategize around how to downplay disagreements — are likely, lobbyists said. RIN prices rally Speculation over the trajectory of the RFS, and the potential for higher future volumes, supported soybean oil futures and widened the bean oil-heating oil (BOHO) spread. The BOHO spread maintains a positive correlation with D4 RIN prices as a widening value raises demand for D4 credits as biofuel producers look to offset higher production costs. Thursday's session ended with current-year ethanol D6 credits valued between 79¢/RIN and 82¢/RIN, while their D4 counterparts held at a premium and closed with a range of 84¢/RIN to 89¢/RIN. These gains each measured more than 5.5pc growth relative to Wednesday's values. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Indian government considers raising DAP subsidy


27/03/25
News
27/03/25

Indian government considers raising DAP subsidy

London, 27 March (Argus) — The Indian government is considering raising the nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) for DAP by around 6,000 rupees/t to around Rs27,911/t for the March-September kharif season. The special additional subsidy of Rs3,500/t for DAP, bringing the current subsidy to Rs25,411/t, is likely to be extended into the kharif season. The special subsidy was initially due to end by 1 April . This would bring the total subsidy for DAP to around Rs31,411/t from Rs25,411/t in the October 2024-March 2025 rabi season. The Inter-Ministerial Committee had proposed raising the NBS for DAP by Rs5,980.60/t last month. The government will still cover losses to importers, but there is no indication that losses will be made up for producers. The maximum retail price (MRP) for DAP is likely to remain at Rs27,000/t. The disparity between the NBS and MRP in India, and a bullish global market, have made DAP receipts unaffordable for Indian importers. Argus ' latest daily DAP assessment stands at $648-650/t cfr India, or $80/t higher than the midpoint of the 28 March 2024 assessment. Firm phosphoric acid and sulphur prices are lifting costs for domestic producers. Jordanian producer JPMC and Indian importer CIL have agreed a second-quarter phosphoric acid price of $1,153/t P2O5 cfr India, up by $98/t P2O5 from the first quarter. And Indian sulphur import prices are up by $91/t at the midpoint from the start of this year. But a drop of $102.50/t at the midpoint in ammonia cfr prices gives Indian producers some relief. By Adrien Seewald Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more