Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US to offer gradual easing of Venezuela sanctions

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 31/03/20

The US government would suspend oil sanctions on Venezuela in the early stages of a political transition plan that was to be laid out by senior US officials this morning.

The plan envisions the incremental lifting of sanctions in tandem with steps toward restoring democracy, including the overhaul of the Opec country's supreme court and the national electoral authority (CNE), according to US officials. The process would culminate in free and fair elections as early as the end of 2020.

Venezuela's national oil industry led by PdV has seen its production and exports nosedive over the past year, with sanctions accelerating a decline rooted in years of neglect and mismanagement. But even if the US lifts oil sanctions, it is unclear that Venezuela would be able to sell much oil following the oil price crash and virus-hit demand this month.

The initiative, which US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and the US special envoy for Venezuela Elliott Abrams were to announce this morning, is designed to restore political momentum at a time when the world is laser-focused on tackling the inexorable spread of the coronavirus. The UN and some countries are urging the US to ease sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and other countries to enable the countries to fight the deadly disease.

The White House is countering that it will gradually lift sanctions on Venezuela, and provide significant aid, if Nicolas Maduro gives up power.

All Venezuelan institutions, with the exception of the National Assembly, are controlled by Maduro, whose presidency is not recognized by the US and more than 50 other countries on the basis of his May 2018 re-election that they deem to have been a fraud. Starting in January 2019, these countries recognize opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's interim president instead, but his authority remains superficial outside the opposition-controlled National Assembly.

Early in the US roadmap, both Maduro and Guaido would step aside to allow the formation of a five-member state council with a military adviser. Four of the council's five members would be selected by the opposition-controlled National Assembly and the fifth would be a "neutral" figure acceptable to both sides.

Each step in the transition would trigger an easing of sanctions. The oil sanctions, which the US imposed in late January 2019, would be suspended upon the formation of the council.

The US is hoping the initiative will break Venezuela's political impasse and restore momentum for political change.

There is little sign that Maduro or his inner circle would be willing to accept the plan, which has echoes in proposals tabled during failed Norwegian-sponsored negotiations last year. Russia and China continue to support Maduro, and are sending in aid.

Nonetheless, the US is hoping a looming potential health catastrophe will change the political calculus in Miraflores presidential palace.

Following last week's US indictments of Maduro and more than a dozen senior associates for drugs trafficking and money-laundering, the Venezuelan leader and his associates would likely be reluctant to agree to any transition plan without a safe exit strategy.

In a fiery speech yesterday, Maduro warned that justice would come to all parties that conspire against him.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
14/04/25

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction

Corrects lock locations in paragraph 5. Houston, 14 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will have to choose between various lock reconstruction and waterway projects for its annual construction plan after its funding was cut earlier this year. Last year Congress allowed the Corps to use $800mn from unspent infrastructure funds for other waterways projects. But when Congress passed a continuing resolutions for this year's budget they effectively removed that $800mn from what was a $2.6bn annual budget for lock reconstruction and waterways projects. This means a construction plan that must be sent to Congress by 14 May can only include $1.8bn in spending. No specific projects were allocated funding by Congress, allowing the Corps the final say on what projects it pursues under the new budget. River industry trade group Waterways Council said its top priority is for the Corps to provide a combined $205mn for work at the Montgomery lock in Pennsylvania on the Ohio River and Chickamauga lock in Tennessee on the Tennessee River since they are the nearest to completion and could become more expensive if further delayed. There are seven active navigation construction projects expected to take precedent, including the following: the Chickamauga and Kentucky Locks on the Tennessee River; Locks 2-4 on the Monongahela River; the Three Rivers project on the Arkansas River; the LaGrange Lock on the Illinois River; Lock 25 on the Mississippi River; and the Montgomery Lock on the Ohio River. There are three other locks in Texas, Pennsylvania and Illinois that are in the active design phase (see map) . By Meghan Yoyotte Corps active construction projects 2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU


14/04/25
News
14/04/25

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

Brussels, 14 April (Argus) — The International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism "does not yet ensure the sector's full contribution to achieving the Paris Agreement goals", the European Commission has said. "Does it have everything for everybody? For sure, it doesn't," said Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, the commission's climate and energy spokesperson said. "This is often the case as an outcome from international negotiations, that not everybody gets the most optimal outcome." The IMO agreement reached last week will need to be confirmed by the organisation in October, the EU noted, even if it is a "strong foundation" and "meaningful step" towards net zero GHG emissions in global shipping by 2050. The commission will have 18 months following the IMO mechanism's formal approval to review the directive governing the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS), which currently includes maritime emissions for intra-EU voyages and those entering or leaving the bloc. By EU law, the commission will also have to report on possible "articulation or alignment" of the bloc's FuelEU Maritime regulation with the IMO, including the need to "avoid duplicating regulation of GHG emissions from maritime transport" at EU and international levels. That report should be presented, "without delay", following formal adoption of an IMO global GHG fuel standard or global GHG intensity limit. Finland's head representative at the IMO delegation talks, Anita Irmeli, told Argus that the EU's consideration of whether the approved Marpol amendments are ambitious enough won't be until "well after October". Commenting on the IMO agreement, the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) pointed to the "neutral" approach to feedstocks, including first generation biofuels. "The EBB welcomes this agreement, where all feedstocks and pathways have a role to play," EBB secretary general Xavier Noyon said. Faig Abbasov, shipping director at non-governmental organisation Transport and Environment, called for better incentives for green hydrogen. "The IMO deal creates a momentum for alternative marine fuels. But unfortunately it is the forest-destroying first generation biofuels that will get the biggest push for the next decade," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama


14/04/25
News
14/04/25

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama

New York, 14 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's back and forth over tariffs that sent oil prices tumbling to a four-year low last week has sparked jitters across the shale patch, although most producers are likely to take their time to respond. The oil and gas industry, one of Trump's biggest cheerleaders and donors during his election campaign, has been taken aback by the speed and scale of the president's escalating trade wars and executives are signalling growing impatience. Meanwhile, Trump's "Drill, baby, drill" mantra is even less likely to become a reality now, after oil slid below the $65/bl level that executives surveyed by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank last month warned was needed to profitably sink a new well. Trump's imposition of punitive tariffs on nearly every major US trading partner led to a sell-off in stock, bonds and commodity markets until he announced a 90-day pause for most nations — except China — on 9 April. While it may be too early for talk about dropping rigs and curtailing production, companies will face tough questions from analysts about their contingency plans when first-quarter results start coming through later this month. One key difference from previous downturns in 2014 and 2020 is that exploration and production (E&P) firms are in a better position this time, with less debt on their balance sheets and more modest growth plans, which may help limit the initial fallout. But higher costs owing to tariffs on steel imports could offset the efficiency savings that have kept production going in an era of restrained spending. "E&Ps are likely to mostly take a wait-and-see approach — with a high level of uncertainty about future policy — and not prematurely lay down rigs," consultancy Enverus principal analyst Andrew Dittmar says. "If prices are weak headed into 2026, that is where you are likely to see a more material reduction in drilling budgets. Feeling dominated The shale industry has welcomed Trump's "energy dominance" agenda and his promise of a permitting overhaul. But cracks are appearing in that relationship because of his stop-start policy on tariffs. "This administration better have a plan," Diamondback Energy president Kaes Van't Hof said in a social media post, in a direct appeal to energy secretary Chris Wright. Shale is the "only industry that actually built itself in the US, manufactures in the US, grew jobs in the US and improved the trade deficit — and by proxy GDP — in the US over the past decade", Van't Hof, who is due to become Diamondback chief executive later this year, said. His company became the largest pure-play producer in the prolific Permian basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico following its $26bn takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources last year. While few public producers were planning any kind of meaningful growth this year as higher dividends and buy-backs continue to be the priority, even that could eventually find itself on the chopping block. "The corporate reality for public players means that already modest growth could be at risk if prices remain near $60/bl," Rystad Energy vice-president for North American oil and gas Matthew Bernstein says. Little in the way of growth was forecast outside the core Permian this year even before Trump rolled out his tariffs. A prolonged period of lower prices could spur a downturn in the top-performing US basin. A combination of short-term activity levels, investor distributions and production could be sacrificed in order to defend margins, according to Rystad. And producers in the Delaware sub-basin could be especially vulnerable, given the region's steep initial decline rates, high well costs and large capital return requirements, the consultancy says. By Stephen Cunningham WTI breakeven price Nymex WTI futures month 1 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Opec cuts oil demand forecasts on tariffs impact


14/04/25
News
14/04/25

Opec cuts oil demand forecasts on tariffs impact

London, 14 April (Argus) — Opec has cut its oil demand growth forecasts by 150,000 b/d for this year and 2026, citing US trade tariffs. In its latest Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR), published today, Opec revised down its 2025 oil consumption growth projection to 1.3mn b/d, from 1.45mn b/d in its previous report. It said this was because of received data in the first three months of the year and "announced US tariffs." For 2026, the producer group now sees oil use growing by 1.28mn b/d, compared with 1.43mn b/d previously. It now sees demand at 105.05mn b/d in 2025, and at 106.33mn b/d in 2026. The outlook for oil demand and prices have sharply deteriorated since US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements and the Opec+ alliance's decision to speed up planned output hikes, both decisions taken in early April. But Opec's oil demand revisions are relatively modest compared with those by some investment banks in recent weeks. Goldman Sachs slashed its oil demand forecast for this year to just 300,000 b/d. Morgan Stanley sees demand growth at 500,000 b/d in the second half of this year, half of its prior estimate. In terms of supply, Opec cut its non-Opec+ liquids growth forecast by 100,000 b/d for 2025 and for 2026, to 910,000 b/d and 900,000 b/d respectively. The US was the main driver for downward revision in both years: Opec now sees the country adding 400,000 b/d in 2025 and 380,000 b/d in 2026, compared with 450,000 b/d and 460,000 b/d previously. Opec+ crude production — including Mexico — fell by 37,000 b/d to 41.02mn b/d in March, according to an average of secondary sources that includes Argus . Opec puts the call on Opec+ crude at 42.6mn b/d in 2025 and 42.8mn b/d in 2026. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australian refiner Viva posts lower sales in Jan-Mar


14/04/25
News
14/04/25

Australian refiner Viva posts lower sales in Jan-Mar

Sydney, 14 April (Argus) — Australian refiner Viva Energy's January-March sales slumped against a year and quarter earlier, while its Geelong refinery margin (GRM) rebounded slightly despite the impact of a refinery-wide outage in January. Total sales for the first quarter of Viva's fiscal year fell on lower commercial and industrial sales, which dipped by 6pc because adverse weather impacted mining demand. Crude intake of 107,000 b/d at the 120,000 b/d Geelong refinery was up by 6pc on the quarter, but 6pc lower on the year. Viva's energy and infrastructure division was hit by a A$20mn ($12.6mn) loss after an unplanned shutdown at Geelong resulting from a power outage in January. Geelong's October-December output was affected by problems with the refinery's residual catalytic cracker unit, late crude arrivals and minor unscheduled maintenance. The GRM was marginally above breakeven levels, Viva said, despite the January outage. Tariffs imposed by the US on its trading partners have led to a fall in oil prices, which should stimulate consumer demand and support retail margins, and the firm has limited exposure to customers directly dependent on US markets, it said. Viva's upgrade to ultra-low sulphur gasoline at the 120,000 b/d Geelong refinery is on schedule, with supply expected to begin from August to meet the federal government's deadline of December this year. A proposed large-scale advanced soft plastics recycling facility to be co-developed with waste management firm Cleanaway will proceed to initial engineering phase in 2026, Viva said on 9 April. The project aims to convert waste soft plastics into food-grade recycled plastics but requires policy certainty, which is expected once details of Canberra's packaging reform, the Extended Producer Responsibility, are released. By Tom Major Viva Energy results (b/d) Jan-Mar '25 Oct-Dec '24 Jan-Mar '24 q-o-q % ± y-o-y % ± Refining intake 107,000 101,000 112,000 6 -6 Sales 288,000 298,000 297,000 -3 -4 GRM ($/bl) 8 7 12 18 -34 Viva has adjusted volumes to account for its acquisition of OTR retail group on 28 March 2024 Source: Viva Energy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more