Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Russia passes Saudi Arabia as top China crude supplier

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 27/05/20

China's crude imports from Russia rose in April but deliveries from Saudi Arabia and Brazil fell sharply, detailed customs data show.

Imports of Russian crude hit 1.75mn b/d last month, up by 6.1pc from March and by 17.7pc from April last year.

Russian exporters shipped more sour Urals crude to China while keeping exports of other key grades steady. Offers for Urals were competitive with other sour grades in April as Riyadh and Moscow launched fierce price competition, generating a rise in buying interest.

China was the main destination for Urals in the first quarter, taking just over 4mn t or around 320,000 b/d. And exports of Urals are likely to rise further in May, with seaborne loadings of the grade from Baltic and Black Sea ports estimated at 2.13mn b/d in April, up by 371,500 b/d compared with the average for January-March. More than 700,000 b/d of Urals left Baltic Sea ports for Asia-Pacific in the first half of April, with almost all heading to China on 80,000-120,000t Aframax vessels.

Russia became the single-largest exporter to China in April, thanks to the rise in its shipments and a fall in deliveries from Saudi Arabia.

China took just 1.26mn b/d of Saudi crude last month, down by 26pc from March to an 11-month low. But deliveries are likely to rebound in May and June, with Saudi Arabia's total crude exports surging by 1.66mn b/d to 9.27mn b/d in April as Riyadh seized market share after the expiry of the Opec+ output restraint deal.

Asia-Pacific absorbed the majority of the increase, with eastbound Saudi shipments rising by 1.24mn b/d to a record 6.12mn b/d, supported by stronger Chinese demand.

China's crude imports from Brazil dropped below 600,000 b/d last month for the first time this year. China took delivery of 545,000 b/d of Brazilian crude in April, down by 28.6pc from March and by 36.3pc from April 2019, and well below average imports in January-March of 874,000 b/d.

China's imports from Iraq also fell in April, dropping by 26.3pc to 971,000 b/d from March's 1.32mn b/d. Deliveries from Iran more than doubled from a month earlier to 126,000 b/d in April, although this was lower by 84pc from a record high year earlier.

Imports from Malaysia were 384,000 b/d in April, up by 55pc from March and more than triple levels in April 2019. China's imports from Malaysia have risen strongly over the past year, despite no comparable increase in Malaysian output, suggesting blenders in the country are disguising the origins of crude from sanctions-hit suppliers such as Venezuela before shipping the cargoes on to China.

Imports from Venezuela were zero again in April for the seventh straight month, the customs figures show. China also took delivery of no US crude in April.

Angolan exports to China were 828,000 b/d, declines of 11.8pc from March and 23.8pc from April last year, as Chinese refiners instead opted for similarly priced Brazilian Lula crude over the west African Djeno grade.

China's total crude imports were 9.84mn b/d in April, up by 1.7pc from March but down by 7.5pc from April 2019, the customs data show. Imports fell from 10.47mn b/d in the first two months of this year, as the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak led to a decline in buying from the end of January and throughout February that hit deliveries in March and April.

Demand started to rebound in late March as China brought the outbreak under control, domestic oil product demand started to rise and crude prices fell. This is likely to support May imports, which Argus expects to rise back above 10mn b/d.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
25/02/25

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms

Washington, 25 February (Argus) — US president Donald Trump has given little indication on whether he will delay or implement his plan to impose stiff import duties on Canadian and Mexican energy commodities and other products on 4 March. Some market participants are hopeful for another extension or cancellation of Trump's executive order that would impose a 10pc tax on Canadian energy imports, a 25pc tariff on non-energy imports from Canada and a 25pc tariff on all imports from Mexico. The uncertainty over the implementation has had vast segments of the energy industry — oil and gas producers, refiners, pipeline operators, traders — bracing for potentially disruptive outcomes. The three governments are negotiating to avert a full-blown trade war, addressing Trump's pretext for imposing the tariffs — Mexico's and Canada's alleged unwillingness to cut flows of fentanyl and immigrants into the US. Trump and Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau last spoke on 23 February, with the two leaders noting that the flow of fentanyl across the shared border had fallen in the preceding month. But Trump, speaking the following day, said that "the tariffs are going forward on time, on schedule". And on Tuesday, Trump repeated to reporters at the White House his previous off-the-cuff remarks about Canada becoming "the 51st US state". "We don't need their oil," Trump said. "We don't need their lumber." Even without the broad tariffs in place, trade disputes will pick up pace next month when Trump's 25pc tariff on all imported steel and aluminum goes into effect on 12 March. The imposition of tariffs after decades of free trade in energy across North America is expected to create legal uncertainty in contractual obligations related to the payment of tariffs and reporting requirements. The current US import duties on crude are set at 5.25¢/bl and 10.5¢/bl, depending on crude quality. The new tariff would be based on the value of the commodity — without specifying how that will be calculated and at what specific point during the transportation process. US government agencies are not expected to clarify the implementation details until Trump's executive order on tariffs goes into effect. US oil industry groups have lobbied the Trump administration to exempt energy imports from tariffs. Trump instead lowered the planned tariff on Canadian energy imports to 10pc, from the originally proposed 25pc. US lawmakers, including close Trump allies, have expressed concern about the potential impact of tariffs. But the Republican lawmakers have shied away from confronting Trump over the issue. "Texas' number one trading partner is Mexico, number two is Canada, so what happens will have an impact on us," US representative Randy Weber (R-Texas) said today at an event hosted by Politico. But Weber added that Texas governor Greg Abbott (R) is "on top of this stuff" and that "if it was going to be a problem for Texas, I think [Abbott] would have been either singing out loud, or he would have gone to talk to the president directly". Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US last year were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian producers also have expressed concern about the uncertain impact of tariffs on crude volumes trans-shipped through the US, either for exports to third country destinations from Gulf coast ports or transported on US pipelines to destinations in eastern Canada. India is a key destination for trans-shipped Canadian crude. Buyers in India loaded 150,000 b/d from the US ports last year, including around 40,000 b/d of trans-shipped Canadian heavy sour crude, data from oil analytics firms Vortexa and Kpler show. By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG

Sydney, 25 February (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy sees LNG demand exceeding supply into the 2030s as project delays lead timelines for nearly 30mn t/yr of new capacity to slip into the next decade, chief executive Meg O'Neill said after releasing the firm's 2024 annual results today. Headwinds affecting some projects and "ongoing, robust demand" within Asia-Pacific will prevent any LNG supply glut, despite easing regulatory hurdles under the Trump administration, O'Neill told investors. Such headwinds could also impact Woodside. The company's 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) terminal is still waiting for federal consent to continue operations past 2030, after passing state government scrutiny last year following six years of assessments. And the planned 11.4mn t/yr Browse project hinges on NWS approvals being granted, with Woodside preferring a decision is made before Australia's elections in May, in which Green and other climate-conscious MPs may win a balance of power. O'Neill said the fully-priced engineering, procurement and construction contract with engineering firm Bechtel for the initial stage of its Louisiana LNG project was "differentiating" with other nearby proposed terminals requiring re-pricing, as Woodside aims to sell down 50pc of the terminal. Woodside will not take a final investment decision (FID) on Louisiana unless it is confident it has partners signed up or extremely close, O'Neill said, referencing the sale of 49pc of Pluto train 2 at FID before it later offloaded part of the Scarborough gas field that will supply the project. "I think there's potential for us to have the whole 50pc [target] sold-down by FID," O'Neill said, adding that "deep negotiations" were underway as the project aims for FID-readiness by 31 March. Woodside said it will cut expenditure on exploration and its New Energy division by $150mn to focus on producing assets. Exploration outlay was $342mn in 2024 and is guided at $200mn for 2025, while the savings from New Energy will mainly come from pausing its 60 t/d H2OK project in the US . In New Energy, Woodside will prioritise its 83pc complete, 1.1mn t/yr US Beaumont ammonia project ahead of first output in July-December and first low-carbon or blue ammonia using carbon capture and storage in the second half of 2026. Cost of production for phase 1 will be $260-$300/t, based on assumed costs after start-up from 2027-29 at 96pc uptime, a fixed/variable split of 70/30pc, a range of Henry hub gas pricing and the 45Q tax credit that grants $85/t of CO2 stored. Woodside made a profit of $3.57bn in 2024, up from $1.66bn for 2023 but below 2022's record of $6.5bn. It posted lower realised oil and gas prices of $63.6/bl of oil equivalent (boe) in 2024 from $68.6/boe in 2023, despite its output rising to 530,000 boe/d. The firm kept its 2025 guidance unchanged at 186mn-196mn boe (510,000-537,000 boe/d). Forecast capital expenditure of $4.5bn-5bn is focused on its 80pc complete Scarborough and 20pc complete Trion projects. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Reopening New Zealand refinery could cost $4bn: Study


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Reopening New Zealand refinery could cost $4bn: Study

Sydney, 25 February (Argus) — Reopening New Zealand's mothballed 135,000 b/d Marsden Point refinery (MPR) could take six years and cost up to NZ$7.3bn ($4.2bn), according to a government-commissioned study. MPR, New Zealand's only refinery that is located north of largest city of Auckland, was converted to an oil product import terminal in 2022. The interim report, which was commissioned by New Zealand's National-led government last year, cited Australian professional services firm Worley's estimates that reestablishing refining would require NZ$4.9bn-7.3bn. This imposes significant risks and costs on MPR owner Channel Infrastructure, which has imported oil products since refining ended in 2022. A reopening would provide more resilience against quality issues with imported fuels, increase stockholding and provide local employment. But this is offset by a dependence on crude imports, with MPR becoming a single point of failure risk, and increased greenhouse gas emissions associated with refining. Fuel Security Study The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment on 25 February separately released a Fuel Security Study, which found that fuel security remains threatened by supply disruption. It recommends that the nation instead focus on increased storage and zero-emission vehicles instead of reopening MPR. The strategies considered for improving New Zealand's fuel supply security included reopening the refinery or building a new one, increasing jet fuel and diesel storages, expanding trucking capacity to mitigate against infrastructure failures, investing in biofuels production and increasing uptake of zero-emissions transport. Resurrecting MPR or building a new refinery for locally produced crude would be inefficient given either expense or the limited effectiveness that a new facility would have in supplying all fuel types required, the study found. The most cost-effective security enhancement is increasing storage levels of diesel and jet fuel, while gasoline was less of a concern given generally high stocks, with more gasoline storages to be converted to other fuels as demand falls owing to electric vehicle (EV) uptake. EVs will likely diminish New Zealand's reliance on gasoline but diesel use will taper off more slowly given less advanced alternatives, while jet fuel demand is likely to rise without other realistic options in the short term. Biofuels were found to be viable for securing domestic jet fuel and diesel supply, but further study is required and developing this sector would cost more. About 70pc of New Zealand's fuel imports are from Singapore or South Korea, exposing the country to shipping disruptions, but fuel companies' ability to adjust supply chains would mitigate any major impacts, the study said. Internally, the threat of natural disasters impacting pipelines or import terminals should lead to more thorough planning for such events. New Zealand would carefully weigh the costs and benefits of the actions suggested in the fuel study, associate energy minister Shane Jones said on 25 February, including considering the creation of energy precincts and special economic zones to spur a domestic biofuels sector. Jones, a member of the NZ First party in coalition with National, added that creating such zones with special regulations and investment support could help attract overseas investors. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Italy's Saipem to merge with Norway's Subsea 7


24/02/25
News
24/02/25

Italy's Saipem to merge with Norway's Subsea 7

London, 24 February (Argus) — Italy's Saipem and Norway's Subsea 7 have agreed to merge, creating a global energy services company with revenues of around €20bn/yr ($21bn/yr) and an order backlog of €43bn. The move is designed to create the scale to tackle large and complex energy projects focused on engineering and construction (E&C) but also on energy transition projects such as wind and carbon capture. Saipem held talks with Subsea 7 over a possible tie-up several years ago but failed to reach an agreement. "The combination will give us a scale that is more in harmony with the magnitude of the projects in offshore energy for oil and gas and renewables industries," said Kristian Siem, chairman of Subsea 7. Under the merger, Subsea 7 will be folded into its Italian rival, with shareholders of the Norwegian company receiving 6.688 Saipem shares for each share they own, along with an extraordinary dividend of €450mn. Each set of shareholders will hold 50pc of the new company on completion. Saipem's largest shareholders — oil and gas firm Eni and state lender CDP — and Subsea 7's largest shareholder Siem Industries have all entered into a separate agreement to support the deal. The new company, Saipem 7, will have a fleet of more than 60 vessels which management says will give it the flexibility to better respond to client requests. "The new company is very, very much an offshore E&C company," said Subsea 7 chief executive John Evans, noting that over 80pc of its operating income comes from this segment. "The two fleets are very compatible and complementary and will allow clients to have a single global service provider to provide everything from ultra-shallow water in the Middle East to ultra-deep in some of the newer provinces," he said. Asked if the new company would be asset light by leasing more of its vessels, Evans said the model of combining older company-owned ships and leased units would continue. "You have to remember that with our backlogs we will be very busy for the next 2-3 years," he said. The merger is expected to generate annual synergies of around €300m in the third year after completion, driven in large part by fleet optimisation and procurement. It is scheduled to close in the second half of 2026 with a binding merger agreement expected mid-2025. Saipem 7 will be listed in both Milan and Oslo and will be headquartered in Milan, although the offshore E&C business will be run as a separate business based in London. Saipem chief executive Alessandro Puliti, who will take over the role of chief executive at Saipem 7, said any decision to spin off the offshore E&C division at a later stage would be evaluated on an opportunistic basis. Puliti said the new company is expected to pay a dividend of at least 40pc of free cash flow after repayment of lease liabilities. By Stephen Jewkes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Grangemouth refinery site to get $253mn in public funds


24/02/25
News
24/02/25

Grangemouth refinery site to get $253mn in public funds

Edinburgh, 24 February (Argus) — The UK government has committed £200mn ($253mn) for investment in clean energy for the site where UK-Chinese firm Petroineos' 150,000 b/d Grangemouth refinery, due to be permanently shut this year, is located. The government said on 23 February that it will work alongside private sector partners to develop new industries and leverage additional funding through the £200mn in public investment allocated from the UK's National Wealth Fund (NWF). The NWF was set up last year by the government to support investment in clean energy industries and mobilise private sector involvement across the UK. "The funding will be available for co-investment with the private sector to help unlock Grangemouth's full potential and secure our clean energy future," UK prime minister Keir Starmer said. Petroineos is planning to close the Grangemouth refinery in Scotland, this year and turn it into an import terminal because of high costs and declining fuel demand in Europe. Refineries in Europe have long faced competitiveness issues from larger and newer refineries in other regions including the Mideast Gulf, Asia-Pacific and Africa. Around 30 refineries have closed in Europe since 2000, while 2.5mn b/d of crude distillation capacity was added outside the region in the past three years alone. Only around 65 workers will be retained by Petroineos to run the terminal once the Grangemouth refinery closes. The government committed to provide a training guarantee for the staff at the refinery to gain new skills at local colleges. UK union Unite welcomed the announcement, saying that the "significant investment should be the start of a real industrial plan for Grangemouth that both safeguards Scotland's energy security and delivers the jobs of the future." But the union warned that clear timescales for the development of Grangemouth and details on jobs were needed. Unite is supporting the conversion of the refinery into a biorefinery for the production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Petroineos said last year that it did not deem the refinery conversion viable, after having considered it. The firm did not immediately reply to a request for comment following the release of the new government funding. The UK government announcement comes after Scotland's first minister John Swinney committed to allocate £25mn from the proceeds of the Scottish offshore wind leasing round ScotWind to establish a just transition fund for Grangemouth. "The aim is to expedite any of the potential solutions that will be set out in the Project Willow report, as well as other proposals that will give Grangemouth a secure and sustainable future," he said last week. Project Willow is a feasibility study commissioned by the UK and Scottish governments to identify long-term industrial options for the site. The report is due to be released this spring. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more