Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Russia passes Saudi Arabia as top China crude supplier

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 27/05/20

China's crude imports from Russia rose in April but deliveries from Saudi Arabia and Brazil fell sharply, detailed customs data show.

Imports of Russian crude hit 1.75mn b/d last month, up by 6.1pc from March and by 17.7pc from April last year.

Russian exporters shipped more sour Urals crude to China while keeping exports of other key grades steady. Offers for Urals were competitive with other sour grades in April as Riyadh and Moscow launched fierce price competition, generating a rise in buying interest.

China was the main destination for Urals in the first quarter, taking just over 4mn t or around 320,000 b/d. And exports of Urals are likely to rise further in May, with seaborne loadings of the grade from Baltic and Black Sea ports estimated at 2.13mn b/d in April, up by 371,500 b/d compared with the average for January-March. More than 700,000 b/d of Urals left Baltic Sea ports for Asia-Pacific in the first half of April, with almost all heading to China on 80,000-120,000t Aframax vessels.

Russia became the single-largest exporter to China in April, thanks to the rise in its shipments and a fall in deliveries from Saudi Arabia.

China took just 1.26mn b/d of Saudi crude last month, down by 26pc from March to an 11-month low. But deliveries are likely to rebound in May and June, with Saudi Arabia's total crude exports surging by 1.66mn b/d to 9.27mn b/d in April as Riyadh seized market share after the expiry of the Opec+ output restraint deal.

Asia-Pacific absorbed the majority of the increase, with eastbound Saudi shipments rising by 1.24mn b/d to a record 6.12mn b/d, supported by stronger Chinese demand.

China's crude imports from Brazil dropped below 600,000 b/d last month for the first time this year. China took delivery of 545,000 b/d of Brazilian crude in April, down by 28.6pc from March and by 36.3pc from April 2019, and well below average imports in January-March of 874,000 b/d.

China's imports from Iraq also fell in April, dropping by 26.3pc to 971,000 b/d from March's 1.32mn b/d. Deliveries from Iran more than doubled from a month earlier to 126,000 b/d in April, although this was lower by 84pc from a record high year earlier.

Imports from Malaysia were 384,000 b/d in April, up by 55pc from March and more than triple levels in April 2019. China's imports from Malaysia have risen strongly over the past year, despite no comparable increase in Malaysian output, suggesting blenders in the country are disguising the origins of crude from sanctions-hit suppliers such as Venezuela before shipping the cargoes on to China.

Imports from Venezuela were zero again in April for the seventh straight month, the customs figures show. China also took delivery of no US crude in April.

Angolan exports to China were 828,000 b/d, declines of 11.8pc from March and 23.8pc from April last year, as Chinese refiners instead opted for similarly priced Brazilian Lula crude over the west African Djeno grade.

China's total crude imports were 9.84mn b/d in April, up by 1.7pc from March but down by 7.5pc from April 2019, the customs data show. Imports fell from 10.47mn b/d in the first two months of this year, as the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak led to a decline in buying from the end of January and throughout February that hit deliveries in March and April.

Demand started to rebound in late March as China brought the outbreak under control, domestic oil product demand started to rise and crude prices fell. This is likely to support May imports, which Argus expects to rise back above 10mn b/d.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
26/02/25

Kirkuk deal BP’s 'most important' for 20 years: CEO

Kirkuk deal BP’s 'most important' for 20 years: CEO

London, 26 February (Argus) — BP's recent deal to redevelop oil and gas fields in the Kirkuk region of Iraq will come to be seen as one of the most important transactions the company has done for two decades, chief executive Murray Auchincloss told investors. Kirkuk's "huge resource base, low lifting cost, low development cost" represented "a tremendous opportunity for us to use our big field management skills", Auchincloss said today during the launch of BP's new strategy. Both sides of the deal are "very incentivised" to grow Kirkuk production, he added. "I feel this is a magnificently aligned structure and I think in 10 years' time we'll look back on this as one of the most important transactions BP has done in 20 years," he said. The deal, which was finalised yesterday, will see the redevelopment of Kirkuk's Baba and Avanah domes, along with the Bai Hassan, Jambur and Khabbaz fields, which currently account for almost all of Iraqi stated-owned North Oil's crude output of around 300,000 b/d. BP executive vice-president for gas and low-carbon energy William Lin confirmed that the first phase of the redevelopment will give BP access to 3bn bl of oil equivalent (boe) and that the agreement will give "a better return" than BP currently gets from its existing arrangement at Iraq's giant Rumaila oil field. A complex existing arrangement at Rumaila sees Iraqi firm Basrah Gas take the gas and BP manage the oil, but the Kirkuk deal means "we have gas rights" as well as a right to the oil, Lin said. As part of its new strategy, BP announced today that it has raised its end-decade goal for overall oil and gas production to 2.3mn-2.5mn boe/d , after previously pledging to reduce its output to 2mn boe/d by 2030. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Colombia extends coal, oil export levy through 2025


26/02/25
News
26/02/25

Colombia extends coal, oil export levy through 2025

Bogota, 26 February (Argus) — Colombia has extended its 1pc surcharge on coal and crude exports to the full year 2025 — instead of the 90 days initially announced — to cover security costs, the country's new finance minister Diego Guevara said. President Gustavo Petro issued the decree on 17 February, after granting himself emergency powers to restore order after violence worsened in a region bordering Venezuela in late January. The levy will also apply to the sale of coal and crude in the domestic market. Petro had initially levied a 1pc surcharge on coal and crude exports for 90 days , with the aim of collecting up to 1.063 trillion pesos ($259mn), with about Ps259bn of that from crude and coal, to help cover security costs in the Catatumbo region. But the full-year surcharge now means the government would collect at least Ps2 trillion, Guevara said in a televised interview. The tax move could have severe consequences for the coal sector, possibly "bankrupting" many companies, and especially endangering smaller firms, Colombian coal federation president Carlos Cante said. "This is part of a strategy to end the international competitiveness of Colombian coal and justify an accelerated energy transition model that does not serve Colombia," Cante said. Fenalcarbon has warned that this new tax scheme could lead to "cascading taxation" that would not only affect large producers, but also small mining firms, which play a crucial role in regions such as La Guajira, Cesar and Norte de Santander. The federation has also noted that this tax burden would compromise the viability of exports and the economic stability of the sector, affecting communities that depend on mining activity. The Colombian mining association (ACM), said the new levy on the first sale and export of coal represents a new obstacle to the development of the sector. "This measure adds to an increasingly complex environment for the industry, which already has one of the highest royalty rates globally," ACM said. Coal and oil companies in Colombia pay an income tax of 35pc, the highest in the OECD nations and sharply higher than the Latin American average of 28pc. Colombia produced around 65mn t of steam coal, coking coal and metallurgical coke in 2024, accounting for 1.1pc of the country's gross domestic product. The new tax would reduce the competitiveness of Colombian coal, Fenalcarbon added. Mining and hydrocarbons made up 47pc of the country's total exports in 2024 of about $50bn, according to figures from statistics department Dane. By Diana Delgado Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

BP raises oil and gas output goal in strategy reset


26/02/25
News
26/02/25

BP raises oil and gas output goal in strategy reset

London, 26 February (Argus) — BP has raised its 2030 target for oil and gas production to 2.3mn-2.5mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) as part of a "fundamental reset" of its strategy that also entails a cut in its renewable energy investments. The 2.3mn-2.5mn boe/d goal leaves little scope for substantial output growth given that BP produced 2.36mn boe/d last year. But it is a stark change from the company's previous target to reduce production to 2mn boe/d by 2030. BP intends to dial down its overall capital expenditure (capex) to $13bn-15bn/yr through to 2027 and to sell $20bn of assets during that time to help strengthen its balance sheet. Its previous plan was to spend $14bn-18bn/yr in 2024-30. The capex cut will be driven by lower spending on renewables, while investment on oil and gas is targeted at $10bn/yr, a slight increase on the $9.8bn it spent last year. BP plans to launch 10 major new upstream projects by the end of 2027, with a further 8-10 starting up by the end of 2030. It also plans to strengthen its upstream portfolio by "reloading [its] exploration hopper". BP expects investment in what it calls its "transition" businesses to be $1.5bn-$2.5bn/yr through to 2027 — around $5bn/yr lower than previous guidance. The company plans to make selective investments in biogas, biofuels and electric vehicle charging businesses and a more focused investment in hydrogen and carbon capture and storage (CCS) assets, alongside a capital-light partnership approach to renewable power. BP announced in December last year a new joint venture with Japanese utility Jera to house the two companies' offshore wind assets, saving it an estimated $4bn in capex until the end of the decade. Along with the higher oil and gas output target and the lower energy transition spend, BP has amended its emissions reduction goal. It now expects its scope 1 and 2 emissions to be 45pc-50pc lower in 2030 than in 2019. Previously, it was targeting a 50pc cut. Downstream assets will contribute to BP's $20bn divestment target. The company has already put its 257,800 b/d Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany up for sale , it will carry out a strategic review of its Castrol global lubricants business and it plans to bring in a partner for its Lightsource BP solar business. BP expects proceeds from the divestment programme, savings from the reduced capex and the boost to cash flow from higher oil and gas production to help it cut its net debt to $14bn-$18bn by the end of 2027, from $23bn at the end of 2024. At the same time the company plans to allocate 30pc-40pc of its operating cash flow to shareholder returns, including a dividend that it sees increasing by more than 4pc/yr. Investment bank RBC Capital Markets noted that BP's new strategy is line with expectations. "To us, much of the release looks to be BP making the right calls for the long term, but it may not please investors today," the bank said. BP's share price was down by 0.9pc just before lunchtime in London. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Trump's Canada, Mexico tariffs deadline looms

Washington, 25 February (Argus) — US president Donald Trump has given little indication on whether he will delay or implement his plan to impose stiff import duties on Canadian and Mexican energy commodities and other products on 4 March. Some market participants are hopeful for another extension or cancellation of Trump's executive order that would impose a 10pc tax on Canadian energy imports, a 25pc tariff on non-energy imports from Canada and a 25pc tariff on all imports from Mexico. The uncertainty over the implementation has had vast segments of the energy industry — oil and gas producers, refiners, pipeline operators, traders — bracing for potentially disruptive outcomes. The three governments are negotiating to avert a full-blown trade war, addressing Trump's pretext for imposing the tariffs — Mexico's and Canada's alleged unwillingness to cut flows of fentanyl and immigrants into the US. Trump and Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau last spoke on 23 February, with the two leaders noting that the flow of fentanyl across the shared border had fallen in the preceding month. But Trump, speaking the following day, said that "the tariffs are going forward on time, on schedule". And on Tuesday, Trump repeated to reporters at the White House his previous off-the-cuff remarks about Canada becoming "the 51st US state". "We don't need their oil," Trump said. "We don't need their lumber." Even without the broad tariffs in place, trade disputes will pick up pace next month when Trump's 25pc tariff on all imported steel and aluminum goes into effect on 12 March. The imposition of tariffs after decades of free trade in energy across North America is expected to create legal uncertainty in contractual obligations related to the payment of tariffs and reporting requirements. The current US import duties on crude are set at 5.25¢/bl and 10.5¢/bl, depending on crude quality. The new tariff would be based on the value of the commodity — without specifying how that will be calculated and at what specific point during the transportation process. US government agencies are not expected to clarify the implementation details until Trump's executive order on tariffs goes into effect. US oil industry groups have lobbied the Trump administration to exempt energy imports from tariffs. Trump instead lowered the planned tariff on Canadian energy imports to 10pc, from the originally proposed 25pc. US lawmakers, including close Trump allies, have expressed concern about the potential impact of tariffs. But the Republican lawmakers have shied away from confronting Trump over the issue. "Texas' number one trading partner is Mexico, number two is Canada, so what happens will have an impact on us," US representative Randy Weber (R-Texas) said today at an event hosted by Politico. But Weber added that Texas governor Greg Abbott (R) is "on top of this stuff" and that "if it was going to be a problem for Texas, I think [Abbott] would have been either singing out loud, or he would have gone to talk to the president directly". Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US last year were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian producers also have expressed concern about the uncertain impact of tariffs on crude volumes trans-shipped through the US, either for exports to third country destinations from Gulf coast ports or transported on US pipelines to destinations in eastern Canada. India is a key destination for trans-shipped Canadian crude. Buyers in India loaded 150,000 b/d from the US ports last year, including around 40,000 b/d of trans-shipped Canadian heavy sour crude, data from oil analytics firms Vortexa and Kpler show. By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG


25/02/25
News
25/02/25

Australia’s Woodside sees robust demand for LNG

Sydney, 25 February (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy sees LNG demand exceeding supply into the 2030s as project delays lead timelines for nearly 30mn t/yr of new capacity to slip into the next decade, chief executive Meg O'Neill said after releasing the firm's 2024 annual results today. Headwinds affecting some projects and "ongoing, robust demand" within Asia-Pacific will prevent any LNG supply glut, despite easing regulatory hurdles under the Trump administration, O'Neill told investors. Such headwinds could also impact Woodside. The company's 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) terminal is still waiting for federal consent to continue operations past 2030, after passing state government scrutiny last year following six years of assessments. And the planned 11.4mn t/yr Browse project hinges on NWS approvals being granted, with Woodside preferring a decision is made before Australia's elections in May, in which Green and other climate-conscious MPs may win a balance of power. O'Neill said the fully-priced engineering, procurement and construction contract with engineering firm Bechtel for the initial stage of its Louisiana LNG project was "differentiating" with other nearby proposed terminals requiring re-pricing, as Woodside aims to sell down 50pc of the terminal. Woodside will not take a final investment decision (FID) on Louisiana unless it is confident it has partners signed up or extremely close, O'Neill said, referencing the sale of 49pc of Pluto train 2 at FID before it later offloaded part of the Scarborough gas field that will supply the project. "I think there's potential for us to have the whole 50pc [target] sold-down by FID," O'Neill said, adding that "deep negotiations" were underway as the project aims for FID-readiness by 31 March. Woodside said it will cut expenditure on exploration and its New Energy division by $150mn to focus on producing assets. Exploration outlay was $342mn in 2024 and is guided at $200mn for 2025, while the savings from New Energy will mainly come from pausing its 60 t/d H2OK project in the US . In New Energy, Woodside will prioritise its 83pc complete, 1.1mn t/yr US Beaumont ammonia project ahead of first output in July-December and first low-carbon or blue ammonia using carbon capture and storage in the second half of 2026. Cost of production for phase 1 will be $260-$300/t, based on assumed costs after start-up from 2027-29 at 96pc uptime, a fixed/variable split of 70/30pc, a range of Henry hub gas pricing and the 45Q tax credit that grants $85/t of CO2 stored. Woodside made a profit of $3.57bn in 2024, up from $1.66bn for 2023 but below 2022's record of $6.5bn. It posted lower realised oil and gas prices of $63.6/bl of oil equivalent (boe) in 2024 from $68.6/boe in 2023, despite its output rising to 530,000 boe/d. The firm kept its 2025 guidance unchanged at 186mn-196mn boe (510,000-537,000 boe/d). Forecast capital expenditure of $4.5bn-5bn is focused on its 80pc complete Scarborough and 20pc complete Trion projects. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more