Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Chesapeake files for bankruptcy protection

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 28/06/20

Chesapeake Energy, the one-time high-flying natural gas producer that thrust US shale development onto a world stage, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection today as collapsing energy prices challenged the company's ability to carry its more-than $9bn in debt.

The company will eliminate about $7bn in debt under the bankruptcy plan and has secured $925mn in debtor-in-possession financing. The company will continue to operate through the process.

Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake was an early champion of using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to coax natural gas from shale rock formations. Led by its outspoken co-founder and chief executive, the late Aubrey McClendon, it developed one of the largest portfolios of US shale assets, became the biggest producer of US natural gas by volume and lured billions of dollars in investment into the shale industry. The company also advocated for more gas use in the power and transportation sectors and was a booster of US gas exports.

Chesapeake issued billions of dollars in debt to amass huge acreage positions in places such as the Marcellus shale gas field in Pennsylvania and the surrounding states, the Haynesville shale of east Texas and northern Louisiana and throughout its home state of Oklahoma. At its height the company deployed thousands of landmen to far-flung oil and gas fields, often paying top dollar for leases. Chesapeake in 2012 had more than $16bn in debt, but worked it down to $9bn in May, when it told investors that low oil and gas prices may force it to default on its loans.

The company last year produced about 2.3 Bcf/d (65mn m³/d), making it the sixth largest US producer by volume. Prices for gas, which still represents the bulk of Chesapeake's output tumbled below $2/mmBtu on a mild winter and robust supplies. Oil prices hit unprecedented lows in April as the global economic slowdown from the Covid-19 pandemic crimped demand for transportation fuels.

Leading the charge into shale

Chesapeake and other so-called independent oil and gas producers sought out new fields armed with easy access to capital and a simple pitch: The US, through the development of shale formations, could unlock energy independence and wean itself from foreign oil. The rapid growth of US shale output and Chesapeake's success at developing those fields caught the attention of companies across the world.

Chesapeake entered into multi-billion dollar joint-venture agreements with major international oil and gas companies, such as Statoil of Norway, French oil major Total and the Chinese state-controlled oil company CNOOC. The deals usually involved exchanging shale acreage for cash and capital to defray drilling costs.

The company's success at this strategy also created the circumstances for its fall. The US in 2011 surpassed Russia to become the world's top gas producer, but the deluge of domestic gas pushed prices lower and made the going tougher for producers that had hitched their future to higher prices.

Turn to crude

Chesapeake attempted to pivot, shifting away from gas production and focusing on higher-value NGLs and oil. The company in 2010 set its sights on becoming one of the biggest producers of liquids in the US. At an energy conference in 2011 McClendon said that the US could become the biggest producer of oil as it continued to tap unconventional crude deposits.

"We are already No. 3, and I think there's an excellent chance by 2020 to return to being the No. 1 oil producer in the world," McClendon said at the Jefferies Global Energy Conference in Houston. "We held that title for 75 years."

The US reached that milestone in 2018, two years ahead of that schedule.

Chesapeake by 2012 had been stung by a low natural gas prices. Its cost to acquire, retain and begin developing properties far outpaced its cash flow. Much of the company's cost strain stemmed from being forced to drill wells to satisfy lease terms.

Chesapeake sold off assets and took out high interest lows. McClendon in early 2013 stepped down following differences with the board. He was replaced by Doug Lawler, a former Anadarko Petroleum executive, in May 2013. Lawler put a stop to McClendon's strategy of endless acquisitions, began selling assets, cutting costs and funding only wells that will generate high returns on investment.

Chesapeake in May said it did not expect to meet its financial covenants starting the in the 2020 fourth quarter. On 19 June the company said it chose not to make an interest payment on outstanding debts, setting the stage for the bankruptcy filing in the Southern District of Texas.

US shale industry asset impairments may top $300bn, raising the prospect of an acceleration in bankruptcies, consultancy Deloitte said in a 22 June report.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/04/25

Australia's OCE sees higher LNG export earnings

Australia's OCE sees higher LNG export earnings

Sydney, 1 April (Argus) — Australia's Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) has revised up its LNG export earnings forecasts for the present fiscal year and the next, given global supply issues and higher than expected prices. Seasonal pressures — including higher winter demand in Europe owing to lower renewable energy output and an end to Russian gas flows via Ukraine — have increased prices, the OCE's Resources and Energy Quarterly (REQ) March report said. The OCE raised its expectations for the average LNG price for the fiscal year to 30 June by 10pc ( see table ), while increasing its forecast for the following year by 14pc from its previous report. Receipts predicted in 2024-25 have been forecast A$8bn ($5bn) higher to A$72bn, while 2025-26 earnings will likely reach A$66bn, up from A$60bn in December's REQ. Asian demand continues to strengthen, even with Japan and South Korean import levels likely peaking. The OCE noted LNG's growing popularity as a transport fuel in China and record-high Indian imports last year, given increased pressure on power grids. Higher prices have failed to dampen demand in southeast Asia — including Malaysia, Bangladesh, Singapore and Thailand — while Taiwan's backtracking on renewable targets, coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductor sector growth, will increase energy demand there. Qatari and US investment in new supply will add 5pc to global export volumes in 2025, while demand witll grow by just 2.5pc, but the REQ expects this year's imports and exports will gradually balance. Greenfield projects The biggest challenge for Australian projects appears to be a lack of greenfield projects, following the expected completion of the 8mn t/yr Scarborough and 3.7mn t/yr Barossa projects in July-December 2026 and July-September 2025 respectively. The impact of these backfill operations in offsetting gradual declines at the 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf LNG facility will have ceased by 2029-30, with exports falling by 2mn t/yr to 78mn t/yr. But oil and gas exploration spending is increasing after years of declines, the OCE said, with onshore search expenditure rising from A$190mn in July-September last year to A$285mn in October-December 2024. Offshore spending rose from A$125mn to A$178mn in the same period, indicating that higher prices are driving greater confidence. The ANEA price — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia — for first and second-half May were assessed at $12.96/mn Btu and $12.995/mn Btu respectively on 28 March. The ASEA price — Argus' assessment for spot LNG deliveries to southeast Asia — for the same period was $12.72/mn Btu and $12.75/mn Btu. By Tom Major Australia LNG export forecasts 2023-24 2024-25 (f) 2025-26 (f) 2026-27 (z) 2027-28 (z) 2028-29 (z) 2029-30 (z) Exports (mn t) 81 80 80 82 80 80 78 Export receipts (A$bn) 70 72 68 64 63 57 51 Mar '25 LNG export price (A$/GJ) 16.1 17.1 16.3 14.9 14.8 13.4 12.5 Dec '24 LNG export price (A$/GJ) 16.1 15.6 14.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a Export price % ± (Mar vs Dec forecasts) 0 10 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a f - forecast z - projection Source: OCE REQ Argus gas prices ($/mn Btu) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Global energy mix evolves as electricity demand surges


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

Global energy mix evolves as electricity demand surges

Climate change is becoming a bigger factor behind electrification, but cleaner energy use is slowing the growth in global emissions, writes Georgia Gratton London, 28 March (Argus) — A substantial increase in electricity demand — boosted by extreme weather — drove an overall rise in global energy demand in 2024, lifting it well above the average pace of increase in recent years, OECD energy watchdog the IEA announced this week. This led to a rise in natural gas consumption, although renewables and nuclear shouldered the majority of the increase in demand, leaving oil's share of total energy demand below 30pc for the first time. Global energy demand rose by 2.2pc in 2024 compared with 2023 — higher than the average demand increase of 1.3pc/yr between 2013 and 2023 — according to the Paris-based agency's Global Energy Review . Global electricity consumption increased faster, by 4.3pc, driven by record-high temperatures — that led to increased cooling needs — as well as growing industrial consumption, the electrification of transport and the rapid growth of power-hungry data centres needed to support the boom in artificial intelligence, the IEA says. Renewables and nuclear covered the majority of growth in electricity demand, at 80pc, while supply of gas-fired power generation "also increased steadily", the IEA says. New renewable power installations reached about 700GW in 2024 — a new high. Solar power led the pack, rising by about 550GW last year. The power generation and overall energy mix is changing, as economies shift towards electrification. The rate of increase in coal demand slowed to 1.1pc in 2024, around half the pace seen in 2023. Coal remained the single biggest source of power generation in 2024, at 35pc, but renewable power sources and nuclear together made up 41pc of total generation last year, IEA data show. Nuclear power use is expected to hit its highest ever this year, the agency says. And "growth in global oil demand slowed markedly in 2024", the IEA says, rising by 0.8pc compared with 1.9pc in 2023. A rise in electric vehicle (EV) purchases was a key contributor to the drop in oil demand for road transport, and this offset "a significant proportion" of the rise in oil consumption for aviation and petrochemicals, the IEA says. Blowing hot and coal Much of the growth in coal consumption last year was down to "intense heatwaves" — particularly in China and India, the IEA found. These "contributed more than 90pc of the total annual increase in coal consumption globally", for cooling needs. The IEA repeatedly noted the significant effect that extreme weather in 2024 had on energy systems and demand patterns. Last year was the hottest ever recorded, beating the previous record set in 2023, and for CO2 emissions, "weather effects" made up about half of the 2024 increase, the watchdog found. "Weather effects contributed about 15pc of the overall increase in global energy demand," according to the IEA. Global cooling degree days were 6pc higher on the year in 2024, and 20pc higher than the 2000-20 average. But the "continued rapid adoption of clean energy technologies" restricted the rise in energy-related CO2 emissions, which fell to 0.8pc in 2024 from 1.2pc in 2023, the IEA says. Energy-related CO2 emissions — including flaring — still hit a record high of 37.8bn t in 2024, but the rise in emissions was lower than global GDP growth. Key "clean energy technologies" — solar, wind and nuclear power, EVs and heat pumps — collectively now prevent about 2.6bn t/yr CO2 of emissions, the IEA says. But there remains an emissions divide between advanced and developing economies. "The majority of emissions growth in 2024 came from emerging and developing economies other than China," the agency says, while advanced economies such as the UK and EU cut emissions last year and continue to push ahead with decarbonisation. Global energy suppy by fuel EJ Growth ±% 2024 2023 2022 24/23 23/22 Total 648 634 622 2.2 1.8 Renewables 97 92 89 5.8 3.1 Nuclear 31 30 29 3.7 2.2 Natural gas 149 145 144 2.7 0.7 Oil 193 192 188 0.8 1.9 Coal 177 175 172 1.2 2.0 Global power generation by fuel TWh Growth ±% 2024 2023 2022 24/23 23/22 Total 31,153 29,897 29,153 4.2 2.6 Renewables 9,992 9,074 8,643 10.0 5.0 Nuclear 2,844 2,743 2,684 3.7 2.2 Natural gas 6,793 6,622 6,526 2.6 1.5 Oil 738 762 801 -3.2 -4.8 Coal 10,736 10,645 10,452 0.9 1.8 Global power generation by country TWh Growth ±% 2024 2023 2022 24/23 23/22 World 31,153 29,897 29,153 4.2 2.6 US 4,556 4,419 4,473 3.1 -1.2 EU 2,769 2,718 2,792 1.9 -2.6 China 10,205 9,564 8,947 6.7 6.9 India 2,059 1,958 1,814 5.2 7.9 Global CO2 emissions by country mn t Growth ±% 2024 2023 2022 24/23 23/22 World 37,566 37,270 36,819 0.8 1.2 US 4,546 4,567 4,717 -0.5 -3.2 EU 2,401 2,455 2,683 -2.2 -8.5 China 12,603 12,552 12,013 0.4 4.5 India 2,987 2,836 2,691 5.3 5.4 *includes industrial process emissions — IEA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US consumer confidence down on policy angst


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

US consumer confidence down on policy angst

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — The University of Michigan's gauge of consumer sentiment fell in March to the lowest level since November 2022, led by a slump in expectations over the "potential for pain" from US economic policies introduced by the new administration. Sentiment fell to 57, down from 64.7 in February and 79.4 in March 2024, according to the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey released Friday. The final reading for March was lower than the preliminary reading. The sentiment index fell to a record low of 50 in June 2022 on inflation concerns. The index of consumer expectations fell to 52.6, the lowest since July 2022, from 64 in February and 77.4 in March last year. The expectations index has lost more than 30pc since November last year. "Consumers continue to worry about the potential for pain amid ongoing economic policy developments," the survey director Joanne Hsu said. The decline "reflects a clear consensus across all demographic and political affiliations: Republicans joined independents and Democrats in expressing worsening expectations … for their personal finances, business conditions, unemployment and inflation," Hsu said. Current economic conditions slipped to 63.8 in March from 65.7 in February and 82.5 last March. Two thirds of consumers expect unemployment to rise in the year ahead, the highest reading since 2009. Year-ahead inflation expectations jumped to 5pc this month, the highest reading since November 2022, from 4.3pc last month. The University of Michigan survey comes three days after The Conference Board's preliminary Consumer Expectations Index fell in March to its lowest in 12 years, to below a threshold that "usually signals" a recession. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ISCC aware EU mulling certification recognition: Update


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

ISCC aware EU mulling certification recognition: Update

Adds comment from the European Commission London, 28 March (Argus) — The ISCC, an international certification system for sustainability, said today that it is aware of discussions in an EU committee about future recognition of its certification for waste-based biofuels. It said there is no legal basis for any planned measures. Industry participants said yesterday that the EU Committee on Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids, and Biomass Fuels is drafting implementing regulations that would include a two-and-a-half year pause to obligatory acceptance of ISCC EU certification for waste-based biofuels. "This action is said to be subject to further legal scrutiny and will need approval by member states," the ISCC said. Currently, member states accept EU-recognised voluntary scheme certification as proof that fuel or feedstocks are compliant with the bloc's Renewable Energy Directive (RED) sustainability criteria. Market participants told Argus that discussions have centred around giving individual countries more choice. "Other voluntary schemes would not be able to fill the gap. The measure would be a severe blow to the entire market for waste-based biofuels and would seriously jeopardise the ability of the obligated parties to comply with blending mandates," the ISCC said. The ISCC has been singled out in a discriminatory way and has supported European Commission and member states' investigations into alleged fraud, it said. "We are more than surprised by this step […and] are unable to see the rationale of the planned measure, which seems ad hoc and baseless," it added. Secretary-general of the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) Xavier Noyon told Argus that, if confirmed, the suspension would affect thousands of operators. "At this time, member states are refusing to comment, and we call on the commission to urgently clarify any decisions of this nature that are on the table," he said. The EBB published its own proposed revision to the RED implementing legislation last month, which expanded the supervisory power of member states over voluntary schemes and certification bodies. The European Commission confirmed that the committee met on 26 March to discuss sustainable certification, promotion of biofuels, avoidance of double counting, and alleged fraud. "We are still working on our examination of this alleged fraud in biodiesel imports from China," said commission energy spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen. But the commission has not taken any decision yet and cannot allude to "possible" scenarios, she said. By John Houghton-Brown, Simone Burgin and Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ISCC aware of EU talks on certification recognition


28/03/25
News
28/03/25

ISCC aware of EU talks on certification recognition

London, 28 March (Argus) — The ISCC, an international certification system for sustainability, said today that it is aware of discussions in an EU committee about future recognition of its certification for waste-based biofuels. It said there is no legal basis for any planned measures. Industry participants said yesterday that the EU Committee on Sustainability of Biofuels, Bioliquids, and Biomass Fuels is drafting implementing regulations that would include a two-and-a-half year pause to obligatory acceptance of ISCC EU certification for waste-based biofuels. "This action is said to be subject to further legal scrutiny and will need approval by member states," the ISCC said. Currently, member states accept EU-recognised voluntary scheme certification as proof that fuel or feedstocks are compliant with the bloc's Renewable Energy Directive (RED) sustainability criteria. There has been no official statement from the European Commission but market participants told Argus that discussions have centred around giving individual countries more choice. "Other voluntary schemes would not be able to fill the gap. The measure would be a severe blow to the entire market for waste-based biofuels and would seriously jeopardise the ability of the obligated parties to comply with blending mandates," the ISCC said. The ISCC has been singled out in a discriminatory way and has supported European Commission and member states' investigations into alleged fraud, it said. "We are more than surprised by this step […and] are unable to see the rationale of the planned measure, which seems ad hoc and baseless," it added. Secretary-general of the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) Xavier Noyon told Argus that, if confirmed, the suspension would affect thousands of operators. "At this time, member states are refusing to comment, and we call on the commission to urgently clarify any decisions of this nature that are on the table," he said. The EBB published its own proposed revision to the RED implementing legislation last month, which expanded the supervisory power of member states over voluntary schemes and certification bodies. By John Houghton-Brown and Simone Burgin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more