Parliament mulls IMO, maritime CO2, scrubbers

Market: Emissions, Oil products
29/10/20

The European Parliament's environment committee has voted for a "phase-out" rather than simple ban of open-loop exhaust scrubbers in the maritime sector. The committee also criticised international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the sector, with members calling for the EU to proceed with its own efforts.

The environment committee voted to slightly amend its opinion on measures for cleaner maritime transport so as to now call on the European Commission to propose a "phase-out and ban on the use of open-loop scrubbers as soon as possible". The committee also expressed "concerns" at the use of LNG.

The opinion approved today will feed into a report by the transport committee that also proposes banning the use of high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) with exhaust cleaning systems. In the transport committee, Danish liberal Soren Gade spoke out against a simple ban on scrubbers without a proper impact assessment. "Shippers have invested millions in scrubbers to comply with environmental legislation," Gade told the transport committee.

IMO efforts insufficient

After voting on its opinion on cleaner maritime transport, the environment committee joined others in criticising recent proposals put forward by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to cut the sector's GHG. The draft proposals are to be considered by the IMO marine environment protection committee (MEPC) on 16-20 November.

EU transport commissioner Adina Valean told the environment committee that she was "pleased" with the outcome of IMO talks, notably on the energy efficiency ship index and the carbon intensity indicator. But Valean will not rest until the IMO approves "concrete technical and operational measures" to deliver on the IMO's GHG reduction strategy, she said.

Rejecting the IMO proposals would have been a mistake, she said.

"We decided not to push for negotiations [at the IMO] to be postponed to an uncertain future date. And it is naive to hope that key players in the IMO will change their minds in six or 12 months. There is no time to wait," Valean said.

"I really ask you [the commission] to put more pressure on the IMO. Times have changed. Why should the shipping sector not be climate neutral in 2050?" Peter Liese, speaking for parliament's largest centre-right EPP group, said.

And Swedish socialist Jytta Guteland said it is "rather embarrassing" that the maritime sector has not contributed more to GHG cuts. She called for slow streaming, wind propulsion and logistics optimisation.

"Every year at the IMO, it is like we wi'll do it next year. It is not good enough," Guteland said.

German Green Jutta Paulus also criticised the IMO.

"We have no binding measures [at the IMO's MEPC]. Nothing that forces ships or companies to adhere to the measures to be taken," Paulus said.

"It is all the more important that the EU pushes ahead with its own measures. We have to move faster than the IMO," Paulus said.

Paulus is behind parliament's report adopted in September calling for the inclusion of maritime GHG emissions in the EU's emissions trading system by 1 January 2022, as well as cutting ships' annual average CO2 emissions by more than 40pc by 2030.

By Dafydd ab Iago

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: USGC gasoline oversupply unlikely to ease

Houston, 31 December (Argus) — Refinery closures and increased export opportunities in the US Gulf coast (USGC) will likely do little to alleviate an oversupply of regional gasoline in early 2025 as refining capacity in Mexico expands. LyondellBasell's 264,000 b/d Houston refinery tentatively plans to shut down during the first quarter of 2025 after previously delaying an end to production from the final quarter of 2023. Though some refiners welcome refinery shutdowns to provide a lift to falling margins , market participants have suggested that the upcoming closures will not considerably reduce the oversupply of product in the region. The Gulf coast's weekly average output totaled 2.2mn b/d in 2024, over one-fifth of the US's 9.7mn b/d weekly average. LyondellBasell's Houston refinery closure could cause total weekly production in the region to contract by as much as 12pc if it goes as planned. Product supplied, a proxy used by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) for finished motor gasoline demand nationwide, has not recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Demand had fallen to fresh lows of 8.15mn b/d in 2020, when Covid-19 pandemic restrictions limited travel, but marginally regained strength after those measures were lifted. In the five years prior to the pandemic, gasoline product supplied ranged between a yearly average of 8.86mn-9.34mn b/d. In 2024, it averaged 8.85mn b/d, just below the pre-pandemic five-year average, but has grown for a second consecutive year after hitting a record low of 8.1mn b/d for 2022. In its energy outlook for 2025, the Louisiana State University's (LSU) Center for Energy Studies said it expected domestic demand to remain relatively flat, but that increased US net exports could shave off excess supply. Gulf coast gasoline stockpiles have exhibited steady growth since 2022, largely outpacing demand for the product, EIA data indicates. In the five years prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, weekly inventory averages ranged between 75mn-83mn bl. After hitting a record weekly average of 86.9mn bl in 2020, stockpiles have hovered above the pre-pandemic range for every year since, with 2024 weekly average inventory levels totaling 83.1mn bl. Gasoline prices peaked in 2022 due to rebounding gasoline demand since the pandemic. Though prices remain above the $2/USG mark since 2020, cash prices for 87 conventional finished gasoline in 2024 averaged 68¢/USG lower than in 2022 and 23¢/USG less than 2023's average, further depressing refining margins from a year earlier. Exports: a closing door Both exports to Latin America and domestic shipments to the US east coast have historically absorbed excess supplies of Gulf coast gasoline, but increased refining capacity and a potential trade war between the US and Mexico could choke off exports to Latin America. Market participants point to exports as a favorable outlet for excess gasoline supply with export data showing a strong correlation with the stock build in the Gulf coast since 2022. The US Gulf coast exported an average of 251,000 b/d in 2024 after four consecutive years of gains, according to trade analytics firm Kpler. Export levels out of the region are more than double the pre-pandemic four-year average of 121,750 b/d. However, Pemex's 400,000 b/d Dos Bocas refinery in Mexico is projected to come on line in late 2025 and will likely reduce the Gulf coast's share of the gasoline export market. Mexico imports nearly 90pc of its gasoline from the US , while roughly 82pc of Gulf coast exports land in Mexico, according to separate Kpler data. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum has continued expanding Mexico's energy independence, with 2024 marking the closest in nine years that gasoline production has approached import levels . Furthermore, US president-elect Donald Trump's potential 25pc tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, including oil and gas, could spark retaliatory tariffs from Mexico, previously threatened by Sheinbaum. Should Trump go through with the tariffs when he takes office on 20 January, the tariffs between both countries would cut off gasoline exports and leave stockpile levels in the Gulf coast significantly higher. By Hannah Borai Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Viewpoint: Power demand could bolster RGGI allowances

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: Power demand could bolster RGGI allowances

Houston, 31 December (Argus) — Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) CO2 allowances in 2025 could get a boost from a projected increase in electricity demand, despite uncertainty over the RGGI states' ongoing program review. Allowance prices hit record highs this past year, particularly during the summer as high temperatures raised expectations for emissions, increasing compliance demand. The first three auctions of 2024 cleared at record levels, draining the cost containment reserve (CCR) — a mechanism where additional allowances are released to temper rising prices — during the March auction . Prices followed suit in the secondary market, reaching multiple all-time highs before peaking on 20 August, with Argus assessing December 2024 and prompt-month allowances at $27.82/short ton (st) and $27.31/st, respectively. The increases have been fueled by anticipated growth in electricity demand as states work to implement policies promoting electrification in the transportation, industrial and heating sectors. In New England alone, peak power demand is forecast to double from 27,000MW to 55,000MW by 2050, according to an Acadia Center report . But the biggest source of this demand — and the steady climb in RGGI allowance prices since late-2023 — is the rapid expansion of data centers, according to University of Virginia professor William Shobe, who studies emissions market and auction design. New CO2-emitting sources such as natural gas-fired plants must factor rising allowance prices into the future cost of electricity in the long-run, Shobe said. As prices rise, other cleaner sources of energy, such as offshore wind and small modular reactors, will become more competitive, he said. Review the review The member states of RGGI launched a review of the program in February 2021. As power demand creates a potential for a bullish RGGI market, the review remains a source of uncertainty for participants and volatility in the secondary market. The program review includes considerations for a more ambitious emissions cap plan beyond 2030. But it has faced a number of delays and was originally scheduled to wrap up last year . Member states have provided few updates on the status and timeline of the review, leaving participants and environmental groups alike on tenterhooks over how a finalized program review — and with it, an updated emissions cap plan — will affect the future supply of allowances. Participants "are always thinking about future scarcity", said Shobe. "The more information we can give them about the future path of scarcity (of allowances) now, the more efficient their own behavior can be." The latest updates were released in September. They included an emissions cap plan that combined two previously floated proposals where the allowance budget starts at about 70mn st, declining at a rate consistent with a zero-by-2035 goal from 2027-2033 and a lower rate consistent with a zero-by-2040 goal from 2033-2037. Member states are also considering adding a second CCR and eliminating the emissions containment reserve (ECR), a market mechanism designed to respond to falling prices by withholding allowances. The review is planned to end in early 2025. A draft rule with additional modeling was to be released in the fall, but there have been no updates regarding another change in timeline. RGGI has not responded to requests for comment. States in limbo The status of Virginia — which left RGGI in 2023 — and Pennsylvania as potential members is another point of uncertainty as those states' participation are under legal scrutiny in their respective courts. Virginia's Floyd County Circuit Court in November ruled that regulation enabling the state's exit from RGGI was unlawful since it was enacted without legislative approval. Governor Glen Youngkin's (R) administration intends to appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia sometime in 2025, but has declined to specify when. While it is unlikely Virginia will rejoin RGGI in the interim, its participation would increase demand for allowances and put an "upward pressure on price", Shobe said. Much of this demand would be fueled by data center expansion, as northern Virginia is the largest market for data centers in the world, with 25pc of all reported data center operational capacity in the Americas and 13pc globally, according to a report by a state legislative commission. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is also reviewing a lower-court decision striking down CO2 trading regulation allowing the state to participate in RGGI. Governor Josh Shapiro (D) has reluctantly defended Pennsylvania's membership in the program as an issue of preserving executive authority, and Republican state lawmakers have been attempting to revive legislation that would cement the state's exit from RGGI. The state's high court could issue a decision sometime in 2025. But Governor Shapiro also proposed a state-specific power plant CO2 cap-and-trade program earlier this year — another development participants should keep an eye on. By Ida Balakrishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

Washington, 31 December (Argus) — The US Supreme Court is on track for another term that could significantly affect the energy sector, with rulings anticipated in the new year that could narrow environmental reviews and challenge California's authority to set its own tailpipe standards. The Supreme Court earlier this month held arguments in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v Eagle County, Colorado , a case in which the justices are being asked to decide whether federal rail regulators adequately studied the environmental effects of a proposed 88-mile railway that would transport 80,000 b/d of crude. A lower court last year found the review, prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), should have analyzed how building the project would affect drilling and refining. Business groups want the Supreme Court to issue an expansive ruling that would limit NEPA reviews only to "proximate" effects, such as how rail traffic could affect nearby wildlife, rather than reviewing distance effects. The court recently agreed to hear a separate case that could restrict California's unique authority under the Clean Air Act to issue its own greenhouse gas regulations for newly sold cars and pickup trucks that are more stringent than federal standards. Oil refiners and biofuel producers in that case, Diamond Alternative Energy v EPA , say they should have "standing" to advance a lawsuit challenging those standards — even though they could now show prevailing in the case would change fuel demand — based on the alleged "coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties". These two cases, likely to be decided by the end of June, follow on the heels of the court's blockbuster decision in June overturning the decades-old "Chevron deference", a foundation for administration law that had given federal agencies greater flexibility when writing regulations. Last term, the court also limited agency enforcement powers and halted a rule targeting cross-state air pollution sources. This term's cases are unlikely to have as far-reaching consequences for the energy sector as overturning Chevron. But industry officials hope the two pending cases will provide clarity on issues that have been problematic for developers, including the scope of federal environmental reviews and the ability of industry to win legal "standing" to bring lawsuits. Two other cases could have significant effects for the oil sector, if the court agrees to consider them at a conference set for 10 January. Utah has a pending complaint before the court designed to force the US to dispose of 18.5mn acres of "unappropriated" federal land in the state, including oil-producing acreage. Utah argues that indefinitely retaining the land — which covers about a third of Utah — is unconstitutional. In another pending case, Sunoco and other oil companies have asked for a ruling that could halt a series of lawsuits filed against them in state courts for alleged damages from greenhouse gas emissions. President-elect Donald Trump's re-election could create complications for cases pending before the Supreme Court, if the incoming administration adopts new legal positions. Trump plans to nominate John Sauer, who successfully represented Trump in his presidential immunity case, as his solicitor general before the Supreme Court. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Bearish year ahead for NOx markets

30/12/24

News

30/12/24

Viewpoint: Bearish year ahead for NOx markets

Houston, 30 December (Argus) — The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) NOx allowance markets will likely face a bearish year in 2025, as the incoming administration of president-elect Donald Trump creates uncertainty over the fate of the latest federal regulation to curb emissions. The US Supreme Court halted implementation of the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "good neighbor" plan in June with a nationwide stay. This left an already stunted regulation to cut NOx emissions, a precursor to harmful ground-level ozone, obsolete for the foreseeable future. EPA finalized a plan in March 2023 to help downwind states meet the 2015 national air quality standards by setting tighter ozone season NOx caps on power plants covered by CSPAR as well as new limits for industrial facilities in more than 20 upwind states. But by the time the justices issued the stay, the number of covered states had already shrunk by more than half because of lower-court orders pausing implementation in 12 states. Prices for seasonal NOx allowances have flatlined and the market has been illiquid over much of 2024 because of uncertainty over how numerous legal challenges against the good neighbor plan would play out. Argus has assessed Group 2 allowances at $775/short ton (st) and Group 3 allowances at a record low $1,250/st since January. This could change, albeit at a slow pace, because EPA finalized an interim rule in November to comply with the nationwide stay. Power plants that had been covered by the good neighbor plan are now under less-stringent NOx budgets tied to older air quality standards, and the 10 states that had been participating in the Group 3 market prior to the stay are now reshuffled into Group 2 and a separate 12-state "expanded" Group 2 market. All that remains is… uncertainty In the new year, the market will wait to see how the Trump administration will deal with the good neighbor plan and the associated legal challenges in the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit and the US Supreme Court. Because of the stay, there is no hurry for the new administration to address the legal woes, and it is unlikely the DC Circuit will soon rule on the legality of EPA's rejection of state ozone reduction plans. The Trump EPA, following precedent of prior administrations, will likely ask the court to pause litigation until it decides whether to continue defending the plan, according to Jeff Holmstead, assistant administrator at the agency under former president George W Bush. The agency will likely revoke the plan at some point and replace it with a rule that is more "modest" and would not significantly affect allowance prices, he said. The EPA under Trump could ultimately decide that upwind states do not significantly contribute to interstate pollution, reversing a determination that has underpinned the good neighbor plan. That could lead to downwind states asking the agency to address specific sources that contribute to their air quality problems, said Carrie Jenks, executive director of Harvard Law School's Environmental and Energy Law Program. The Supreme Court is also hearing a case to decide the proper court venue for Clean Air Act disputes, which involves the good neighbor plan. The Trump administration likely will agree with various states and industry groups that say EPA's rejections of individual state plans are not a "nationally applicable" action and must be litigated in the regional circuit courts, but the Supreme Court is likely to continue the venue case, Jenks said. Oral arguments will likely be held early next year. It is also unclear how Lee Zeldin, Trump's pick to lead EPA will affect the regulation. Zeldin is a moderate, given his history, and will likely "not want to impose significant new burdens on fossil fuel power plants", Holmstead said. Trump's plans to downsize the federal bureaucracy could also affect future rulemakings, according to Jenks. "Nobody really knows what's going to happen," she said. As a result, market activity is likely to remain limited in the coming months as participants await legal and regulatory clarity. In addition, markets are likely to be oversupplied now that power plants are under lighter NOx caps. Most states in the seasonal NOx markets were well below their limits for the 2024 ozone season, despite a 9.2pc increase in cumulative emissions in the expanded Group 2. EPA will also allow some power plants to convert vintage 2021-23 Group 3 allowances to Group 2 or expanded Group 2 allowances, adding to supply. With low demand and a potential oversupply, seasonal NOx allowances could see prices fall . By Ida Balakrishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Chancay port may increase Peru bunker demand

30/12/24

News

30/12/24

Viewpoint: Chancay port may increase Peru bunker demand

New York, 30 December (Argus) — The opening of Peru's Chancay port next year likely will boost the country's bunkering demand and drive-up competition on the Latin American Pacific coast. Able to accommodate larger ships and vessels equipped with marine exhaust scrubbers, the unveiling of the new facility — likely in the first quarter — could spur demand for very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO). Chancay, which is owned by Chinese state-owned port operating company Cosco Shipping and Peruvian mining company Volcan, has a 17.8-meter depth, compared with a depth of 16 meters in El Callao part, which is south of Chancay near Lima, Peru. Chancay's depth allows it to receive container ships with a capacity of up to 18,000 twenty-foot equivalent units The larger vessels will likely take on around 3,000-5,000 metric tonnes of marine fuel in one port call, according to one source familiar with the Peruvian bunker market. "The port is gradually beginning to receive container vessels, RoRo, and bulk carriers," said Augusto Ganoza, who heads Chilean bunker supplier Agunsa's operations in Peru. "I anticipate an increase in bunkering demand at Chancay, particularly if vessels call at Callao first and then proceed to Chancay, which I believe will be the case for most." But bunker buying appetite in Chancay also will depend on marine fuel prices in China. El Callao VLSFO was assessed at a $85/t premium to Zhoushan, China, in November. That differential tightened from its peak earlier this year at $143/t in April. That differential could temper the expected increase in bunkering demand in Peru. Other market contacts from outside Peru said that any increase in demand stemming from Chancay's opening is unlikely to drag down activity in competing ports such as Panama, largely because of higher prices in Peru and better quality of bunker fuel available in Panama. The VLSFO November monthly average in El Callao was $656/t, which was an $89/t premium to Panama VLSFO. By Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more